Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

On-target Deposition from Two Engine-Powered Sprayers in Medium Foliage Density Citrus Canopies

Version 1 : Received: 28 May 2024 / Approved: 29 May 2024 / Online: 29 May 2024 (07:45:21 CEST)

How to cite: Larbi, P. A. On-target Deposition from Two Engine-Powered Sprayers in Medium Foliage Density Citrus Canopies. Preprints 2024, 2024051933. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.1933.v1 Larbi, P. A. On-target Deposition from Two Engine-Powered Sprayers in Medium Foliage Density Citrus Canopies. Preprints 2024, 2024051933. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.1933.v1

Abstract

Spray penetration into citrus canopies is critical for adequate coverage and deposition to ensure effective pest control. However, mismatch of air assistance to target canopy characteristics can lead to unintended spray loss through over penetration. To evaluate the effect of air assistance on on-target deposition, two sprayers (surrogates for airflow rates) were used to apply a fluorescent tracer dye solution @ target concentration of 300 ppm to 16 medium foliage density tree blocks in a commercial mandarin orchard. The complete factorial experiment in three replications comprised two ground speeds (1.6 and 4.8 km/h), two disc-core nozzles (TeeJet® D3-25 and D6-45), and either one or two nozzle rows to obtain a wide range of application rates (496 to 9,719 L/ha). Dye deposition significantly decreased with canopy depth (p=<0.001) by nearly 7 times across the 3.4-m-wide canopies but was not significant over 1.2 to 2.2 m sampling height (p=0.867). Deposition obtained with the low airflow rate sprayer was significantly greater (p=<0.001) than that obtained with the high airflow rate sprayer over the dose range likely due to too much air pushing out spray droplets. This study underscores the importance of matching the air assistance of orchard sprayers to the target canopy.

Keywords

air-assistance; airblast sprayer; application rate; fluorometry; spray penetration

Subject

Engineering, Other

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.