©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA.

All
rights reserved. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form
NACE SP21424-2018
without the express written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE Inter- Item No. 21424
national by means of our website www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone)
281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard. Approved 2017 Dec

Alternating Current Corrosion on

Cathodically Protected Pipelines: Risk
Assessment, Mitigation, and Monitoring

This NACE International standard represents a consensus of those individual members ABSTRACT
who have reviewed this document, its scope, and provisions. Its acceptance does not in This standard practice presents guidelines
any respect preclude anyone, whether he or she has adopted the standard or not, from and procedures for use during risk assess-
manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not ment, mitigation, and monitoring of corrosion
in conformance with this standard. Nothing contained in this NACE standard is to be con- on underground, cathodically protected steel
strued as granting any right, by implication or otherwise, to manufacture, sell, or use in piping systems caused by proximity to alter-
connection with any method, apparatus, or product covered by letters patent, or as in- nating current (AC) power supply systems.
demnifying or protecting anyone against liability for infringement of letters patent. This
standard represents minimum requirements and should in no way be interpreted as a As shared right-of-way and utility corridor
restriction on the use of better procedures or materials. Neither is this standard intended practices become more common, AC influ-
to apply in all cases relating to the subject. Unpredictable circumstances may negate the ence on adjacent metallic structures has
usefulness of this standard in specific instances. NACE assumes no responsibility for the greater significance, and corrosion due to
interpretation or use of this standard by other parties and accepts responsibility for only AC influence becomes of greater concern.
those official NACE interpretations issued by NACE in accordance with its governing This standard is not intended to supersede
procedures and policies which preclude the issuance of interpretations by individual vol- or replace existing corrosion control stan-
unteers. dards, but rather to complement these stan-
dards when the influence of AC-powered
Users of this NACE standard are responsible for reviewing appropriate health, safety, systems becomes significant.
environmental, and regulatory documents and for determining their applicability in rela-
tion to this standard prior to its use. This NACE standard may not necessarily address all The effects of lightning and AC power trans-
potential health and safety problems or environmental hazards associated with the use mission systems on human safety are not
of materials, equipment, and/or operations detailed or referred to within this standard. covered by this standard. However, the mit-
Users of this NACE standard are also responsible for establishing appropriate health, igation measures implemented for safety
safety, and environmental protection practices, in consultation with appropriate regula- and system protection, as outlined in NACE
tory authorities if necessary, to achieve compliance with any existing applicable regula- SP0177, can also be used for AC corrosion
tory requirements prior to the use of this standard. control and are cited whenever feasible.

CAUTIONARY NOTICE: NACE standards are subject to periodic review, and may be re-
vised or withdrawn at any time in accordance with NACE technical committee proce- KEYWORDS
dures. NACE requires that action be taken to reaffirm, revise, or withdraw this standard Cathodic protection, alternating current
no later than five years from the date of initial publication and subsequently from the date (AC), pipeline, corrosion.
of each reaffirmation or revision. The user is cautioned to obtain the latest edition. Pur-
chasers of NACE standards may receive current information on all standards and other
NACE publications by contacting the NACE FirstService Department, 15835 Park Ten
Place, Houston, TX 77084-5145 (telephone +1 281-228-6200).

ISBN 1-57590-384-9
©2018, NACE International
 Foreword
In NACE standards, the terms shall, This standard practice presents guidelines and procedures for use during risk assess-
must, should, and may are used in ac- ment, mitigation, and monitoring corrosion on underground, cathodically protected steel
cordance with the definitions of these piping systems caused by proximity to alternating current (AC) power supply systems.
terms in the NACE Publications Style This standard is not intended to supersede or replace existing corrosion control stan-
Manual. The terms shall and must are dards, but rather to complement these standards when the influence of AC-powered
used to state a requirement, and are con- systems becomes significant.
sidered mandatory. The term should is
used to state something good and is rec- As shared right-of-way and utility corridor practices become more common, AC influ-
ommended, but is not considered man- ence on adjacent metallic structures has greater significance, and corrosion due to AC
datory. The term may is used to state influence becomes of greater concern.
something considered optional.
The effects of lightning and AC power transmission systems on human safety are not
covered by this standard. However, the mitigation measures implemented for safety and
system protection, as outlined in NACE SP0177, can also be used for AC corrosion con-
trol and are cited whenever feasible.1

The original technical background for this standard is the NACE Technical Committee
Report “AC Corrosion State-of-the-Art: Corrosion Rate, Mechanism, and Mitigation Re-
quirements” prepared by NACE Task Group 327 and published by NACE in January
2010.2 Supplements to the current understanding of AC corrosion and criteria for this
have been made in PRCI(1) reports3,4 published in October 2016.

This standard addresses typical power transmission frequencies up to 60 Hz only.

This standard was prepared by Task Group (TG) 430 on “AC Corrosion on Cathodically
Protected Pipelines: Risk Assessment, Mitigation, and Monitoring” in 2018. TG 430 is
administered by Specific Technology Group (STG) 05 on Cathodic/Anodic Protection and
sponsored by STG 35 on Pipelines. This standard is issued by NACE under the auspices
of STG 05.

(1)
Pipeline Research Council International (PRCI), 1401 Wilson Blvd., Ste. 1101, Arlington, VA 22209.

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
2 — SP21424-2018
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express NACE International
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
 NACE International Standard Practice (SP21424-2018)

Alternating Current Corrosion on Cathodically

Protected Pipelines: Risk Assessment,
Mitigation, and Monitoring
1. General.....................................................................................................................4
2. Definitions.................................................................................................................4
3. Sources of AC...........................................................................................................5
4. Basic Understanding of AC Corrosion......................................................................5
5. Risk Assessment.......................................................................................................6
6. Criteria.......................................................................................................................8
7. Mitigation...................................................................................................................8
8. Monitoring Strategies................................................................................................9
9. Long Term Monitoring.............................................................................................12
References..............................................................................................................13
Appendix A: Measurement and Monitoring Equipment (Nonmandatory)...............14

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
NACE International
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express SP21424-2018 — 3
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
 Section 1: General
1.1 AC (alternating current) corrosion is defined as corrosion initiated and propagating
under the influence of alternating current. AC corrosion on cathodically protected
underground pipelines is commonly the result of a combined action of the AC
voltage, the cathodic protection conditions, a coating defect—usually small—and
the chemical and physical conditions of the soil. If the AC component is either
entirely removed or limited to a certain level, the corrosion will be mitigated.

AC corrosion is also influenced by direct current (DC). As such, in addition to

mitigation by limiting the AC component, AC corrosion can be reduced by adjust-
ing the DC-component – through the cathodic protection (CP) system.

1.2 An AC corrosion evaluation process (Figure 1) should include an analysis which

New pipeline (5.3) Analysis results in development and implementation of a mitigation strategy, development
New interference source (5.2) (Risk
Existing pipeline (5.1) Assessment) of a monitoring strategy, and implementation of that monitoring strategy. If subse-
quent monitoring indicates risk of AC corrosion, the analysis as such should be
reviewed, the mitigation strategy should be improved, or—in case values of the
Mitigation monitoring parameter are violated but it is documented that this does not lead to
Strategy
corrosion—the monitoring strategy can be modified.

Monitoring 1.3 The provisions of this standard should be applied under the direction of compe-
Strategy tent persons, who, by reason of knowledge of the physical sciences as well as the
principles of engineering and mathematics, acquired by education and related
practical experience, are qualified to engage in the practice of corrosion control of
Monitoring Unsafe buried ferrous piping systems. Such persons may be registered professional en-
gineers or persons recognized as corrosion specialists or CP specialists by NACE
if their professional activities include suitable experience in external corrosion
Safe
control on buried ferrous piping systems and AC interference and mitigation.
Figure 1: AC Corrosion Evaluation
Process 1.4 This standard should be used in conjunction with the references contained herein.

Section 2: Definitions
AC Corrosion: Corrosion initiated and propagating under the influence of alternating current.

AC Current Density (JAC): Unit: A/m2. The AC current density in a coating defect or in a
coupon or probe used to simulate a coating defect of a certain area.

AC-Voltage (UAC): Unit: V. Difference in AC potential between the pipeline and the earth. The
AC voltage is the ultimate driving force for the AC current density at a coating defect —which
may cause corrosion—or the AC current density at grounding devices (including galvanic
anodes) installed for mitigation purposes. The AC voltage is not a constant value since:

• it will change over time primarily due to intermittent conditions in the AC power system,
for instance because household power consumption is different during daytime and
nighttime.

• it will change along the length of the pipeline since the induced voltage depends on
characteristics of the pipeline, characteristics of the interfering AC power system, as
well as the geometrical and geographical alignment.

AC Voltage Survey: Measurements along the pipeline designed to provide evidence of

the actual level of AC pipe to electrolyte potentials or Coating Stress Voltage resulting from
existing AC interference sources.

