Richard Overy
Born
in The United Kingdom
December 23, 1947
Genre
Russia's War: A History of the Soviet Effort, 1941-1945
28 editions
—
published
1997
—
|
|
|
Why the Allies Won
37 editions
—
published
1995
—
|
|
|
The Dictators: Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia
35 editions
—
published
2004
—
|
|
|
1939: Countdown to War
33 editions
—
published
2009
—
|
|
|
Blood and Ruins: The Great Imperial War, 1931-1945
12 editions
—
published
2021
—
|
|
|
The Bombers and The Bombed: Allied Air War over Europe 1940-1945
18 editions
—
published
2013
—
|
|
|
The Battle Of Britain: Myth and Reality
17 editions
—
published
2001
—
|
|
|
The Times Complete History of the World
29 editions
—
published
2001
—
|
|
|
A History of War in 100 Battles
5 editions
—
published
2014
—
|
|
|
Interrogations: The Nazi Elite in Allied Hands, 1945
16 editions
—
published
2001
—
|
|
“There have been ample opportunities since 1945 to show that material superiority in war is not enough if the will to fight is lacking. In Algeria, Vietnam and Afghanistan the balance of economic and military strength lay overwhelmingly on the side of France, the United States, and the Soviet Union, but the will to win was slowly eroded. Troops became demoralised and brutalised. Even a political solution was abandoned. In all three cases the greater power withdrew. The Second World War was an altogether different conflict, but the will to win was every bit as important - indeed it was more so. The contest was popularly perceived to be about issues of life and death of whole communities rather than for their fighting forces alone. They were issues, wrote one American observer in 1939, 'worth dying for'. If, he continued, 'the will-to-destruction triumphs, our resolution to preserve civilisation must become more implacable...our courage must mount'.
Words like 'will' and 'courage' are difficult for historians to use as instruments of cold analysis. They cannot be quantified; they are elusive of definition; they are products of a moral language that is regarded sceptically today, even tainted by its association with fascist rhetoric. German and Japanese leaders believed that the spiritual strength of their soldiers and workers in some indefinable way compensate for their technical inferiority. When asked after the war why Japan lost, one senior naval officer replied that the Japanese 'were short on spirit, the military spirit was weak...' and put this explanation ahead of any material cause. Within Germany, belief that spiritual strength or willpower was worth more than generous supplies of weapons was not confined to Hitler by any means, though it was certainly a central element in the way he looked at the world.
The irony was that Hitler's ambition to impose his will on others did perhaps more than anything to ensure that his enemies' will to win burned brighter still. The Allies were united by nothing so much as a fundamental desire to smash Hitlerism and Japanese militarism and to use any weapon to achieve it. The primal drive for victory at all costs nourished Allied fighting power and assuaged the thirst for vengeance. They fought not only because the sum of their resources added up to victory, but because they wanted to win and were certain that their cause was just.
The Allies won the Second World War because they turned their economic strength into effective fighting power, and turned the moral energies of their people into an effective will to win. The mobilisation of national resources in this broad sense never worked perfectly, but worked well enough to prevail. Materially rich, but divided, demoralised, and poorly led, the Allied coalition would have lost the war, however exaggerated Axis ambitions, however flawed their moral outlook. The war made exceptional demands on the Allied peoples. Half a century later the level of cruelty, destruction and sacrifice that it engendered is hard to comprehend, let alone recapture. Fifty years of security and prosperity have opened up a gulf between our own age and the age of crisis and violence that propelled the world into war. Though from today's perspective Allied victory might seem somehow inevitable, the conflict was poised on a knife-edge in the middle years of the war. This period must surely rank as the most significant turning point in the history of the modern age.”
― Why the Allies Won
Words like 'will' and 'courage' are difficult for historians to use as instruments of cold analysis. They cannot be quantified; they are elusive of definition; they are products of a moral language that is regarded sceptically today, even tainted by its association with fascist rhetoric. German and Japanese leaders believed that the spiritual strength of their soldiers and workers in some indefinable way compensate for their technical inferiority. When asked after the war why Japan lost, one senior naval officer replied that the Japanese 'were short on spirit, the military spirit was weak...' and put this explanation ahead of any material cause. Within Germany, belief that spiritual strength or willpower was worth more than generous supplies of weapons was not confined to Hitler by any means, though it was certainly a central element in the way he looked at the world.
The irony was that Hitler's ambition to impose his will on others did perhaps more than anything to ensure that his enemies' will to win burned brighter still. The Allies were united by nothing so much as a fundamental desire to smash Hitlerism and Japanese militarism and to use any weapon to achieve it. The primal drive for victory at all costs nourished Allied fighting power and assuaged the thirst for vengeance. They fought not only because the sum of their resources added up to victory, but because they wanted to win and were certain that their cause was just.
The Allies won the Second World War because they turned their economic strength into effective fighting power, and turned the moral energies of their people into an effective will to win. The mobilisation of national resources in this broad sense never worked perfectly, but worked well enough to prevail. Materially rich, but divided, demoralised, and poorly led, the Allied coalition would have lost the war, however exaggerated Axis ambitions, however flawed their moral outlook. The war made exceptional demands on the Allied peoples. Half a century later the level of cruelty, destruction and sacrifice that it engendered is hard to comprehend, let alone recapture. Fifty years of security and prosperity have opened up a gulf between our own age and the age of crisis and violence that propelled the world into war. Though from today's perspective Allied victory might seem somehow inevitable, the conflict was poised on a knife-edge in the middle years of the war. This period must surely rank as the most significant turning point in the history of the modern age.”
― Why the Allies Won
“No one in either system could be unaware that State Security was out there, but for the ordinary citizen, uninterested in politics, lucky enough not to belong to one of the groups stigmatized as enemies, the attitude was as likely to be prudent respect, even approval, rather than a permanent state of fear.”
― The Dictators: Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia
― The Dictators: Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia
“Moral and ethical questions have no validity in Total War except in as far as their maintenance or destruction contributes towards ultimate Victory. Expediency, not morality, is the sole criterion of human conduct in Total War.’ Dennis Wheatley, Total War, 1941”
― Blood and Ruins: The Last Imperial War, 1931-1945
― Blood and Ruins: The Last Imperial War, 1931-1945
Topics Mentioning This Author
topics | posts | views | last activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chicks On Lit: The Bronze Horseman | 28 | 106 | Aug 26, 2011 06:50PM | |
THE WORLD WAR TWO...: Recommended or Further Reading from "Inferno/All Hell Let Loose" | 12 | 106 | Oct 17, 2012 02:41AM | |
THE WORLD WAR TWO...: 2012 - July - "Inferno/All Hell Let Loose: The World at War, 1939-1945" by Max Hastings | 201 | 116 | Dec 01, 2012 12:53PM | |
The History Book ...: SECOND WORLD WAR - THE LIBERATION TRILOGY - GLOSSARY - PART ONE ~ (SPOILER THREAD) | 153 | 253 | Jun 03, 2013 07:00PM | |
The History Book ...: JILL'S 50 BOOKS IN 2014 | 203 | 262 | Dec 31, 2014 09:46PM | |
The History Book ...: SECOND WORLD WAR - THE LIBERATION TRILOGY - BIBLIOGRAPHY ~ (SPOILER THREAD) | 49 | 182 | Jan 18, 2015 12:17PM | |
The History Book ...: MATTHEW BARLOW'S 50 BOOKS READ IN 2015 | 111 | 113 | Jan 01, 2016 10:44AM |
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Richard to Goodreads.