Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
I Saw the TV Glow (2024) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
186 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Pretty Bad Movie
cinemapersonified29 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Rating: 5.1 Overall, a fever dream that is a profound allegory for transgender identity, but its poor plot construction, bland dialogue, and monotonous performances do a poor job at being a vehicle for this message.

Direction: Pretty Bad The direction on a macroscale is pretty good because they do a pretty good job setting the aesthetic for the movie and building the world; the direction on a microscale is pretty bad because most of the interpersonal scenes feel very boring; the direction of actors is pretty bad because the performances feel bland and monotonous (with no chemistry between the two leads); the storytelling is not that good, but this is mainly because the story is poorly constructed; they build tension decently well

Story: Pretty Bad The concept is interesting and is built decently well; the plot structure is a mess because it feels like the exposition is too long and the conflict is introduced too late and the movie just ends very abruptly (it could have really benefited from 20 minutes of extra time); the character writing is not the best, but still prevalent as you see how the television show is an extension of their identity

Screenplay: Pretty Bad The dialogue is incredibly bland and monotonous (except for in the climax); the humor is pretty dry; the symbolism is incredibly profound as the movie is an allegory for transgender identity, and they do a good job finding the right balance of being overt/subtle about it; the movie does not really build towards anything, even though there is some foreshadowing

Acting: Bad to Pretty Bad Justice Smith: Pretty Bad (Very monotonous performance and his levels just don't match where they should be, but his performance gets better towards the end) Brigette Lundy-Paine: Bad to Pretty Bad (An incredibly monotonous performance that does not develop chemistry with their lead, but their monologue towards the end is pretty powerful because you can feel how personal it is) Rest of the cast: Bad (The movie is really about the two leads, but the rest of the cast does not do a good job in supporting them or helping tell the story)

Soundtrack: Pretty Good Enjoyed the soundtrack because it helped set the aesthetic for the movie

Cinematography: Good Enjoyed the framing and the wide-angle shots because it helped set the aesthetic for the movie; enjoyed the 90s television shots because it helped emulate that era

Editing: Pretty Good Used well with the cinematography to help set the aesthetic

Sound: Pretty Good Used well to help show the cheap nature of 1990s television

Visual Effects: Pretty Good I enjoyed how tacky it was because it helped make this movie feel like a fever dream or surreal

Makeup: Pretty Good It helped make this movie feel surreal, like a fever dream

Pacing Pacing is incredibly slow because the movie is mostly exposition; the overarching conflict is presented too late

Climax Climax feels more like the inciting incident because it really introduces the conflict, but it is profound in its message

Tone The tone is surreal, mixed with 1990s television.
116 out of 176 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Very Misleading Trailer...
pjylover10 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
If one has only seen the trailer for this art house film then they would think it's a horror movie about memory and tv, and perception of reality and looks like it'll lead into the Lovecraftian horror, but alas it did not.

It's hard to say exactly what the film wants to be. I know the writer and director Jane Schoenbrun has stated that it's about transitioning from one gender to another and it sort of feels like that, but it also feels like parents and abuse, and about sexuality. My point is that the message is messy. The trailer does not help.

The trailer plays it out that it's gonna be this Kubrickesque horror film that is slow and scary. The film is slow but it is also frustrating because it takes each character so much dialogue to get to the point. Justice Smith did a great job with what he had and I can see he can lead a movie.

Would I recommend it? I don't know, probably not. It's neither scary or bizarre enough. Sure there are some weird moments but I've seen films that are far far weirder.

5/10.
107 out of 163 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Interesting aesthetics, community theater level acting
ncviglione-7179917 June 2024
Bridgette Lundy-Paine delivered their lines like they were being fed to her through an ear piece. The terrible acting completely took me out of the universe the director was trying to convey. There were too many boring, drawn out monologues delivered monotonously without emotion, it almost became comical. It's really hard to connect to characters who show no resolve whatsoever. There were interesting themes but they were poorly executed, wish there was more emotional depth. There are so few actors with lines that these poor performances stick out like a sore thumb. Film has the vibe of a CW show written by an angsty teen who loves LED lighting.
34 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not for everyone but a memorable experience.
dweston-3866916 June 2024
Writer/director Jane Schoenbrun made a highly atmospheric little film a couple of years ago called ' We're All Going To The Worlds Fair' on a shoestring budget but the film left an inedible impression on me that I included it on my ten best of the year.

The follow up continues the same microscopic view of adolescence, loneliness and social exclusion that still retains the same wonderful wintry neon feel as the previous film. See also the classic 'It Follows' and ' Rivers Edge'-these all perfectly capture the inner feelings of the characters; bored teenagers in middle small town America caught in a mystery.

It is talky and slow and I get if some will be put off. I didn't take to the characters breaking the 'fourth wall' and start speaking directly to the camera; it felt like the audience had to be spoon fed exactly what the character is feeling.

The acting is excellent from Justice Smith and Brigette Lunday-Paine and young Ian Foreman as the young Owen. Bringing a vulnerable, isolated look on the faces. Is there a hint of abuse here?

I felt like I did in the 90s with 'Twin Peaks' where I wanted to dive straight into the TV set and be in the dark and magical small US town (there are lots of 'Lynchian' references here, not just the photography and sound but the musical interlude in the small bar) Like the similar 'Beau is Afraid' (ageing) this is a smart, extremely well done expressionist horror that I may not want to see again in a hurry but will stay in my mind for a long time.
26 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A brilliantly weird movie for the young weirdos who found solace in weird media
A deeply sad, heartfelt, surrealist film that is very likely to be the most unique American film released in 2024, and even more likely to be misunderstood by at least 75% of its viewers. On the surface, it's one of the most locked-in mid-90's nostalgia pieces I've ingested, but beneath that it's one of the most complex coming-of-age films I can think of.

To me, the movie was an expression of the kids who grew up in dysfunctional families in the 90's (the TV generation), those who were drawn to dark media due to that (which was extremely prevalent in the late 80's up through the mid 90's), and in turn, those who ended up with a far deeper connection with those dark fantasy worlds than they had with most other humans, and reality as a whole. When it's time to grow up, things get rough...I can relate, because I was 100% one of those kids during that exact era, so this one hit a lot of buttons that made a lot of sense for me.

There are some impressively unique horror/monster effects in this film, that are equal parts comical and terrifying, simultaneously, which feels like yet another element that is heavily loyal to the era it is inspired by. This, along with many other elements, allow this movie to differentiate itself pretty boldly from everything else coming out right now. Common horror fans will likely just be confused by this film, which tends to be the case with most psychological horror films that actually offer anything with emotional purpose, but it offers plenty of cerebral scares and lots of melancholic gloom.

Leads Brigette Lundy-Paine and Justice Smith do an immense job of keeping things deathly serious and dreamlike, Smith almost feeling like he fittingly "can't handle being human" a lot of the time. There are several sequences where their performances bring the movie to a full Lynchian realm - of course this is also due to visionary director Jane Schoenbrun's skilled directing. Speaking of that, I just realized that the segment that feels most like a nod to Lynch in a multitude of ways is the one that features bands performing live at a strange club, much like the Road House in the last season of Twin Peaks. Kris Esfandiari of King Woman makes an especially strong appearance here. It certainly doesn't hurt that they put together a very tasteful soundtrack that feels very reminiscent of the classic movie soundtracks of the 90's. It's fitting that the movie and soundtrack begin with a Broken Social Scene cover, because the whole album kind of feels like a full Broken Social Scene album, with similar dynamics and vibes throughout.

While it's truly hard to compare this to anything, it feels HIGHLY inspired by ARE YOU AFRAID OF THE DARK?, the Canadian kids horror program broadcast in the 90's on Nickelodeon, more than anything, while it's themes remind me only of a couple other movies, Pixar's INSIDE OUT, and the very wild SYNECDOCHE, NEW YORK. While I cried my eyes out at that Pixar movie, this one is too committed to its surrealism and gloom to induce actual tears, but the overall melancholy remains very heavy and very real throughout.

This is a movie about the weirdos who found solace in media for weirdos. Brilliantly, the movie itself is weird (and sincere) enough to be that exact sort of weird type of media that the new young weirdos may find the same kind of solace in when they watch this as a teenager in reality now. I think that might be the whole point. If it wasn't, then it's awfully masterful accident. That's 2 strikingly unique and effective psychological horror films by Jane Schoenbrun now, 2 for 2...I officially deem thee a visionary force to be reckoned with.
123 out of 237 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
If You Have Childhood Trauma, It Might Be Triggering...
jericha-2740218 May 2024
I won't lie. Some of the execution is messy. There are some questionable cast choices made and sometimes they stick out really bad. However, the final product still leaves an impact.

To be clear, there aren't any explicit depictions of abuse. Yet the film's undertones are depressing and bleak. If you grew up in a dysfunctional household as kid in the 90s or 2000s, this film will hit you hard (I agree with one of the previous reviewers).

At first, you're going to be like... WTF. And then when the film is over, you're going to be thinking about your childhood and stuff.

And if you feel like an underachiever in life, be prepared to cry some more...

I feel like the people who don't get it weren't the weirdos growing up. Everything isn't for everybody but don't give a movie a one star review because you didn't understand it.
87 out of 168 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Hands down one of the worst movies I've seen
wbprops2 June 2024
What did I just watch? This might rank as the worst film I've ever seen and only the 2nd time in my 48 yr old life I've walked out of a movie. I can tell you the trailers are BS. I was expecting something kitschy in the vein of Poltergeist maybe but this certainly wasn't a horror or a thriller for that matter. I don't know what the hell it was. If its aim was to be weird, I love weird but it wasn't that either. It was the most pretentious, boring, nonsensical piece of garbage I've seen in years! There is no plot, no real character development, no tension, horrible audio(could barely tell what they were saying at times),the characters aren't likable whatsoever, the music was awful, the idea that he aged two years into a completely different person who looked nothing like him was ridiculous. We sat through as much as we could and finally left 10 minutes before it was over. That's how bad it was. It felt like an angsty 12 year old made it. It was worse that bad because it was so damn BORING. Total waste of an afternoon.
164 out of 237 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A surreal coming of age tale that lingers days after watching
yoshimasu_k8 May 2024
We aren't even halfway through the year yet, but I can't imagine another 2024 movie topping "I Saw the TV Glow" for me. It's a surreal coming of age tale - definitely NOT straight-forward, in-your-face horror - that will likely be a "love it" or "hate it" due to writer-director Jane Schoenbrun's bold and distinct vision. It's obviously a "love it" for me, as I found the film moving and near-perfect on every level.

If anyone's feeling hesitant because of Schoenbrun's micro-budgeted directorial debut, "We're All Going to the World's Fair," "TV Glow" is completely different stylistically and in its scope. I appreciated "World's Fair" as a directorial debut and thought it had strong moments, but it ultimately fell short for me. HOWEVER, watching it did make me excited to see what Schoenbrun would do for their next film!

While "World's Fair" felt mostly grounded in reality (or maybe a somewhat augmented reality due to the character's downward descent into their online world), the uncanny and hypnotic are more present in "TV Glow." As I mentioned, this isn't a straight-forward, in-your-face horror movie - it dabbles more in the Lynchian approach of slow-burn nightmares that leave you unsure of what exactly you just witnessed. The focus, though, is mostly on our protagonists and their individual and shared journeys of loneliness, dysmorphia, and the horrors that spawn from such damaging states of mind.

Also, I can confirm (without spoilers) that this is NOT based on that one creepypasta about the mysterious children's TV show, "Candle Cove"! The movie does center on a TV show for young people, but the type of show it is and its role in the characters' lives are much different. While that creepypasta has a great and terrifying twist, this movie's characters' relationship with "The Pink Opaque" is one of obsession, nostalgia, and realization.

Lastly, "TV Glow" will likely PISS OFF viewers that cry "WOKE" at every instance of diversity or inclusion - and that is ALWAYS a PLUS in my book! What they're really complaining about is the fact that different people and communities are having more and more movies about them. I know, this review kind of went off track... the only thing left to say is: They'll be fine with "The Beekeeper", "Argylle", "Fall Guy", "Boy Kills World", and a slew of other Hollywood movies representing them in 2024 and beyond. Meanwhile, unique and necessary voices like Schoenbrun's can simultaneously exist and we're all better for it.
98 out of 251 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
21st century cult classic - cultural commentary
jahleafoflife31 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Dysmorphia and Dissociation!

