Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
This interdisciplinary study engages law, history, and political theory in a first attempt to crystallize the lessons the global 'refugee crisis' can teach us about the nature of international law. It connects the dots between the actions of Jewish migrants to Palestine after WWII, Vietnamese 'boatpeople', Haitian refugees seeking to reach Florida, Middle Eastern migrants and refugees bound to Australia, and Syrian refugees currently crossing the Mediterranean, and then legal responses by states and international organizations to these movements. Through its account of maritime migration, the book proposes a theory of human rights modelled around an encounter between individuals in which one of the parties is at great risk. It weaves together primary sources, insights from the work of twentieth-century thinkers such as Hannah Arendt and Emmanuel Levinas, and other legal materials to form a rich account of an issue of increasing global concern.
European Journal of International Law (EJIL)
Book Review: Itamar Mann, Humanity at Sea, Maritime Migration and the Foundations of International Law (2016)2017 •
European Journal of International Law
Maritime Legal Black Holes: Migration and Rightlessness in International LawThe article explores the trope of the " legal black hole " to reveal questions of legal theory arising from contemporary migrant drownings. The theme was popularized during what was then called the " war on terror, " but its trajectory is longer and more complex. Its material history, as well as its intellectual history within legal scholarship, suggest three distinct 'legacies' of legal black holes: the counter-terrorism legacy; the migrant-detention legacy; and the legacy of the maritime legal black hole. The tripartite division provides a typology of instances where persons are rendered rightless. While the two former types are characterized by de-facto rightlesness due to a violation of international law, the latter exposes a seldom-acknowledged yet crucial characteristic of international law: age-old doctrine on the division of responsibilities between states and individuals at land and at sea is now creating the conditions in which some people are rendered de-jure rightless. Moreover, the typology sheds light on the specifically legal reasons for the seeming failure to end mass drowning of migrants and refugees in the Mediterranean Sea. Tracing the ways in which people become de-jure rightless is ultimately suggested as a broader research agenda for scholars of international law.
Over the past decades, European border control policies have led to militarisation and securitisation of the sea borders in the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean. The available data, although very limited, make three conclusions plausible: 1. the intensification of European border control policies has not reduced the number of migrants; 2. the intensification of European border control policies have led to the shifting of undocumented migration to ever more dangerous routes; 3. the number of registered border deaths has increased considerably over the years. This development has been chronicled elsewhere. An issue which is part of European border control in the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean is the interception of migrants at the high seas, and sometimes in the waters of the country of embarkation. In this contribution, I want to focus on two legal issues to which these developments (increasing border deaths and interception) give rise. The first concerns the question whether the European States, which undertake to guard their borders jointly, are responsible under Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) for the people who die in their efforts to evade these border controls. The second concerns the compatibility of the interception of migrants with Article 3 ECHR. The limited nature of this undertaking of this paper needs to be emphasised. On both points, European States have little if any interest in factual information becoming public. As a consequence, little information is available about what is happening precisely, while such information is crucial to evaluating these practices in light of international law. The legal analysis presented here is therefore tentative. Only if and when full information becomes available can a comprehensive analysis be developed.
This chapter grapples with the vexed issue of protection at sea, unpacking destination States’ practices of interdiction and their justification on purported humanitarian grounds. It problematizes the instrumentalization of rescue, based on the supposed benevolent effect of ‘stopping the boats’ as a means to ‘save lives’. Two competing yet complementary dynamics are detected and critiqued. First, while destination States inflate their policing competence through reliance on rescue rhetoric and intervene beyond prerogatives explicitly recognized in the law of the sea, they tend to maintain minimalistic constructions of the associated concepts of ‘distress’ or ‘place of safety’ to reduce the scope of their legal responsibilities. Thus, secondly, they deflate their rescue duties and detach them from related international protection obligations, either by deflecting them to third countries or by negating them altogether. Drawing on examples from the US Caribbean interdiction programme, the Australian ‘Pacific Strategy’, and the mare clausum approach favoured in the Mediterranean, the chapter traces the shift from direct to indirect forms of interdiction, increasingly performed by third countries or private actors, culminating in practices of interdiction by omission, which not only tolerate, but purposively embed, the risk of death as part of the migration control toolbox of destination States. The final effect is one that paradoxically transforms rescue into an interdiction tool, denying access to asylum for ‘boat migrants’.
Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, Vol. XVIII, Ciudad de Mexico 2018
A Tale of Non-State Actors and Human Rights at Sea: Maritime Migration Crisis and Commercial Vessels’ ObligationsThe main purpose of this article is to present the role which non-state actors have played in the maritime migration crisis in Europe. Therefore, theoretical considerations regarding non-state actors’ obligations derived from human rights regulations and refugee law, in terms of maritime migration, have been conducted. The author points out that, in the current situation very little attention has been devoted to the shipping industry and commercial vessels as holders of human rights responsibilities and hence such analysis is necessary. The author analyzes international legal acts from the scope of international maritime law, human rights law and refugee law. In conclusion, it is summarized that addressing the issue of maritime migration would require amending many international legal treaties. Additionally, it is indicated that it is necessary to study migration as a complex phenomenon which has not only implications in international law pertaining to human rights and refugee law, but also for the shipping industry.
Nikodinovska Krstevska, Ana and Tushevska, Borka. Migration at sea. International Legal Perspectives and Regional Approaches. Giannini Editore, Naples, Italy, pp. 61-76. ISBN 978-88-7431-818-6
Migration at sea. International Law Perspectives and Regional ApproachesThe present volume comprises the written version of some of the interventions presented at the Conference 'Migration at sea: International Law Perspectives and Regional Approaches' held on 6 October 2016 in Ohrid, Macedonia. They touch upon the salient points of the discussions, and regard the comparison of prospects within international law and the regional approaches recently adopted. Their aim is to make a contribution to the legal literature currently available, and to offer many points for reflection, from the complexity of the legal picture on the subject of migration as a whole, and the responsibility of states in the matter of rescue at sea, to the main questions relating to problems of security inherent in migration in the Balkans. Many other aspects are also considered beyond the legal, arising from this, including an analysis of some specific and critical humanitarian points intrinsic to the phenomenon of migration, and in particular of the current emergency of asylum seeking refugees.
2014 •
PEACE & SECURITY-PAIX ET SÉCURITÉ INTERNATIONALES (EuroMediterranean Journal of International Law and International Relations)
Irregular Migration across the Mediterranean Sea: Problematic Issues Concerning the International Rules on Safeguard of Life at SeaMigration by sea is a phenomenon which is largely associated with irregular flows and growing concern by destination States about border control and integrity of restrictive migration policies. Only incidentally, the human rights’ costs are extensively debated. The Mediterranean Sea is a crucial scenario which highlights the difficulty encountered by the Search and Rescue regime to cope with the techniques adopted by smugglers and with the additional tensions provoked by some features of EU migration law. The SAR provisions are inherently accompanied by certain elasticity, in order to take into account the variety of concrete situations. In a regional context characterized by political divergences among European states and between the latters and transit countries, some IMO and EU’s attempts to draw a solution are evaluated: it clearly emerges that the failures to find out a reasonable compromise are due to factors external to maritime law. Such factors must be addressed with more courage by the EU member states: the hot issue of the burden sharing; a really comprehensive dialogue with origin countries and transit countries on the complex subject of international migration; the renunciation to ask the cooperation of states with a negative human rights record. Absent a more far reaching policy, dramatic events and hidden deaths will sadly continue, as far as the crocodile tears of European politicians when some incident eventually reaches the attention of media and of public opinion. MIGRATION IRREGULIERE DANS LA MER MEDITERRANEE: ASPECTS PROBLEMATIQUES CONCERNANT LES RÈGLES INTERNATIONALES SUR SAUVEGARDE DE VIE EN MER La migration via mer est un phénomène qui est en grande partie associé aux flux irréguliers et à la préoccupation croissante des États de destination relativement au contrôle de ses frontières et à l’intégrité de ses politiques migratoires restrictives. Très rarement, les aspects relatifs aux droits de l’homme reçoivent l’attention qu’ils mériteraient. La Méditerranée est un scénario crucial qui met en évidence les difficultés rencontrées par le système de la Recherche et du Sauvetage quand il fait face aux techniques adoptées par les trafiquants et aux tensions additionnelles provoqués par certaines règles du droit d’immigration de l’UE. Les dispositions sur les activités SAR sont accompagnées par certaine élasticité, afin de prendre en