Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

LeanIn.Org
FoundedMarch 2013; 11 years ago (2013-03)
FounderSheryl Sandberg
Type501(c)(3)
FocusOffering women the ongoing inspiration and support to help them achieve their goals
Location
  • Palo Alto, California, U.S.
Area served
Global
Key people
Sheryl Sandberg, co-founder and board chair
Rachel Thomas, co-founder, president, and board member
Dave Goldberg, founding board member
Gina Bianchini, co-founder and advisor
Websitewww.leanin.org

LeanIn.Org (also known as Lean In Foundation) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization founded by then present Chief Operating Officer of Meta Platforms Sheryl Sandberg in 2013 dedicated "to offering women the ongoing inspiration and support to help them achieve their goals."[1] The organization desires to support women in three main ways: community, education, and circles, or small, coordinated peer groups that meet to share their experiences and learn together. Launched after the release of Sandberg's bestselling book, Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead, the organization views itself as the next step in an effort to change "the conversation from what we can’t do to what we can do."[1] Since its launch, over 380,000 women and men have joined the Lean In community, creating 34,000 Lean In Circles in over 157 countries to date.[2]

The organization is also responsible for annual national campaigns such as #BanBossy and #LeanInTogether, which were designed to accomplish Lean In's goals and establish partnerships. The Lean In Foundation also develops an annual Women in the Workplace Survey in conjunction with McKinsey & Company, which examines female leadership and diversity management across organizations in corporate America.[3]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/1
    Views:
    46 183
  • Acting with Power with Deborah Gruenfeld