When I went to see Jane Schoenbrun's (2024) I Saw the TV Glow, I was reminded of other depictions of dissociation in films-Darren Aronofsky's (2010) Black Swan, Brad Anderson's (2004) The Machinist, James Mangold's (1999) Girl, Interrupted; but none of these depictions dive as deeply into body dysmorphia as Schoenbrun's colorful psychological nightmare. I'll admit while I was watching it, I was so enamored by the visuals-the color palettes, the composition-that I missed a lot of what the story was. I knew Schoenbrun was trans, but failed to make the connection during the film: a TV show character trapped in a "real life human body" is a metaphor for the body dysmorphia that trans people experience when they are unable to transition.

The protagonist, Owen, is a reclusive young man in an intimate relationship with television, specifically a supernatural horror show called The Pink Opaque. Maddy is two years older, a lesbian who introduces Owen to The Pink Opaque. Maddy makes her sexuality clear to him before they hang out, that she is not into guys. He assures her that he's not interested in her like that. Maddy asks him if he likes girls or boys to which he responds, "I don't know. I like TV shows." This scene hints at the character's break from gender and/or sexual normativity, hinting at asexuality or queerness.

Owen struggles with asthma throughout the film, becoming more wheezy and short of breath as we age with him from adolescence to middle age. Maddy goes missing for ten years and returns suddenly with an urgent message for Owen, that she is not really Maddy and he is not really Owen, the two of them have been brainwashed into thinking they've been watching the show when in reality they are the two main characters in the show, Isabel and Tara, and can only enter their true bodies/identities by burying themselves alive. Maddy is really Tara and Owen is really Isabel. Owen's real body (Isabel's body) has been poisoned with Luna Juice and buried alive, which speaks to why he has literally and figuratively been suffocating throughout the movie. When Tara/Maddy tells Isabel/Owen this, he thinks she's crazy and proceeds to live out the rest of his life as Owen.

By the end of the movie, Owen is in his fifties working at an arcade and is basically continuously hyperventilating. After an episode of screaming, he goes to the bathroom and cuts his stomach down the middle and rips it open revealing a glow of blinding light, an indication of his true essence being the TV show deep within him. Then he returns to the arcade and apologizes to everyone for his outburst, claiming it was because of a new medication.

All of these metaphors became clear to me when the movie ended abruptly after this scene. I noticed a lot of people crying and hugging each other when the credits started rolling, which puzzled me, since my experience of the film was more surreal and I wasn't grasping the underlying meaning. As we left the theater, a trans person said to people leaving the theater, "It's okay if you want to transition! I did it and it was the best decision of my life!" Only then did it click what this movie was really about. The film was categorized as drama/horror, which strongly influenced how I was watching it. If it were categorized as psychological drama, perhaps I would've been paying attention to more of the inner workings of the story and less anticipation of being scared by the more conventional elements of horror (i.e. Gore, suspense, thrill, etc.). Although it's not scary in these more conventional ways, the real horror of this film is its brutal message of reality for trans people then and now.

As cis male-bodied person, I don't think I can ever truly understand what this movie is really about. It causes me to wonder if this film is even supposed to be understood or even watched by cis people. Who is the intended audience of this film? Why is it marketed as drama/horror rather than LGBTQ+? I'm reminded of the character Thelonious "Monk" Edison in Cord Jefferson's (2023) American Fiction, a Black author who is fighting against the industry's standard to assume Black writers must always belong in the category Black literature. Perhaps Schoenbrun is making a similar statement in how the LGBTQ+ cinema is perceived and categorized, that a trans directer doesn't have to always fall within that category, even though the story is clearly about being trans.

The film speaks to the many lived experiences of trans people in the 1990s-the trauma, suppression, suicide and how these elements persist today. But I still was critical of the writing and performances which felt weak at times, especially Brigette Lundy-Paine's acting during the planetarium scene which felt incredibly forced and was painful to watch-not in a good way. The film's use of neon color and dreamlike sequences misguided me from the core of the story which is profoundly deep and specific; it is not a surrealist, absurdist, abstract piece, even though that's what I thought I was seeing while watching it.

People are going to love and hate this movie. It's going to be a cult classic of the 21st century regardless of how I or anyone feels about the writing, performances, cinematography, editing, etc. I believe it is cemented in film history as a milestone. I honestly have never seen anything like it, I just wish there was more of the dripping oozing ice cream man-but again, it's not a body horror piece, it's an ethnographic psychological drama that deconstructs life for trans people in a culture that refuses to see them as human.

Although I'm cis and do not experience body dysmorphia, I do experience dissociation frequently, particularly with the qualities of social media, film, and television and how it alters my perception of my reality, identity, and the human condition. As I left the theater and saw trash all over the streets, dozens of homeless people on every corner, I started to wonder if I was really there, the place I called home for my joyful and playful childhood. The dichotomy of the place I grew up in and the place I was in (Burlington, Vermont), I started to wonder if I was really someone else, somewhere else. But perhaps that's what growing up is about, where the ugliness that was always there starts to reveal itself to you.

I don't think dissociation needs to be confined into the category of a disorder or mental illness. The line between one's fantasy and dissociation is fine or even subjective. Let people dream and let them become their dreams. I personally like my fantasies as fantasies and let my dreams be dreams, but transformation is always inevitable. This film has the potential to start a critical and crucial dialogue around identity and how it's altered, suppressed, and/or discovered, cultivating the possibility for more trans acceptance.
40 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Ambiguous, pretentious, and overall dull.
Dougie B9 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I really couldn't tell you the plot of this movie. I could tell you what happened, but I couldn't give you all of the reasons why any of it did. I honestly felt like I was watching an experimental project from a first year art school student who wouldn't even be able to explain the meaning of what we saw if asked.

Even if this movie was comprehensible, there so many odd things about it from a production standpoint. For example, the audio on the TV show the main characters watch is terrible, to the point of almost being inaudible. Old TV didn't sound THAT bad. The casting between young Owen and adult Owen (Justice Smith) is just jarring since they look nothing like each other, and they play each other only 2 years apart.

MINOR SPOILERS - I had to read an interview with the writer/director just to know that the movie is supposed to be an allegory for gender transitioning, and I never picked up on that, at all. One character was gay, and their struggles were portrayed, while the other came across as asexual, and very little of that was ever explored. Was their "sexuality" their love for this TV show? I couldn't tell you because the movie tells you nothing.
174 out of 260 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
this was made for the sad trans teens :)
emuri_z52 July 2024
This was made for the trans kids who grew up with tumblr and creepypastas as their source of comfort (lmao), not a grown white man named david who thinks he's a movie critic. I can't get this film out of my head, it's comforting in a weird quiet classmate type of way. The soundtrack is incredible, the acting is great, the lighting is absolutely fire, and overall i was left crying for days after my first time watching this. Thank you, jane schoenbrun, for making people like me feel seen and loved. It's for sure not for your average slasher horror enthusiast, so "keep an open mind" is all the advice i can really give.
13 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mesmerizingly weird and oddly provocative
PotassiumMan11 May 2024
A sullen teenager discovers an entrancing television show that speaks to him in ways he's never envisioned when he meets and develops an eccentric friendship with an older girl in his school. While this film turns out to be something a bit more than an archetypal coming-of-age fare, it's quite comfortable staying in that genre most of the time. It never really scratches the surface of horror, despite suggesting the vibe at times. You might not know what to make of this when all it's said and done and I readily confess that I still do not. In the end you either run with the film's committed strangeness or you don't. If you're expecting a straightforward conclusion, this most likely is not for you.

Philosophically, this film is right up my alley, notwithstanding my reservations about the protagonist, who at times seems pitiable. The theme of holding onto adolescent fixations through the years even as they become antiquated and caricature-like is something that strikes near and dear to me. How well it's conveyed here is a matter of debate. The film's whimsical vibe sometimes queers the pitch of this rich concept that's at work. But in the end, it's a good quirky indie that never tries to be something it's not. For those who understand this notion, this film is happily recommended.
51 out of 130 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is not a horror movie
jkmcgee-5083415 June 2024
Warning: Spoilers
First this is not a horror movie, not remotely close to a horror movie. This is a teen drama, it's about misunderstood youth, the outcasts, the people that feel like they don't belong. The kids that don't have anyone to identify with so they turn to films, tv, games, books etc. It reminds me a bit of myself in the 90s, I was (and still am) obsessed with horror, with oddities, with the weird things in life and have never felt like I fit in anywhere, much like the characters of the film.