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
4 — SP21424-2018
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express NACE International
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
Coating Stress Voltage (AC voltage with respect to close earth): Unit: V. Difference in AC
potential between the metallic surface of a coated structure and the earth in contact with the
outer surface of the coating. Circuit theory and computer simulations illustrate that the coating
stress voltage is, more accurately, the driving force for the AC current density at coating defects
when AC mitigation in the form of ribbon anodes is installed in the proximity of the coating defect.

DC Current Density (JDC): Unit A/m2. The DC current density at a coating defect or at a
coupon or probe used to simulate a coating defect of a certain area.

Excessive cathodic protection (CP): Cathodic protection levels that lead to cathodic
protection DC current densities exceeding 1 A/m2 or cathodic protection levels that lower
the spread resistance due to cathodic reactions.

Interference: Any electrical disturbance on a structure as a result of stray current.

ON Potential (EON): Unit: V. DC potential measured between the pipeline and a reference
electrode placed in the adjacent soil while the cathodic protection current is flowing. This
potential includes voltage drops in the soil (IR drops).

Polarized Potential: Unit: V and instant OFF-Potential are used interchangeably. The
terms refer to pipe to electrolyte DC potential excluding the voltage-drop error associated
with the current flowing from a cathodic protection system. The measured OFF potential
may include a voltage drop associated with circulating exchange current between anodic
and cathodic areas at the pipe.

Spread Resistance (RS): Unit: Ω∙m2. Refers to the resistance from the pipe to earth
through a specific coating defect, or of a coupon or probe of known area, to earth. The
spread resistance multiplied by the DC current density constitutes the voltage drop men-
tioned above, and the spread resistance is (approximately) the proportionality factor be-
tween AC voltage and AC current density.

Stray Current: Current flowing through paths other than the intended circuit.

Other parameters and definitions not mentioned above are in accordance with NACE stan-
dards, practices and reports identified in the References list.

Section 3: Sources of AC
3.1 The AC may be imposed on the pipeline in several ways as described in NACE
SP0177.1 The main source of AC interference is adjacent AC power systems such
as high voltage power lines or AC power systems for AC driven trains.

3.2 Three coupling mechanisms exist between the pipeline and the power systems:
inductive coupling, resistive coupling, and capacitive coupling. It is understood
that inductive coupling is the main contribution to AC corrosion when dealing with
long term (i.e. steady state) AC interference.

Section 4: Basic Understanding of AC Corrosion

When AC corrosion develops, this typically involves the steps illustrated in Figure 2 as
discussed below.

4.1 For pipelines with cathodic protection applied in accordance with usual criteria,5
the development of AC corrosion requires simultaneous co-existence of induced
AC, excessive cathodic protection, and small coating defects. Threshold values
are given in Section 6 (Criteria) of this document.

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
NACE International
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express SP21424-2018 — 5
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
 4.1.1 The induced AC will lead to the discharge of AC current at coating de-
fects, the intensity of which (AC current density) is measured in A/m2.

4.1.2 The AC current density will be governed by the AC voltage (coating

stress voltage) and the spread resistance, associated with the coating defect,
through Ohm’s Law.

4.1.3 The spread resistance is governed by the size of the coating defect, the
soil resistivity at the coating defect, the chemistry of the soil, and by the cathodic
protection current density in the coating defect.

4.2 The AC current density may lead to DC depolarization. This means that a higher CP
(DC) current density is required to maintain a certain cathodic protection potential.

4.3 Increasing the level of cathodic protection may be attempted in order to mitigate
AC corrosion. However, in the AC corrosion scenario, this will have the opposite
effect, since the increase of CP current density further decreases the spread re-
sistance at the coating defect due to the production of ions such as OH– (alkaliza-
tion). It is noted that the spread resistance may also increase rather than de-
crease under CP conditions as a result of the formation of high resistive films,
such as magnesium- or calcium hydroxides or -oxides, on the steel surface at
elevated pH conditions, if these earth alkaline cations are present in the soil.
These conditions then lead to a decreased AC corrosion risk.

4.4 Through elevated levels of CP (Paragraphs 4.2 and 4.3), the spread resistance will
decrease, thereby increasing the AC current density. This will further depolarize
DC, decreasing the spread resistance, etc. This scenario results in an autocatalytic
cycle leading to AC corrosion. Getting out of this cycle requires control of the AC
current density as well as control of the DC current density, as defined in Section 6.

