Review
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
‘Law and…’ a New Perspective
Version 1
: Received: 21 September 2022 / Approved: 23 September 2022 / Online: 23 September 2022 (09:35:18 CEST)
How to cite: Cati, M. M. ‘Law and…’ a New Perspective. Preprints 2022, 2022090369. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202209.0369.v1 Cati, M. M. ‘Law and…’ a New Perspective. Preprints 2022, 2022090369. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202209.0369.v1
Abstract
This paper reinterprets, differently from the existing literature, the relationship between law and economics not from the point of view of a lawyer-economist but rather from the point of view of an economist-mathematician, and it raises a methodological issue. To do so, some of the elements of the theory of sets are borrowed to argue that behavioral economics, its application to behavioral law and economics, and behavioral economists have generalized the pioneering work of Judge Calabresi, with reference to the famous books ‘Tragic Choices’ and ‘The Future of Law and Economics – Essays in Reform and Recollection’. Even if the usage of the theory of sets made in this paper is intuitive, some of its basics are reviewed in the appendix.
Keywords
Law and Psychology; Law and Economics; Behavioral Economics; Behavioral Law and Economics
Subject
Social Sciences, Law
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment