The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pleiotropy in complex traits: challenges and strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Genetics, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrg3461 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadia Solovieff, Chris Cotsapas, Phil H. Lee, Shaun M. Purcell, Jordan W. Smoller |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 55% |
| Scientists | 12 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,046 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 2% |
| Germany | 6 | <1% |
| Norway | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 2% |
| Unknown | 987 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 290 | 28% |
| Researcher | 206 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 104 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 57 | 5% |
| Other | 174 | 17% |
| Unknown | 144 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 380 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 177 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 11% |
| Psychology | 42 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 38 | 4% |
| Other | 116 | 11% |
| Unknown | 180 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,086,859
of 26,522,772 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#549
of 2,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,351
of 212,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#6
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,522,772 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.