4.5 According to the present scientific explanation, the mechanism of AC corrosion

involves one or more of the following processes:2-4,6-9

4.5.1 Lack of passivity due to the fast cycling of the potential across the im-
mune/passive stability line of steel on the Pourbaix diagram. The corrosion pro-
cess is fast and can occur within the period of an AC cycle, whereas subsequent
Induced AC Small Defect Excessive CP passivation requires the formation of ferrous oxides or hydroxides. These pro-
cesses are slower and may not run to completion within the period of an AC cycle.
Pre-requisites 4.5.2 Cycling of the potential between the regions of stability of protecting and
non-protecting ferrous oxides and –hydroxides, the result of which is a net oxida-
Depolarization tion of the steel.
Increased AC Increased DC
Current (CP) Current
4.5.3 Extreme alkalization at the coating defect due to the AC corrosion cycle
described. The very high pH values at the coating defects, combined with the AC
may reach the critical high-pH corrosion area in the Pourbaix diagram, favoring
Ohm’s Law Alkalinity corrosion by the formation of HFeO2–.

4.5.4 Thermal heating due to the exchange of high AC current densities has
Reduced Spread Resistance been reported to be a potential source for increasing the risk of AC corrosion. In-
creased soil conductivity and reaction kinetics are generally expected during local
soil heating, and bubble formation as well as local soil dry out may occur.
Figure 2: Autocatalytic Nature of AC
Corrosion on Cathodically Protected Section 5: Risk Assessment
Pipelines
The risk assessment procedure for AC corrosion is different when dealing with existing
pipelines (see Paragraph 5.1), new interference sources (see Paragraph 5.2), or new pipe-
lines (see Paragraph 5.3).

5.1 For existing pipelines, the AC corrosion evaluation process recommends an initial
analysis involving factors such as pipeline history record, proximity assessments,
CP data and evaluation of existing pipeline and coupon data, etc. If the initial
analysis indicates that an AC corrosion risk is present, the initial analysis should
be followed by a detailed analysis involving AC calculations and/or AC measure-
ments, evaluation of historical CP data and abnormalities, DC interference, in line
inspection results and other existing data relevant for the analysis. If the data

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
6 — SP21424-2018
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express NACE International
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
 available is insufficient for making a reasonable assessment based on sound
engineering practices, the existing data material should be supplemented.

5.2 New AC or DC interference sources that may cause additional corrosion risk on
existing pipelines shall be subject to detailed analysis. This should be carried out
as early as possible, preferably at design stage, and subsequently—when the
new source is fully established—practical measurements should be made. Some
guidelines are outlined in this section.

5.3 New pipelines with interfering AC systems shall be subject to detailed analysis at
the design stage, and subsequently—when established in practice—be subjected
to practical measurements. Some guidelines are identified in this section.

5.4 Initial analysis on existing pipelines can be performed in order to gain an initial im-
pression on the risk of AC corrosion or in order to identify if supplementary investi-
gations or analysis are required. The initial analysis may comprise the following:

5.4.1 Pipeline Corrosion History: If previous corrosion incidents—whether

in line inspection results or revealed by excavation or leakage—have failed to be
explained with certainty using other mechanisms, they could beneficially be
re-evaluated in view of AC corrosion characteristics given in this standard.

5.4.2 AC Voltage Measurements: Generally, the risk of AC corrosion increases

with increasing AC voltage even though it has been observed that even at low AC
voltages (<1V), AC corrosion can occur if the spread resistance and/or bulk soil
resistivity is very low. This is, however, an extreme condition. Furthermore, regard-
less of the AC voltage level, high resistivity soils will generally result in low AC cur-
rent density and subsequently lower the risk of AC corrosion.

5.4.3 DC Cathodic Protection Potential: AC corrosion may result from the

case of inadequate or excessive CP present on a pipeline. If significant pipe metal
voltage drops occur due to the pipeline current, it should be considered to further
investigate this in combination with the above AC voltage observations.

5.4.4 Soil Resistivity Surveys: The spread resistance is influenced by the

soil resistivity. As such, if results from soil resistivity surveys indicate areas with
low soil resistivity combined with points described in Paragraphs 5.4.1-5.4.3, ini-
tiation of further analysis should be considered. The following soil resistivity pa-
rameters can be applied as a guideline to corrosion risk:10,11

• Below 25 Ω.m: very high risk,

• Between 25 and 100 Ω.m: high risk,
• Between 100 and 300 Ω.m: medium risk,
• Above 300 Ω.m: low risk.

5.4.5 DC Interference: If there is evidence of cathodic or anodic interference

in combination with AC, further detailed analysis shall be considered.