Transcription

Thank's Leticia, it's really nice to be here. I'd like to start with an observation, which is that most people when preparing for a situation in which you want to have power will start by thinking a lot about what we're gonna say, and we don't think twice about this it seems reasonable. We assume going into situations like this that it's better to be right than wrong. We assume that it's better to be smart sound smart than not. We assume it's better to come off competent and critical rather than incompetent and easily misled. and we assume that it's better to tell people things they didn't already know than just a repeat back to others what they burn said. I'm not gonna tell you that these beliefs are wrong exactly, but what I want to tell you is that they're not nearly as important as we think they are when it comes to trying to have impact. What's really important for you to understand is that people are forming impressions of you and making judgments all the time, in the blink of an eye with their attention on very fleeting aspects of behavior. I want to tell you about just a few findings from my field, which is social psychology, I think lend support to this idea that people may not be listening as carefully to you as you might think. One of the things that I think you should know is that whether you're perceived as competent in groups actually has very little to do with the quality of the arguments that you make, but it's very tightly connected to the quantity arguments that you make. It turns out this has been shown in many studies now the more a person contributes in a conversation, the more status they acquire. And again I'm not going to say this is entirely independent of argument quality, but it's less tightly connected then we would like to think it is. You should know also that when we look at personality traits and try to predict status that ascended to leadership positions in groups, we found another interesting set of patterns. The qualities in people that predict status are not tightly connected at all to how much people know and how good we are articulating what we now. The single strongest predictor status on a personality level is extroversion. Extroversion is simply the extent to which your outgoing and talkative. This is highly predictive of status of both men and women. I should tell you about a couple of other data points in this chart that you may find interesting. Neuroticism has an interesting relationship to status. So you can see is a correlational data. Neuroticism is bad for status in men, the good news ladies is it doesn't matter for us at all. And finally, I just want to point out that, you know consistent with this idea that your ability to make sound arguments is not the most important predictor of your status. physical attractiveness is highly predictive of status in almost every situation and here again. It looks like this is only true for men, in fact that's not true. Physical attractiveness is predicting a status in women as well, but it's not a linear relationship. So what you'll see with women is that physical attractiveness helps with status up to a point and then once you've passed that threshold, it kinda starts to work against you, which is why you don't see statistical relationship here. So the point is just to say, you know, if what we're doing is relying on our ability to make sound arguments as a basis for attaining status and power, we're kinda missing the boat. There are very strong predictors of status that have absolutely nothing to do with these qualities. It turns out that whether you're arguments are persuasive also have less to do with their quality than you might think. And to illustrate this point I want to tell you about it say that was done many years ago now and I tell you a little bit about it you'll understand how long ago this was. But this was done by a psychologist at Harvard who's name is Ellen Langer. And what she wanted to understand was when someone ask someone else for a favor, what kinds of requests increase the likelihood of getting yes. So she had her research assistants go out into the university and visit different office buildings and look for that special place that used to exist in office buildings where there was a room that held one giant photocopier and there was a line of people standing waiting to use it. So research assistants one out in search of these lines and their job was to approach the person who is next in line and ask if they could cut in front of them. And they were told to make this request in one of three ways: Either they said may I use the xerox machine. This is a fairly straightforward request with no justification. Or they said, may I use the Xerox machine because I'm in a rush. This is a request with a logical justification. not a bad reason to let someone cut in front of you. Or they said may use a Xerox machine because I need to make copies.Right, it's a justification, not the most logical one. So remember her question is which in these types of requests is going to increase the likelihood of getting a yes. And it turns out that giving a justification made a difference. So if you gave a reason for your request you are more likely to get a yes but the logical reason had no power at all over the reason that had absolutely no value. Right, it's just another piece of evidence to suggest that people may not be listening as carefully to you as you think they are, as you hoped they would be and that the logic associated with subtleties of your argument may be lost on many people. One final piece of data I want to share with you is that this is something I think most of us see in our organizations all the time, many arguments are not even heard until the right person makes them. So people are assessing your status before you open your mouth and depending on what they decide you know either they're paying attention or they're not. So the upshot is that people are making decisions about whether to pay attention to you in a very short period of time. They're gonna decide whether you're someone who is worthy of their attention last than a 100 milliseconds. So we need to understand how people do this. If our goal is to have impact, we need to know what are people paying attention to that allows them to make these kinds of assessments. If you wanna predict the content up the impressions that people form other people, you can look at the independent affects of three different aspects of our behavior. You can look at the impact of our words, you can look at the impact of how we use our voices, independent of our woeds and you can look at the impact these very subtle nonverbal cues. The way we use our eyes, the way we stand, the types of gestures that we use and what you'll find over and over again in the research is that your words account for only 10 percent or less of the variance in the impressions that people form. So the vast majority of social meaning, the vast majority of the meaning that people take away from their interaction with you comes from these physical ways of behaving and nonverbal behaviors that most of us are almost never thinking about at all. Something you should know about this as well, I think is really important to understand is it in those circumstances where our verbal messages and nonverbal messages are misaligned. People will remember what your body told them. So it's really important I think to develop a kind of conscious awareness of some of these things, which most of us don't have. I wanna make the suggestion that there is actually a body language of power and we know it. But we know it so well we don't know we know it. So what's happened from the day most of us are born is that we're socialized by the people who care about us to learn to use our bodies in ways that allow us to show others that we know our place. We learn how to use our bodies in ways to gain their respect other people, we learn how to use our bodies in ways that tell people not to mess around with us, and it's such basic aspect our culturalization and socialization that we learn to use our bodies to negotiate social hierarchy without any conscious awareness and the fact that this is what we're doing. I want to make a suggestion that very small, subtle changes in our physical behavior can have a tremendous impact actually. Not only on the perceptions that other people have about us, but on our own psychology. I don't have time right now to go into and all the different physical determinants or that the ways in which we display power and status are natural behavior, I'm going to talk about that later today. But let me just address one very important and common differentiating physical activity. Iif you look at behavior up high and low-ranking group members both in animals and in humans one of the most striking differences is that you'll notice that high-ranking group members use their bodies in much more physically expansive ways and lower ranking members do. So you can see in both these pictures what a high-ranking group member will do is making their body large. Take up as much space as they'd like. They get-- the high-ranking member gets to define the way space gets used. And you'll see an expansive body postures basically where the arms and legs are held outside the body as a way of making the footprint bigger. Lower-ranking group members do the opposite you'll see contraction of the body. So the limbs come closer to the body and you'll see as you do in both these pictures there's often a bowing, nodding, a dipping down as a way of making a footprint smaller. What you need to understand about this is the reason that we use these behaviors as I mentioned before is to signal to other people that were not actually interested in having a fight. We use these things actually get along with other people. And the impact of our non-verbal displays affects not only how people respond to us but it reflects how we feel about ourselves and how we see ourselves So the last thing I'd like you to do before I and today is to give you a little experience with this I'm going to actually ask you right now to get into an expensive posture, they're directions right here about how you can do it. So I'm going to ask you to make sure your elbows are away from your body, you can put your hands behind your head, or put the arm across a chair and once you're-- make sure you're comfortable that's what it's all about. Once you're in a posh like you hold it so don't release that yet get into an expansive posture and holed. And what I'm going to ask you to do is to show you on the next slide is a couple sentences and I would like you to read aloud while you're in this posture, okay. So get in the posture and hold it. I'm gonna count is three and we're gonna read what comes up on the next slide together. 1, 2 3. I can't do it I feel so helpless. You believe it? It's like a big joke. It's like a big joke. right? And it's not case that these thoughts are never in your head but it's very hard to believe what you say when your body tell you something different, right. Let's try the alternative. Get into a contract in her constricted posture. So keep your hands very close to your body, make sure your knees are together, it can help sometimes lean forward. And if you really want to have this experience turn one foot in. Okay, hold this posture. Again, I'm going to ask you to read their lines on the next slide. I'll count to three. one, two, three I'm totally in charge, Not so much, right? So you get that feeling right, What I'm gonna talk about later there's actually a lot of data coming out now to show that it's not the case that our bodies only follow our psychology but we actually take cues from what our bodies are telling us and the way we hold our bodies affects actually how powerful we feel and how powerfully we behave. So let me just leave you with the three things I hope you would get from when I talked about today. The first thing is I want you to recognize the power nonverbal behavior in determining your power and influence in situations where else would you like to accomplish. I also wanted to touch on the importance being able to tune your behavior in the context of the social hierarchy as a way of making relationships work and as a way of getting along with other people. And then a third thing I'd like you to recognize is that you can't really underestimate the importance of alignment between your body and mind as away supporting your and your desire to be successful in professional roles. Thanks very much

