Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
↓ Skip to main content

Potential Uses of Probiotics in Clinical Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Microbiology Reviews, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
patent
13 patents
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
677 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
581 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential Uses of Probiotics in Clinical Practice
Published in
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, October 2003
DOI 10.1128/cmr.16.4.658-672.2003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregor Reid, Jana Jass, M. Tom Sebulsky, John K. McCormick

Abstract

Probiotics are defined as live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. There is now mounting evidence that selected probiotic strains can provide health benefits to their human hosts. Numerous clinical trials show that certain strains can improve the outcome of intestinal infections by reducing the duration of diarrhea. Further investigations have shown benefits in reducing the recurrence of urogenital infections in women, while promising studies in cancer and allergies require research into the mechanisms of activity for particular strains and better-designed trials. At present, only a small percentage of physicians either know of probiotics or understand their potential applicability to patient care. Thus, probiotics are not yet part of the clinical arsenal for prevention and treatment of disease or maintenance of health. The establishment of accepted standards and guidelines, proposed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization, represents a key step in ensuring that reliable products with suitable, informative health claims become available. Based upon the evidence to date, future advances with single- and multiple-strain therapies are on the horizon for the management of a number of debilitating and even fatal conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 581 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 565 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 89 15%
Student > Bachelor 86 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 13%
Researcher 70 12%
Student > Postgraduate 29 5%
Other 80 14%
Unknown 154 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 144 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 89 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 37 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 4%
Other 65 11%
Unknown 168 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#759,316
of 26,437,155 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#143
of 1,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#635
of 57,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,437,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them