Version 1
: Received: 5 March 2024 / Approved: 11 March 2024 / Online: 11 March 2024 (18:14:22 CET)
How to cite:
Xu, J.; Kölsch, F. M.; Dyszak, G. N.; Lehsing, C.; Bowers, A. R. Directional Vibro-Tactile Hazard Warnings for Drivers with Vision Impairments. Preprints2024, 2024030659. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0659.v1
Xu, J.; Kölsch, F. M.; Dyszak, G. N.; Lehsing, C.; Bowers, A. R. Directional Vibro-Tactile Hazard Warnings for Drivers with Vision Impairments. Preprints 2024, 2024030659. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0659.v1
Xu, J.; Kölsch, F. M.; Dyszak, G. N.; Lehsing, C.; Bowers, A. R. Directional Vibro-Tactile Hazard Warnings for Drivers with Vision Impairments. Preprints2024, 2024030659. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0659.v1
APA Style
Xu, J., Kölsch, F. M., Dyszak, G. N., Lehsing, C., & Bowers, A. R. (2024). Directional Vibro-Tactile Hazard Warnings for Drivers with Vision Impairments. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0659.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Xu, J., Christian Lehsing and Alex R. Bowers. 2024 "Directional Vibro-Tactile Hazard Warnings for Drivers with Vision Impairments" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0659.v1
Abstract
Vision impairment may delay responses to hazards when driving. In a proof-of-concept driving simulator study, we evaluated a hazard warning device designed for vision impaired drivers. Three groups participated: 11 persons with central vision loss (CVL; median age 60 years), 12 with homonymous field loss (HFL; 52 years) and 11 with normal vision (NV; 60 years). CVL is characterised by impaired visual acuity and contrast sensitivity while HFL is a loss of vision in the same half of the visual field (blind side) in both eyes. Participants completed drives with and without the device which gave a directional vibro-tactile warning for an approaching pedestrian hazard when collision risk exceeded a pre-defined threshold. Warnings significantly (p< 0.001) reduced brake response times for CVL (∆= 0.54s) and HFL (∆= 0.30s), but not NV participants. For HFL participants, the reduction was greater (p = 0.02) for hazards on the blind (∆= 0.57s) than seeing side (∆= 0.10s). The warnings significantly reduced collision rates for CVL participants from 11 to 0% (all hazards) and for HFL participants from 30 to 1.7% (blind side hazards). Thus, hazard warnings may be beneficial in improving safety of vision impaired drivers; further research is warranted.
Keywords
driving safety; vision impairment; advanced driver assistance systems; hemianopia; central vision loss
Subject
Engineering, Transportation Science and Technology
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.