According to the new proposed model, in addition to the anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) due to land -use change and fossil fuel burning, significant emissions of CO2 are released from the ocean at sites of upwelling currents, which...
moreAccording to the new proposed model, in addition to the anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) due to land -use change and fossil fuel burning, significant emissions of CO2 are released from the ocean at sites of upwelling currents, which connect the global overturning circulation with the sea surface, as exemplified by the upwelling currents along the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC). Carbon dioxide was sequestered in deep oceanic layers which were disturbed through detonations of the nuclear bomb tests early in the1960s as confirmed by multiple time series of temperature and geochemical records. New features contributed to this article are
• the abrupt and vigorous change of the climate since about 1960, by contrast to the mild and gradual warming since the beginning of the Industrial Era, a period of adaptation after the cold Little Ice Age
• the identification of the temporal coincidence of the initiation of the severe climate change in the 1960s with the bomb tests associated with geochemical anomalies and steady temperature increase,
• the outrageous rate of CO2 emission, five times higher than similar extreme events in the geological past,
• the function of the Southern Ocean both as sink and as source of CO2 with prevailing outgassing currently,
• the heat engine along the boundary of the Antarctica Lithospheric Plate which stimulates upwelling and causes widespread continental warming of the West Antarctic climate, confirmed since 1958.
Therefore, apart from the Greenhouse Effect, we are currently confronted with the Nuclear Bomb Effect, a much more severe likelihood. It is not argued that the Bomb Effect is a proven fact, but only that there are strong indications for it and therefore it is an emergency for the scientific community to accelerate the investigations by absolute priority, which requires significant international support.
The evidence for the climatic change predominantly is based on measurements of the temperature globally and the increase of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and the oceans. The relevant data are reconsidered based on the latest results and their current interpretation. Multiple time series are correlated, including the temperature, the greenhouse gases, the isotopic values of the radiocarbon (14C) and the stable isotope 13C. Furthermore, it is suggested that field surveys and modeling applications in the latest couple of years indicate that the Southern Ocean surrounding Antarctica is very likely a source of carbon dioxide from deep oceanic waters in tandem with CO2 intake at the ocean surface from the atmosphere. It is not considered a coincidence that the increase of temperature and the geochemical anomalies start simultaneously with the nuclear bomb spike, approximately in 1960, as highlighted in the following.
The temperature increase is still in the expected range of warming after the cold period of the Little Ice age from 1570 to 1900 AD in the Northern Hemisphere. However, the CO2 increase is beyond any geological record, continues, and will persist so for some time, even after zeroing the fossil fuel burning. The reason is that a proportion of the CO2 in the atmosphere comes from sequestered gases in the ocean which travel southwards along the Global Overturning Circulation to join the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, where they upwell heated by the oceanic ridge of the Antarctic Lithospheric Plate and the elevated relief of the ridge.
It is not argued that the Bomb Effect is a proven fact, but only that there are reliable indications for it and therefore it is an emergency for the scientific community to accelerate the investigations in Antarctica by absolute priority which requires international support and coordination.