Biochemical Basis for the Time-of-Day Effect on Glufosinate Efficacy against Amaranthus palmeri
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Quantification of the Time-of-Day Effect on Glufosinate Efficacy
4.2. GS1 and GS2 mRNA Expression in the Light vs. Dark and Different Plant Parts
4.3. GS1 and GS2 Protein Abundance in the Light Versus Dark
4.4. The Turnover of Glutamine Synthetase Activity Following Glufosinate Treatment
4.5. Data Analysis
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cren, M.; Hirel, B. Glutamine synthetase in higher plants regulation of gene and protein expression from the organ to the cell. Plant Cell Physiol. 1999, 40, 1187–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Unno, H.; Uchida, T.; Sugawara, H.; Kurisu, G.; Sugiyama, T.; Yamaya, T.; Sakakibara, H.; Hase, T.; Kusunoki, M. Atomic structure of plant glutamine synthetase: A key enzyme for plant productivity. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 29287–29296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oliveira, I.C.; Brears, T.; Knight, T.J.; Clark, A.; Coruzzi, G.M. Overexpression of cytosolic glutamine synthetase. Relation to nitrogen, light, and photorespiration. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129, 1170–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Edwards, J.W.; Walker, E.L.; Coruzzi, G.M. Cell-specific expression in transgenic plants reveals nonoverlapping roles for chloroplast and cytosolic glutamine synthetase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 3459–3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Keys, A.J. The re-assimilation of ammonia produced by photorespiration and the nitrogen economy of C3 higher plants. Photosyn. Res. 2006, 87, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takano, H.K.; Dayan, F.E. Glufosinate-ammonium: A review of the current state of knowledge. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 3911–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takano, H.K.; Beffa, R.; Preston, C.; Westra, P.; Dayan, F.E. A novel insight into the mode of action of glufosinate: How reactive oxygen species are formed. Photosyn. Res. 2020, 144, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Droge-Laser, W.; Siemeling, U.; Puhler, A.; Broer, I. The metabolites of the herbicide L-phosphinothricin (glufosinate): Identification, stability, and mobility in transgenic, herbicide-resistant, and untransformed plants). Plant Physiol. 1994, 105, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gill, H.S.; Eisenberg, D. The crystal structure of phosphinothricin in the active site of glutamine synthetase illuminates the mechanism of enzymatic inhibition. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 1903–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Merchant, R.M.; Culpepper, A.S.; Eure, P.M.; Richburg, J.S.; Braxton, L.B. Controlling glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in cotton with resistance to glyphosate, 2, 4-D, and glufosinate. Weed Technol. 2014, 28, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heap, I. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. 2021. Available online: www.weedscience.org (accessed on 14 July 2021).
- Brunharo, C.A.; Takano, H.K.; Mallory-Smith, C.A.; Dayan, F.E.; Hanson, B.D. Role of glutamine synthetase isogenes and herbicide metabolism in the mechanism of resistance to glufosinate in Lolium perenne L. spp. multiflorum biotypes from Oregon. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 8431–8440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Block, M.; Botterman, J.; Vandewiele, M.; Dockx, J.; Thoen, C.; Gossele, V.; Movva, N.R.; Thompson, C.; Van Montagu, M.; Leemans, J. Engineering herbicide resistance in plants by expression of a detoxifying enzyme. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 2513–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Braz, G.B.P.; Oliveira, R.S., Jr.; Constantin, J.; Raimondi, M.A.; Franchini, L.H.M.; Biffe, D.F.; Arantes, J.G.Z.; Takano, H.K. Selectivity of ammonium-glufosinate applied alone or in mixture with pyrithiobac sodium in transgenic LL® cotton. Planta Daninha 2012, 30, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takano, H.K.; Beffa, R.; Preston, C.; Westra, P.; Dayan, F.E. Reactive oxygen species trigger the fast action of glufosinate. Planta 2019, 249, 1837–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumaratilake, A.R.; Preston, C. Low temperature reduces glufosinate activity and translocation in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Weed Sci. 2005, 53, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takano, H.K.; Beffa, R.; Preston, C.; Westra, P.; Dayan, F.E. Physiological factors affecting uptake and translocation of glufosinate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 3026–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petersen, J.; Hurle, K. Influence of climatic conditions and plant physiology on glufosinate-ammonium efficacy. Weed Res. 2001, 41, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takano, H.K.; Beffa, R.; Preston, C.; Westra, P.; Dayan, F.E. Glufosinate enhances the activity of protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors. Weed Sci. 2020, 68, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinson, K.B.; Durgan, B.R.; Gunsolus, J.L.; Sothern, R.B. Time of day of application effect on glyphosate and glufosinate efficacy. Crop Manag. 2005, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sellers, B.A.; Smeda, R.J.; Li, J. Glutamine synthetase activity and ammonium accumulation is influenced by time of glufosinate application. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2004, 78, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cánovas, F.M.; Avila, C.; Botella, J.R.; Valpuesta, V.; de Castro, I.N. Effect of light-dark transition on glutamine synthetase activity in tomato leaves. Physiol. Plant. 1986, 66, 648–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aliverdi, A.; Ahmadvand, G.; Emami-Namivandi, B. Weed control of glufosinate, oxyfluorfen, and paraquat as affected by the application time of day. Planta Daninha 2020, 38, e020221613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salas-Perez, R.A.; Saski, C.A.; Noorai, R.E.; Srivastava, S.K.; Lawton-Rauh, A.L.; Nichols, R.L.; Roma-Burgos, N. RNA-Seq transcriptome analysis of Amaranthus palmeri with differential tolerance to glufosinate herbicide. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195488. [Google Scholar]
- Takano, H.K.; Fernandes, V.N.; Adegas, F.S.; Oliveira, R.S., Jr.; Westra, P.; Gaines, T.A.; Dayan, F.E. A novel TIPT double mutation in EPSPS conferring glyphosate resistance in tetraploid Bidens subalternans. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habash, D.Z.; Massiah, A.J.; Rong, H.L.; Wallsgrove, R.M.; Leigh, R.A. The role of cytosolic glutamine synthetase in wheat. Annals Appl. Biol. 2001, 138, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forlani, G. Purification and properties of a cytosolic glutamine synthetase expressed in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia cultured cells. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2000, 38, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirel, B.; Gadal, P. Glutamine synthetase in rice: A comparative study of the enzymes from roots and leaves. Plant Physiol. 1980, 66, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lacuesta, M.; González-Moro, B.; González-Murua, C.; Aparicio-Tejo, P.; Muñoz-Rueda, A. Effect of phosphinothricin (glufosinate) on activities of glutamine synthetase and glutamate dehydrogenase in Medicago sativa L. J. Plant Physiol. 1989, 134, 304–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Takano, H.K.; Dayan, F.E. Biochemical Basis for the Time-of-Day Effect on Glufosinate Efficacy against Amaranthus palmeri. Plants 2021, 10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102021
Takano HK, Dayan FE. Biochemical Basis for the Time-of-Day Effect on Glufosinate Efficacy against Amaranthus palmeri. Plants. 2021; 10(10):2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102021
Chicago/Turabian StyleTakano, Hudson K., and Franck E. Dayan. 2021. "Biochemical Basis for the Time-of-Day Effect on Glufosinate Efficacy against Amaranthus palmeri" Plants 10, no. 10: 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102021