The problem with the film is we don't know enough of the characters to connect with them or even care about them. You can assume they are obsessed with a television show (The Pink Opaque), they watch as teens. I say assume because it really isn't expressed in the film, it's kind of implied with Maddy but Owen just seems so indifferent to absolutely everything, he shows interest in the show but I'm not sure obsessed is the right word for him, he just doesn't show much emotion. I really wish the characters and their friendship had been more fleshed out and their relationship shown more. We see them watch the show together twice over the span of 2 years and they don't appear to be all that close. Maddy goes missing and the movie jumps 8 years and we see them reunite. There are flashbacks of their friendship showing Owen in a dress implying he may be trans or at least experimenting, this seems like such an important moment as you can interpret the film to being about someone struggling with their identity but being too scared to express it but it's just shown as a blip, it's never even talked about. I found this so incredibly frustrating and annoying that it was skimmed over so quickly.

The film it self is so fractured, the scenes feel choppy and not finished, many don't seem to have a point and the scenes that feel like they are FINALLY going somewhere they don't, they end too soon or offer no conclusion or explanation. At no point does it feel like the creator has actually provided a coherent story. It feels lazy and like the director/writer got lost in their own work. It feels like a short story idea that they weren't able to resolve or flesh out enough to fill the entire film so instead we end up with this mess that doesn't make any sense at all. The only positive thing I have to say about this movie is the cast, they were absolutely fantastic with the material they were given, I just wish we had seen more of their characters and more range as they are both fairly flat and emotionless the entire span of the movie.

I can appreciate a film that is open to interpretation, or is meant to be more symbolic than literal, however at some point the creator needs to stand their ground on SOMETHING and have some sort of solid concept, something tangible, the entire movie shouldn't be up for debate. That is just lazy story telling. Are Owen and Maddy really Isabelle and Tara and The Pink Opaque is real? Or are they just your normal teens struggling with their sexuality and identity in a world that makes them feel unaccepted? Saying it can be interpreted as either isn't true and again is lazy. You can't interpret it as both when both ideas aren't fully explored and certainly not when the story only feels half told.

I love A24 typically, I've rarely been let down by their releases but this one really is just such a huge disappointment. I do not understand how anyone can say this is some brilliant film when frankly it's just mediocre and feels like a student art project that never got it's point across and is trying way too hard to be seen as "art". At the end of the day I took it as the kids weren't experiencing anything paranormal, Maddy struggled with her sexuality and ran away from home never to be seen again. Owen struggled with his gender identity, he hallucinates Maddy coming back as an adult. Own then spends his life pretending to be whatever he thinks people deem to be "normal" (have a family) only to realize who he actually is when he is middle aged. There is no conclusion to the film, we don't know if Owen accepts himself, if Owen even knows who is is, if he finds happiness, absolutely NOTHING....it just ends.
56 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Mesmerizingly, amazingly, stupendously boring
piratemike-3323316 June 2024
The trailer for this movie got me somewhat interested, and then reading these reviews which I think were written by the studio along with everyone that worked on this film made me thing that this was a watchable movie. About 45 minutes into the movie, I was in awe that nothing interesting had happened. About an hour and ten minutes in, I was flabbergasted that I had somehow missed the conflict of the film. What is the plot? Where is this going? Is this a very very long TV pilot.

Then I shut off the movie. I don't know what happens, but I don't think that it does. Happen. Nothing. I felt good about saving those minutes of my life to do something else.

Like most people that gave this honest reviews, the flashback sequences were very hard to understand/hear. The actor choice of the main character was confusing when he jumps 2 years and looks like a completely different person, but then 8 years later looks exactly the same. I thought I missed a story about his younger brother or something. Don't waste your time on this.
61 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
fantastic allegory for repression
rijupitervega7 July 2024
Warning: Spoilers
If u ain't never stared into an open grave & had to decide between facin either a terrifyin unknown or the horror of what is, this movie is gonna miss u by a mile. This story is not abt ditchin a small town & how beautiful life can be thereafter. This story is abt what happens when u refuse to acknowledge the truth within yrself- when u know somethin is desperately wrong & yr miserable but fear keeps u frozen where u are. What happens when u miss yr chances to break free & have to live with the consequences? Can u finally tear yrself open & see what's been within u all along? Or will u slowly suffocate in a prison yr too scared to escape?
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I reject the premise!
ellebonet30 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I definitely loved this movie I thought it was very good at what it was trying to do but I really disagreed with the way they portrayed transness & coming out as killing yourself. (before I continue I should say I am transfeminine and have been out for four years) I understand why people describe it that way-I mean my own father has told me "my son is dead" before but I feel like that narrative is really more the cisgender perspective of someone else coming out. I also was really frustrated with how they presented coming out as this binary choice between killing yourself in a horrific way & (maybe/potentially) becoming free or living a miserable existence suffocating for the rest of your life. I don't think it's such a simple one or the other existence for us and to be honest I think portraying it that way was reductive. It's definitely designed to prey on that fear of wasting away the years of your life.

