This template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Hey there. I'm concerned that this template is not following WP:BIDIRECTIONAL, which is a guideline that helps ensure that navboxes only include items that are closely related to their topic. I have removed the "official leaders", as I don't believe the pandemic is their defining characteristic, therefore I wouldn't feel comfortable placing this navbox in their articles. I think we should consider whether we need to prune additional entries from this navbox that aren't closely related enough to COVID-19. Good candidates for removal from the navbox are articles that don't currently have this navbox in their article, such as the hospitals. Thoughts? Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:44, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
