McDONALD INSTITUTE MONOGRAPHS
Temple landscapes
Fragility, change and resilience
of Holocene environments
in the Maltese Islands
By Charles French, Chris O. Hunt, Reuben Grima,
Rowan McLaughlin, Simon Stoddart & Caroline Malone
Volume 1 of Fragility and Sustainability – Studies on Early Malta,
the ERC-funded FRAGSUS Project
Temple landscapes
McDONALD INSTITUTE MONOGRAPHS
Temple landscapes
Fragility, change and resilience of Holocene
environments in the Maltese Islands
By Charles French, Chris O. Hunt, Reuben Grima,
Rowan McLaughlin, Simon Stoddart & Caroline Malone
With contributions by
Gianmarco Alberti, Jeremy Bennett, Maarten Blaauw, Petros Chatzimpaloglou,
Lisa Coyle McClung, Alan J. Cresswell, Nathaniel Cutajar, Michelle Farrell,
Katrin Fenech, Rory P. Flood, Timothy C. Kinnaird, Steve McCarron,
Rowan McLaughlin, John Meneely, Anthony Pace, Sean D.F. Pyne-O’Donnell,
Paula J. Reimer, Alastair Ruffell, George A. Said-Zammit, David C.W. Sanderson,
Patrick J. Schembri, Sean Taylor, David Trump†, Jonathan Turner, Nicholas C. Vella
& Nathan Wright
Illustrations by
Gianmarco Alberti, Jeremy Bennett, Sara Boyle, Petros Chatzimpaloglou,
Lisa Coyle McClung, Rory P. Flood, Charles French, Chris O. Hunt, Michelle Farrell,
Katrin Fenech, Rowan McLaughlin, John Meneely, Anthony Pace, David Redhouse,
Alastair Ruffell, George A. Said-Zammit & Simon Stoddart
Volume 1 of Fragility and Sustainability – Studies on Early Malta,
the ERC-funded FRAGSUS Project
This project has received funding from the
European Research Council (ERC) under
the European Union’s Seventh Framework
Programme (FP7-2007-2013) (Grant
agreement No. 323727).
Published by:
McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
University of Cambridge
Downing Street
Cambridge, UK
CB2 3ER
(0)(1223) 339327
[email protected]
www.mcdonald.cam.ac.uk
McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2020
© 2020 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Temple landscapes is made available under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialNoDerivatives 4.0 (International) Licence:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
ISBN: 978-1-902937-99-1
Cover design by Dora Kemp and Ben Plumridge.
Typesetting and layout by Ben Plumridge.
On the cover: View towards Nadur lighthouse and Għajnsielem church
with the Gozo Channel to Malta beyond, from In-Nuffara (Caroline Malone).
Edited for the Institute by James Barrett (Series Editor).
Contents
Contributors
Figures
Tables
Preface and dedication
Acknowledgements
Foreword
Introduction
xi
xiii
xvi
xix
xxi
xxiii
Caroline Malone, Simon Stoddart, Chris O. Hunt, Charles French,
Rowan McLaughlin & Reuben Grima
0.1. Introduction
0.2. Background to FRAGSUS as an archaeological project
0.3. Environmental research in Malta and the Mediterranean
0.4. The development of the FRAGSUS Project and its questions
0.5. Archaeological concerns in Maltese prehistory and the FRAGSUS Project
0.6. The research programme: the sites and their selection
0.7. Investigating the palaeoenvironmental context
0.8. Archaeological investigations
1
1
3
5
6
8
9
10
11
Part I
The interaction between the natural and cultural landscape – insights into the
fifth–second millennia bc
17
Chapter 1
The geology, soils and present-day environment of Gozo and Malta
Petros Chatzimpaloglou, Patrick J. Schembri, Charles French, Alastair Ruffell
& Simon Stoddart
1.1. Previous work
1.2. Geography
1.3. Geology
1.4. Stratigraphy of the Maltese Islands
1.4.1. Lower Coralline Limestone Formation
1.4.2. Globigerina Limestone Formation
1.4.3. Chert outcrops
1.4.4. Blue Clay Formation
1.4.5. Greensand Formation
1.4.6. Upper Coralline Limestone Formation
1.4.7. Quaternary deposits
1.5. Structural and tectonic geology of the Maltese Islands
1.6. Geomorphology
1.7. Soils and landscape
1.8. Climate and vegetation
19
Chapter 2
19
19
21
23
23
23
25
26
28
28
29
29
29
31
32
Chronology and stratigraphy of the valley systems
35
Chris O. Hunt, Michelle Farrell, Katrin Fenech, Charles French, Rowan McLaughlin,
Maarten Blaauw, Jeremy Bennett, Rory P. Flood, Sean D. F. Pyne-O’Donnell, Paula
J. Reimer, Alastair Ruffell, Alan J. Cresswell, Timothy C. Kinnaird, David Sanderson,
Sean Taylor, Caroline Malone, Simon Stoddart & Nicholas C. Vella
2.1. Methods for dating environmental and climate change in the Maltese Islands
35
Rowan McLaughlin, Maarten Blaauw, Rory P. Flood, Charles French, Chris O. Hunt,
Michelle Farrell, Katrin Fenech, Sean D.F. Pyne-O’Donnell, Alan J. Cresswell,
David C.W. Sanderson, Timothy C. Kinnaird, Paula J. Reimer & Nicholas C. Vella
2.1.1. Data sources for chronology building
35
2.1.2. Pottery finds
41
v
2.2. Basin infill ground penetrating radar surveys
Alastair Ruffell, Chris O. Hunt, Jeremy Bennett, Rory P. Flood,
Simon Stoddart & Caroline Malone
2.2.1. Rationale
2.2.2. Geophysics for basin fill identification
2.2.3. Valley locations
2.3. The sediment cores
Chris O. Hunt, Michelle Farrell, Rory P. Flood, Katrin Fenech,
Rowan McLaughlin, Nicholas C. Vella, Sean Taylor & Charles French
2.3.1. Aims and methods
2.3.2. The core descriptions
2.3.3. Magnetic susceptibility and XRF analyses of the cores
2.4. Age-depth models
Maarten Blauuw & Rowan McLaughlin
2.4.1. Accumulation rates
2.5. A local marine reservoir offset for Malta
Paula J. Reimer
2.6. Major soil erosion phases
Rory P. Flood, Rowan McLaughlin & Michelle Farrell
2.6.1. Introduction
2.6.2. Methods
2.6.3. Results
2.6.4. Discussion
2.6.5. Conclusions
Chapter 3
The Holocene vegetation history of the Maltese Islands
Michelle Farrell, Chris O. Hunt & Lisa Coyle McClung
3.1. Introduction
Chris O. Hunt
3.2. Palynological methods
Lisa Coyle-McClung, Michelle Farrell & Chris O. Hunt
3.3. Taxonomy and ecological classification
Chris O. Hunt
3.4. Taphonomy
Chris O. Hunt & Michelle Farrell
3.5. The pollen results
Michelle Farrell, Lisa Coyle-McClung & Chris O. Hunt
3.5.1. The Salina cores
3.5.2. Wied Żembaq
3.5.3. Xemxija
3.5.4. In-Nuffara
3.5.5. Santa Verna
3.5.6. Ġgantija
3.6. Synthesis
3.6.1. Pre-agricultural landscapes (pre-5900 cal. bc)
3.6.2. First agricultural colonization (5900–5400 cal. bc)
3.6.3. Early Neolithic (5400–3900 cal. bc)
3.6.4. The later Neolithic Temple period (3900–2350 cal. bc)
3.6.5. The late Neolithic–Early Bronze Age transition (2350–2000 cal. bc)
3.6.6. The Bronze Age (2000–1000 cal. bc)
3.6.7. Late Bronze Age, Punic and Classical periods (c. 1000 cal. bc to ad 1000)
3.6.8. Medieval to modern (post-ad 1000)
3.7. Conclusions
vi
41
41
41
43
43
43
49
59
64
64
65
65
65
66
67
68
71
73
73
74
75
75
87
87
87
87
87
95
105
107
107
108
109
110
111
112
112
113
113
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Molluscan remains from the valley cores
Katrin Fenech, Chris O. Hunt, Nicholas C. Vella & Patrick J. Schembri
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Material
4.3. Methods
4.4. Radiocarbon dates and Bayesian age-depth models
4.5. Results
4.5.1. Marsaxlokk (MX1)
4.5.2. Wied Żembaq (WŻ)
4.5.3. Mġarr ix-Xini (MĠX)
4.5.4. Marsa 2
4.5.5. Salina Deep Core
4.5.6. Xemxija 1 and 2
4.6. Interpretative discussion
4.6.1. Erosion – evidence of major events from the cores
4.7. Environmental reconstruction based on non-marine molluscs
4.7.1. Early Holocene (c. 8000–6000 cal. bc)
4.7.2. Mid-Holocene (c. 6000–3900 cal. bc)
4.7.3. Temple Period (c. 3900–2400 cal. bc)
4.7.4. Early to later Bronze Age (2400–c. 750 cal. bc)
4.7.5. Latest Bronze Age/early Phoenician period to Late Roman/Byzantine
period (c. 750 cal. bc–cal. ad 650)
4.8. Concluding remarks
4.9. Notes on selected species
4.9.1. Extinct species
4.9.2. Species with no previous fossil record
4.9.3. Other indicator species
The geoarchaeology of past landscape sequences on Gozo and Malta
Charles French & Sean Taylor
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Methodology and sample locations
5.3. Results
5.3.1. Santa Verna and its environs
5.3.2. Ġgantija temple and its environs
5.3.3. Skorba and its immediate environs
5.3.4. Taċ-Ċawla settlement site
5.3.5. Xagħra town
5.3.6. Ta’ Marżiena
5.3.7. In-Nuffara
5.3.8. The Ramla valley
5.3.9. The Marsalforn valley
5.3.10. Micromorphological analyses of possible soil materials in the Xemxija 1,
Wied Żembaq 1, Marsaxlokk and Salina Deep (SDC) cores
5.4. The Holocene landscapes of Gozo and Malta
5.5. A model of landscape development
5.6. Conclusions
Cultural landscapes in the changing environments from 6000 to 2000 bc
Reuben Grima, Simon Stoddart, Chris O. Hunt, Charles French,
Rowan McLaughlin & Caroline Malone
6.1. Introduction
6.2. A short history of survey of a fragmented island landscape
6.3. Fragmented landscapes
vii
115
115
117
117
117
117
127
127
128
128
133
152
153
153
155
155
155
155
155
156
156
157
157
158
158
161
161
164
165
165
174
183
188
190
192
192
193
195
196
213
217
221
223
223
223
225
6.4. The Neolithic appropriation of the landscape
6.5. A world in flux (5800–4800 cal. bc)
6.6. The fifth millennium bc hiatus (4980/4690 to 4150/3640 cal. bc)
6.7. Reappropriating the landscape: the ‘Temple Culture’
6.8. Transition and decline
6.9. Conclusion
227
227
228
230
236
237
Part II
The interaction between the natural and cultural landscape – insights from
the second millennium bc to the present: continuing the story
239
Chapter 7
Cultural landscapes from 2000 bc onwards
Simon Stoddart, Anthony Pace, Nathaniel Cutajar, Nicholas C. Vella,
Rowan McLaughlin, Caroline Malone, John Meneely & David Trump†
7.1. An historiographical introduction to the Neolithic–Bronze Age transition
into the Middle Bronze Age
7.2. Bronze Age settlements in the landscape
7.3. The Bronze Age Phoenician transition and the Phoenician/Punic landscape
7.4. Entering the Roman world
7.5. Arab
7.6. Medieval
7.7. The Knights and the entry into the modern period
241
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
The intensification of the agricultural landscape of the Maltese Archipelago
Jeremy Bennett
8.1. Introduction
8.2. The Annales School and the Anthropocene
8.3. The Maltese Archipelago and the longue durée of the Anthropocene
8.4. Intensification
8.5. Population
8.5.1. Sub-carrying capacity periods
8.5.2. Post-carrying capacity periods
8.6. The agrarian archipelago
8.6.1. The agricultural substrate
8.6.2. The development of agricultural technology
8.7. Discussion: balancing fragility and sustainability
Locating potential pastoral foraging routes in Malta through the use of a
Geographic Information System
Gianmarco Alberti, Reuben Grima & Nicholas C. Vella
9.1. Introduction
9.2. Methods
9.2.1. Data sources
9.2.2. Foraging routes and least-cost paths calculation
9.3. Results
9.3.1. Garrigue to garrigue least-cost paths
9.3.2. Stables to garrigues least-cost paths
9.4. Discussion
9.4. Conclusions
Chapter 10 Settlement evolution in Malta from the Late Middle Ages to the early twentieth
century and its impact on domestic space
George A. Said-Zammit
10.1. The Medieval Period (ad 870–1530)
10.1.1. Medieval houses
viii
241
243
246
250
250
251
251
253
253
254
255
257
258
258
260
262
262
262
264
267
267
267
267
268
271
271
273
276
283
285
285
288
10.1.2. Giren and hovels
10.1.3. Cave-dwellings
10.1.4. Architectural development
10.2. The Knights’ Period (ad 1530–1798)
10.2.1. The phase ad 1530–1565
10.2.2. The phase ad 1565–1798
10.2.3. Early modern houses
10.2.4. Lower class dwellings
10.2.5. Cave-dwellings and hovels
10.2.6. The houses: a reflection of social and economic change
10.3. The British Period (ad 1800–1900)
10.3.1. The houses of the British Period
10.3.2. The effect of the Victorian Age
10.3.3. Urban lower class dwellings
10.3.4. Peasant houses, cave-dwellings and hovels
10.4. Conclusions
Chapter 11 Conclusions
Charles French, Chris O. Hunt, Michelle Farrell, Katrin Fenech,
Rowan McLaughlin, Reuben Grima, Nicholas C. Vella, Patrick J. Schembri,
Simon Stoddart & Caroline Malone
11.1. The palynological record
Chris O. Hunt & Michelle Farrell
11.1.1. Climate
11.1.2. Farming and anthropogenic impacts on vegetation
11.2. The molluscan record
Katrin Fenech, Chris O. Hunt, Nicholas C. Vella & Patrick J. Schembri
11.3. The soil/sediment record
Charles French
11.4. Discontinuities in Maltese prehistory and the influence of climate
Chris O. Hunt
11.5. Environmental metastability and the longue durée
Chris O. Hunt
11.6. Implications for the human story of the Maltese Islands
Charles French, Chris O. Hunt, Caroline Malone, Katrin Fenech,
Michelle Farrell, Rowan McLaughlin, Reuben Grima, Patrick J. Schembri
& Simon Stoddart
References
289
292
292
293
293
293
294
297
298
298
298
299
300
301
301
302
303
303
303
307
308
310
313
314
316
325
Appendix 1
How ground penetrating radar (GPR) works
Alastair Ruffell
351
Appendix 2
Luminescence analysis and dating of sediments from archaeological sites
and valley fill sequences
Alan J. Cresswell, David C.W. Sanderson, Timothy C. Kinnaird & Charles French
A2.1. Summary
A2.2. Introduction
A2.3. Methods
A2.3.1. Sampling and field screening measurements
A2.3.2. Laboratory calibrated screening measurements
A2.4. Quartz OSL SAR measurements
A2.4.1. Sample preparation
A2.4.2. Measurements and determinations
353
ix
353
354
355
355
355
356
356
356
A2.5. Results
A2.5.1. Sampling and preliminary luminescence stratigraphies
A2.5.2. Gozo
A2.5.3. Skorba
A2.5.4. Tal-Istabal, Qormi
A2.6. Laboratory calibrated screening measurements
A2.6.1. Dose rates
A2.6.2. Quartz single aliquot equivalent dose determinations
A2.6.3. Age determinations
A2.7. Discussion
A2.7.1. Ġgantija Temple (SUTL2914 and 2915)
A2.7.2. Ramla and Marsalforn Valleys (SUTL2917–2923)
A2.7.3. Skorba Neolithic site (SUTL2925–2927)s
A2.7.4. Tal-Istabal, Qormi (SUTL2930)
A2.7. Conclusions
357
357
357
363
363
363
367
367
371
372
372
373
373
376
376
Appendix 2 – Supplements A–D
379
Appendix 3
Deep core borehole logs
Chris O. Hunt, Katrin Fenech, Michelle Farrell & Rowan McLaughlin
401
Appendix 4
Granulometry of the deep cores
Katrin Fenech
421 (online edition only)
Appendix 5
The molluscan counts for the deep cores
Katrin Fenech
441 (online edition only)
Appendix 6
The borehole and test excavation profile log descriptions
Charles French & Sean Taylor
535
Appendix 7
The detailed soil micromorphological descriptions from the buried soils and
Ramla and Marsalforn valleys
Charles French
A7.1. Santa Verna
A7.2. Ġgantija Test Pit 1
A7.3. Ġgantija WC Trench 1
A7.4. Ġgantija olive grove and environs
A7.5. Skorba
A7.6. Xagħra town
A7.7. Taċ-Ċawla
A7.8. In-Nuffara
A7.9. Marsalforn Valley Profile 626
A7.10. Ramla Valley Profile 627
A7.11. Dwerja
549
549
551
552
553
553
554
555
555
556
556
556
Appendix 8
The micromorphological descriptions for the Malta deep cores of Xemxija 1,
Wied Żembaq 1, Marsaxlokk and the base of the Salina Deep Core (21B)
Charles French & Sean Taylor
557
Appendix 9
The charcoal data
Nathan Wright
563
Index
565
x
Contributors
Dr Gianmarco Alberti
Department of Criminology, Faculty for Social
Wellbeing, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Rory P. Flood
School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s
University, University Road, Belfast, Northern
Ireland
Email:
[email protected]
Jeremy Bennett
Department of Archaeology, University of
Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Email:
[email protected]
Prof. Charles French
Department of Archaeology, University of
Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Maarten Blaauw
School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s
University, University Road, Belfast, Northern
Ireland
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Reuben Grima
Department of Conservation and Built Heritage,
University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Petros Chatzimpaloglou
Department of Archaeology, University of
Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Evan A. Hill
School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s
University, University Road, Belfast, Northern
Ireland
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Lisa Coyle McClung
School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s
University, University Road, Belfast, Northern
Ireland
Email:
[email protected]
Prof. Chris O. Hunt
Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores
University, Liverpool, UK
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Alan J. Cresswell
SUERC, University of Glasgow, East Kilbride,
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Timothy C. Kinnaird
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences,
University of St Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland
Email:
[email protected]
Nathaniel Cutajar
Deputy Superintendent of Cultural Heritage,
Heritage Malta, Valletta, Malta
Email:
[email protected]
Prof. Caroline Malone
School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s
University, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN,
Northern Ireland
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Michelle Farrell
Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience,
School of Energy, Construction and Environment,
Coventry University, Coventry, UK
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Steve McCarron
Department of Geography, National University of
Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Katrin Fenech
Department of Classics & Archaeology, University
of Malta, Msida, Malta
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Rowan McLaughlin
School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s
University, University Road, Belfast, Northern
Ireland
Email:
[email protected]
xi
John Meneely
School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s
University, University Road, Belfast, Northern
Ireland
Email:
[email protected]
Prof. Patrick J. Schembri
Department of Biology, University of Malta,
Msida, Malta
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Anthony Pace
UNESCO Cultural Heritage, Valletta, Malta
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Simon Stoddart
Department of Archaeology, University of
Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Sean D.F. Pyne-O’Donnell
Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang
Technological University, Singapore
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Sean Taylor
Department of Archaeology, University of
Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Email:
[email protected]
Prof. Paula J. Reimer
School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s
University, University Road, Belfast, Northern
Ireland
Email:
[email protected]
Dr David Trump†
Dr Jonathan Turner
Department of Geography, National University
of Ireland, University College, Dublin, Ireland
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Alastair Ruffell
School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s
University, University Road, Belfast, Northern
Ireland
Email:
[email protected]
Prof. Nicholas C. Vella
Department of Classics and Archaeology, Faculty
of Arts, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Email:
[email protected]
George A. Said-Zammit
Department of Examinations, Ministry for
Education and Employment, Government of Malta,
Malta
Email:
[email protected]
Dr Nathan Wright
School of Social Science, The University of
Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Email:
[email protected]
Prof. David C.W. Sanderson
SUERC, University of Glasgow, East Kilbride,
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
Email:
[email protected]
xii
Figures
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.10
1.11
1.12
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
2.11
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.10
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Location map of the Maltese Islands in the southern Mediterranean Sea.
Location of the main Neolithic archaeological and deep coring sites investigated on Malta and Gozo.
Some views of previous excavations on Malta and Gozo.
Some views of recent excavations.
The location of the Maltese Islands in the southern Mediterranean Sea with respect to Sicily and
North Africa.
Stratigraphic column of the geological formations reported for the Maltese Islands.
Geological map of the Maltese Islands.
Typical coastal outcrops of Lower Coralline Limestone, forming sheer cliffs.
Characteristic geomorphological features developed on the Lower Coralline Limestone in western
Gozo (Dwerja Point).
The Middle Globigerina Limestone at the Xwejni coastline.
An overview of the area investigated in western Malta.
The end of the major fault system of Malta (Victorian Lines) at Fomm Ir-Riħ.
An overview of the western part of Gozo where the chert outcrops are located.
Chert outcrops: a) and c) bedded chert, and b) and d) nodular chert.
Four characteristic exposures of the Blue Clay formation on Gozo and Malta.
Map of the fault systems, arranged often as northwest–southeast oriented graben, and strike-slip
structures.
Summary of new radiocarbon dating of Neolithic and Bronze Age sites on Gozo and Malta.
Summed radiocarbon ages for the main sediment cores.
The location of the Birżebbuġa Għar Dalam and Borġ in-Nadur basins and their GNSS-located
GPR lines.
The core locations in Malta and Gozo.
Radiocarbon activity in settlement cores.
The Xemxija 2 core by depth.
The Wied Żembaq 1 and 2 cores by depth.
The Mġarr ix-Xini core by depth.
The Marsaxlokk 1 core and part of 2 by depth.
The resistivity and magnetic susceptibility graphs for Xemxija 1 core.
The resistivity and magnetic susceptibility graphs for Xemxija 2 core.
The multi-element data plots for Xemxija 1 core.
The multi-element data plots for Wied Żembaq 1 core.
The multi-element data plots for Marsaxlokk 1 core.
RUSLE models of soil erosion for the Maltese Islands in September and March.
R and C factors and their product.
Valley catchments and core locations in the Mistra area of Malta.
The modern pollen spectra.
Pollen zonation for the Salina Deep Core.
Pollen zonation for the Salina 4 core.
Pollen zonation for the Wied Żembaq 1 core.
Pollen zonation for the Xemxija 1 core.
Pollen zonation for the pit fills at In-Nuffara.
Pollen and palynofacies from the buried soils below the temple at Santa Verna.
Pollen and palynofacies from Test Pit 1 on the southwestern edge of the Ġgantija platform.
Photomicrographs (x800) of key components of the palynofacies at Santa Verna and Ġgantija.
Marsaxlokk 1 molluscan histogram.
Wied Żembaq 1 molluscan histogram.
Mġarr ix-Xini molluscan histogram.
Marsa 2 molluscan histogram.
Salina Deep Core molluscan histogram.
Marine molluscan histogram for the Salina Deep Core.
xiii
2
11
12–13
14
20
22
22
23
24
24
25
26
27
27
28
30
36
36
42
44
48
51
52
54
55
60
60
61
62
63
69
70
79
81
82–3
88–9
92–3
96–7
101
102
104
106
120
122
129
134
138
139
4.7
4.8
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
5.10
5.11
5.12
5.13
5.14
5.15
5.16
5.17
5.18
5.19
5.20
5.21
5.22
5.23
5.24
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
7.1
7.2a
7.2b
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
8.1
8.2
9.1
Xemxija 1 molluscan histogram.
144
Base of Xemxija 2 molluscan histogram.
145
Location map of the test excavation/sample sites and geoarchaeological survey areas on Gozo and Malta.
164
Plan of Santa Verna temple and the locations of the test trenches.
166
Santa Verna excavation trench profiles all with sample locations marked.
167
The red-brown buried soil profiles in Trench E, the Ashby and Trump Sondages within the
Santa Verna temple site.
170
Santa Verna soil photomicrographs.
172–3
Plan of Ġgantija temple and locations of Test Pit 1 and the WC Trench excavations, with as-dug views
of the WC Trench and TP1.
175
Section profiles of Ġgantija Test Pit 1 on the southwest side of Ġgantija temple and the east-west section
of the Ġgantija WC Trench on the southeast side.
176
Ġgantija TP 1 photomicrographs.
178
Ġgantija WC Trench 1 photomicrographs.
180
Section profiles of Trench A at Skorba showing the locations of the micromorphological and OSL samples. 183
Skorba Trench A, section 1, photomicrographs.
185
Skorba Trench A, section 2, photomicrographs.
186
Taċ-Ċawla soil photomicrographs.
189
A typical terra rossa soil sequence in Xagħra town at construction site 2.
191
Xagħra soil photomicrographs.
191
In-Nuffara photomicrographs.
193
The Marsalforn (Pr 626) and Ramla (Pr 627) valley fill sequences, with the micromorphology samples
and OSL profiling/dating loci marked.
194
Ramla and Marsalforn valley profiles soil photomicrographs.
195
Photomicrographs of the Blue Clay and Greensand geological substrates from the Ramla valley.
199
Xemxija 1 deep valley core photomicrographs.
202
Wied Żembaq 1 deep valley core photomicrographs.
206
Marsaxlokk and Salina Deep Core photomicrographs.
210
Scrub woodland on an abandoned terrace system and garrigue plateau land on the north coast of Gozo.
213
Terracing within land parcels (defined by modern sinuous lanes) on the Blue Clay slopes of the
Ramla valley with Xagħra in the background.
216
The location of the Cambridge Gozo Project survey areas.
224
Fieldwalking survey data from around A. Ta Kuljat, B. Santa Verna, and C. Għajnsielem on Gozo
from the Cambridge Gozo survey and the FRAGSUS Project.
227
The first cycle of Neolithic occupation as recorded by the Cambridge Gozo survey using kernel density
analysis for the Għar Dalam, Red Skorba and Grey Skorba phases.
229
The first half of the second cycle of Neolithic occupation as recorded by the Cambridge Gozo survey
using kernel density analysis implemented for the Żebbuġ and Mġarr phases.
232
The second half of the second cycle of Neolithic occupation as recorded by the Cambridge Gozo survey
using kernel density analysis for the Ġgantija and Tarxien phases.
233
Kernel density analysis of the Tarxien Cemetery, Borġ in-Nadur and Baħrija periods for the areas
covered by the Cambridge Gozo survey.
244
The evidence for Bronze Age settlement in the Mdina area on Malta.
245
The evidence for Bronze Age settlement in the Rabat (Gozo) area.
245
Distribution of Early Bronze Age dolmen on the Maltese Islands.
246
Distribution of presses discovered in the Mġarr ix-Xini valley during the survey.
248
The cultural heritage record of the Punic tower in Żurrieq through the centuries.
249
The changing patterns of social resilience, connectivity and population over the course of the centuries
in the Maltese Islands.
252
An oblique aerial image of the northern slopes of the Magħtab land-fill site, depicting landscaping efforts
including ‘artificial’ terracing.
256
RUSLE estimates of areas of low and moderate erosion for Gozo and Malta.
259
a) Sheep being led to their fold in Pwales down a track; b) Sheep grazing along a track on the
Bajda Ridge in Xemxija, Malta.
269
xiv
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
9.9
9.10
9.11
9.12
9.13
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
A2.1
A2.2
A2.3
A2.4
A2.5
A2.6
A2.7
A2.8
A2.9
A2.10
A2.11
A2.12
A2.13
A2.14
A2.15
A2.16
A2.17
Least-cost paths (LCPs), connecting garrigue areas, representing potential foraging routes across the
Maltese landscape.
Density of LCPs connecting garrigue areas to random points within the garrigue areas themselves.
Location of ‘public spaces’, with size proportional to the distance to the nearest garrigue-to-garrigue LCP.
LCPs connecting farmhouses hosting animal pens to randomly generated points within garrigue areas in
northwestern (A) and northeastern (B) Malta.
As for Figure 9.5, but representing west-central and east-central Malta.
As for Figure 9.5, but representing southern and southwestern Malta.
Location of ‘public spaces’, with size proportional to the distance to the nearest outbound journey.
a) Public space at Tal-Wei, between the modern town of Mosta and Naxxar; b) Tal-Wei public space as
represented in 1940s survey sheets.
Approximate location of the (mostly disappeared) raħal toponyms.
Isochrones around farmhouse 4 representing the space that can be covered at 1-hour intervals considering
animal walking speed.
Isochrones around farmhouse 2 representing the space that can be covered at 1-hour intervals considering
animal walking speed (grazing while walking).
a) Isochrones around farmhouse 5 representing the space that can be covered at 1-hour intervals;
b) Isochrones around farmhouse 6; c) Isochrones around farmhouse 7.
The likely distribution of built-up and cave-dwellings in the second half of the fourteenth century.
The lower frequency of settlement distribution by c. ad 1420.
The distribution of settlements just before ad 1530.
The late medieval Falson Palace in Mdina.
A girna integral with and surrounded by stone dry walling.
A hovel dwelling with a flight of rock-cut steps.
The hierarchical organisation of settlements continued, with the addition of Valletta, Floriana and the
new towns around Birgu.
An example of a seventeenth century townhouse with open and closed timber balconies.
An example of a two-storey razzett belonging to a wealthier peasant family.
The distribution of built-up settlements in about ad 1900.
An example of a Neo-Classical house.
Summary of tree and shrub pollen frequencies at 10 sample sites.
Summary of cereal pollen frequencies at 14 sample sites.
Schematic profiles of possible trajectories of soil development in the major geological zones of Malta
and Gozo.
The main elements of a new cultural-environmental story of the Maltese Islands throughout the last
10,000 years.
Marsalforn valley, Gozo.
Marsalforn valley, Gozo.
Ramla valley, Gozo.
Ġgantija Test Pit 1, Gozo.
Skorba Neolithic site; trench A, East section; trench A, South section.
Skorba, Trench A, South section.
Tal-Istabal, Qormi, Malta.
Tal-Istabal, Qormi, Malta.
Photograph, showing locations of profile sample and OSL tubes, and luminescence-depth profile,
for the sediment stratigraphy sampled in profile 1.
Photograph, and luminescence-depth profile, for the sediment stratigraphy sampled in profile 3.
Photograph, and luminescence-depth profile, for the sediment stratigraphy sampled in profile 2.
Photograph, and luminescence-depth profile, for the sediment stratigraphy sampled in profiles 4 and 6.
Photograph, and luminescence-depth profile, for the sediment stratigraphy sampled in profile 5.
Apparent dose and sensitivity for laboratory OSL and IRSL profile measurements for SUTL2916 (P1).
Apparent dose and sensitivity for laboratory OSL and IRSL profile measurements for SUTL2920 (P2).
Apparent dose and sensitivity for laboratory OSL and IRSL profile measurements for SUTL2913 (P3).
Apparent dose and sensitivity for laboratory OSL and IRSL profile measurements for SUTL2924 (P4).
xv
271
272
273
274
274
275
276
277
279
280
281
282
286
286
288
289
290
291
295
296
297
299
301
304
305
311
317
360
361
361
361
362
362
364
364
365
365
366
366
367
370
370
370
370
A2.18
A2.19
A2.20
A2.21
A2.22
A2.23
A2.24
A2.25
SB.1
SB.2
SB.3
SB.4
SB.5
SB.6
SB.7
SB.8
SB.9
SB.10
SB.11
SB.12
SC.1
SC.2
SC.3
SC.4
SC.5
SC.6
SC.7
SC.8
SC.9
SC.10
SC.11
SC.12
SD.1
SD.2
SD.3
SD.4
SD.5
SD.6
Apparent dose and sensitivity for laboratory OSL and IRSL profile measurements for SUTL2929 (P5).
Apparent dose and sensitivity for laboratory OSL and IRSL profile measurements for SUTL2928 (P6).
Apparent dose and sensitivity for laboratory OSL and IRSL profile measurements for SUTL2931 (P7).
Probability Distribution Functions for the stored dose on samples SUTL2914 and 2915.
Probability Distribution Functions for the stored dose on samples SUTL2917–2919.
Probability Distribution Functions for the stored dose on samples SUTL2921–2923.
Probability Distribution Functions for the stored dose on samples SUTL2925–2927.
Probability Distribution Function for the stored dose on sample SUTL2930.
Dose response curves for SUTL2914.
Dose response curves for SUTL2915.
Dose response curves for SUTL2917.
Dose response curves for SUTL2918.
Dose response curves for SUTL2919.
Dose response curves for SUTL2921.
Dose response curves for SUTL2922.
Dose response curves for SUTL2923.
Dose response curves for SUTL2925.
Dose response curves for SUTL2926.
Dose response curves for SUTL2927.
Dose response curves for SUTL2930.
Abanico plot for SUTL2914.
Abanico plot for SUTL2915.
Abanico plot for SUTL2917.
Abanico plot for SUTL2918.
Abanico plot for SUTL2919.
Abanico plot for SUTL2921.
Abanico plot for SUTL2922.
Abanico plot for SUTL2923.
Abanico plot for SUTL2925.
Abanico plot for SUTL2926.
Abanico plot for SUTL2927.
Abanico plot for SUTL2930.
Apparent ages for profile 1, with OSL ages.
Apparent ages for profile 2, with OSL ages.
Apparent ages for profile 3, with OSL ages.
Apparent ages for profiles 4 and 6, with OSL ages.
Apparent ages for profile 5, with OSL ages.
Apparent ages for profile 7.
371
371
371
374
374
375
375
376
385
385
386
386
387
387
388
388
389
389
390
390
391
391
392
392
392
393
393
393
394
394
394
395
397
397
398
398
399
399
Description of the geological formations found on the Maltese Islands.
The cultural sequence of the Maltese Islands (with all dates calibrated).
Quartz OSL sediment ages from the Marsalforn (2917–2919) and Ramla (2921–2923) valleys,
the Skorba temple/buried soil (2925–2927) and Tal-Istabal, Qormi, soil (2930).
Dating results for positions in the sediment cores.
Summary stratigraphic descriptions of the sequences in the deep core profiles.
Mean sediment accumulation rates per area versus time for the deep cores.
Radiocarbon measurements and ΔR values from early twentieth century marine shells from Malta.
Calibrated AMS 14C dates of charred plant remains from Santa Verna palaeosol, Gozo.
Physical properties of the catchments.
Normalized Diffuse Vegetation Index (NDVI) for the catchments in 2014–15 and average rainfall data
for the weather station at Balzan for the period 1985 to 2012.
Semi-natural plant communities in the Maltese Islands.
21
37
Tables
1.1
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.1
xvi
40
45
57
64
65
68
68
69
76
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.10
3.11
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.12
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
5.10
5.11
5.12
5.13
5.14
5.15
5.16
5.17
8.1
8.2
11.1
Attribution of pollen taxa to plant communities in the Maltese Islands and more widely in the Central
Mediterranean.
Characteristics of the taphonomic samples from on-shore and off-shore Mistra Valley, Malta.
The pollen zonation of the Salina Deep Core with modelled age-depths.
The pollen zonation of the Salina 4 core with modelled age-depths.
The pollen zonation of the Wied Żembaq 1 core with modelled age-depths.
The pollen zonation of the Xemxija 1 core with modelled age-depths.
The pollen zonation of the fill of a Bronze Age silo at In-Nuffara, Gozo.
Summary of the pollen analyses of the buried soil below the Santa Verna temple structure.
Summary of the pollen analyses from the buried soil in Ġgantija Test Pit 1.
Activity on Temple sites and high cereal pollen in adjacent cores.
List of freshwater molluscs and land snails found in the cores, habitat requirement, palaeontological
record and current status and conservation in the Maltese Islands.
Molluscan zones for the Marsaxlokk 1 core (MX1).
Molluscan zones for the Wied Żembaq 1 core (WŻ1).
Molluscan zones for the Wied Żembaq 2 core (WŻ2).
Integration of molluscan zones from the Wied Żembaq 1 and 2 cores.
Molluscan zones for the Mġarr ix-Xini 1 core (MĠX1).
Molluscan zones for the Marsa 2 core (MC2).
The non-marine molluscan zones for the Salina Deep Core (SDC).
Molluscan zones for the Salina Deep Core (SDC).
Molluscan zones for the Xemxija 1 core (XEM1).
Molluscan zones for the Xemxija 2 core (XEM2).
Correlation and integration of molluscan data from Xemxija 1 (XEM1) and Xemxija 2 (XEM2).
Micromorphology and small bulk sample sites and numbers.
Summary of available dating for the sites investigated in Gozo and Malta.
pH, magnetic susceptibility, loss-on-ignition, calcium carbonate and % sand/silt/clay particle size
analysis results for the Ġgantija, Santa Verna and the Xagħra town profiles, Gozo.
Selected multi-element results for Ġgantija, Santa Verna and Xagħra town buried soils, and the
Marsalforn and Ramla valley sequences, Gozo.
Summary of the main soil micromorphological observations for the Santa Verna, Ġgantija and the
Xagħra town profiles, Gozo.
pH, magnetic susceptibility and selected multi-element results for the palaeosols in section 1, Trench A,
Skorba.
Loss-on-ignition organic/carbon/calcium carbonate frequencies and particle size analysis results for the
palaeosols in section 1, Trench A, Skorba.
Summary of the main soil micromorphological observations of the buried soils in sections 1 and 2,
Trench A, Skorba.
Summary of the main soil micromorphological observations of the possible buried soils at Taċ-Ċawla.
Field descriptions and micromorphological observations for the quarry and construction site profiles in
Xagħra town.
Sample contexts and micromorphological observations for two silo fills at In-Nuffara.
Summary of the main soil micromorphological observations from the Ramla and Marsalforn valley fill
profiles.
Main characteristics of the Upper and Lower Coralline Limestone, Globigerina Limestone, Blue Clay
and Greensand.
Summary micromorphological descriptions and suggested interpretations for the Xemxija 1 core.
Summary micromorphological descriptions and suggested interpretations for the Wied Żembaq 1 core.
Summary micromorphological descriptions and suggested interpretations for the Marsaxlokk 1 core.
Summary micromorphological descriptions and suggested interpretations for the base zone of the base
of the Salina Deep Core.
Carrying capacity estimates for the Neolithic/Temple Period of the Maltese Archipelago.
Summary of population changes in the Maltese Archipelago.
Summary of the environmental and vegetation changes in the Maltese Islands over the longue durée.
xvii
77
80
84
90
94
98
103
103
105
105
118
121
123
125
128
130
135
140
142
146
148
151
162
163
168
169
181
184
184
188
189
190
192
196
197
200
207
209
211
258
261
306
11.2
11.3
11.4
A2.1
A2.2
A2.3
A2.4
A2.5
A2.6
A2.7
A2.8
A2.9
SA.1
SA.2
SA.3
SA.4
SA.5
A3.1
A3.2
A3.3
A3.4
A3.5
A3.6
A3.7
A3.8
A3.9
A3.10
A3.11
A3.12
A4.1
A4.2
A4.3
A4.4
A4.5
A4.6
A4.7
A4.8
A5.1
A5.2
A5.3
A5.4
A5.5
A5.6
A5.7
A5.8
A5.9
A8.1
A8.2
A8.3
A8.4
A9.1
Summary of events revealed by the molluscan data in the deep cores.
309
Major phases of soil, vegetation and landscape development and change during the Holocene.
312
Occurrence of gypsum in FRAGSUS cores and contemporary events.
314
Sample descriptions, contexts and archaeological significance of the profiling samples used for initial
screening and laboratory characterization.
358
Sample descriptions, contexts and archaeological significance of sediment samples SUTL2914–2930.
360
Activity and equivalent concentrations of K, U and Th determined by HRGS.
368
Infinite matrix dose rates determined by HRGS and TSBC.
368
Effective beta and gamma dose rates following water correction.
369
SAR quality parameters.
369
Comments on equivalent dose distributions of SUTL2914 to SUTL2930.
372
Quartz OSL sediment ages.
372
Locations, dates and archaeological significance of sediment samples SUTL2914–2930.
373
Field profiling data, as obtained using portable OSL equipment, for the sediment stratigraphies examined
on Gozo and Malta.
379
OSL screening measurements on paired aliquots of 90–250 μm 40% HF-etched ‘quartz’.
380
OSL screening measurements on three aliquots of 90–250 μm 40% HF-etched ‘quartz’ for SUTL2924.
382
IRSL screening measurements on paired aliquots of 90–250 μm 15% HF-etched ‘polymineral’.
382
IRSL screening measurements on three aliquots of 90–250 μm 15% HF-etched ‘polymineral’
for SUTL2924.
383
Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Salina Deep Core.
401
Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Salina 4 core.
405
Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Salina 2 core.
407
Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Xemxija 1 core.
408
Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Xemxija 2 core.
411
Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Wied Żembaq 1 core.
413
Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Wied Żembaq 2 core.
413
Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Mgarr ix-Xini core.
414
Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Marsaxlokk core.
416
Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Marsa 2 core.
417
Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Mellieħa Bay core.
418
Key to the scheme for the description of Quaternary sediments.
419
Marsa 2.
421 (online edition only)
Mgarr ix-Xini.
424 (online edition only)
Salina Deep Core.
427 (online edition only)
Wied Żembaq 2.
429 (online edition only)
Wied Żembaq 1.
430 (online edition only)
Xemxija 1.
432 (online edition only)
Xemxija 2.
435 (online edition only)
Marsaxlokk 1.
438 (online edition only)
Marsa 2.
442 (online edition only)
Mgarr ix-Xini.
456 (online edition only)
Salina Deep Core non-marine.
466 (online edition only)
Salina Deep Core marine.
478 (online edition only)
Wied Żembaq 2.
490 (online edition only)
Wied Żembaq 1.
496 (online edition only)
Xemxija 1.
502 (online edition only)
Xemxija 2.
516 (online edition only)
Marsaxlokk 1.
528 (online edition only)
Xemxija 1 core micromorphology sample descriptions.
557
Wied Żembaq 1 core micromorphology sample descriptions.
559
Marsaxlokk core micromorphology sample descriptions.
560
Salina Deep Core micromorphology sample descriptions.
561
The charcoal data from the Skorba, Kordin, In-Nuffara and Salina Deep Core.
563
xviii
Preface and dedication
Caroline Malone
The FRAGSUS Project emerged as the direct result
of an invitation to undertake new archaeological
fieldwork in Malta in 1985. Anthony Bonanno of the
University of Malta organized a conference on ‘The
Mother Goddess of the Mediterranean’ in which
Colin Renfrew was a participant. The discussions that
resulted prompted an invitation that made its way to
David Trump (Tutor in Continuing Education, Cambridge University), Caroline Malone (then Curator of
the Avebury Keiller Museum) and Simon Stoddart
(then a post-graduate researcher in Cambridge). We
eagerly took up the invitation to devise a new collaborative, scientifically based programme of research
on prehistoric Malta.
What resulted was the original Cambridge Gozo
Project (1987–94) and the excavations of the Xagħra
Brochtorff Circle and the Għajnsielem Road Neolithic house. Both those sites had been found by local
antiquarian, Joseph Attard-Tabone, a long-established
figure in the island for his work on conservation and
site identification.
As this and the two other volumes in this series
report, the original Cambridge Gozo Project was the
germ of a rich and fruitful academic collaboration
that has had international impact, and has influenced
successive generations of young archaeologists in
Malta and beyond.
As the Principal Investigator of the FRAGSUS
Project, on behalf of the very extensive FRAGSUS team
I want to dedicate this the first volume of the series
to the enlightened scholars who set up this now 35
year-long collaboration of prehistoric inquiry with our
heartfelt thanks for their role in our studies.
We dedicate this volume to:
Joseph Attard Tabone
Professor Anthony Bonanno
Professor Lord Colin Renfrew
and offer our profound thanks for their continuing
role in promoting the prehistory of Malta.
xix
Acknowledgements
They were helped by Vincent Van Walt, who provided
technical assistance. Al Ruffell and John Meneely did
geophysical evaluation and GRP location of the cores.
During fieldwork, Tim Kinnaird and Charles French
were assisted by Sean Taylor, Jeremy Bennett and
Simon Stoddart. We are grateful to the Superintendence of Cultural Heritage, Malta and Heritage Malta
for permission to undertake the analyses and much
practical assistance.
For Chapter 5, we would like to thank all at Heritage Malta, the Ġgantija visitor’s centre and the University of Malta for their friendly and useful assistance
throughout. In particular, we would like to thank
George Azzopardi, Daphne Caruana, Josef Caruana,
Nathaniel Cutajar, Chris Gemmell, Reuben Grima,
Joanne Mallia, Christian Mifsud, Anthony Pace, Ella
Samut-Tagliaferro, Mevrick Spiteri, Katya Stroud,
Sharon Sultana and Nick Vella. We also thank Tonko
Rajkovača of the McBurney Laboratory, Department
of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, for making the thin section slides, the Physical Geography
Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of
Cambridge, and the ALS Global laboratory in Seville,
Spain, for processing the multi-element analyses.
For Chapter 6, Reuben Grima wrote the first
draft of this contribution, receiving comments and
additions from the other authors.
For Chapter 7, Simon Stoddart wrote the first
draft of this contribution, receiving comments and
additions from the other authors.
For Chapter 9, we thank Sharlo Camilleri for providing us with a copy of the GIS data produced by the
MALSIS (MALtese Soil Information System) project.
We are grateful to Prof. Saviour Formosa and Prof.
Timmy Gambin, both of the University of Malta, who
facilitated the donation of LiDAR data, together with
computer facilities, as part of the European project
ERDF156 Developing National Environmental Monitoring Infrastructure and Capacity, from the former Malta
This volume records research undertaken with funding from the European Research Council under the
European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme
(FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement n. 323727
(FRAGSUS Project: Fragility and sustainability in
small island environments: adaptation, cultural change
and collapse in prehistory – http://www.qub.ac.uk/
sites/FRAGSUS/). All the authors of this volume are
indebted to the ERC for its financial support, and to
the Principal Investigator of the FRAGSUS Project,
Prof. Caroline Malone (Queen’s University, Belfast,
UK), for her central role in devising the project and
seeing this research through to publication.
For Chapter 2, we extend warm thanks to the
staff of the 14CHRONO centre at QUB, especially
Stephen Hoper, Jim McDonald, Michelle Thompson
and Ron Reimer, all of whom took a keen interest in
the FRAGSUS Project. The success of the FRAGSUS
Project in general and the radiocarbon dating exercise
has depended on their work. We thank the Physical
Geography Laboratory staff at the School of Geography, University College Dublin, for the use of their
ITRAX XRF core scanner. In particular, we would like
to thank Dr Steve McCarron, Department of Geography, National University of Ireland, Maynooth and Dr
Jonathan Turner, Department of Geography, National
University of Ireland, University College, Dublin.
We thank Prof. Patrick Schembri for sourcing and
collecting the Acanthocardia samples from the Natural
Museum of Natural History. Sean Pyne O’Donnell
thanks Dr Chris Hayward at the Tephrochronology
Analytical Unit (TAU), University of Edinburgh, for
help and advice during microprobe work. Dr Maxine
Anastasi, Department of Classics and Archaeology,
University of Malta, helped identify the pottery from
the settlement cores. Dr Frank Carroll helped show
us the way forward; but sadly is no longer with us.
Chris Hunt, Rory Flood, Michell Farrell, Sean Pyne
O’Donnell and Mevrick Spiteri were the coring team.
xxi
Acknowledgements
Environment and Planning Authority. A number of
individuals were happy to share their recollections of
shepherding practices in Malta and Gozo over the last
sixty or seventy years; others facilitated the encounters. We are grateful to all of them: Charles Gauci,
Grezzju Meilaq, Joseph Micallef, Louis Muscat, Ċettina
and Anġlu Vella, Ernest Vella and Renata Zerafa.
Simon Stoddart would like to thank Prof. Martin
Jones and Rachel Ballantyne for their advice in constructing Figure 11.4. The editors would like to thank
Emma Hannah for compiling the index.
Firstly, the FRAGSUS Project is the result of
a very generous research grant from the European
Research Council (Advanced Grant no’ 323727), without which this and its two partner volumes and the
research undertaken could not have taken place. We
heartily thank the ERC for its award and the many
administrators in Brussels who monitored our use of
the grant. The research team also wants to record our
indebtedness to the administrators of the grant within
our own institutions, since this work required detailed
and dedicated attention. In particular we thank Rory
Jordan in the Research Support Office, Stephen Hoper
and Jim McDonald – CHRONO lab, and Martin
Stroud (Queen’s University Belfast), Laura Cousens
(Cambridge University), Glen Farrugia and Cora
Magri (University of Malta), the Curatorial, Finance
and Designs & Exhibitions Departments in Heritage
Malta and Stephen Borg at the Superintendence of
Cultural Heritage. Finally, we thank Fr. Joe Inguanez
(Emeritus Head of Department, Department of Sociology, University of Malta) for offering us the leitmotif
of this volume while a visiting scholar in Magdalene
College, Cambridge: ‘Mingħajr art u ħamrija, m’hemmx
sinjorija’ translating as ‘without land and soil, there is
no wealth’.
xxii
Foreword
Anthony Pace
Sustainability, as applied in archaeological research
and heritage management, provides a useful perspective for understanding the past as well as the modern
conditions of archaeological sites themselves. As often
happens in archaeological thought, the idea of sustainability was borrowed from other areas of concern,
particularly from the modern construct of development and its bearing on the environment and resource
exploitation. The term sustainability entered common
usage as a result of the unstoppable surge in resource
exploitation, economic development, demographic
growth and the human impacts on the environment
that has gripped the World since 1500. Irrespective of
scale and technology, most human activity of an economic nature has not spared resources from impacts,
transformations or loss irrespective of historical and
geographic contexts. Theories of sustainability may
provide new narratives on the archaeology of Malta
and Gozo, but they are equally important and of
central relevance to contemporary issues of cultural
heritage conservation and care. Though the archaeological resources of the Maltese islands can throw
light on the past, one has to recognize that such
resources are limited, finite and non-renewable. The
sense of urgency with which these resources have to
be identified, listed, studied, archived and valued is
akin to that same urgency with which objects of value
and all fragile forms of natural and cultural resources
require constant stewardship and protection. The idea
of sustainability therefore, follows a common thread
across millennia.
It is all the more reason why cultural resource
management requires particular attention through
research, valorization and protection. The FRAGSUS
Project (Fragility and sustainability in small island
environments: adaptation, cultural change and collapse in prehistory) was intended to further explore
and enhance existing knowledge on the prehistory
of Malta and Gozo. The objective of the project as
designed by the participating institutional partners
and scholars, was to explore untapped field resources
and archived archaeological material from a number
of sites and their landscape to answer questions that
could be approached with new techniques and methods. The results of the FRAGSUS Project will serve to
advance our knowledge of certain areas of Maltese
prehistory and to better contextualize the archipelago’s importance as a model for understanding island
archaeology in the central Mediterranean. The work
that has been invested in FRAGSUS lays the foundation for future research.
Malta and Gozo are among the Mediterranean
islands whose prehistoric archaeology has been
intensely studied over a number of decades. This
factor is important, yet more needs to be done in the
field of Maltese archaeology and its valorization.
Research is not the preserve of academic specialists.
It serves to enhance not only what we know about
the Maltese islands, but more importantly, why the
archipelago’s cultural landscape and its contents
deserve care and protection especially at a time of
extensive construction development. Strict rules and
guidelines established by the Superintendence of
Cultural Heritage have meant that during the last two
decades more archaeological sites and deposits have
been protected in situ or rescue-excavated through a
statutory watching regime. This supervision has been
applied successfully in a wide range of sites located in
urban areas, rural locations and the landscape, as well
as at the World Heritage Sites of Valletta, Ġgantija,
Ħaġar Qim and Mnajdra and Tarxien. This activity
has been instrumental in understanding ancient and
historical land use, and the making of the Maltese
historic centres and landscape.
Though the cumulative effect of archaeological
research is being felt more strongly, new areas of
interest still need to be addressed. Most pressing are
those areas of landscape studies which often become
xxiii
Foreword
peripheral to the attention that is garnered by prominent megalithic monuments. FRAGSUS has once
again confirmed that there is a great deal of value
in studying field systems, terraces and geological
settings which, after all, were the material media in
which modern Malta and Gozo ultimately developed.
There is, therefore, an interplay in the use of the term
sustainability, an interplay between what we can learn
from the way ancient communities tested and used the
very same island landscape which we occupy today,
and the manner in which this landscape is treated in
contested economic realities. If we are to seek factors
of sustainability in the past, we must first protect its
relics and study them using the best available methods in our times. On the other hand, the study of the
past using the materiality of ancient peoples requires
strong research agendas and thoughtful stewardship.
The FRAGSUS Project has shown us how even small
fragile deposits, nursed through protective legislation
and guardianship, can yield significant information
which the methods of pioneering scholars of Maltese
archaeology would not have enabled access to. As
already outlined by the Superintendence of Cultural
Heritage, a national research agenda for cultural heritage and the humanities is a desideratum. Such a framework, reflected in the institutional partnership of the
FRAGSUS Project, will bear valuable results that will
only advance Malta’s interests especially in today’s
world of instant e-knowledge that was not available
on such a global scale a mere two decades ago.
FRAGSUS also underlines the relevance of
studying the achievements and predicaments of past
societies to understand certain, though not all, aspects
of present environmental challenges. The twentieth
century saw unprecedented environmental changes
as a result of modern political-economic constructs.
Admittedly, twentieth century developments cannot
be equated with those of antiquity in terms of demography, technology, food production and consumption
or the use of natural resources including the uptake
of land. However, there are certain aspects, such as
climate change, changing sea levels, significant environmental degradation, soil erosion, the exploitation
and abandonment of land resources, the building and
maintenance of field terraces, the rate and scale of
human demographic growth, movement of peoples,
access to scarce resources, which to a certain extent
reflect impacts that seem to recur in time, irrespectively of scale and historic context.
Anthony Pace
Superintendent of Cultural Heritage (2003–18).
xxiv
Appendix 3
Deep core borehole logs
Chris O. Hunt, Katrin Fenech, Michelle Farrell
& Rowan McLaughlin
Table A3.1. Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Salina Deep Core.
Core
Depth (m)
Sediments
Interpretation
22
29.50–29.47
Creamy micritic limestone
Rockhead:
Globigerina
Limestone
29.47–29.30
Yellowish-brown (10 YR5/4) to greyish-brown (10YR 4/3) very compact silty clay with
sub-angular to rounded clasts. Clay skins present beneath clasts, a few clay-lined rootlet
casts, occasional rootlets and very occasional land snail and charcoal fragments
Palaeosol developed
on colluvium (?
Late Pleistocene
interstadial)
29.30–29.17
Grey (10YR 5/1) to greyish-brown (10YR 5/2) very muddy sandy gravel with occasional
land snail and charcoal fragments
Fluvial gravel: poor
sorting is consistent
with deposition
from muddy flow (?
Late Pleistocene)
28.50–28.32
Dark yellowish-brown (10YR 4/4) matrix-supported limestone gravel, clasts rounded to
sub-rounded, micritic calcite skins under clasts, matrix showing some slickensiding
28.32–28.20
Very dark brown (10YR 8/2) clast-supported sandy to openwork gravel, clasts rounded
to sub-rounded, micritic calcite skins under clasts
Fluvial gravels with
pedogenic features
(? Late Pleistocene)
28.20–28.12
Very pale brown (10YR 7/3) mottled yellowish-brown matrix-supported cobbly gravel
clasts rounded to sub-rounded, micritic calcite skins under clasts, matrix showing some
slickensiding
28.12–28.04
Brown (7.5YR 4/3) silty sandy clay with rare small sub-rounded stones with blocky
structure and hair-like micritic fills between peds, rare root pores
28.04–27.97
Yellowish-brown (10YR 5/4) clast-supported gritty sandy gravel
27.97–27.95
Dark greyish-brown (10YR 4/2) slightly sandy clayey silt with pronounced blocky
structure and micritic fills between peds
27.95–27.78
Dark grey (10YR 4/1) and brown (10YR 4/3) slightly gritty silty clay, coarsening upward,
crudely laminated and with occasional charcoal flecks
27.78–27.61
Brown (10YR 4/3) to dark brown (10YR 3/3) matrix-supported fine clayey gravel with
small-scale trough cross-sets
27.61–27.58
Dull brown (10YR 5/3) muddy clast-supported gravel, fining upward
27.58–27.56
Brown (10YR 4/3) clay
27.56–27.53
Dark brown (10YR 3/3) matrix-supported gravel, sandy clay matrix, odd charcoal and
land snail fragments
27.53–27.42
Brown (10YR 4/3) sandy clay with very occasional stones, small scale trough cross-sets,
blocky structure with micritic joint linings and clay skins beneath pebbles. Some land
snail fragments
21A
21B
21C
401
Fluvial deposits
with pedogenic
features (? Late
Pleistocene)
Fluvial deposits
with pedogenic
features (? Late
Pleistocene or
Holocene)
Appendix 3
Table A3.1 (cont.).
Core
Depth (m)
Sediments
Interpretation
20A
27.00–26.96
Very dark grey (2.5Y 3/1) stony silty clay
26.96–26.93
Dull brown (10YR 5/4) muddy gravel
26.93–26.87
Very dark grey (2.5Y 3/1) slightly stony silty clay
26.87–26.70
Dark greyish brown (2.5Y 4/2) slightly muddy granules to fine gravel
Shallow marine
sediments, probably
sub-littoral or
upper delta-front
(Holocene)
26.70–26.65
Very dark grey (2.5Y 3/1) slightly stony clay
26.65–26.56
Bluish-grey (10BG 4/1) shelly clay
26.56–26.46
Dark grey (N 4/1) silty clay, crudely laminated with sand lenses
26.46–26.38
Dark grey (N 3.5/1) shelly clay
26.38–26.25
Dark grey (N 3/1) fine muddy gravel
26.25–26.13
Dark grey (N 3.5/1) medium muddy sand
26.13–26.00
Dark grey (N 4.5/1) coarse muddy sand
26.00–25.95
Greyish yellow-brown (10YR 4.5/2) coarse gritty sand
20D
25.95–25.60
Dull yellowish-brown (10YR 4.5/3) slightly muddy gritty coarse sand
19A
25.50–25.28
Brownish-grey (10YR 4/1) silty clay
19B
25.28–24.85
Brownish-grey (10YR 4/1) silty clay, becoming slightly sandy upwards
19C
24.85–24.48
Dark grey (2.5Y 3.5/1) silty sandy clay and fine muddy sand, indefinitely laminated
20B
20C
19D
18A
18B
18C
24.48–24.18
Dark grey (2.5Y 3.5/1) slightly sandy silty clay
24.18–24.12
Dark grey (2.5Y 3.5/1) gritty sandy silty clay
24.00–23.80
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) clay
23.80–23.68
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) silty clay, indistinctly laminated, some shells
23.68–23.62
Grey (2.5Y5/1) muddy sand, some shells
23.62–23.36
Dark grey (2.5Y4/1 to 2.5Y3/1) silty clay, thickly but indistinctly laminated, odd shells
23.36–23.33
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) muddy sand, some shells
23.33–23.32
Light brownish-grey (5YR 7/2) sandy clay
23.32–23.19
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) muddy sand, some shells
23.19–23.10
Dark grey (2.5Y4.5/1) sandy mud with very abundant, mostly angular, wood fragments
23.10–23.09
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) muddy sand, some shells
23.09–23.06
Dark grey (2.5 Y4/1) mud with lenses of fine sand
23.06–23.02
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) very muddy sand
18D
23.02–22.70
Dark grey (2.5Y 4.5/1) clay, very plastic
17A
22.50–22.22
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) silty clay, laminated, shelly
402
Shallow marine
sediments, probably
delta-front
Shallow marine
delta front and
proximal prodeltaic sediments,
deposited mostly
from gravity
flows, interbedded
with quiet
water laminated
sediments
Deep core borehole logs
Table A3.1 (cont.).
Core
Depth (m)
Sediments
17B
22.22–21.83
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) to dark greenish-grey (2.5YR 4/1) silty clay and silty sand in three
coarsening-up laminated units
17C
21.83–21.71
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) silty clay, indistinctly but finely laminated
21.71–21.63
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) sand and silty clay in fining-upward couplets 2–4 mm thick
21.63–21.52
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) silty clay, passing up into dark greenish-grey (2.5Y 4/1) silty and
then sandy clay
21.52–21.43
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) fine sandy silty clay, indistinctly laminated
21.43–21.13
Very dark grey (2.5Y 3/1) to dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) sands, silty clays and clays, finely
laminated
21.13–21.06
Very dark grey (2.5Y 3/1) silty clays interlaminated with olive-yellow (2.5Y 6/8) sands
16A
21.00–20.66
Dark grey (2.5Y 4.5/1) clayey sand and sandy clay, laminated
16B
20.66–20.43
Dark grey (2.5Y 4.5/1 to 2.5Y 5/1) slightly silty fine sandy clay with partings covered in
bivalve fragments
16C
20.43–20.14
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1 to 2.5Y 5/1) silty clay, thinly laminated
16D
20.14–19.91
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1 to 2.5Y 5/1) silty clay, thinly laminated
16E
19.91–19.66
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1 to 2.5Y 5/1) silty clay with a little fine sand, thinly laminated
17D
15A
Interpretation
19.50–19.36
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) silty clay
19.36–19.34
Very dark grey (2.5 Y3.5/1) sandy silty clay with abundant charcoal
19.34–19.10
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) silty clay, sandy silty clay and silty sand, in three coarseningupward units
15B
19.10–18.79
Dark grey (2.5Y 3/1 to 2.5Y 4/1) sandy silty clay and silty clay, laminated
15C
18.79–18.51
Dark grey (2.5Y 3/1 to 2.5Y 4/1) sandy silty clay and silty clay, laminated
15D
18.51–18.23
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) sandy silty clay, laminated
14A
18.00–17.64
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) sandy silty clay, odd shells
14B
17.64–17.39
Dark grey to grey (2.5Y 4/1 to 2.5Y 5/1) slightly sandy silty clay
14C
17.39–17.01
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) clayey silty sands and grey (2.5Y 5/1) silty clays in four finingupward units
14D
17.01–16.70
Grey (2.5 Y5/1) sandy silty clay and silty clays in three fining-upward units
13A
16.50–16.24
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) silty clay
16.24–16.20
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) fine sandy silty clay
403
Marine distal prodeltaic sediments,
mostly deposited by
small-scale gravity
flows, interbedded
with lower-energy
quiet-water
sediments
Appendix 3
Table A3.1 (cont.).
Core
Depth (m)
Sediments
13B
16.20–15.85
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) fine sandy silty clay with occasional sandy partings
13C
15.85–15.45
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) sandy silty clay and greyish-brown (2.5Y 5/2) silty clay in four
fining-upward units
12A
12B
12C
Interpretation
15.0–14.90
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) silty clay
14.90–14.68
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) sandy silty clay with shells
14.68–14.42
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) sandy silty clay
14.42–14.22
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) sandy silty clay
14.22–14.12
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) silty clay
14.12–13.98
Dark grey (5Y 4/1) silty clay
13.98–13.90
Dark grey (5Y 4/1) sandy silty clay with charcoal fragments
13.90–13.77
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) silty clay
11A
13.20–12.77
Dark grey (5Y 5/1) muddy gravelly sand
11B
12.77–12.41
Dark grey (5Y 4/1) gritty muddy sand with shells
12D
11C
Shallow sandy
marine shoal
sediments, often
deposited within
wave-base, possibly
eel-grass meadows
12.41–12.16
Dark grey (5Y 5/1) muddy sand with shells
12.16–12.11
Dark grey (5Y 4/1) muddy sand, very shelly
11D
12.11–11.81
Dark grey (5Y 4/1) sandy mud and muddy sand with some shell
10
11.60–11.31
Grey (10Y 4/1) silty sand with much shell
11.31–11.13
Grey (5Y 4/1) sandy mud with odd shells
11.13–11.05
Grey (5Y 4/1) sandy mud with abundant shell and eelgrass fibre, becoming more clayey
upward
11.00–2.40
Shell gravel, hydro-collapsed and not sampled
Shallow marine,
high energy
shoal sediments
deposited within
wave-base
2.40–0.00
Rubble and masonry
Salt pan roadway
and wall foundation
404
Deep core borehole logs
Table A3.2. Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Salina 4 core.
Core
Depth (m)
Description
Interpretation
SA4-K
11.02–10.82
Dark greenish-grey (2.5GY 4/1) mud. Ag1, As3
10.82–10.7
Dark grey (7.5Y 4/1) mud with few shells. Gs1, Ga1, As2
Quiet-water estuarine,
deposition mostly from
suspension
10.7–10.67
Dark grey (7.5Y 4/1) sandy silty mud. Ga1, As3
10.67–10.47
Dark grey (7.5Y 4/1) shelly gravelly mud. Poorly sorted, no bedding. Lots of shells.
Ggmin1, Ga1, As2
10.47–10.02
Olive-grey (7.5Y 4/2) sandy silty mud with shell fragments. No bedding. Lumps of
humified material at 10.69–10.71 m. Ga1, As3
10.02–9.48
Grey (7.5Y 4/1) shelly sandy mud. Gs1, Ag1, As2
9.48–9.34
Grey (7.5Y 4/1) Ag1, As3
9.34–9.02
Grey (7.5Y 4/1) shelly sandy mud. Gs1, Ag1, As2
9.02–8.15
Dark greenish grey (5GY 4/1) muddy sand. Large shell at 8.86–8.875 m, stone at
8.34–8.37 m. Ag1, As3
8.15–8.02
Olive-grey (7.5Y 5/2) muddy sand. Ag1, Gs3
8.02–7.88
Grey (7.5Y 4/1) sandy mud. Gs0.5, As3.5
7.88–7.87
Grey (7.5Y 4/1) very sandy mud. Gs2, As2
7.87–7.58
Grey (7.5Y 4/1) sand. Ag1, As3
7.58–7.56
Grey (7.5Y 4/1) shelly sand. As1, Ag1, Gs2
7.56–7.02
Greenish-grey (2.5GY 6/1) sandy mud. As3, Gs1
7.02–6.86
Grey (7.5Y 5/1) poorly sorted sandy shelly silt with clay. Lots of broken shells,
some herbaceous detritus. Gs3, Ga1, Dh 5–10%
6.86–6.38
Grey (7.5Y 5/1) silty clay. Trace amounts of sand, band of humified organic
detritus at 6.785 m. No structures. Ag1, As3, Dh 5–10%
6.38–6.02
Olive grey (5Y 5/2) muddy sand. Slightly humified eelgrass at 6.32–6.29 m. Gs3,
Ga1.
6.02–5.84
Grey (7.5Y 5/1) silty clay. Ag1, As3
5.84–5.80
Grey (7.5Y 5/1) sandy silty mud. Ag1, Ga1, As1, Gs1
5.80–5.78
Grey (7.5Y 5/1) silty clay. Ag1, As3
5.78–5.70
Grey (7.5Y 5/1) sandy mud. Poorly sorted. Gs3, Ag1
5.70–5.63
Grey (7.5Y 5/1) silty clay. Ag1, As3
5.63–5.43
Grey (7.5Y 5/1) muddy sand. Poorly sorted, some Fe staining. Gs3, Ga1
5.43–5.39
Grey (2.5Y 6/1) sandy mud. Gs1, As3
5.39–5.02
Grey (2.5Y 6/1) well sorted medium to coarse sand. Gs4
5.02–4.90
Olive-grey (7.5Y 5/2) silty clay with some organic detritus. Ag1, As3, Dh 5–10%
Sharp upper boundary
4.90–4.38
Grey (7.5Y 5/1) sandy silt with some large shells at 4.76 m. Moderately sorted,
traces of Dh detritus. Shell fragments present. Gs4
4.38–4.02
Missing/liquified
SA4-J
SA4-I
SA4-H
SA4-G
SA4-F
SA4-E
405
Estuarine sediments.
Coarser layers reflect
flood input of sediment
from upstream, finer
layers are suspension
deposits between major
floods
Appendix 3
Table A3.2 (cont.).
Core
Depth (m)
Description
SA 4-D
4.02–3.47
Greyish-olive (7.5Y 6/2) silty clay with lump of very humified organic material at
3.77 m. Eelgrass (humified) at 3.54 and (humified) at 3.72 m
3.47–3.38
Olive-grey (5Y 5/2) sandy silty clay
3.38–3.36
Olive-black (7.5Y 2/2) silty clay with moderately humified eelgrass at 3.37 m
3.36–3.26
Olive-grey (5Y 5/2) sandy silty clay
3.26–3.18
Olive-black (7.5Y 2/2) silty clay with slightly humified eelgrass at 3.18–3.25 m
3.18–3.02
Olive-grey (5Y 5/2) sandy silty clay
SA4-C
SA4-B
SA4-A
Interpretation
3.02–2.70
Olive-grey (7.5Y 7/2) silty clay
2.70–2.52
Olive-grey (7.5Y 7/2) silty clay
Lagoonal sediments
2.52–2.02
Olive-grey (7.5Y 7/2) silty clay
2.02–1.89
Greenish-grey (2.5GY 6/1) silty clay. Some charcoal and shells (very minor traces).
No structures. Diffuse upper boundary. Ag1, As3
1.89–1.23
Very pale brown (10YR 7/3) silty clay (fine to medium silt). Fine textural
laminations detected with scalpel (not visible). Fe stained. At 1.8 m transition to
olive grey (2.5GY 6/1) silty clay. Slightly sharp upper boundary. Ag1, As3
1.23–1.16
Very pale brown (10YR 7/3) poorly sorted silty sand with some clay. Shell
fragments. Gs2, Ag1, As1
1.16–1.02
Brown 10YR 5/3 silty clay darkening to dark grey (10YR 4/ at 1.095 m. Textural
laminations detected with scalpel (not visible). Fe stained. Ag1, As3
1.01–0.89
Brownish-yellow (10YR 6/6) moderately well sorted clayey silt. Looks mottled,
oxidized. Some broken shell fragments present throughout. Some coarse bedding.
Silty-sand beds interdigitated throughout (at 0.99, 0.96, 0.94, 0.92 and possibly
0.90–0.89 m). Ag2, As1, Ga1
0.89–0.83
Light yellowish-brown (10YR 6/4) poorly sorted sandy silt with shell fragments.
Massive, poorly structured. GS3, Ag1
0.83–0.58
Brownish-yellow (10YR 6/6) moderately well sorted clayey silt. Mottled,
oxidized. Some broken shell fragments present throughout. Some coarse bedding
(sedimentary structures). Ag2, As1, Ga1
0.58–0.51
Not recovered (made ground)
Floodplain back-basin
lagoonal sediments with
coarse layers deposited
during major floods
Made ground
406
Deep core borehole logs
Table A3.3. Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Salina 2 core.
Core
Depths in core
Lithology
Interpretation
SA2-7 (6.545.24 m)
6.54–6.47 m
Dark grey brown highly organic sandy silty clay.
Estuarine sediments. Mostly quietwater suspension deposits
6.47-6.36 m
Grey shelly coarse sand
High-energy shallow estuarine
sediments
6.36-6.24 m
Dark grey brown highly organic sandy silty clay becoming
shelly upward. Burrowed upper surface with in-situ deep
infaunal mollusc in burrow.
Estuarine sediments. Mostly quietwater suspension deposits
6.24-5.68 m
Grey shelly to very shelly very coarse sand with some organic
fragments. Some bedding suggesting layers of about 5-8 cm
thickness
High-energy shallow estuarine
sediments
5.68-5.24
Probably hydrocollapsed coarse shelly sand
High-energy estuarine shoal
sediments, very rapidly deposited
5.06-4.36 m
Dark grey fine silty sand, gradually coarsening upward and
with occasional shell, showing faint bedding 1-2 cm thick.
Estuarine sediments. Mostly quietwater suspension deposits
4.36-4.12 m
Grey, coarse, occasionally shelly sand with water-escape
structures, possibly partly hydrocollapsed
High-energy shallow estuarine
sediments
SA2-5 (4.043.26 m)
4.04-3.26 m
Grey very coarse sand with very abundant shell and occasional
organic matter, hydrocollapsed
High-energy shallow estuarine
sediments
SA2-4 (3.192.35 m)
3.19-2.82 m
Grey mottled strong-brown laminated sandy clayey silt with
odd shell. Mottles probably mark the location of burrows.
Estuarine quiet-water sediments.
2.82-2.78 m
Grey and light grey laminated slightly silty clay. Erosive upper
boundary
Estuarine quiet-water sediments.
High-energy shallow estuarine
sediments
SA2-6 (5.064.12 m)
2.78-2.72 m
Grey fine shell gravel, fining upward into
2.72-2.49 m
Grey very shelly slightly silty sand passing gradually upward
into greyish-brown shell gravel. Sharp upper boundary
2.49-2.37 m
Grey brown coarse shelly sand, fining upward
2.37-2.35 m
Grey brown shelly sand
SA2-3 (2.271.78 m)
2.27-1.78 m
Light greyish brown coarse to very coarse shelly sand,
with indistinct layering. Layers 5-6 cm thick are marked by
differences in grain size and porosity
High-energy shallow estuarine
sediments
SA2-2 (1.630.94 m)
1.63-1.27 m
Light greyish brown coarse to very coarse shelly sand, but
gradually fining upward to medium to coarse shelly sand,
with indistinct layering. Layers 5-6 cm thick are marked by
differences in grain size and porosity, Sharp but burrowed
upper boundary
High-energy shallow estuarine
sediments
1.27-0.97 m
Pale yellowish brown to brownish yellow coarse to medium
sand
High-energy littoral sediments
0.73-0.66 m
Light greyish brown coarse shelly sand, coarsening up into fine
shelly gravel. Sharp upper boundary
High-energy shallow estuarine
sediments
0.66-0.45 m
Brownish-grey to dark brownish-grey organic fine shelly sand
with indistinct layering 2-5 cm thick and occasional burrows
picked out by colour variation, Occasional shallow infaunal
bivalves in-situ. Sharp upper boundary
Estuarine sandflat
0.45-0.19 m
Very light brownish yellow coarse to medium sand with
abundant shell, showing indistinct layering 6-8 cm thick,
picked out by grain size variation
High-energy littoral sediments
SA2-1 (0.730.03 m)
407
Appendix 3
Table A3.4. Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Xemxija 1 core.
Core
Depth (m)
Description
Interpretation
XEM1-9
9.99–9.93
Brown (10YR 4/4) matrix-supported breccia of fairly uniform clasts of soil
aggregates (mainly sub-angular) with occasional limestone grit. Slightly silty clay
with grit and occasional shell fragments
Mass-flow deposits
composed of aggregates
derived from eroded soil
9.93–9.81
Dark brown (7.5YR 3/3) coarse diamict with sub-rounded to sub-angular
limestone clasts to 2 cm. Gritty clay matrix. Very gradual transition to
9.81–9.67
Dark brown (7.5YR 3.5/3.5) diamict with disordered sub-rounded to sub-angular
limestone clasts in a matrix of sandy clay. Odd tiny mollusc fragments.
9.67–9.50
Brown (10YR 4.5/3) matrix-supported breccia of limestone fragments (mostly subangular) and soil aggregates. Gritty clay with particles all aligned in one direction.
9.50–9.39
Dark greyish-brown (10YR 4/2) breccia of clay soil aggregates (some sub-angular
whereas in the rest of the core most are rounded). Mostly clast-supported but
some matrix-supported. c. 20% limestone fragments at the bottom, c. 5% at the top
9.39–9.26
Brown (7.5YR 3/2) breccia of clay soil aggregates with occasional limestone
fragments and charcoal. Relatively coarse at the bottom – appears to fine upwards.
Transition to
9.26–9.21
Dark brown (7.5YR 3.5/2) breccia of soil aggregates up to 5 mm, and limestone
grit (c. 30%, small, sub-rounded clasts). Mostly matrix-supported but odd voids
around some clasts. Slightly silty clay. Transitional above and below
9.21–9.13
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) matrix-/clast-supported breccia of soil aggregates, size
2–5 mm. Rather clayey, possibly some silt. Odd limestone chips, occasional very
small charcoal fragments, little bit of sand-sized limestone
9.13–9.09
Dark grey (10YR 4/1) breccia of 2–3 mm soil aggregates with small voids between
some. Occasional brownish red (2.5YR 4/8) mottling. Tiny limestone chips and
possible shell fragments
A-B profile of a buried
soil; very micritic
indicating calcareous
groundwater and
seasonal drying,
developed on mass-flow
deposit of aggregates
derived from eroded soil
9.09–8.97
Very dark greyish-brown (10YR 2.5/1) matrix-supported fine breccia of soil
aggregates. Nearly 100% clay with tiny charcoal fragments and very occasional
very small limestone chips
Mass-flow deposit
composed of aggregates
derived from eroded soil
8.97–8.88
Brown (10YR 3/2) slightly silty clay, slightly fining upwards with dark red (2.5YR
3/6) mottling. Breccia of soil aggregates. Abundant small limestone fragments
Truncated profile of a
buried soil; developed
on mass-flow deposit of
aggregates derived from
eroded soil
8.90–8.83
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) almost pure clay with odd shell fragments and little bits
of wood
8.83–8.76
Black (2.5Y 2/1) to dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) clayey silt with clod of peaty organic
matter (very highly humified with abundant ostracods). Occasional shell and
wood fragments
Freshwater marsh and
shallow pool deposits,
probably a lagoonal
setting behind a bay-bar
8.76–8.56
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) clayey silt / silty clay. Very organic, full of very small
gastropod fragments. Occasional wood and charcoal
8.56–8.46
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1 silty clay / clayey silt. Fairly abundant lumps of tufa
(root encrustations?) and odd bits of charcoal and wood. Abundant freshwater
gastropods
8.46–8.25
Dark grey (10YR 4.5/1) clay with possible slight silt component. Odd tufa lumps
(one has a core of organic material suggesting they are encrustations around
organic matter). Odd shell fragments (mainly gastropods). Rootlets preserved as
very rotten organic matter, mostly near the top
8.25–8.09
Very dark grey (7.5YR 3/1) slightly shelly, slightly silty clay with occasional tufa
lumps, charcoal fragments and little bits of organic matter. Gradual transition
over c. 2 cm to
8.09–8.00
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) clayey silt with very high organic content and very occasional
shell fragments. c. 1 cm thick light brownish-grey (2.5Y 6/2) tufa layers and 0.5 cm
thick layers of brown mud
XEM1-8
408
Deep core borehole logs
Table A3.4 (cont.).
Core
Depth (m)
Description
Interpretation
XEM1-7
7.80–7.67
Strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) becoming downwards brown 10YR 4/3 clayey silt/silty
clay with occasional shells and large root casts from unit above. Perhaps more
clayey with depth
Deposits of a seasonally
drying marsh
7.67–7.30
Dark greyish-brown (10YR 4/2) variably matrix-/clast-supported breccia of soil
aggregates with occasional angular to sub-rounded limestone fragments, slightly
silty clay. Occasional rootlets, a very little shell. Odd orange ironstone-like small
pebbles. Potsherd present at 7.62 m
7.30–6.73
Greyish-brown (10YR 4.5/2) matrix-supported breccia of soil aggregates. Slightly
silty clay with odd small limestone clasts and large rootlets (longest = c. 12 cm)
6.68–6.57
Very dark grey (7.5YR 3/1.5) slightly silty clay. Very fine matrix-supported breccia
6.57–6.38
Dark grey (10YR 4/1) mottled brown (7.5YR 4/4) and strong brown (7.5YR 4/6)
clayey silt. Clast-supported breccia of soil aggregates
Mass-flow deposits of
aggregates derived from
eroded soil profiles, from
a series of grain/mud
flow events, interrupted
by phases of weak
pedogenesis (at 6.03–
6.05 m and 6.7–6.85 m)
indicating periods of
some stabilization.
6.38–6.32
Brown (10YR 4/4) to brownish-yellow (10YR 6/8) very slightly silty clay. Clastsupported breccia of soil aggregates
6.32–6.15
Dark greyish-yellow (10YR 4/2) slightly silty clay. Partly matrix-, partly clastsupported breccia of soil aggregates
6.15–6.05
Dark greyish-yellow (10YR 4/2) clay silty clay. Clast-supported breccia of soil
aggregates with occasional sub-angular limestones
6.05–6.03
Dark greyish-brown (10YR 4/2) clay. Matrix-supported breccia of soil aggregates
6.03–5.89
Dark greyish-brown (10YR 4/2) clast-supported breccia of clay soil aggregates.
Less dense with more air gaps than unit above. Some brighter mottles (10YR 5/6)
XEM1-6
XEM1-5
5.89–5.79
Brown (10YR 4/3) matrix-supported breccia of silty clays and fine soil aggregates
5.67–5.64
Very dark grey (2.5Y 3.5/1) shelly, slightly silty clay. Very distinct line of organic
matter fragments at top of unit
5.64–5.36
Dark grey (10YR 4/1) to grey (10YR 6/1) slightly clayey silt containing organic
matter. Contains tiny limestone and shell fragments. Patchy – contains little marly
lumps
5.36–5.25
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) highly organic clay with little pockets of very humified
organic matter. Contains one piece of sub-rounded limestone and odd little bits of
shell
5.25–5.17
Brownish-grey (10YR 4/1) organic marl passing up into greyish-yellow-brown
(10YR 6/2) very organic marl. Silty clay with abundant chunks of organic matter
and occasional shell fragments. Banded, darkening upwards
5.17–5.12
Black (10YR 2/1) dense organic matter, slightly fibrous. Much more solid than
previous ‘peat’ units. No inorganic matter. Humification H3. Tiny fragments of
shell at 5.17 m – erosion surface?
5.12–4.98
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) slightly shelly, highly organic, silty clay with very
abundant plant fragments. Less humified than previous layer
4.98–4.89
Black (N 2/0) highly organic, very well humified, slightly fibrous peat.
Humification H9–10
4.89–4.85
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) slightly shelly silty clay, grades upwards into peat
4.85–4.79
Slightly shelly black (N 2/0) organic mud. Quite fibrous and very highly humified
409
Shallow freshwater
lagoon, some clastic
input
Shallow freshwater
lagoon, probably with
much dense vegetation
and minimal clastic input
Appendix 3
Table A3.4 (cont.).
Core
Depth (m)
Description
Interpretation
XEM1-4
4.60–4.53
Dark grey (2.5Y 4/1) shelly clay with odd bits of charcoal, no obvious roots. More
shelly than other units
4.53–3.62
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) clay to very slightly silty clay. Odd fragments of vegetable
material, charcoal, rootlets and darker streaks. Occasional sub-angular rocks
Shallow freshwater
lagoon and paludal
marsh. Near permanent
waterlogged conditions,
and only minimal input
of very fine sediment
XEM1-3
XEM1-2
XEM1-1
3.55–3.40
Grey (5Y 5/1) slightly shelly clay with rootlets and odd charcoal flecks.
3.40–3.20
Grey (5Y 5/1) slightly shelly silty clay. Very vague laminations at 3.36–3.38 m.
Slight transition to…
3.20–3.03
Reddish-grey (2.5 YR 5/1) shelly, very slightly silty clay with occasional irregular,
weathered-looking limestone lumps.
3.03–2.92
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) slightly silty clay. Slightly shelly with occasional small stones.
Mottles could be mud pellets again. Gradual transition to
2.92–2.65
Grey (2.5Y 6/1) slightly shelly clay with odd charcoal fragments and abundant
iron mottling brown (10YR 5/3) and brownish-yellow (10YR 6/6). Mottles actually
appear to be mud clasts from soil inwash
2.40–2.36
Grey (2.5Y 6/1) clayey fine to medium sand. Fines upwards slightly – sand coarser
below 2.37 m. Estuarine shell fragments
Storm runoff input to
lagoon
2.36–2.25
Grey (2.5Y 6/1) sandy clay, slightly mottled with flecks of organic matter.
Occasional rootlets and shell fragments
Lagoonal sediments
2.25–1.99
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) silty clay with flecks of blackish organic matter. Some possible
pieces of wood
1.99–1.92
Light brownish-grey (2.5Y 6/2) organic clay with c. 2 mm greyish-brown (2.5Y 5/2)
laminations of more organic material showing current bedding. Occasional reed
macrofossils and charcoal
1.92–1.80
‘Transition zone’ light brownish-grey (2.5Y 6/2) clay with odd shell fragments.
Very small black mottles throughout.
1.80–1.40
Light olive-brown (2.5Y 5/3) slightly clayey silt with c. 2 mm laminations in places
and yellowish-brown mottles throughout. Black mottling along roots. Odd small
shell fragments
1.42–1.33
Light reddish-brown (2.5YR 6/4) clay with light grey (10Y 7/1) mottles and
occasional roots and sub-rounded small limestone clasts
1.33–1.23
Reddish-brown (5YR 4.5/4) with mottles black (5YR 2.5/1) and yellowish-red
(2.5YR 4/8) diamict with sub-angular to sub-rounded limestone clasts in a silty
clay matrix with manganese and iron oxide staining
1.23–0.75
Breccia of sub rounded pale yellow (2.5Y 7/4) limestone fragments in a matrix of
crushed limestone
Made ground
0.75–0.54
Light yellowish-brown (2.5Y 6/4) with occasional mottles of brown (7.5YR 5/4) and
light olive-grey (5Y 6/2) slightly clayey silt light
Overbank alluvium,
gleyed
410
Deposits of a seasonal
marsh
Colluvium
Deep core borehole logs
Table A3.5. Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Xemxija 2 core.
Core
segment
Depth (m)
Description
Interpretation
XEM2-8
9.33–8.99
Brown (10YR 4/3) breccia of clay soil aggregates. Occasional charcoal and
limestone chippings. Some voids
Mass-flow deposits of
aggregates derived from
eroded soil profiles,
from a series of grain/
mud flow events
8.99–8.91
Very dark grey (2.5Y 3.5/1.5) clay with shell fragments and very finely
comminuted charcoal
8.91–8.72
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) slightly gritty grey clay with limestone lumps, odd little
tufaceous bits, very small shell fragments. Quite frequent charcoal
Paludal marsh
sediments. Marsh was
episodically in receipt
of distal mudflows or
muddy floods
8.72–8.66
Black (10YR 2/1) highly organic slightly silty clay. Possible burrow, may also be
soft sediment deformation structures
8.66–8.55
Dark grey (10YR 3.5/1) silty clay/clayey silt with shell fragments and odd tiny
limestone particles. Lots of very waterlogged wood
8.22–7.89
Dark greyish-brown (10YR 4/2) breccia of soil aggregates up to 5–6 mm across.
Quite a lot of void space. Very occasional shell fragments, occasional limestone
chippings. Very slightly silty clay
7.89–7.63
Brown (10YR 4/3) breccia of soil aggregates, mostly matrix-supported but some
slightly clast-supported. Slightly silty clay with possible dark soil mottles. Odd
tiny charcoal flecks and limestone bits
7.63–7.38
Greyish-brown (10YR 4.5/2) diamict. Slightly silty clay matrix, mostly in
the form of sub-rounded soil aggregates. Quite stony (up to 2 cm irregular
limestone lumps). Occasional charcoal
7.38–7.26
Dark greyish-brown (10YR 4.5/2) clay with tiny black flecks (probably
charcoal), odd limestone pebbles and charcoal/wood. Fairly dense, not much
structure, occasional quite large voids
7.17–6.88
Dark grey (10YR 4.5/1.5) clay with occasional charcoal and limestone
fragments. Very little shell compared with units above. Some quite large
(c. 8 cm) rootlets, some containing very rotten organic matter. Mottling at top of
unit. Small patches where pellets of soil (peds) are present – soil aggregates?