Background and mission

The Lean In Foundation was formed in response to the success of Sandberg's book, Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. The proceeds from book sales went toward funding the nonprofit.[4]

Circles

Lean In Circles are communities of peers who “meet regularly to learn and grow together.”[2] Circles were originally designed to have 8 to 12 peers who would meet monthly.[5] Although each circle varies in location and size, all Circles provide robust networks of peer support. Circles frequently involve facilitated discussion on gender issues between both women and men. After a year of operation, there were 14,000 Lean in Circles around the world.[6] To date, over 60,000 women have created Lean In Circles in over 188 countries, and 85% of circle members accredit Lean In Circles for a "positive change in their life."

CSE

Lean in Computer Science and Engineering Chapter supports women studying computer science and engineering. Founded in collaboration with The Anita Borg Institute, Facebook, and Linkedin, to date, there are over 250 Circles and 6,000 members. In summer 2015, chapter members launched a “Lean IN-terns Program” for students interning at Bay Area tech companies.

Military

The Lean In Military Chapter launched in September 2015 in partnership with the Department of Defense. Within just one year, the chapter grew to over 100 circles and nearly 2000 members. This Chapter includes all branches of the military.

Veterans

On May 21, 2016, National Armed Forces Day, Lean In kicked off the launch of Veterans Circles by top influences like Michelle Obama, Sheryl Sandberg, and Senator Amy Klobuchar. The goal is to assimilate and integrate women veterans into civilian communities.

Partnerships

The Lean In Foundation Partnerships team is responsible for developing and maintaining strategic partnerships for the organizations as well as manage the Circles program. In February 2014, the nonprofit partnered with Getty Images to offer a collection of images that represent women in empowering ways.[7]

Women in the Workplace Survey

The Women in the Workplace Survey is a comprehensive study conducted by LeanIn.org and McKinsey & Company on current statistics of working women at corporate American companies. The first study was conducted in 2015, building on similar McKinsey research in 2012, and studied more than 118 companies and 30,000 employees. The 2015 report concluded that in spite of modest improvements, women are still severely underrepresented at every level in the corporate company leadership pipeline, with the “greatest disparity at the senior levels of leadership” and lowest in technology and industrial companies.”.[8] The report disproves the belief that women are underrepresented in leadership because they are leaving companies at higher rates or because they cannot find a work-life balance. Instead, it explains that this disparity occurs because women face an uneven playing field, gender diversity not prioritized widely, and participation in work and family balance programs is low because of fears from both genders that doing so will negatively affect their careers.

The key findings of the study include: The leadership ambition gap persists. Women experience an uneven playing field. Gender diversity is not widely believed to be a priority. Employee programs are abundant, but participation is low. There is still inequality at home. Men and women have very different networks.

Based on the research conducted, it will take over 25 years to reach gender equity at the senior vice-president level of corporate companies and over 100 years to reach equity in the C-suite.

Campaigns

Ban Bossy

The organization partnered with Girl Scouts of the USA on a public initiative to encourage girls leadership called Ban Bossy.[9] Beyoncé, Jennifer Garner, Condoleezza Rice, Jane Lynch, and Diane Von Furstenberg were featured in a promotional video for the project.[10] The campaign suggested that use of the word discouraged women from achieving leadership positions––arguing that when a boy asserts himself, he is recognized as a leader, but in the same scenario when a girl asserts herself, she risks being called as “bossy.”[11] The campaign included pledges to #banbossy, along with a website including education guides and leadership tips to ban bossy in action.

Beyoncé stated in the PSA that “girls are less interested in leadership than boys,” and Lynch who explained “and that’s because they worry about being called bossy.” These statements were backed up by Garner who stated that “being labeled something matters.” Beyoncé's closing quotation served as the basis for the campaign as she said “I’m not bossy, I’m the boss.”[12][13]

There was some backlash to the campaign. Joan Rivers found the movement petty, while Margot Talbot argued the campaign should have reclaimed the word instead of condemning it.[13][14]

Lean In Together

In March 2015, a partnership with the NBA and WNBA was initiated to emphasize "how men benefit from equality and providing practical tips for men to do their part at home and at work."[15][16]

#20PercentCounts

In April 2017, the organization launched #20PercentCounts, a national campaign on Equal Pay Day to highlight the importance of closing the gender pay gap. Working with Lean In community leaders in more than 25 U.S. cities, the organization was able to recruit hundreds of businesses to offer 20% off purchases and share information on the gender pay gap in their communities. And In partnership with Funny or Die and Hulu, LeanIn.Org produced a video showing the impact of the pay gap on women's everyday lives, amassing more than 5 million views.[17]

Criticism

An early criticism of Lean In came from Sandberg's advertisements for unpaid interns in 2013.[18]

Melissa Gira Grant in The Washington Post criticized the concept of the Lean In Circles. She was critical of the requirement to stay "positive" and that working-class women would be left out of the conversation.[19] Some women have had trouble finding the right circle to fit their own needs and lifestyles.[6]

Other critics claim that Lean In is designed for "financially well-off women."[20]

References

  1. ^ a b "About - Lean In". Lean In. Retrieved 2016-05-12.
  2. ^ a b "Lean In Circles | Join the Official Community!". leanincircles.org. Retrieved 2016-05-12.
  3. ^ Kelleher, Susan M. (2015). "Study Shows Little Advancement in Gender Equality for Corporate America". Woman Advocate. 1 (1): 28–29. Retrieved 26 June 2016 – via EBSCO.
  4. ^ Leger, Donna Leinwand (6 February 2015). "Facebook's Sandberg: Women engineers should Lean In". USA Today. Retrieved 26 June 2016.
  5. ^ Dowd, Maureen (23 February 2013). "Pompom Girl for Feminism". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 June 2016.
  6. ^ a b Bonos, Lisa (7 March 2014). "A Year After 'Lean In,' These Are Sheryl Sandberg's Truest Believers". The Washington Post. Retrieved 26 June 2016.
  7. ^ Cain Miller, Claire (February 9, 2014). "LeanIn.org and Getty Aim to Change Women's Portrayal in Stock Photos". New York Times. Retrieved 19 June 2016.
  8. ^ "Women in the workplace | McKinsey & Company". www.mckinsey.com. Archived from the original on 2016-02-17.
  9. ^ "Let's Ban Bossy Together!". Girl Scouts of the USA. Retrieved 19 June 2016.
  10. ^ Brandle, Lars (March 13, 2014). "Beyonce Backs Campaign to 'Ban Bossy': Watch". Billboard. Retrieved 19 June 2016.
  11. ^ "Ban Bossy".
  12. ^ "Beyoncé, Jennifer Garner, Jane Lynch join prominent women in #BanBossy campaign". New York Daily News. 10 March 2014.
  13. ^ a b "Don't Ban "Bossy"". The New Yorker. 2014-03-13. Retrieved 2016-06-28.
  14. ^ "'It's so stupid'– Joan Rivers isn't a fan of 'ban bossy'". SiriusXM Blog. 2014-03-25. Retrieved 2016-06-28.
  15. ^ Shelburne, Ramona (24 March 2016). "NBA players talk about the power of #LeanInTogether". ESPN. Retrieved 19 June 2016.
  16. ^ "NBA and WNBA Partner with LeanIn.Org to encourage men to support equality at home and at work". NBA. 5 March 2015. Retrieved 19 June 2016.
  17. ^ "#20PercentCounts".
  18. ^ Edwards, Jim; Smith, Kevin (15 August 2016). "Sheryl Sandberg's Lean In Foundation Is Damaging Her Reputation By Refusing To Pay Its Interns". Business Insider. Retrieved 26 June 2016.
  19. ^ Grant, Melissa Gira (25 February 2013). "Sheryl Sandberg's 'Lean In' Campaign Holds Little for Most Women". The Washington Post. Retrieved 26 June 2016.
  20. ^ Johnston, Katie (24 May 2014). "Workers Trying to Unionize Appeal to Sheryl Sandberg". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 26 June 2016.

Further reading

External links

This page was last edited on 8 April 2024, at 03:04
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.