Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Next Article in Journal
Six-Step Model of Nature-Based Therapy Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Azithromycin Removal from Water Using UV Radiation, Fe (VI) Oxidation Process and ZnO Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Associations of Socioeconomic Status, Parental Smoking and Parental E-Cigarette Use with 10–11-Year-Old Children’s Perceptions of Tobacco Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes: Cross Sectional Analysis of the CHETS Wales 3 Survey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sugarcane Bagasse as an Efficient Biosorbent for Methylene Blue Removal: Kinetics, Isotherms and Thermodynamics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 3
10.3390/ijerph17030684
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide in Septic Tanks for Treating Black Water via an Immobilized Media of Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacteria

by
Jeong-Hee Kang
1,
Hyeong-Gyu Namgung
2,
Jeong-Il Cho
1,
Sung Soo Yoo
1,
Bong-Jae Lee
1 and
Hyon Wook Ji
1,*
1
Department of Land, Water and Environment Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283 Goyangdae-Ro, Ilsanseo-Gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi-Do 10233, Korea
2
New Tech. Research Department, Korea District Heating Corporation, 92, Gigok-Ro, Giheung-Gu, Gyeonggi-Do 17099, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(3), 684; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030684
Submission received: 2 December 2019 / Revised: 14 January 2020 / Accepted: 18 January 2020 / Published: 21 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pollution Remediation and Management)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In South Korea, the installation of septic tanks for treating black water (STBW) is regulated even in sewage treatment areas to prevent the black water deposition in combined sewers. STBWs in which black water is anaerobically decomposed generate high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). In this study, an immobilized media of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) was used to remove the H2S. SOB media was prepared by using activated sludge collected from a wastewater treatment plant. Prior to field application, an appropriate cultivation period and aeration rate for SOB activation were estimated through a laboratory-scale test. The SOB was activated after a 23-day cultivation period and an aeration rate of 0.25 L-water/L-air/min. Moreover, the maximum H2S removal efficiency was observed at a cultivation period of 43 days and an aeration rate of 0.38 L-water/L-air/min. Then, the SOB media was installed on STBWs of various capacities. The H2S removal efficiency was compared between with and without SOB media. The maximum H2S elimination capacity with SOB media was 12.3 g/m3/h, which was approximately three times higher than without SOB media. Furthermore, the energy efficiency and oxidation rate were also three times higher with SOB, demonstrating the applicability of SOB for H2S removal in STBW.

1. Introduction

Septic tanks are on-site private sewage treatment facilities often employed in rural areas where it is difficult to send domestic wastewater to wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). Therefore, septic tanks are designed to separate solids and remove organic matter from domestic wastewater [1]. However, due to the poor conditions of the sewage system in South Korea, installing a septic tank for treating black water (STBW) is regulated in areas with combined sewers to avoid deposition of wastewater solids, odors, and hygienic problems caused by the direct discharge of black water into the sewage system.
STBWs are generally operated in anaerobic conditions because, in contrast with the aerobic method, the operational cost or post-installation management is not required except for cleaning once a year [2]. Black water remains in the STBWs for a long residence time of 2–3 days, during which various contaminants are decomposed by anaerobic bacteria [3]. In this process, the sulfur and nitrogen compounds in the water are decomposed together with organic matter, and various odors are generated in the STBWs [4]. Among the various odorous substances, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is one of the major contributors because the generated concentrations are far higher than the minimum detectable concentration. For example, Zuo et al. [5] reported that H2S was generated at concentrations of up to 100–400 ppmv in septic tanks. The odor of H2S due to its high concentrations in the STBWs spreads to sewers and reaches the surface through inlets, becoming a nuisance and a health hazard to urban residents. Therefore, STBW odors can be eliminated efficiently by removing H2S. In light of the above situation, the Korean Government mandated the installation of aeration systems to prevent anaerobic decomposition taking place in STBWs, and therefore, prevent the generation of odors. However, this method has a low H2S removal efficiency and cannot fundamentally solve odor problems because most of the H2S in the water evaporates into the atmosphere during aeration. Moreover, once the aeration pump operation is stopped, odors can easily reoccur because the STBW quickly becomes anaerobic again.
Various technologies to treat H2S have been developed and applied [6,7]. The physical treatment technologies, such as absorption and adsorption, require a large space and are cost-intensive. The chemical treatment methods have disadvantages such as difficulty of transport, requirement of chemicals, and high cost. Moreover, these methods are impractical to apply in a septic tank due to maintenance issues [8,9]. However, the application of biological treatment technologies is feasible because these require simple auxiliary installations and are easy to operate [10].
In a biological treatment process, the selection and cultivation of microorganisms that utilize the target substrate as a main metabolite is essential. To remove H2S, sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) is widely used. Because SOB use H2S as their primary substrate, they exhibit a high oxidation rate and high specific growth rate in the presence of this compound. Thus, these have been used in various biological treatment processes. There are many studies on removal and purification of H2S using SOB. Namgung and Song [9] developed a system to remove H2S in biogas by oxidizing it using Thiobacillus, resulting in a ≥98% H2S removal efficiency even at pH values below 1.5. Moreover, Yousef et al. [11] used SOB to treat industrial wastewater, and SOB has been used in many other instances and conditions to remove H2S [12]. Recently, a study on a SOB scrubber to remove high concentrations of H2S in sour gas even at an extreme condition of halo alkaline was reported [13].
However, studies involving the application of SOB to remove H2S in septic tanks are largely lacking. Neisi et al. [4] conducted experiments to remove H2S in septic tanks using a vermicomposting biofilter. They investigated the relation between gas retention time and removal efficiencies and long-term performance. However, H2S was treated using a biofilter in a separate space (not in the septic tank). As stated above, installation of new facility is impossible due to the confined space of septic tank and difficulty of maintenance. On the other hand, in the present study, the installation of SOB media in a septic tank was feasible because it is directly submerged in water, and among auxiliary installations, only a pump and a few pipelines are required.
SOB remove H2S by oxidizing it to form sulfate ions; therefore, we developed an immobilized SOB media. Operation parameters must be evaluated by applying SOB media to field septic tanks to obtain an effective H2S removal rate. The most important operation factors in biological treatment processes are aeration rate, quantity of nutrients and substrates, temperature, and pH. Among the parameters, aeration rate is one of the most crucial factors because oxygen is an important electron acceptor for the metabolism of SOB [4,14].
Therefore, SOB-immobilized media were developed and applied in a septic tank. To estimate an optimized aeration rate, various experiments were conducted at laboratory-scale and pilot-scale setups. SOB media was prepared by cultivating SOB in commercial Styrofoam. It was installed inside a STBW and oxygen was supplied. To determine the basic parameters for the application of SOB to STBW, the SOB activation period (i.e., the culture time required to observe SOB activity) was determined, and the H2S removal efficiency was verified via a laboratory test. Additionally, the SOB media was installed in real field STBWs to assess their H2S removal rate (odor elimination capacity); this served as an indicator of their operational efficiency.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacteria (SOB) Media

Figure 1 illustrates the experimental setup for the preparation of SOB media. The SOB media was cultivated in a Plexiglas reactor with dimensions 380 × 580 × 690 mm. A commercial Styrofoam was embedded in the reactor as a substrate for SOB attachment. The Styrofoam, which has the porosity of 40 PPI, was cut into 1 cm3 cubes and inserted into the SOB culture to prepare the SOB media. A disk-type ceramic diffusor was installed at the bottom of the reactor to inject fine air bubbles.
Activated sludge and wastewater collected from a WWTP were used as seed for SOB culture. The SOB culture was prepared by mixing sludge of 10 L and wastewater of 40 L, after which the SOB was cultivated by injecting air into the SOB culture at 10 L/min. The H2S concentration in the wastewater (i.e., the main substrate for SOB) was approximately 0.5 mg/L, which was insufficient for SOB growth. Thus, the SOB culture was replaced with 10 L of NaHS solution containing 150 mg/L of H2S every day. Before injecting the solution, the pump operation was stopped, and 10 L of the supernatant was extracted. As a carbon source for SOB growth, 10 g of milk powder was added every day. The pH of the SOB culture was maintained neutral at approximately 7.0 throughout the cultivation period.

2.2. Laboratory-Scale Experiment

The experimental setup for H2S removal in the laboratory was similar to the setup for SOB medium preparation depicted in Figure 1. A box containing 1 L of SOB media was placed inside an 80 L Plexiglas reactor (400 × 400 × 500 mm) by fixing the bottom of the box to the reactor. Synthetic black water containing H2S of 10 mg/L was prepared by using NaSH and distilled water. The inside of the reactor was filled with 40 L of synthetic black water. Air was injected into the SOB media from the bottom using an impeller pump; the airflow was adjusted to correspond to the aeration rate of 0.13–0.38 L-air/min/L-water using a flow meter. Liquid H2S and pH analyzers were installed to monitor H2S concentration and pH changes.

2.3. Pilot-Scale Test

Figure 2 illustrates the SOB media installed in a typical STBW. The SOB media was installed in the last filtration tank in a 3-stage STBW. The media volume was 1 m3, and installation was carried out after a 40-day incubation period in the laboratory. Similar to the laboratory setup, the air was supplied by connecting a diffusor and a blower. The blower had a 2.2 kW capacity and was operated at its maximum output during the test period. The SOB media (with aeration) was placed in 20 STBWs in commercial buildings in Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do; all STBWs examined herein were varied in the range of 70–1000 m3 capacity.

2.4. Analytical Methods

The H2S concentration and pH in water were measured using an H2S analyzer (MS08, AMT Analysenmesstechnik GmbH, Rostock, Germany) equipped with an amperometric probe. After the completion of the test, the concentration was measured by directly immersing the probe in the liquid inside the reactor. The measured concentration range was 0–50 mg/L, with a detection limit of 0.5 mg/L. The gaseous H2S concentration was measured using an H2S analyzer (GHS-8AT, GASTEC Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan) equipped with a diffuse electrochemical sensor installed inside the STBW. The measured concentration range was 0–500 ppmv, with a detection limit of 1 ppmv.
The sulfate ions were measured using an ion chromatograph (792 Basic IC, Metrohm AG, St. Gallen, Switzerland) equipped with A-Supp 15 column. After the test was completed, some aqueous solution in the analyzer or STBW was collected for analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. SOB Activation Period

The inside of the STBW was anaerobic because it was isolated from the atmosphere, thus creating unfavorable conditions for SOB growth. Moreover, even though oxygen was supplied through a blower, it would have been unreasonable to expect an immediate increase in SOB activity. Therefore, the SOB activation time had to be estimated. For this, SOB media was prepared and cultivated for 5, 12, 23, 30, and 45 days, after which the H2S removal rate for each media was tested. The H2S removal rate was calculated using the following equation.
Oxidation   rate   mg / h = C 0 − C t t
where C0 and Ct are the concentrations of aqueous H2S (mg/L) at the start and end of the experiment, respectively, and t is the experiment time (min). These rates were then compared with the H2S reduction rate when only aeration was performed without SOB media.
Prior to the evaluation of H2S removal rate, microbial identification analysis via 16S rRNA sequencing was performed on SOB media samples. The analysis results indicated that the top 20 dominant species identified accounted for 48%–71% of all microbes in samples. The most dominant microbe belonged to the family Rhodocyclaceae, which encompasses SOB species [15]; this indicates that H2S was likely oxidized by the SOB media.
The experiments showed that approximately 330 mg of H2S was removed per hour without SOB media (Figure 3). In the figure, w/o SOB and w/SOB represent without and with SOB, respectively. Moreover, applying SOB media cultivated for less than 12 days resulted in a similar result due to low SOB activity. However, when the SOB media cultivated for 23 days was applied, the H2S removal rate increased to approximately 580 mg/h. Furthermore, the H2S removal rate was 980 mg/h with a 45-day culture. Thus, it was concluded that SOB cultures exhibit activity after 23 days of cultivation, meaning that field applications would require no less than 23-day SOB cultures under aerobic conditions.
The H2S removal rate was 330 mg/h with aeration only, which was largely attributable to evaporation into the atmosphere via stripping. Table 1 summarizes the pH, sulfate ions, and H2S concentration of the aqueous solution after the end of the experiment. The total amount of sulfate ions remaining in the aqueous solution with aeration was approximately 32.1 mg, which was approximately 30% of the removed H2S amount. Although aeration only had a notable H2S reduction effect, most of the H2S was emitted into the atmosphere, which does not resolve the problem of H2S odors. In contrast, once SOB became activated after being cultivated for 23 days or more, more than 50% of the H2S was oxidized to sulfate ions. When the SOB were cultivated for 30 days or more, the oxidation rate was 64%. Thus, it can be concluded that H2S oxidation to sulfate ions after SOB media application would substantially reduce odors in STBWs. However, SOB media with less than 23 days of cultivation exhibited a low SOB activity and only a 30% H2S oxidation rate to sulfate ions, which was similar to that of aeration only. Therefore, SOB media should have sufficiently high activity to achieve effective odor removal from the STBWs.
The oxidation paths of aqueous H2S to solid sulfur or sulfate ions via SOB activity are detailed in Equations (2)–(4) [12]. However, protons are generated in the process of oxidation to sulfate ions, resulting in a pH decrease in the aqueous solution. This is demonstrated by the results in Table 1, which indicate that the pH was lowered at higher oxidation rates. When oxidizing H2S with 45-day SOB cultures, which exhibited the highest SOB activity, the pH decreased to 5.7. However, SOB exhibit their highest activity at a neutral pH; thus, constant low pH conditions during long-term operations could adversely affect the SOB activity, and countermeasures would be required to address this problem [16].
H 2 S + 0.5 O 2 → S 0 + H 2 O   Δ G 0 = − 209.4   kJ / reaction
S 0 + 1.5 O 2 + H 2 O → SO 4 2 − + 2 H + Δ G 0 = − 587.1   kJ / reaction
H 2 S + 2 O 2 → SO 4 2 − + 2 H +   Δ G 0 = − 798.2   kJ / reaction

3.2. H2S Removal in a Lab-Scale Experiment

As mentioned above, SOB activity increased gradually after cultivation for 23 days, and after 45 days, the H2S removal rate was more than three times higher than that of aeration alone. However, if the oxygen supply stopped or was insufficient, the H2S removal efficiency decreased due to low SOB activity. Additionally, aeration rate is also one of the critical factors for SOB. Oxygen supply increased with increasing aeration rate because of the enhancement in mass transfer rate. Thus, different aeration rates (0.13, 0.25, 0.38 L-air/min/L-water) were assessed with 40-day SOB cultures to compare their effect on H2S removal rates.
Figure 4 shows the changes in H2S concentration in the water. The initial H2S concentration was approximately 10 mg/L. As the aeration rate increased, the concentration of aqueous H2S decreased faster, because the mass transfer rates of H2S from liquid to gaseous phase increased at higher aeration rates. Even with only aeration (without SOB), the removal rate of H2S was enhanced from 18% to 50% with increasing aeration rate. However, the aqueous H2S was mainly removed by stripping, and the H2S transfer rate from liquid to gas increased with under increased aeration rates.
The increased aeration rate also positively affected the H2S removal rate of SOB, indicating the mass transfer rates from gas to liquid phase. When the aeration rate was 0.13 L-air/min/L-water, the H2S removal rate was not substantially different from aeration only (without SOB). However, when the aeration rate increased to 0.25 L-air/min/L-water, the removal rate increased approximately 1.5-fold and almost doubled at 0.38 L-air/min/L-water. This is because the aqueous oxygen supply increased; proper dissolved oxygen (DO) levels were maintained by the higher mass transfer rate and, therefore, the SOB activity reached a maximum.
It is well known that SOB activated at DO above 0.5 mg/L. In addition, proper DO concentration could be achieved by means of operation at adequate aeration rate (Table 2). Cheng et al. [17] applied bioscrubber immobilized SOB to remove H2S in biogas. They reported that the concentration of DO was retained from 0.5 to 1.0 mg/L at an aeration rate of 0.28 L-air/min/L-water and obtained removal efficiency of 90%. Potivichayanon et al. [18] presented that a similar relation between aeration rate and DO concentration was observed. The aeration rate was 0.59 L-air/min/L-water and DO was maintained above 0.5 mg/L. Lohwacharin et al. [19] operated the airlift bioreactor with lower aeration rate of 0.07 L-air/min/L-water and DO was less than 0.2 mg/L. Rattanapan et al. [20] treated H2S in biogas using a packed bed biofilter at an aeration rate of 0.37 L-air/min/L-water and obtained removal efficiency of 100%. They concluded that oxygen was sufficiently supplied to the reactor because of an adequate aeration rate. Chaiprapat [16] also obtained a good removal rate of H2S by using the bioscrubber with an aeration rate of 0.29 L-air/min/L-water. Based on the reported literature, herein, the aeration rate of >0.25 L-air/min/L-water was used for adequate operation of the SOB media.
In the experiment without SOB, a linear reduction trend was observed for reduction of aqueous H2S concentration. This trend was due to the continuous H2S evaporation. This was because the evaporated H2S was continuously being discharged outside the reactor, and a gas–liquid concentration equilibrium could not be achieved. Accordingly, the driving force for mass transfer remained constant. Even with SOB media, a linear reduction trend was observed at 0.13 L-air/min/L-water because the oxidation performance was insufficient due to the low air supply. However, at an aeration rate above 0.25 L-air/min/L-water, the concentration decreased exponentially. This was presumably because the SOB activation and H2S available to the SOB decreased with the oxidation of H2S in water. This trend was more evident at 0.38 L-air/min/L-water, and almost no reduction of H2S concentration occurred after 15 min. Therefore, energy efficiency could be improved by adjusting the operation time of the blower based on the aqueous H2S concentration. This is an important advantage of the SOB media.
In addition, an increase in aeration rate improves mass transfer in both gas–liquid and liquid–gas directions, and this was likely the cause of the increased H2S removal rate [21]. Therefore, higher aeration rate led to higher SOB media performance among the experimental range herein.