5.4.6 Coupon or Corrosion Rate Probe Measurements: If the criteria (see

Section 6) are found to be violated, detailed analysis shall be performed.

5.5 Detailed assessment of the induced AC voltage shall include calculations and/or
AC voltage measurement surveys. A CP system design should include an evalu-
ation to estimate the level of AC voltages and currents.

5.5.1 Calculations of the induced AC along the pipeline should be made in ac-
cordance with NACE SP0177. The calculations should be used in the establish-
ment of a mitigation design strategy integrating principles stipulated in Section 7.

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
NACE International
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express SP21424-2018 — 7
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
 5.5.2 AC pipe to electrolyte potential measurements shall be conducted over
those portions of the interfered pipeline on which AC exposure has been noted or
is suspected. The exact location, date and time that each measurement was
taken shall be recorded and compared with information (where obtainable) from
the electric utility company regarding peak load conditions and actual load condi-
tions at the time of measurement. The AC pipe to electrolyte potential measure-
ments can then be paired with the load information to predict worst case induction
level. Datalogging over an extended period is also useful in this regard.

The AC calculation and/or AC pipe to electrolyte potential measurements will re-

sult in a detailed knowledge of the induced AC level along the pipeline. The opti-
mum position of AC mitigation measures can be determined by computing tools
and/or field measurements—thus forming the (AC) mitigation strategy.

Section 6: Criteria
6.1 Corrosion Rate: Effective control of AC corrosion can be shown by a documented
corrosion rate less than 0.025 mm/y (1 mil per year) which is the commonly used
benchmark for effective external corrosion control according to NACE SP0169.
This can be achieved using weight loss coupons or corrosion rate probes such as
electrical resistance type probes. Comparison of consecutive in line metal loss in-
spection tools may also be used to quantify corrosion, provided the resolution of
the applied tool is sufficient to detect small-diameter attacks such as AC corrosion.

6.2 Current Density: Unless effective AC corrosion control has been otherwise docu-
mented (Paragraph 6.1), the AC current density should not exceed a time-
weighted average of:

• 30 A/m2 if DC current density exceeds 1 A/m2

• 100 A/m2 if DC current density is less than 1 A/m2

The AC- and DC current densities are measured at coupons according to the
guidelines given in Section 8.

6.3 AC Voltage: The AC voltage induced on a pipeline is the driving force for AC cor-
rosion. The AC voltage should be mitigated to a level where the above current
densities are met.

6.4 Cathodic Polarization: AC corrosion is inhibited by cathodic polarization. The crite-

ria given in NACE SP0169 shall be followed,5 but the cathodic DC current densities
given in Paragraph 6.2 should be noted.

6.5 The above criteria shall be documented for a representative period of time, ac-
counting for variations in influencing parameters.

Section 7: Mitigation
7.1 AC corrosion can be controlled by mitigating the induced AC voltage (reduce the
pipe coating stress voltage), by controlling the pipeline CP condition, and by con-
trolling DC interference. The measures should be taken in parallel.

7.2 AC Mitigation: The AC mitigation can be made in several ways, in accordance

with NACE SP0177.1

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
8 — SP21424-2018
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express NACE International
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
7.3 Control of the Cathodic Protection Condition: Since AC corrosion may result both
if inadequate and if excessive CP is applied, the CP system should be designed
to maintain a uniform potential profile along the pipeline. If significant pipe metal
voltage drops occur due to the pipeline current, it should be considered to increase
the number of CP systems attached as well as optimize the position of the CP
systems to minimize voltage drops in the pipeline and hence the risk of inadequate
or excessive CP.

7.4 Control of DC Interference Currents: Both anodic and cathodic DC interference

conditions shall be considered, since AC corrosion may result both if inadequate
CP is present during anodic interference, or if excessive CP results from cathodic
interference. DC interference should be mitigated in accordance with NACE
SP0169.5

7.5 Mitigation of AC Corrosion through Construction Design: Especially during the

engineering design of new pipelines or new AC high voltage power lines, the
possibilities of reducing the induced AC voltage should be considered whenever
practical. The magnitude of AC induction depends on several factors as stipulated
in NACE SP0177. Also, repair of coating faults mitigates the initiation and propa-
gation of AC corrosion.

7.6 Since AC corrosion can proceed at a very high rate, the mitigation measures
planned for new pipelines must be in place as soon as the pipeline is in contact
with the soil.

