Aiding the search: Examining individual differences in multiply-constrained problem solving
- PMID: 29723709
- DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.04.008
Aiding the search: Examining individual differences in multiply-constrained problem solving
Abstract
Understanding and resolving complex problems is of vital importance in daily life. Problems can be defined by the limitations they place on the problem solver. Multiply-constrained problems are traditionally examined with the compound remote associates task (CRAT). Performance on the CRAT is partially dependent on an individual's working memory capacity (WMC). These findings suggest that executive processes are critical for problem solving and that there are reliable individual differences in multiply-constrained problem solving abilities. The goals of the current study are to replicate and further elucidate the relation between WMC and CRAT performance. To achieve these goals, we manipulated preexposure to CRAT solutions and measured WMC with complex-span tasks. In Experiment 1, we report evidence that preexposure to CRAT solutions improved problem solving accuracy, WMC was correlated with problem solving accuracy, and that WMC did not moderate the effect of preexposure on problem solving accuracy. In Experiment 2, we preexposed participants to correct and incorrect solutions. We replicated Experiment 1 and found that WMC moderates the effect of exposure to CRAT solutions such that high WMC participants benefit more from preexposure to correct solutions than low WMC (although low WMC participants have preexposure benefits as well). Broadly, these results are consistent with theories of working memory and problem solving that suggest a mediating role of attention control processes.
Keywords: Compound remote associates; Individual differences; Multiply-constrained problem solving; Problem solving; Working memory.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
The role of working memory capacity in analytic and multiply-constrained problem-solving in demanding situations.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jun;73(6):920-928. doi: 10.1177/1747021820909703. Epub 2020 Mar 19. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020. PMID: 32052699
-
When higher working memory capacity hinders insight.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):39-49. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000152. Epub 2015 Jun 29. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016. PMID: 26120772
-
Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):749-77. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.749. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006. PMID: 16822145
-
A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1282-1311. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1220-5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 28108977 Review.
-
High working memory capacity does not always attenuate distraction: Bayesian evidence in support of the null hypothesis.Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):897-904. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0419-y. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013. PMID: 23479339 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Cognitive Underpinnings of Multiply-Constrained Problem Solving.J Intell. 2021 Feb 1;9(1):7. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9010007. J Intell. 2021. PMID: 33535470 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Creativity-Related Studies Applying the Remote Associates Test From 2000 to 2019.Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 23;11:573432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573432. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33192871 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous