Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Evaluating Double-Duty Actions in Rwanda’s Secondary Cities

Version 1 : Received: 8 May 2024 / Approved: 9 May 2024 / Online: 9 May 2024 (07:46:18 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Demekas, S.; Prytherch, H.; Bayisenge, F.; Habumugisha, S.; Kraemer, K.; Monroy-Gomez, J.; Nabacu, I.; Speich, C.; Turinimigisha, I.; Barjolle, D. Evaluating Double-Duty Actions in Rwanda’s Secondary Cities. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1998. Demekas, S.; Prytherch, H.; Bayisenge, F.; Habumugisha, S.; Kraemer, K.; Monroy-Gomez, J.; Nabacu, I.; Speich, C.; Turinimigisha, I.; Barjolle, D. Evaluating Double-Duty Actions in Rwanda’s Secondary Cities. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1998.

Abstract

The double burden of malnutrition (DBM) is escalating in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including in Rwanda, most notably in urbanizing areas. The 2019-2020 Rwanda Demographic Health Survey (DHS) revealed 33% of children under 5 are stunted while 42% of women in urban areas are overweight or obese. This coexistence has contributed to a surge in non-communicable diseases (NCDs), particularly in secondary cities. Using the World Health Organization’s (WHOs) “double-duty action” (DDA) concept, this study aims to identify and evaluate interventions with double-duty potential in Rwanda, focusing on the districts of Rusizi and Rubavu. Guided by Hawkes et al.’s conceptual framework for identifying DDA entry points, a desk review of national policies pinpointed 4 programs with DDA potential: early childhood development (ECD) centers, the school feeding program, farmer field schools (FFS), and the provision of nutrition-sensitive direct support. In-person interviews with key stakeholders assessed their implementation and a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis informed context-specific recommendations for their improvement. Recommendations include targeting beliefs surrounding nutrition, improving trainings for community educators, enhancing parent – particularly father – involvement, and close follow-up. These findings offer actionable strategies for governments and nutrition stakeholders and may benefit similar interventions in other rapidly urbanizing LMICs.

Keywords

double burden of malnutrition; food system transition; nutrition policy; nutrition interventions

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Other

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.