I think its easier to make people fear that they've wasted their time than to make them feel like there's always ways to enjoy your life wherever they are (like everything everywhere all at once did). It felt like there was only one acceptable way for the main character to express their gender and explore their identity which was one they weren't comfortable with & subjecting them to this horrible existence because of that felt lame in my opinion. Overall I think it was great as a concept, great as a movie, but I really disliked it as a trans story.

When I watched it last night my friends and I just came out of it feeling this sense of dread and we ended up coincidentally being in the same theatre as two of my other friends who had the same experience and we had a little group cry. I feel like we already know it's horrifying to be trans & preying on that feeling with no depiction of any trans joy is kind of low hanging fruit & feeds into this narrative a lot of cisgender people have that's like "oh I feel bad for you it must be so horrible to be trans." but it's not! Sure it can be terrifying but it is also the most beautiful thing I have ever experienced. I hope whoever reads this far has a good day.
32 out of 94 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
One of the worst films I've ever seen
trentagardner22 May 2024
I cannot stress this enough, this is one of the worst films I've ever seen. I kept waiting for something to happen. My girlfriend and I kept waiting for something to happen. That thing that hooks you in to show you that indeed there is a story happening and you're not wasting your time.

That moment never came. I love weird. I love art house. But this was just art house indulgence. I respect that there is probably more going on with this film's message that I'm not seeing and I elect to do more research. But I won't waste my time and sit through it again. If the message is THAT buried and it's "left up to interpretation" then I think the mission of the film is lost imo. Im not a filmmaker so I can't judge too hard. But as a songwriter if my song isn't clear the audience won't always connect to it. I think it's going to be very hard for audiences to connect with this film on a deeper level due to its lack of clarity to its point. Beau is Afraid was more clear than this...
123 out of 186 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Tearjerking period piece about coming out (or not) as gender-nonconforming
LikeallHungarians19 May 2024
I feel I have to write an apologia for my rating, because this is actually an 8.5 film for me.

This is destined to become a cult classic. It's been written about plenty before how this captures a time before the internet accelerated fandom and yet while there was remarkable TV (escapism) being produced. Jane Schoenbrun's genius--besides a couple excellent transitions--is that she achieves art by producing questions, not answers.

The principal actors (including the boy who depicts the main character as a pre-teen) have to be commended, as it's got to be exceedingly difficult to act autism, or more to the point to depict a character who's emotionally distanced themself from reality due to the mental torture of being unable to express their authentic self. There are plenty of shining moments, and Brigette Lundy-Paine in particular achieves an enigmatic performance that will be worth returning to for cinephiles for the rest of time. But there are moments when even Brigette overacts (especially early on), and the other actors aren't always able to succeed in portraying awkward surfaces with resonant emotional sublimation.

The cinematography is quite good, although it doesn't rise to the greatest-of-all-time that would deserve a 10/10.

What the movie could really have done without is the voiceovers/direct addresses. Maybe that postmodern extravagance is supposed to be reminiscent of the '90s shows which are being evoked--although that seemed to be done more in kids' shows--but it doesn't add meaning to the film's narrative.
50 out of 153 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Uber creative storytelling
michelebruck25 June 2024
An important, patiently built story about emerging adolescent gender identity and sexuality as it crosses into adulthood. Told in a highly creative and compelling way with a rich visual aesthetic and captivating acting. My grown kids and I continued talking about it for days after. Our audience in the theater was zeroed into the entire movie. Haven't enjoyed such a focused viewing in a public theater in forever! Highly memorable in all the right ways. The way the story illuminates different responses to LGBTQ struggles is both enriching and agonizing. Hope it serves to inspire those who feel trapped by the ignorance and cruelty of others.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I saw my brain cells die
gregori-kaplan15 June 2024
It's nicely shot a bunch of intentionally bad acting of rather shallow script.

I didn't give it rating of 1 because the movie did awake a wide range of emotions, but unfortunately those mostly had to do with fighting urge of rage quitting. It was rather clear it's not going to get any better, and that's after seeing through the major plot points I was later surprised I was right about, after reading about interview with the director.

Do yourself a favor and stay clear away, unless you're too high to fight this mess of a movie. The time is too precious to be wasted, and even the visuals and music don't make up for the rest.
105 out of 157 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I Saw an Excellent Movie
tiaskyelandish19 June 2024
I was astonished. After watching it, my jaw dropped. To be honest, this film got under my skin and was more frightening than most horror movies. It has a lot of spine-chilling sights and sounds already scorched into my memory. I knew this was going to hit hard given we're in Pride month. Even then, I wasn't prepared for the movie to hit this hard. It's also a shattering representation of the all-consuming, depressing nature of restraint and suppression and how nostalgia can be a gift and a curse. It's also helped by the fantastic performances of Justice Smith and Brigette Lundy-Paine, the phenomenal direction and writing from Jane Schoenbrun, and the great soundtrack. Art is art regardless of what you are. This film is necessary, especially in times like this. I get it isn't going to be for everyone. However, it's an excellent movie.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's good. But come on, it's not a horror movie
zeemccabe2 June 2024
Reviews are mixed on this movie, and I can see why. I'm on the fence about a few stylistic choices. But my biggest gripe was that it wasn't a horror movie. It's a moody and bit spooky sometimes, and some parts that gave me full body chills. The moments of sadness and desperation were very moving. But no payoff on the horror front.

That aside, I really enjoyed it. It was like Beau Is Afraid meets Twin Peaks season 3 meets Brigsby Bear meets Us, to name a few. The influences are obvious, but it still was a good film on its own.

This movie has very relatable themes. Those who aren't LGBTQIA+ such as myself can still identify with the coming of age troubles, among others. I found myself discovering old feelings and memories, and identifying with the lead character strongly. And it offered me a glimpse into a wholly new perspective as well.

It's a good movie, and I'm glad I was able to watch it in theaters. It's a step above an indie movie, but it's far from a masterpiece. It's visually stunning and goes deep. But the story and storytelling fall a bit short.
21 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wtf did I just watch?
melaniechiera26 May 2024
I've seen my fair share of movies .. enough to consider myself to be a film fanatic. I love all genres, comedy, drama, horror, action, psychological thrillers... you name a genre, I'll give you my favorite film in said category. But this? I don't even know how to classify this. It's weird, like a solid 1996 artsy poetry slam stage act, type of weird. It was like I took an hour and 40 minute ride inside the mind of a schizo affective person. But not an intriguing or even interesting ride. It was like what I'd imagine they're thinking during one of their word salad, but in the visual aspect. Kind of like this review ... a word salad ....of just what in the ever loving, waste of time, nonsense did we just waste our precious, hard earned dollars on seeing in the movie theatre? Seriously .. what is this?
79 out of 117 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad doesn't begin to describe how bad this is
bettyshields-4328915 June 2024
This is next level bad, the decent and good reviews have to be fake on every level. The only redeeming quality about this film is that it ends. If you're a fan of slow pacing as in watching a snail go uphill in slow motion then this is the film you've been waiting for. The cast is unwatchable and there's absolutely nothing engaging about any of it. It's impossible that anyone actually enjoyed this film, and anyone that calls it art or unique or quirky or special or anything other then horrible is masking what this film really is - which is a complete mess. An incredibly bad experimental student film being passed off as some type of cinematic accomplishment.
83 out of 123 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Chilling and accurate
sweetcypress77719 June 2024
Any kid who has experience the slow suffocation and isolation of having your identity erased by suburban expectations, of being unseen, especially under threat of violence and retribution this movie will be eye opening and heavy.

It seems slow, but that gives you an opportunity to appreciate the staging and all the interesting things in the background like the signs in the school hallway. I'm watching it for the third time in 24 hours just to absorb it.

Ignore the low ratings. This movie is 33 in the top 44 and climbing. Word about it is getting out and people want to see it for a reason.

Fred Durst is perfect and chilling and Justice Smith is sublime. Bridgette Lundy-Paine is also fantastic and the soundtrack Carrie's the surreal movie perfectly.

Excellent job by writer and direct Jane Schoenberg!
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed