Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mark Kelman (born August 20, 1951) is jurist and vice dean of Stanford Law School. As a prominent legal scholar, he has applied social science methodologies, including economics and psychology, to the study of law. He is one of the most cited law professors.[1] He is regarded as one of the co-founders of the critical legal studies movement and authored "A Guide to Critical Legal Studies." He is widely known for his influential[2] 1978 critique of the Coase theorem,[3] a core part of law and economics.

He graduated from Harvard College and Harvard Law School.[4]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    1 193
    1 444
    349
  • UC Berkeley ME Department Research
  • Panel Discussion | Debating "The Heuristics Debate" Part-1
  • Critical Legal Studies Movement

Transcription

Narrative

Being a published novelist, Kelman is well aware of the role of narrative in forming a sense of personal identity[5] - as also of the way narratives may be incriminating or exculpatory, depending on the time frame used.[6]

Thus, for example, when viewed in a long enough time-frame, a criminal act which appears at first sight the result of individual responsibility may, Kelman suggests, be instead the deterministic result of socio-economic conditions.[7]

Rational rhetoricism

Kelman argues that much in the law involves providing rational interpretative constructs that surround a non-rational core – what he terms 'rational rhetoricism'[8] with the result that, in his words, "It is illuminating and disquieting to see that we are nonrationally constructing the legal world over and over again....".[9]

Stanley Fish has proposed in rebuttal that such rhetorical constructs are in fact a necessary aspect of the human condition, and thus an inevitable facet of the legal world as well.[10]

See also

Publications

  • Mark Kelman, What Followed Was Pure Lesley (1973)
  • Mark Kelman, 'Choice & Utility' Wisconsin Law Review 1979 (1979)
  • Mark Kelman, 'Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law' Stanford Law Review (1981)

References

  1. ^ "Brian Leiter Most Cited Law Professors by Specialty, 2000-2007".
  2. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-19. Retrieved 2011-02-02.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  3. ^ "Redirecting".
  4. ^ "Mark G. Kelman".
  5. ^ Robin West, Narrative, Authority, and Law (1993) p. 254
  6. ^ G. Binder/R. Weisberg, Literary Criticism of Law (2000) p. 264
  7. ^ Stanley Fish, Doing What Comes Naturally (1989) p. 393-7
  8. ^ Fish, p. 393
  9. ^ Quoted in Fish, p. 395
  10. ^ Fish, p. 395-6

External links

This page was last edited on 12 April 2024, at 11:58
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.