Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
↓ Skip to main content

Combined effects of host genetics and diet on human gut microbiota and incident disease in a single population cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
298 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
225 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined effects of host genetics and diet on human gut microbiota and incident disease in a single population cohort
Published in
Nature Genetics, February 2022
DOI 10.1038/s41588-021-00991-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Youwen Qin, Aki S. Havulinna, Yang Liu, Pekka Jousilahti, Scott C. Ritchie, Alex Tokolyi, Jon G. Sanders, Liisa Valsta, Marta Brożyńska, Qiyun Zhu, Anupriya Tripathi, Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza, Rohit Loomba, Susan Cheng, Mohit Jain, Teemu Niiranen, Leo Lahti, Rob Knight, Veikko Salomaa, Michael Inouye, Guillaume Méric

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 298 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 322 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 7%
Student > Master 22 7%
Other 20 6%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 117 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 6%
Computer Science 7 2%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 137 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 264. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#147,407
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#214
of 7,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,839
of 535,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#6
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 535,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.