Version 1
: Received: 15 March 2024 / Approved: 18 March 2024 / Online: 18 March 2024 (09:39:18 CET)
How to cite:
Deliceoğlu, G.; Çakır, V. O.; Kabak, B.; Ceylan, H. I.; Muntean, R. I.; Ștefănică, V. Does Athletes' Respiratory Muscle Strength Affect Max VO2 Kinetics?. Preprints2024, 2024030987. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0987.v1
Deliceoğlu, G.; Çakır, V. O.; Kabak, B.; Ceylan, H. I.; Muntean, R. I.; Ștefănică, V. Does Athletes' Respiratory Muscle Strength Affect Max VO2 Kinetics?. Preprints 2024, 2024030987. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0987.v1
Deliceoğlu, G.; Çakır, V. O.; Kabak, B.; Ceylan, H. I.; Muntean, R. I.; Ștefănică, V. Does Athletes' Respiratory Muscle Strength Affect Max VO2 Kinetics?. Preprints2024, 2024030987. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0987.v1
APA Style
Deliceoğlu, G., Çakır, V. O., Kabak, B., Ceylan, H. I., Muntean, R. I., & Ștefănică, V. (2024). Does Athletes' Respiratory Muscle Strength Affect Max VO2 Kinetics?. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0987.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Deliceoğlu, G., Raul Ioan Muntean and Valentina Ștefănică. 2024 "Does Athletes' Respiratory Muscle Strength Affect Max VO2 Kinetics?" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0987.v1
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of athletes' respiratory muscle strength, as assessed through maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory pressure (MEP), on aerobic endurance, as indicated by maximal oxygen consump-tion (Max VO2) kinetics. Respiratory muscle strength was assessed using a digital spirometer (Pony FX Cosmed, Italy), while maximal oxygen utilization capacity was measured using a breath-by-breath automatic portable gas analysis system (Cosmed K5, Italy). Statistical analysis was conducted utilizing SPSS 22.0. Based on the standardized regression coefficients (β), it was found that MEP (mean ± SD: 130.95 ± 42.82) and inspiratory diaphragmatic circumference values significantly influenced ventilatory equivalent (VE), oxygen consumption (VO2), and carbon dioxide pro-duction (VCO2). Conversely, the remaining predictor variables did not exhibit a sig-nificant effect on VE (mean ± SD: 134.80 ± 36.69), VO2 (mean ± SD: 3877.52 ± 868.47 ml), and VCO2 (mean ± SD: 4301.27 ± 1001.07 ml). In contrast, measurements of chest circumference (mean ± SD: 91.40 ± 10.72 cm), MEP, and diaphragmatic cir-cumference during inspiration (mean ± SD: 95.20 ± 10.21 cm) were found to signifi-cantly impact Max VO2 (mean ± SD: 58.52 ± 10.74 ml/kg/min), while the other pre-dictor variables did not demonstrate a significant effect on Max VO2. Conclusively, the study revealed that measured values of diaphragmatic circumference during inspiration and MEP exerted a notable influence on Max VO2, VE, VO2, and VCO2. Our findings underscore the importance of considering respiratory muscle strength in assessing and enhancing athletes' aerobic performance. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the interplay between respiratory function and exercise capacity, offering potential avenues for optimizing training regimens and perfor-mance outcomes in athletic contexts.
Public Health and Healthcare, Public Health and Health Services
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.