3.3. SOB Media Application

Based on the lab-scale experiment, SOB media cultivated for 40 days was installed in the STBWs of two buildings with similar capacity (1.5 m3) and use (commercial complex). The liquid and gaseous H2S concentrations were observed for approximately 110 min, after which the aeration with and without SOB media were compared. The changes in the aqueous and gaseous H2S concentrations were monitored, and the operational index was calculated.
Figure 5 shows a graph representing the concentration profiles of gaseous and aqueous H2S. When aeration was provided without SOB media, the initial H2S concentration of 10 mg/L in water remained constant for approximately 20 min before gradually decreasing. Although the evaporation of H2S occurred via stripping, high concentrations persisted. This was because the H2S in the sludge at the bottom of the STBW was disturbed by aeration. However, H2S in the water decreased, while H2S concentrations in the air continuously exhibited high concentrations. Additionally, H2S in the water was not oxidized due to the air injection and instead evaporated into the air. The H2S in the water remained at approximately 7 mg/L initially due to the disturbance of the bottom deposits, even with the addition of SOB. However, the concentration gradually declined to 1 mg/L at the end of the experiment, which was lower than that without SOB. Furthermore, the H2S concentration in the air also decreased sharply after 35 min and remained below 10 ppmv thereafter due to the oxidation of aqueous H2S by SOB.
Considering the highest aqueous H2S concentration observed and the concentration at the end of the experiment, both experiments show similar removal efficiencies of approximately 95%. However, the H2S evaporated into the air was not oxidized into an odorless substance. Therefore, the net removal efficiency (REnet) must be calculated to account for the mass balance of aqueous and gaseous H2S concentrations. The equation for REnet is detailed below:
RE net % = ( C L , Max × V L + C G , Max × V G ) − ( C L , end × V L + C G , end × V G ) ( C L , Max × V L + C G , Max × V G ) × 100 %
where CL,Max is the maximum concentration of aqueous H2S (mg/L), VL is the aqueous volume (L), CG,Max is the maximum concentration of gaseous H2S (mg/L), and VG is the volume of the headspace (L). REnet was 43.8% for aeration without SOB and 93.4% for aeration with SOB, respectively. Thus, SOB demonstrated a removal efficiency twice as high as that of aeration alone. In conclusion, SOB media has noticeable removal capacity for H2S in STBWs.
SOR (specific oxidation rate) is the amount of H2S that can be removed per power unit applied, i.e., the H2S reduction relative to the input power. It was calculated as follows:
SOR g · S / kWh = C 0 − C t · V P · t
where C0 and Ct are the concentrations of aqueous H2S (mg∙S/L) at the start and end of the experiment, respectively, V is the volume of the aqueous solution (L), P is the power consumption of the blower (kW), and t is the experiment time (h). When only aeration was performed (without SOB), the SOR was 85.02 g∙S/kWh; in contrast, the SOR with SOB was approximately three times higher (242.26 g∙S/kWh). In conclusion, SOB technology has high potential applicability for STBW odor removal owing to its higher H2S removal and power efficiency, compared to that of aeration alone.
Proper aeration rate and power consumption were estimated to apply to the SOB media. Additionally, the volume of SOB media is also an important operational factor. The proper volume of the media can be determined by evaluating the maximum elimination capacity (EC) per SOB media unit volume. To determine the elimination capacity, the same 1 m3 media and 2.2 kW pumps were installed and operated at 20 STBWs with a capacity from 100 to 1000 m3. Then, the aqueous H2S concentration was measured 24 h after starting the operation. Figure 6 shows a graph representing the relationship between the specific loading rate (m3-solution/m3-SOB), which accounts for the STBW volume per 1 m3 of media, as well as the EC. The EC was calculated using the following equation:
EC g / m 3 / h = C 0 − C t · V L V s · t
where C0 and Ct are the concentrations of aqueous H2S (mg/L) at the start and end of the experiment, respectively, VL is the liquid volume in the STBW (m3), vs. is the volume of the SOB media (m3), and t is the reaction time (h). When only aeration was performed, the maximum EC was approximately 4.5 g/m3/h; in contrast, the maximum EC in the STBW with SOB media nearly quadrupled to 17.5 g/m3/h. The EC in this study was very low compared to that reported in the literature. For example, Zytoon et al. [22] treated gas containing H2S at very high concentration of 10,000-25,000 ppmv in an airlift bioreactor and reported that the maximum decomposition capacity was 111.3 g/m3/h. Moreover, Ramírez et al. [23] obtained a decomposition capacity of 20–140 g/m3/h depending on the gas retention time, with the inlet concentration of H2S gas being 372 ppmv. Aroca et al. [24] tested H2S removal rate using two biotrickling filters immobilized with Thiobacillus thioparus and Acidithiobacillus. The obtained EC of 14 g/m3/h with Thiobacillus thioparus at a H2S concentration of 400 ppmv, while the EC obtained with Acidithiobacillus was 300 g/m3/h at a 2000 ppmv. Chaiprpat et al. [16] conducted the study using the bioscrubber and reported EC of 220 g/m3/h at 8700 ppmv H2S. In conclusion, EC is influenced by the quantity of substrate, i.e., H2S. Therefore, EC obtained in this study had smaller value than that reported in other studies due to lower concentrations of H2S in the septic tanks.
In addition, it would be difficult to directly compare the maximum decomposition capacity observed in this study with that of other bioreactors. Firstly, the SOB media applied to the STBW was operated in batch mode; when aeration is initiated, the conditions of the STBW become aerobic, and the generation of H2S is nearly suppressed. Therefore, once the H2S begins to be oxidized by SOB, only the residual H2S participates in the reaction. Furthermore, the reaction time considered for the calculation of EC in this study is likely higher than the actual time required to achieve the maximum EC. For instance, the concentration of aqueous H2S was likely to reach a steady state several hours earlier than end of the experiment. Accordingly, the actual reaction time would be less than 24 h, and thus the EC value must be underestimated. Therefore, the EC value calculated in this study must be applied only for calculating the volume of the media in the STBW and must not exceed 1000 m3-solution/m3-SOB, considering the capacity of the STBW.

4. Conclusions

An immobilized SOB media was applied to effectively remove H2S and ameliorate its associated odor from STBWs. To achieve this, operating factors were determined. The cultivation period was defined as the minimum period of 23 days required for SOB adaptation to the matrix, and 0.25 L-air/min/L-water should be applied to obtain the H2S removal rate. The cultivation period or aeration rate improved the H2S removal rate. In the pilot-scale tests, all three factors, REnet, SOR, and EC were approximately three times higher with SOB than without SOB. This indicates successful application of the SOB media to septic tanks and the process is very energy efficient. Moreover, H2S in water was rarely emitted into the atmosphere because of its oxidation upon SOB treatment. Therefore, SOB treatment could potentially replace aeration for H2S removal. The technique can be applied with efficiency and at low cost for wastewater treatment, even at large scales, with simultaneous prevention of environmental and health hazards that are caused due to H2S generation and spread.

Author Contributions

Data curation and writing—original draft preparation, J.-H.K.; methodology, H.-G.N.; data curation J.-I.C. and B.-J.L.; visualization, S.S.Y.; writing-review and editing H.W.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This subject is supported by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE: 2017-0007-00001) as “Public Technology Program based on Environmental Policy.”

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adhikari, J.R.; Lohani, S.P. Design, installation, operation and experimentation of septic tank–UASB wastewater treatment system. Renew. Energy 2019, 143, 1406–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Massoud, M.A.; Tarhini, A.; Nasr, J.A. Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: Applicability in developing countries. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 652–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lusk, M.G.; Toor, G.S.; Yang, Y.Y.; Mechtensimer, S.; De, M.; Obreza, T.A. A review of the fate and transport of nitrogen, phosphorus, pathogens, and trace organic chemicals in septic systems. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Tehnol. 2017, 47, 455–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Neisi, A.K.; Shakhi, Z.; Naghan, D.J.; Goodarzi, G.; Yari, A.R.; Mohammadi, M.J. Removal of hydrogen sulfide from septic tank by vermicomposting bio filter. Arch. Hyg. Sci. 2016, 5, 278–285. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zuo, Z.; Chang, J.; Lu, Z.; Wang, M.; Lin, Y.; Zheng, M.; Zhu, D.Z.; Yu, T.; Huang, X.; Liu, Y. Hydrogen sulfide generation and emission in urban sanitary sewer in China: What factor plays the critical role? Environ. Sci. Water Res. 2019, 5, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Panza, D.; Belgiorno, V. Hydrogen sulphide removal from landfill gas. Process Saf. Environ. 2010, 88, 420–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ho, K.L.; Lin, W.C.; Chung, Y.C.; Chen, Y.P.; Tseng, C.P. Elimination of high concentration hydrogen sulfide and biogas purification by chemical–biological process. Chemosphere 2013, 92, 1396–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khoshnevisan, B.; Tsapekos, P.; Alfaro, N.; Díaz, I.; Fdz-Polanco, M.; Rafiee, S.; Angelidaki, I. A review on prospects and challenges of biological H2S removal from biogas with focus on biotrickling filtration and microaerobic desulfurization. Biofuel Res. J. 2017, 4, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Namgung, H.K.; Song, J. The effect of oxygen supply on the dual growth kinetics of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans under acidic conditions for biogas desulfurization. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 1368–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Promnuan, K.; Sompong, O. Biological hydrogen sulfide and sulfate removal from rubber smoked sheet wastewater for enhanced biogas production. Energy Procedia 2017, 138, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yousef, N.; Mawad, A.; Aldaby, E.; Hassanein, M. Isolation of sulfur oxidizing bacteria from polluted water and screening for their efficiency of sulfide oxidase production. Glob. NEST J. 2019, 21, 259–264. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pokorna, D.; Zabranska, J. Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in environmental technology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1246–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. De Rink, R.; Klok, J.B.; van Heeringen, G.J.; Keesman, K.J.; Janssen, A.J.; ter Heijne, A.; Buisman, C.J. Biologically enhanced hydrogen sulfide absorption from sour gas under haloalkaline conditions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 383, 121104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rodriguez, G.; Dorado, A.D.; Bonsfills, A.; Sanahuja, R.; Gabriel, D.; Gamisans, X. Optimization of oxygen transfer through venturi-based systems applied to the biological sweetening of biogas. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2012, 87, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luo, J.F.; Lin, W.T.; Guo, Y. Functional genes based analysis of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria community in sulfide removing bioreactor. Appl. Microbial. Biotechnol. 2011, 90, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chaiprapat, S.; Mardthing, R.; Kantachote, D.; Karnchanawong, S. Removal of hydrogen sulfide by complete aerobic oxidation in acidic biofiltration. Process Biochem. 2011, 46, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheng, Y.; Yuan, T.; Deng, Y.; Lin, C.; Zhou, J.; Lei, Z.; Zhang, Z. Use of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria enriched from sewage sludge to biologically remove H2S from biogas at an industrial-scale biogas plant. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2018, 3, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Potivichayanon, S.; Pokethitiyook, P.; Kruatrachue, M. Hydrogen sulfide removal by a novel fixed-film bioscrubber system. Process Biochem. 2006, 41, 708–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lohwacharin, J.; Annachhatre, A.P. Biological sulfide oxidation in an airlift bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rattanapan, C.; Boonsawang, P.; Kantachote, D. Removal of H2S in down-flow GAC biofiltration using sulfide oxidizing bacteria from concentrated latex wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rollbusch, P.; Bothe, M.; Becker, M.; Ludwig, M.; Grünewald, M.; Schlüter, M.; Franke, R. Bubble columns operated under industrially relevant conditions–current understanding of design parameters. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 126, 660–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zytoon, M.A.; El-Shazly, A.H.; Noweir, M.H.; Al-Zahrani, A.A. Biological treatment of hydrogen sulfide in an airlift bioreactor with direct gas injection. Environ. Prot. Eng. 2015, 41, 131–142. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ramírez, M.; Gómez, J.M.; Aroca, G.; Cantero, D. Removal of hydrogen sulfide by immobilized Thiobacillus thioparus in a biotrickling filter packed with polyurethane foam. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 4989–4995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Aroca, G.; Urrutia, H.; Núñez, D.; Oyarzún, P.; Arancibia, A.; Guerrero, K. Comparison on the removal of hydrogen sulfide in biotrickling filters inoculated with Thiobacillus thioparus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 10, 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 17 00684 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) media in laboratory-scale tests.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) media in laboratory-scale tests.
Ijerph 17 00684 g001
Ijerph 17 00684 g002 550
Figure 2. Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) media applied in a septic tank for treating black water (STBW).
Figure 2. Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) media applied in a septic tank for treating black water (STBW).
Ijerph 17 00684 g002
Ijerph 17 00684 g003 550
Figure 3. Variation of H2S removal rate depending on the cultivation periods. The error bars indicate the standard deviation of triplicate experiments.
Figure 3. Variation of H2S removal rate depending on the cultivation periods. The error bars indicate the standard deviation of triplicate experiments.
Ijerph 17 00684 g003
Ijerph 17 00684 g004 550
Figure 4. Changes in normalized H2S concentration with and without SOB media at different aeration rates.
Figure 4. Changes in normalized H2S concentration with and without SOB media at different aeration rates.
Ijerph 17 00684 g004
Ijerph 17 00684 g005 550
Figure 5. Concentration profiles of gaseous and aqueous H2S in (a) aeration without SOB and (b) aeration with SOB conditions.
Figure 5. Concentration profiles of gaseous and aqueous H2S in (a) aeration without SOB and (b) aeration with SOB conditions.
Ijerph 17 00684 g005
Ijerph 17 00684 g006 550
Figure 6. Short-term elimination capacity curves with and without SOB.
Figure 6. Short-term elimination capacity curves with and without SOB.
Ijerph 17 00684 g006
Table
Table 1. Chemical properties of the examined solutions after experiments.
Table 1. Chemical properties of the examined solutions after experiments.
SOB Cultivation
Period (Days)		pHResidual SO42− in Solution (mg)H2S Removed
(mg)		SO42−/H2S
Without SOB7.232.1111.30.29
57.133.8113.20.30
126.935.6115.10.31
236.388.3168.30.52
306.0176.2275.40.64
455.7232.6327.30.71
Table
Table 2. Aeration rate and DO concentration in previous studies and in this study.
Table 2. Aeration rate and DO concentration in previous studies and in this study.
Aeration Rate (L-Air/min/L-Water)DO (mg/L)ReactorReferences
0.29NSBioscrubber[16]
0.280.5–1.0Bioscrubber[17]
0.59>0.5Bioscrubber[18]
0.07<0.2Airlift bioreactor[19]
0.37NSPacked bed bioreactor[20]
0.13–0.38--this study
NS: Not specified.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, J.-H.; Namgung, H.-G.; Cho, J.-I.; Yoo, S.S.; Lee, B.-J.; Ji, H.W. Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide in Septic Tanks for Treating Black Water via an Immobilized Media of Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacteria. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 684. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030684

AMA Style

Kang J-H, Namgung H-G, Cho J-I, Yoo SS, Lee B-J, Ji HW. Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide in Septic Tanks for Treating Black Water via an Immobilized Media of Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacteria. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(3):684. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030684

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Jeong-Hee, Hyeong-Gyu Namgung, Jeong-Il Cho, Sung Soo Yoo, Bong-Jae Lee, and Hyon Wook Ji. 2020. "Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide in Septic Tanks for Treating Black Water via an Immobilized Media of Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacteria" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 3: 684. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030684

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop