Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Roseto Revisited: Fact or Fiction

Version 1 : Received: 11 September 2024 / Approved: 11 September 2024 / Online: 12 September 2024 (11:07:53 CEST)

How to cite: Adhikari, S.; Ogedegbe, O.; Devinsky, O. Roseto Revisited: Fact or Fiction. Preprints 2024, 2024090964. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.0964.v1 Adhikari, S.; Ogedegbe, O.; Devinsky, O. Roseto Revisited: Fact or Fiction. Preprints 2024, 2024090964. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.0964.v1

Abstract

Objective: A 1964 study challenged the consensus that saturated fat consumption increased the risk for myocardial infarction (MI). Roseto Pennsylvania, an Italian-American enclave of 1600 people, had similar rates of cigarette smoking, obesity and higher saturated fat consumption as neighboring towns, but far lower MI death rates. More than 50 years later, it remains uncertain if Roseto’s residents had better heart health than the average American and if so, what factors were responsible. Methods: We compared MI deaths in Roseto and neighboring towns to the Framingham Heart Study cohort matched for age and sex. Results: We found no evidence that MI deaths were lower in Roseto, PA than in Framingham, MA when controlling for age and sex. While the role of social support in health is uncontested, methodological issues, confounding factors and biases challenge the validity of the Roseto study. Conclusions: The dramatically lower MI and MI mortality rates among males in Roseto reflects biases in sampling and comparison populations, which also impacted the contrasting Diet-Heart hypothesis that saturated fats cause heart disease. Although social support enhances health outcomes, the Roseto study neither supported nor refuted this connection.

Keywords

diet; obesity; health; social support; saturated fat

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Life Sciences

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.