Marshy soil with input
of aggregates from
eroded soil profiles
6.88–6.81
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) slightly silty clay with odd shells, piece of charcoal,
small mud pellet
6.81–6.69
Dark grey (10YR 4/1) slightly tufaceous clay with odd shell fragments and
occasional vegetable matter
Freshwater lagoon with
declining clastic input
through time
6.69–6.53
Black (10YR 2/1) highly organic slightly clayey silt. Contains mollusc fragments,
at least one seed and rather decayed wood/charcoal
6.53–6.22
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) highly organic slightly silty clay with occasional tufa
lumps, some freshwater molluscs, tiny organic chunks (wood/charcoal). Vague
layering in places, particularly at bottom
6.12–6.05
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) silty clay with abundant tufa lumps. Also contains
molluscs and black organic matter (wood/charcoal). Denser than layer above
6.05–5.72
Grey (10YR 4.5/1) clay with definite lumps of charcoal, wood fragments and
tufa lumps
5.72–5.64
Grey (10YR 5/1) highly organic clay with plant fragments. Odd limestone
fragments and shell, much comminuted organic matter
5.64–5.62
Grey (10YR 4.5/1) smooth clay with tiny shell fragments
5.62–5.59
Dark grey (5YR 4/1) silty clay with much finely divided organic matter. Little
bits of charcoal/wood and shell
5.59–5.43
Yellowish-brown (10YR 5/5) clay with occasional tufaceous lumps and
limestone pebbles, odd shell fragments and bits of charcoal/wood
5.43–5.28
Brownish-grey (10YR 4/1) very organic-rich clay with occasional shells, some
plant fibres, lumps of tufa and wood/charcoal. Limestone pebble. Slightly gritty
(sand-sized limestone)
5.28–5.23
Black (10YR 2/1) very rich silty clay. Drawn down in burrow-like structure to
5.33 m
XEM2-7
XEM2-6
XEM2-5
411
Mass-flow deposits of
aggregates derived from
eroded soil profiles,
from a series of grain/
mud flow events
Appendix 3
Table A3.5 (cont.).
Core
segment
Depth (m)
Description
XEM2-4
5.03–4.26
Brownish-grey (10YR 5/1) highly organic slightly silty clay. Occasional slightly
tufaceous lumps, little bits of shell and limestone chippings, small fragments
of wood and/or charcoal, very occasional molluscs. Large rock at 4.63–4.58 m.
Possibly was another at 4.40–4.36 m. A c. 5 mm thick blackish band at 4.71 m.
Slightly tufaceous band at 4.88 m
4.26–4.24
Black (10YR 2/1) laminated fibrous organic matter, humification H7
interspersed with a very thin clay layer (5 mm). Very pasty macrofossils, small
lump of tufa
4.24–4.18
Brownish-grey (10YR 4/1) slightly silty clay with shell fragments and organic
matter fragments (possibly wood)
4.18–4.11
Black (10YR 2/1) organic matter, humification H7, with plant macrofossils. Very
little structure
4.02–3.34
Grey (5Y 5.5/1) slightly shelly clay with occasional limestone fragments
3.34–3.26
Brown (2.5Y 5/2) silty clay with occasional tiny limestone fragments and shell
fragments. Gradual transition to
3.26–3.15
Grey (2.5Y 5/1) clay with odd limestone pebbles and some very finely divided
charcoal. Gradual transition to
3.03–2.96
Grey (5Y 4.5/1) slightly shelly clay. Appears to have faint partings – may well
be laminated
2.96–2.87
Grey (2.5Y 6/1) slightly shelly clay with yellowish (10YR 5/4) mottling and odd
charcoal fragments. Indefinite transition over c. 2 cm to
2.87–2.85
Greyish-yellow-brown (10YR 5/2) very shelly clay
2.85–2.64
Black (2.5Y 5/1) silty clay with very abundant shells (freshwater snails?),
charcoal and plant fragments
2.64–2.60
Grey (10YR 5/1) very shelly clay with odd charcoal fragments
2.60–2.52
Light brownish-grey (2.5Y 6/2) very shelly clay containing chunk of wood.
Gradual transition to
2.52–2.46
Black (2.5Y 5/1) slightly clayey sand with abundant shell fragments (estuarine
gastropods). Becomes siltier downwards
2.46–2.23
Black (2.5Y 5/1) slightly silty clay with some charcoal and plant fibres, very
occasional wood and shell fragments
2.23–2.15
Brown (10YR 5/3) clay with odd bits of charcoal. More oxidized form of unit
above
2.15–2.10
Light brownish-grey (2.5Y 4/2) pure clay with occasional grassy fibres, small
charcoal fragments and small piece of wood.
2.10–1.98
Olive-brown (2.5Y 4.5/3) mottled with brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) silty clay
2.03–1.87
Dull yellowish-brown (10YR 4.5/3) silty clay with odd smears of black
(manganese or charcoal?) and some definite charcoal fragments
1.87–1.73
Dull yellowish-brown (10YR 5/4) fairly uniform clay with poorly developed
pedogenic structures
1.73–1.52
Dull orange-brown (10YR 5.5/4) with mottles of yellowish-brown (10YR 5/8)
silty clay with rusty mottles (probably alongside root voids). Occasional
angular limestone particles and charcoal
1.52–1.36
Orange (2.5Y 6/6) clay with very occasional limestone clasts and black charcoallike smears.
1.36–1.33
Yellowish-brown (10YR 5/6) slightly gritty slightly pebbly silty clay
1.33–1.17
Limestone rubble
XEM2-3
XEM2-2
XEM2-1
Interpretation
Lagoon of variable
salinity
Seasonal lagoon
passing upwards into
pedogenically altered
overbank floodplain
Pedogenically altered
colluvium
Made ground
412
Deep core borehole logs
Table A3.6. Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Wied Żembaq 1 core.
Core
Depth (m)
Description
Interpretation
WZ1-5
5.48–5.23
Black (10YR 2/1) clay with minor sand component. Occasional shells and root channels.
Core stopped by stone at 5.48 m
Salt marsh
5.23–4.84
Dark grey (10YR 4/1) clay, less sandy than unit above. Dark-stained root channels, small
shells and stones (c. 2–3 mm) present
4.84–4.54
Dark brown (10YR 3/3) slightly sandy orange clay with occasional shells and small
stones. Particularly stony layer 4.69–4.74 m
4.51–3.71
Dark grey (10YR 4/1) clay, slightly organic. Occasional shells, small stones and root
channels. Black (10YR 2/1) organic band 4.0–4.2 m
3.71–3.64
Dark brown (10YR 3/3) lightly sandy smooth brown clay.
3.64–3.51
Dark yellowish-brown (10YR 3/4) sandy clay with occasional shells, dark staining along
root channels and small limestone fragments
WZ1-3
3.49–2.51
Dark yellowish-brown (10YR 4/4) sandy clay with occasional shells, dark staining along
root channels and small limestone fragments, darkening at base
WZ1-2
2.42–2.36
Brown (10YR 4/3) slightly sandy orange clay containing small limestone fragments and
shells
2.36–2.16
Weathered limestone
2.16–1.74
Dark brown (10YR 3/3) clay with black mottling along several root channels. More shelly
than unit above
1.74–1.42
Yellowish-brown (10YR 5/4) slightly sandy orange clay containing small limestone
fragments and shells. Large stone at 1.45–1.52 m
1.42–1.28
Yellowish-brown (10YR 5/4) sandy clay
1.28–1.16
Compact brown (7.5 YR 4/4) clay with occasional limestone grit
WZ1-4
WZ1-1
Colluvium on
the fringes of a
floodplain
Salt marsh with
input of colluvial
sediments
Alluvial overbank
Table A3.7. Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Wied Żembaq 2 core.
Core
segment
Depth (m)
Description
Interpretation
WZ2-5
5.13–5.03
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) clay. Large limestone boulder at 5.05–5.19 m, below this is
almost pure clay
5.03–4.89
Very dark greyish-brown (10YR 3/2) same as lowest unit in WZ2-4, but more brownish
hue
Salt marsh
in receipt of
occasional
colluvial sediment
4.90–4.82
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) slightly sandier clay with occasional small shells and stones.
Slightly organic? Transitional zone over 2 cm
4.82–4.74
Dark yellowish-brown (10YR 4/4) clay. Less sandy with occasional small stones. Sharp
boundary
4.74–4.71
Dark yellowish-brown (10YR 4/4) sandy clay with small (2–3 mm) limestone fragments.
Sharp boundary
3.95–3.85
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) clay with higher sand content
3.85–3.18
Very slightly darker than unit above. More frequent dark staining along root channels
3.18–2.95
Sandy dark brown (10YR 3/3) clay with occasional small rotten limestone fragments
(2–3 mm). Some dark staining along root channels
WZ2-4
WZ2-3
WZ2-2
WZ2-1
2.95–2.89
Dark brown (10YR 3/3) silty clay
2.89–2.65
Large pieces of rotten limestone
2.65–2.21
Brown (10YR 4/3) slightly sandy clay with occasional small shells and limestone
fragments (2–3 mm)
1.95–1.35
Brown (10YR 5/3) varying to (10YR 4/3) slightly sandy clay with occasional small shells
and limestone fragments (2–3 mm)
1.35–1.31
Brown (7.5YR 4/2) darker brownish-red clay
1.31–1.15
Compact brown (7.5 YR 4/4) clay. Large stone at base
413
Shallow possibly
seasonal saline
lagoon with
marine connection
and input of
colluvial sediment
Appendix 3
Table A3.8. Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Mgarr ix-Xini core.
Core
segment
Depth
(m)
Description
Interpretation
MGX1-K
7.43–7.21
Pale brown (2.5Y 7/4) gravel fining up to silt. From base to 7.375 m clasts are subangular to angular with a size range 42 x 33 mm to 20 x 19 mm; clast at 7.28–7.32 m
is sub-rounded and 48 x 46 mm. Rest of unit consists of granules and fine gravels in
a slightly clayey sandy silt matrix. Very compacted. Ggmax2, Ggmin1, Gs1, Ag 2%,
As 5%
7.21–7.12
Light greyish-brown (2.5Y 6/3) coarse and fine sands with some broken shell
fragments. Gs4, Ggmin 2%
Estuary subjected to
high-energy flood
events delivering
coarse clastics
as gravity flows,
interspersed with finegrained sediments
from fall-out
7.12–6.93
Grey (10Y 4/1) slightly silty clay. As3, Ag1
6.93–6.84
Breccia. Ggmax2, As1, Ag1
6.80–6.75
Light yellow (2.5Y 7/4) very consolidated slightly gravelly sand with coarse silt.
Poorly sorted, no bedding. Clasts sub-angular to sub-rounded. Gs2, Ga1, Ggmin 1
6.75–6.60
One or two large gravel clasts, some mud but mostly missing. No Troels-Smith
description possible. Probably openwork gravel.
6.60–6.45
Yellowish grey (2.5Y 5/1) poorly sorted muddy sand with gravel. Shell fragments
throughout. Gs2, Ga1, Ggmin1
6.45–6.21
Not recovered
6.17–5.82
Very dark grey (2.5Y 3/1) slightly clayey fine sandy silt with some gravel. Cryptic
plane bedding. Some plant remains. Ag2, Ga1, Gs1, As c. 5%
5.82–5.72
Very dark grey (2.5Y 3/1) slightly gravelly silt. As3, Gs1, Ggmin 2–5%
5.72–5.58
Olive-yellow (5Y 6/4) gravel with one very big clast (30 x 26 mm). Gs3, GGmin1,
Ggmax c. 2%
5.38–5.33
Dull yellow (2.5Y 6/4) gravelly coarse sand with some shell fragments. Grains subrounded and poorly sorted. Gs3, Ggmin1
5.33–5.06
Grey (5Y 5/1) (at 5.295 m grading to yellowish-grey (2.5Y 4/1) shelly sand. Bedding
shown by sharp colour changes. Ag2, Ga1, Gs1, Ggmax 2–5%, Ggmin 2–5%
5.06–4.95
Dull yellow (2.5Y 6/3) at 5.01 m grading to grey (5Y 5/1) gravelly sandy mud. Poorly
sorted, no bedding. Ggmin1, Ag1, Gs2, Ggmax 1–2%
4.91–4.69
Bright yellowish-brown (2.5Y 7/6) coarse sand, fining upward into medium sand
with a mud drape of sandy silty clay. Gs3, Ga1
4.69–4.65
Greyish-yellow (2.5Y 7/2) gravel, with large angular to sub-angular clasts with some
sand and silt. Ggmax3, Gs1, Ga c. 5%
4.65–4.60
Grey (10Y 5/1) coarse to medium sandy clayey silt with a little gravel. Gs1, Ga1, Ag2
4.60–4.56
Greyish-yellow (2.5Y 7/2) poorly sorted coarse sand with some granules and a gravel
clast. Gradual transition into overlying unit. Ggmax1, Ggmin1, Gs2
4.56–4.46
Grey (10Y 6/1) poorly sorted sandy silty mud. Gs1, Ga1, Ag1, Ggmin 2–5%
4.46–4.32
Light yellow (2.5Y 7/3) poorly sorted gravels. One large (c. 15 x 46 mm) gravel clast).
Gs2, Ggmin1, Ggmax1
4.28–4.15
Greyish-olive (7.5Y 5/2) massive fine to medium silt with shell fragments and slightly
humified plant remains throughout. Some complete shell tests. 4.24–4.25 m: poorly
sorted silty gravelly sands. Ag3, Gs1, Ggmin c. 5%, shell fragments c. 10%
4.15–3.97
Pale yellow (2.5Y 8/4) fine to coarse gravel. Ggmin3, Ggmax1
3.97–3.78
Light yellow (2.5Y 7/4) silty gravelly coarse shelly sand. Lots of broken shell
fragments. Clasts fairly angular. Ga1, Gs3
3.78–3.69
Not recovered
MGX1-J
MGX1-I
MGX1-H
MGX1-G
MGX1-F
414
Deep core borehole logs
Table A3.8 (cont.).
Core
segment
Depth
(m)
Description
MGX1-E
3.65–3.62
Grey (5Y 5/1) moderately well sorted sandy mud with some granules and gravel.
Some shells. As1, Ag1, Ga1, Gs1
3.62–3.57
Grey (5Y 5/1) sandy gravelly mud/muddy sand with broken shell fragments. Sharp
upper boundary; more diffuse lower boundary. Gs2, As1, Ag1
3.57–3.55
Grey (5Y 5/1) moderately well sorted sandy mud with some granules and gravel.
Some shells. Sharp upper boundary. As1, Ag1, Ga1, Gs1
3.55–3.37
Light grey (10Y 7/1) very well lithified sandy muddy micrite with manganese
nodules. Bedded, friable. No Troels-Smith description possible
3.37–3.33
Grey (5Y 5/1) sandy mud with some shell fragments and manganese nodules; fewer
plant remains. As2, Ag1, Gs1, Dl 2–5%, Dh 2–5%, Ggmin 2–5%
3.33–3.30
Light olive-grey (5GY 7/1) almost pure massive clay with some roots present. As3,
Ag1
3.30–3.09
Grey (5Y 5/1) gravelly sandy mud with some shell fragments. Woody (?) plant
macrofossil at 3.24 m. As2, Ag1, Gs1, Dl 2–5%, Dh 2–5%, Ggmin 2–5%
Estuarine sediment
3.09–3.06
Light greenish-grey (5GY 7/1) almost pure massive clay with a few roots. As3, Ag1
Short-lived palaeosol
3.02–2.98
Not recovered
2.98–2.95
Grey (7.5Y 4/1) clayey silt with sand, trace of organic detritus. As1, Ag1, Gs2
2.95–2.82
Grey (10Y 6/1) clayey, sandy silt. As1, Ag2, Gs1
2.82–2.69
Grey (10Y 4/1) clayey, sandy silt. As1, Ag2, Gs1
2.69–2.60
Grey (10Y 6/1) clayey, sandy silt, As1, Ag2, Gs1
2.60–2.43
Greyish-olive (5Y 5/2) gravelly sand, poorly sorted, well rounded clasts. Gs3,
Gg(min)1, Lim. 3
2.39–2.14
Light olive grey (2.5GY 7/1) massive slightly gravelly silty clay. Some humified plant
detritus and broken shells. Ag1, As3, Dl c. 10%, Dh c.5%, Ggmin c. 2–5%.
2.14–1.91
Greyish-olive (7.5Y 5/2) poorly sorted shelly gravelly sand. Shell mostly fragmentary.
Gs3, Ggmin1
1.91–1.80
Not recovered
1.76–1.49
Greyish-olive (7.5Y 6/2) coarse slightly gravelly sand with some shell fragments and
humified detritus Gs4, Dh 5%, Gg(min) 5%
1.49–1.39
Greyish-olive (5Y 4/2) sandy coarse gravel. Gs1, Gg(max)2, Gg(min)1, Lim. 3–4
1.39–1.26
Not recovered
1.26–1.17
Light yellow (2.5Y 7/4) very poorly sorted gravelly sand Gs3, Gg(min)1,
Gg(max)10%, Lim. 4
1.13–0.93
Pale yellow (2.5Y 8/4) poorly sorted gravelly sand with some shell fragments.
Ggmin1, Gs2, Ga1
0.93–0.54
Dull yellow (2.5Y 6/4) massive slightly stony sandy clayey silt. As1, Ag2, Gs2, Ggmin
5–10%
MGX1-D
MGX1-C
MGX1-B
MGX1-A
Interpretation
415
Palaeosol with
calcrete developed on
estuarine sediments
suggesting a strongly
seasonal climate and
several hundred years
of emergence above
sea level.
Estuary with fine
deposits from fallout interspersed
with coarse clastics
deposited from gravity
flows originating as
catchment floods
Appendix 3
Table A3.9. Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Marsaxlokk core (a second core, MX2, was attempted but was blocked at 2 m).
Core
Depth (m)
Description
Interpretation
MX1-4
3.86–3.53
Pale pinkish-brown (10YR 8/4) calcitic silt; dense amorphous calcium
carbonate
Palaeosol: rather muddy
plugged calcrete horizon
3.53–3.32
Pinkish-brown (10YR 7/4), calcitic silty clay loam with common weathered
limestone
Palaeosol: B horizon
3.32–2.92
Brown to reddish-brown (5YR 4/4) silty clay loam
Palaeosol: in situ terra rossa
topsoil; Early to mid-Holocene
2.92–2.86
Light yellowish-brown (10YR 6/4) fine gravel and coarse sand with marine
shell fragments
Probable ancient beach
2.86–2.45
Dark yellowish-brown (10YR 4/4) silty clay loam with frequent fine
limestone pebbles
Lagoon with abundant
terrestrial clastic input
2.45–1.92
Yellowish-red (5YR 4/4) silty (clay) loam with occasional fine limestone
pebbles
1.92–1.86
Pale brown (10YR 6/3) fine gravel and coarse sand
Salt marsh in receipt of
abundant terrestrial clastic
sediment
1.85–1.70
Light brownish-grey (10YR 6/2) very fine sandy/silt; possibly microlaminated; laminar humified and amorphous sesquioxide replaced plant
remains
MX1-3
MX1-2
MX1-1
1.70–1.65
Very dark grey (10YR 3/1) organic silt mud
1.65–1.55
Brownish-yellow (10YR 6/6) fine gravel and coarse sand
1.55–0.86
Light grey (10YR 7/1), calcitic, very fine sandy silt
0.86–0.50
Light yellowish-brown (10YR 6/4) silt loam
0.50–0.12
Pale brown (10YR 6/3) fine sandy/silt loam with fine limestone fragments
416
Deep core borehole logs
Table A3.10. Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Marsa 2 core (after Carroll 2007).
Core
segments
Depth (m)
Munsell colour
Description
11
9.25–8.8
7.5YR5/6
Strong brown stony sandy silty clay, below
Riverine braidplain sediments
8.95 m sandy clayey gravel. Rockhead at 9.25 m
10
8.8–8.2
7.5YR5/6-5YR3/4
Strong brown stony sandy silty clay, then at
8.5 m dark reddish brown very stony sandy
silty clay, with a large rock between 87.5 and
8.8 m
Riverine braidplain sediments
9
8.2–7.6
7.5YR6/6-7.5YR5/67.5YR4/6-5YR3/4
Reddish-yellow gravel, then at 7.85 m strong
brown silty sand, then at 8.05 m dark reddish
brown sandy silty clay
Riverine braidplain sediments
8
7.6–7.0
7.5YR6/8-7.5YR5/67.5YR6/6
Reddish-yellow gravel, then at 7.15 m strong
brown stony silty sand, at 7.25 m strong brown
clayey silty sand, at 7.50 m reddish yellow
clayey silty sand
Riverine praidplain sediments
7
6.8–5.9
2.5YR4/1-7.5YR3/35YR3/2-10YR4/310YR5/4-10YR5/3
Dark grey silty clay with marine shell, with
a sharp change at ~6.28 m to dark brown
sandy clay, then at ~6.42 m brown and
yellowish-brown silty sand, then at 6.5 m
yellowish-brown stony silty sand grading into
gravel, then at 6.75 m brown stony silty sand
Quiet-water estuarine sediments.
Below 6.28 m riverine braidplain
sediments, possibly of Late
Pleistocene age
6
5.2–4.2
2.5YR4/1
Dark grey sandy silty clay with marine shell
Quiet-water estuarine sediments
5
4.2–3.2
2.5YR5/1-2.5YR4/1
Grey sandy silty clay with marine shell
becoming dark grey below 3.85 m and
increasingly sandy below 4.05 m
Quiet-water estuarine sediments,
with some distal fluvial input
below 4.05 m
4
3.2–2.55
7.5YR5/6-5YR3/4
Grey sandy silty clay with some marine shell,
large rock and some stones between 2.55 and
2.7 m
Quiet-water estuarine sediments
with a density-flow deposit
between 2.55 and 2.7 m
3
2.2–1.7
2.5YR6/1-2.5YR5/1
Grey silty sand, passing into grey sandy silty
clay below 1.85 m
Estuarine sediments
2
1.2–0.8
10YR5/4-10YR 5/2
Yellowish-brown sandy silt becoming greyish
brown below 0.95 m
Overbank and colluvial sediments
1
0.3–0
10YR6/4
Yellowish-brown sandy silt
Overbank and colluvial sediments
Interpretation
417
Appendix 3
Table A3.11. Stratigraphy and interpretation of the Mellieħa Bay core.
Core
MB1-E
MB1-D
MB1-C
MB1-B
MB1-A
Depth (m)
Description
Interpretation
5.44–5.36
Not recovered
5.36–5.15
Light grey (2.5Y 7/2) silty clay, with pocket of relatively well-sorted sand at
5.26–5.28 m, grading to very dark greyish-brown (10YR 3/2) at bottom. Shell
fragments present throughout. Sharp upper boundary. Ag1, As3
Offshore suspension
deposits, below wave-base.
Sand layer probably relates
to storm sedimentation
5.15–4.44
Medium to coarse grey (5Y 6/1) sand with traces of gravel at c. 5.38 m and
granules at c. 5.27 m. Grains sub-rounded. Organic material and shell
fragments present throughout. Gs3, Ga1, Ggmin 2%
Shallow marine sands,
probably within wave-base
4.44–4.27
Coarse grey (10Y 6/1) slightly clayey well-sorted sand with shell fragments.
Diffuse upper boundary. Gs3–4.
4.27–4.24
Light grey (10Y 7/1) slightly silty fine to medium sand with shell fragments.
Sharp upper boundary. Gs3, Ga1
4.24–4.23
Light grey (10Y 7/1) poorly sorted fine gravel and very coarse sand with shell
fragments. Sharp upper boundary; slightly diffuse lower boundary. Gs3,
Ggmin1
4.23–3.44
Pale yellow (7.5Y 8/3) moderately sorted slightly gravelly medium to coarse
sand. (c. 2–5% fine gravel). Grains sub-angular to sub-rounded. Eelgrass noted
at 4.17–4.18 m; macroscopic charcoal at 4.08 m. Slight colour change and
fining upwards towards top of unit – diffuse transition from c. 3.74 m. More
shell fragments present from 30–36 cm. Gs3, Gg1 (whole unit)
3.35–3.18
Grey (5Y 5/1), darkening to very dark grey (10YR 3/2) by 3.19 m, very shelly
clay with some coarse sand. As3, Gs1
3.18–3.14
Grey silty clay (5Y 5/1). Ag3, As1
3.14–2.44
Pale brown (2.5Y 7/3) slightly clayey slightly gritty silt (~90% silt) transitioning
to grey (5Y 5/1) silt at 2.53 m. Gs4, Ggmin 5%, Lim. 2
2.44–2.01
Grey (5Y 5/1) slightly gravelly, gritty coarse to medium sand with shell
fragments. Grains sub-rounded to sub-angular. Some laminations apparent
at 2.28–2.305 m. Some very faint possible structure below this. Diffuse upper
boundary. Gs4, Ggmin 1–2%, also shell fragments
Shallow marine sands,
probably within wave-base
2.01–1.60
Pale brown (2.5Y 7/3) medium sand, well-sorted. Fewer shell fragments than
previously. Grains mainly sub-rounded. Some fine silt content (c. 10%). Some
structure visible – bedding at 1.81–1.92 m. Slightly diffuse upper boundary.
Gs3, Ga1
Beach or shallow marine
within wave-base
Suspension deposits below
wave base
1.60–1.48
Light yellow (5Y 7/3) fine sandy silt. Well-sorted. Gs2, Ga2
Lagoon
1.48–1.44
Light yellow (5Y 7/3) well-rounded to sub-rounded medium to coarse sand
with some shell fragments
Beach
1.44–1.42
Large clast of ~35 mm
1.44–1.24
Greyish-brown (2.5Y 5/2) sand becoming paler (2.5Y 7/3) at 1.265 m; medium
to coarse, sub-rounded to rounded. Gs4
1.24–1.19
Greyish-brown (2.5Y 5/2) sand with clay and silt, noticeable root material
present. Gs2, Ag1, As1, Dl5%
Paludal marsh or shallow
lagoon
1.19–1.08
Pale brown (2.5Y 7/3) coarse to very coarse sand with angular to sub-angular
grains; 62–73
Beach
1.08–0.66
Pale brown (2.5Y 7/3) medium sand with sub-angular to sub-rounded grains
Dune sand
0.66–0.64
Black (N1) organic clay mud, ~ 6 mm thick layer
Dune slack
0.64–0.44
Pale brown (2.5Y 7/3) medium to coarse sand with angular to sub-angular
grains. Top 15 cm collapsed and unconsolidated. Gs4
Dune sands
418
Deep core borehole logs
Table A3.12. Key to the scheme for the description of Quaternary sediments, modified to exclude categories of organic sediments not encountered
(after Troels-Smith 1955).
Class
Detritus
Argilla
Grana
Code
Element
Description
Dl
Detritus lignosus
Fragments of woody plants > 2 mm
Dh
Detritus herbosus
Fragments of herbaceous plants > 2 mm
Dg
Detritus granosus
Woody and herbaceous plant remains < 2 mm and > 0.1 mm
As
Argilla steatodes
Particles of clay < 0.002 mm
Ag
Argilla granosa
Particles of silt 0.06 to 0.002 mm
Ga
Grana arenosa
Mineral particles 0.6 to 0.2 mm
Gs
Grana saburralia
Mineral particles 2.0 to 0.6 mm
Gg(min)
Grana glareosa minora
Mineral particles 6.0 to 2.0 mm
Gg(max)
Grana glareosa majora
Mineral particles 20.0 to 6.0 mm
419
Temple landscapes
The ERC-funded FRAGSUS Project (Fragility and sustainability in small island environments: adaptation,
cultural change and collapse in prehistory, 2013–18), led by Caroline Malone (Queens University Belfast)
has explored issues of environmental fragility and Neolithic social resilience and sustainability
during the Holocene period in the Maltese Islands. This, the first volume of three, presents the
palaeo-environmental story of early Maltese landscapes.
The project employed a programme of high-resolution chronological and stratigraphic
investigations of the valley systems on Malta and Gozo. Buried deposits extracted through coring and
geoarchaeological study yielded rich and chronologically controlled data that allow an important new
understanding of environmental change in the islands. The study combined AMS radiocarbon and
OSL chronologies with detailed palynological, molluscan and geoarchaeological analyses. These enable
environmental reconstruction of prehistoric landscapes and the changing resources exploited by the
islanders between the seventh and second millennia bc. The interdisciplinary studies combined with
excavated economic and environmental materials from archaeological sites allows Temple landscapes to
examine the dramatic and damaging impacts made by the first farming communities on the islands’ soil
and resources. The project reveals the remarkable resilience of the soil-vegetational system of the island
landscapes, as well as the adaptations made by Neolithic communities to harness their productivity, in
the face of climatic change and inexorable soil erosion. Neolithic people evidently understood how to
maintain soil fertility and cope with the inherently unstable changing landscapes of Malta. In contrast,
second millennium bc Bronze Age societies failed to adapt effectively to the long-term aridifying trend
so clearly highlighted in the soil and vegetation record. This failure led to severe and irreversible erosion
and very different and short-lived socio-economic systems across the Maltese islands.
Editors:
Charles French is Professor of Geoarchaeology in the Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge.
Chris O. Hunt is a Professor in the School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores
University, Liverpool.
Reuben Grima is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Conservation and Built Heritage, University
of Malta.
Rowan McLaughlin is Senior Researcher in the Department of Scientific Research at the British Museum
and honorary research scholar at Queen’s University Belfast.
Caroline Malone is a Professor in the School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast.
Simon Stoddart is Reader in Prehistory in the Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge.
Published by the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research,
University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3ER, UK.
Cover design by Dora Kemp and Ben Plumridge.
ISBN: 978-1-902937-99-1
ISBN978-1-902937-99-1
978-1-902937-99-1
ISBN
9 781902 937991