Scholars still debate the issue of the location of Cnidus. On contrary to the views of some scholars, it appears that Cnidus was not relocated from Burgaz to Tekir and that actually it lied just across the promontory of Triopium on the...
moreScholars still debate the issue of the location of Cnidus. On contrary to the views of some scholars, it appears that Cnidus was not relocated from Burgaz to Tekir and that actually it lied just across the promontory of Triopium on the mainland at the tip of Cnidian Cherronesus from the colonial period onwards. It had surrendered to the Persian general Harpagus in 546 BC. It does not seem to have involved in Ionian revolt, even though most of the Carian cities supported it. After the establishment of the Delian League in 478 BC, its military leaders, Pausanias and Cimon, sailed to the coasts of Caria and Lycia to control over the cities there and then get their financial support, including Cnidus. Having extended her political hegemony over the seas, Athens secured the overall control of the League by 454 BC. Then, by this time onwards, she initiated to inscribe both the names and the payments of the League members on stone. In this study, we shall, first of all, concentrate on the issue of the location of Cnidus and then on the political relations of Cnidus with both the Persians and other Greek city-states during the first half of V th century BC. Afterwards by taking into account the inscriptive evidence concerning the payments of Cnidus and the cities around her to the League as well as the other relevant literary sources, we shall try to make new inferences about the political circumstances around Cnidus and its vicinity within the context of Athenian struggle against Persia and Sparta until the end of V th century BC.