Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
↓ Skip to main content

Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
4421 Mendeley
citeulike
14 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1002601107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria G. Dominguez-Bello, Elizabeth K. Costello, Monica Contreras, Magda Magris, Glida Hidalgo, Noah Fierer, Rob Knight

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 51 1%
Spain 9 <1%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Canada 8 <1%
France 8 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Other 30 <1%
Unknown 4289 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 722 16%
Student > Bachelor 619 14%
Student > Master 592 13%
Researcher 526 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 243 5%
Other 636 14%
Unknown 1083 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 915 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 701 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 539 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 364 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 116 3%
Other 572 13%
Unknown 1214 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 820. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2024.
All research outputs
#24,440
of 26,512,053 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#720
of 105,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38
of 107,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4
of 718 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,512,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 718 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.