Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See also: Patriarchalism
Patriarcha, or The Natural Power of Kings
AuthorRobert Filmer
LanguageEnglish
SubjectDivine right of kings
Published1680
Media typePrint
ISBN978-1409952374

Patriarcha, or The Natural Power of Kings is a book by the English philosopher Robert Filmer. It was likely begun in the 1620s and completed before the outbreak of the English Civil War in 1642 but it was only published in 1680 after the Restoration. The book defends the divine right of kings on the basis that all modern states' authority derived from the Biblical patriarchs (whom Filmer saw as Adam's heirs), history and logic. Concurrently, he criticized rival theories claiming the basis of a state should be the consent of the governed or social contract.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/1
    Views:
    23 217
  • Cyryl I w Polsce. Przywitanie w katedrze prawosławnej

Transcription

Argument

The book describes an arrangement of patriarchy at every level of human society, and argues that this is natural. The state is like a family in which kings are like fathers with subjects who are like children.[1]

Reception

John Locke and others attacked what they saw as the absurdity of Filmer's views.[2] The first of Locke's Two Treatises of Government consists mainly of criticism of Filmer. Locke found Filmer's account of political authority unworkable, arguing that it could not be used to justify any actual political authority, since it is impossible to show that any particular ruler is one of Adam's heirs.[3]

Patriarcha remains Filmer's best known work. R. S. Downie considers Filmer's attacks on contract and consent as explanations of political obligation to be plausible, and finds it unfortunate that Filmer's belief in Adam's kingship has obscured them.[2]

References

  1. ^ Saini, Angela (2023). The Patriarchs: The Origins of Inequality. Boston: Beacon Press. p. 2. ISBN 9780807014547.
  2. ^ a b Downie 2005. p. 302.
  3. ^ Woolhouse 2005. p. 525.

Bibliography

Books
  • Downie, R. S. (2005). Honderich, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-926479-1.
  • Woolhouse, Roger (2005). Honderich, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-926479-1.
This page was last edited on 25 May 2024, at 16:38
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.