compte la variété des situations concrètes. Dans un contexte régional caractérisé par des divergences politiques entre les États membres de l’UE et entre ceux-ci et les États de transit, quelques tentatives poussées par l’OMI et l’UE sont évaluées dans la présente étude: de toute évidence, il ressort que les échecs pour trouver un compromis raisonnable sont dus à des facteurs externes au droit maritime. Ces facteurs doivent être recouverts d’une plus grande participation des États membres de l’UE: la question sensible du partage de la charge, un très large dialogue avec les pays d’origine et de transit sur les complexités de la migration internationale; le renoncement, au même temps, la demande de coopération des pays qui ne respectent pas suffisamment les droits de l’homme. Á l’absence d’une politique plus ambitieuse et à long terme, les événements dramatiques et morts silencieuses vont se poursuivre, et aussi les «larmes de crocodile» des politiciens européens qui se posent lorsqu’un incident vient à provoquer l’attention des médias communication et l’opinion publique MIGRACIÓN IRREGULAR EN EL MAR MEDITERRÁNEO: ASPECTOS PROBLEMATICOS RELATIVOS A LAS REGLAS INTERNACIONALES SOBRE LA PROTECCIÓN DE LA VIDA EN MAR La migración vía mar es un fenómeno abundantemente asociado con los flujos irregulares y con la creciente preocupación por parte de los Estados de destino con respecto al control des sus fronteras y a la integridad de sus políticas migratorias restrictivas. Muy raramente, los aspectos relativos a los derechos humanos reciben la atención que merecerían. El Mar Mediterráneo representa un escenario crucial que destaca las dificultades que el régimen de búsqueda y rescate encuentra al enfrentarse con las técnicas empleadas por los traficantes y con las tensiones adicionales consecuencia de ciertas pautas del derecho de inmigración de la UE. Las disposiciones sobre las actividades SAR son inherentemente acompañadas por una cierta elasticidad, a fin de tomar en cuenta la variedad de las situaciones concretas. En un contexto regional caracterizado por divergencias políticas entre los Estados miembros de la UE y entre estos y los Estados de tránsito, algunas tentativas impulsadas por la OMI y la UE son evaluadas en el presente estudio: resulta que el fracaso en llegar a un razonable compromiso se debe a motivos ajenos al derecho marítimo. Tales factores deben ser abarcados con mas implicación por parte de los Estados miembros de la UE: el delicado tema de la repartición de las cargas; una diálogo realmente amplio con los países de origen y con los de tránsito sobre las complejidades de las migraciones internacionales; la renuncia, al mismo tiempo, a pedir la cooperación de países que no respetan con suficiencia los derechos humanos. A falta de una política más ambiciosa y de largo plazo, los eventos dramáticos y las muertes silenciosas están destinados a seguir, así como las “lagrimas de cocodrilo” de los políticos europeos que surgen cuando algún incidente llega a provocar la atención de los medios de comunicación y de la opinión publica.
Летняя школа по русской литературе. 2024. Т. 20. № 1
О происхождении эпитафии на могиле Якова Григорьевича Гуревича / About the Origin of the Epitaph on the Grave of Yakov Grigorievich Gurevich2024 •
International Journal of Supply Chain Management
Supply Chain Management in Fishing Industry: A Case StudyUnder the Shadow of Al-Andalus? Spanish teenagers’ attitudes and experiences with religious diversity at school
Under the shadow of Al-Andalus? Spanish teenagers' attitudes and experiences with religious diversity at school2012 •
Perspectivas da Educação Matemática
Pedagogías decoloniales devenidas de la Educación Matemática Decolonial Transcompleja2019 •
DENARIUS. REVISTA DE ECONOMÍA Y ADMINISTRACIÓN
La escuela histórica alemana y el debate del método2019 •
İlahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi
Antik Mısır, Antik Yunan ve Yahudilikte Köken, Yasa ve Düzen: Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme2024 •
Revista Estudos Institucionais
O DISCRETO CHARME DO BÁSICO: REFLEXÕES SOBRE A PRÁTICA DO ENSINO DO DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO NA UERJ ON TEACHING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AT UERJ2023 •
Proceedings of the 2023 Artificial Life Conference
The Degeneracy of Control Architectures in Cell Lineages: Implications for Tissue Homeostasis2023 •
Education for Chemical Engineers
Potential impact on the recruitment of chemical engineering graduates due to the industrial internship2019 •
Cadernos de Agroecologia
Preparados homeopáticos auxiliam na diminuição de populações de pulgões em rúcula2018 •
Ramanujan International Journal of Business and Research
Social Media Analytics: The Next Big Thing?2019 •
Africa Spectrum
Review: Rita Kesselring, Bodies of Truth: Law, Memory and Emancipation in Post-Apartheid South Africa (2016)2017 •
Chronicles of health impact assessment
Methods to Conduct a Health Impact Assessment Learning Collaborative2020 •
2013 •
International Journal of Mosquito Research
Dengue and natural remedies for its prevention and control: A review2022 •