Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Local Versus Global Time in Early Relativity Theory
Version 1
: Received: 9 June 2024 / Approved: 10 June 2024 / Online: 11 June 2024 (08:41:43 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 9 July 2024 / Approved: 10 July 2024 / Online: 10 July 2024 (15:50:11 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 9 July 2024 / Approved: 10 July 2024 / Online: 10 July 2024 (15:50:11 CEST)
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Dieks, D. Local versus Global Time in Early Relativity Theory. Entropy 2024, 26, 608. Dieks, D. Local versus Global Time in Early Relativity Theory. Entropy 2024, 26, 608.
Abstract
In his groundbreaking 1905 paper on special relativity, Einstein distinguished between local and global time in inertial systems, introducing his famous definition of distant simultaneity to give physical content to the notion of global time. Over the following decade, Einstein attempted to generalize this analysis of relativistic time to include accelerated frames of reference, which, according to the principle of equivalence, should also account for time in the presence of gravity. Characteristically, Einstein’s early methodology focused on simple, intuitively accessible physical situations, often exhibiting a high degree of symmetry. In this paper, we show that while Einstein’s heuristic approach led to significant insights into the nature of relativistic time, it also posed challenges for him in making the final conceptual leap to global time as a conventionally chosen fourth coordinate. We also address some misunderstandings concerning Einstein’s early work on time and the gravitational redshift.
Keywords
Time and gravity; Coordinate time and proper time; Gravitational redshift
Subject
Physical Sciences, Other
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment