Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
×
This suit was brought by the plaintiff against the United States to recover for the use and occupation of certain lands and buildings. The judgment of the Court of Claims was rendered against him, and he appealed here.
He sued in the Court of Claims for the difference between the contract price and the market price of the oats at the time of the delivery. One ground of his ...
People also ask
Title. U.S. Reports: Langford v. United States, 101 U.S. 341 (1880). Names. Miller, Samuel Freeman (Judge); Supreme Court of the United States (Author) ...
POPE, Circuit Judge. Langford, the appellant, was convicted of violation of the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 398 [now § 2421]. The indictment was in two counts.
The district court agreed in part. It vacated the life sentence under the ACCA, ruling that the first-degree robbery and breaking-and-entering convictions were ...
Indicted on two counts of robbery, appellant was convicted after a jury trial. Motions for severance, for mistrial and for dismissal of the second count were ...
United States District Court Northern District of Alabama. Circuit. 11th. Office Location. Northeastern. Case Type. civil. Nature of Suit.
I. INTRODUCTION. A factor in determining if a search is reasonable under the. Fourth Amendment is whether police officers knock and announce.
LANGFORD v. UNITED STATES is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 19, 1880. The case was argued before the court on ...
The only proposition urged by counsel for appellants is that the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground that a witness for the government — ...