The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 203 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide associations of human gut microbiome variation and implications for causal inference analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Microbiology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41564-020-0743-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A. Hughes, Rodrigo Bacigalupe, Jun Wang, Malte C. Rühlemann, Raul Y. Tito, Gwen Falony, Marie Joossens, Sara Vieira-Silva, Liesbet Henckaerts, Leen Rymenans, Chloë Verspecht, Susan Ring, Andre Franke, Kaitlin H. Wade, Nicholas J. Timpson, Jeroen Raes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 7% |
| Belgium | 6 | 3% |
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 143 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 106 | 52% |
| Scientists | 79 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 292 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 20% |
| Researcher | 53 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 14% |
| Unknown | 77 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 65 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 25 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 82 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 228. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#177,760
of 26,456,908 outputs
Outputs from Nature Microbiology
#160
of 2,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,834
of 438,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Microbiology
#6
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,456,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 97.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.