Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

Psychometric properties of the hebrew translation of the patient activation measure (PAM-13)

PLoS One. 2014 Nov 20;9(11):e113391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113391. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Objective: "Patient activation" reflects involvement in managing ones health. This cross-sectional study assessed the psychometric properties of the Hebrew translation (PAM-H) of the PAM-13.

Methods: A nationally representative sample of 203 Hebrew-speaking Israeli adults answered the PAM-H, PHQ-9 depression scale, SF-12, and Self-efficacy Scale via telephone.

Results: Mean PAM-H scores were 70.7±15.4. Rasch analysis indicated that the PAM-H is a good measure of activation. There were no differences in PAM-H scores based on gender, age or education. Subjects with chronic disease scored lower than those without. Scores correlated with the Self-efficacy Scale (0.47), Total SF-12 (0.39) and PHQ-9 (-0.35, P<0.0001), indicating concurrent validity. Discriminant validity was reflected by a significant difference in the mean PAM-H score of those who scored below 10 (72.1±14.8) on the PHQ-9 (not depressed) compared to those scoring ≥10 (i.e. probable depression) (59.2±15.8; t 3.75; P = 0.001).

Conclusion: The PAM-H psychometric properties indicate its usefulness with the Hebrew-speaking Israeli population.

Practice implications: PAM-H can be useful for assessing programs aimed at effecting changes in patient compliance, health behaviors, etc. Researchers in Israel should use a single translation of the PAM-13 so that findings can be compared, increasing understanding of patient activation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Depression / psychology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Participation / psychology*
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / standards*
  • Psychometrics
  • Self Efficacy
  • Sickness Impact Profile
  • Translations

Grants and funding

This research was fully funded by the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research Grant #206981. www.israelhpr.org.il/e/. The funders or any individuals employed or contracted by them had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.