In non-consequentialist ethical thought, there is a moral distinction between killing and letting die. Whereas killing involves intervention, letting die involves withholding care.[1][2]
Also in medical ethics there is a moral distinction between euthanasia and letting die. Legally, patients often have a right to reject life-sustaining care, in areas that do not permit euthanasia.[3]
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/3Views:4 0199 796626
-
Judith Thomson, The Trolley Problem | Killing And Letting Die | Philosophy Core Concepts
-
Moral significance of killing versus letting die
-
Talking About Killing, Torturing and Letting Die
Transcription
See also
References
- ^ Thomson, Judith Jarvis; The Hegeler Institute (1976). Sugden, Sherwood J. B. (ed.). "Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem". Monist (in German). 59 (2): 204–217. doi:10.5840/monist197659224. ISSN 0026-9662. PMID 11662247.
- ^ Foot, Philippa (1967). "The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect". Oxford Review. 5: 5–15.
- ^ aafp.org
Further reading
- Bennett Jonathan (1993), 'Negation and abstention: two theories of allowing' in B. Steinbock and A. Norcross (eds.), Killing and Letting Die, pp. 230-56, New York: Fordham University Press.
 | This article about ethics is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This death-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This page was last edited on 25 April 2024, at 21:04