Section 8: Monitoring Strategies

8.1 Locations along the pipeline suitable for AC corrosion tests and monitoring should
result from the AC corrosion risk assessment (Section 5). Test points should be
installed where the analysis shows a risk of AC corrosion. Such locations include:

a) Locations at which the AC voltage is shown by calculation or by AC voltage

surveys to be significant,
b) Locations at which the soil resistivity is low (see Paragraph 5.4.4 for guidance),
c) Locations at which the CP condition can be excessive e.g. nearby CP current
sources,
d) Locations at which the CP condition can be inadequate like in mid points
between CP current sources,
e) Locations at which DC interference (anodic or cathodic) is present,
f) Locations where in line inspection, excavation activities or leak history have
shown corrosion activity,
g) Locations where observations on coupons or soil corrosion probes have
exceeded threshold values as defined in Section 6.

8.2 Installation of coupons and/or corrosion rate probes is necessary in order to in-
vestigate and monitor the AC corrosion risk at the test stations. The installation of
coupons and probes should be made in accordance with NACE SP0104.12 The
capability of the coupon or probe surface to represent an actual coating defect on
the pipeline must be maintained to the greatest possible extent. The following
points must be considered:

a) The coupon/probe shall be positioned in the same soil or backfill as the

pipeline itself.
b) The geometry (size and shape) of the coupon/probe influences the spread
resistance. Unlike recommendations for other CP applications where the
coupon should simulate the largest anticipated coating defect on the

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
NACE International
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express SP21424-2018 — 9
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
 structure,12 a 1 cm2 coupon or probe is generally applied for AC corrosion risk
evaluation.10,11

c) The coupon/probe should not cause or receive any electrical interference

from adjacent coupons or coating faults unless being part of the purpose of
monitoring.

d) The coupon/probe should have, and maintain, an effective electrical contact

with the surrounding soil. During the installation process, the soil around the
coupon shall be compacted to prevent settlement and voids forming around
the coupon. These voids could result in loss of full contact between the cou-
pon surface and the surrounding soil, giving inaccurate results.

Coupons and probes can be installed by different methods (during construc-

tion, during excavation, by auguring, by hand digging, by vacuum excava-
tion) as described in NACE SP0104.12

8.3 Measurements performed at the selected test points shall provide information on
the quantities given in Section 6 (Criteria).

8.3.1 Corrosion Rate Measurements

Corrosion rate measurements can, according to NACE SP0104,12 gen-

erally be made using one of the following techniques:

• Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)

• Linear polarization resistance (LPR)
• Electrical resistance (ER).

Under cathodic protection and AC interference conditions, the EIS and

LPR techniques cannot be applied successfully.

Electrical resistance (ER) measurements require the installation of suit-

able electrical resistance probes. Corrosion is detected by the increase
of the electrical resistance of the coupon as corrosion progressively de-
creases the thickness of the coupon. The primary advantage is that the
average corrosion rate can be followed continuously and used to opti-
mize AC corrosion mitigation measures. The primary disadvantage is
that the accuracy is compromised if localized corrosion occurs.

Alternatively, weight loss measurements and visual examination proce-

dures can be applied. This requires installation of pre-weighed coupons.
After some time of operation (months/years) the coupon is excavated
and brought to a laboratory for cleaning, inspection and weighing. This
procedure is described in ASTM(2) G1-03.13 The primary advantage of
the procedure is that the visual inspection provides detailed information
of the corrosion topography—maximum as well as an average corrosion
rate. The primary disadvantage is that the coupon provides no informa-
tion until it is excavated and that the weight loss measurement does not
accurately reflect the corrosion rate if localized corrosion occurs.

8.3.2 Coupon Current Measurements

Coupon currents (AC and DC) can be measured either by the

voltage drop across a series resistor or by low resistance ammeters. For
both AC and DC current measurements, the value of the series resistor

(2)
ASTM International (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor, Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
10 — SP21424-2018
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express NACE International
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
 should be sufficiently low to avoid significant disturbance of the system.

For AC current measurements, the value of the series resistor should be

insignificant compared with the spread resistance of the coupon. For DC
current measurements, the value of the series resistor should be
insignificant compared with the sum of the coupon spread resistance and
polarization resistance. The accuracy of the measurement depends on
the selection of the series resistance value, the accuracy of the series
resistor and the accuracy of the meter. The series resistor should be
verified regularly, and the meter should be part of routine calibration
procedures.

It should be noted that the current densities measured on coupons may

not reflect maximum current density if localized corrosion occurs or if
cathodic scaling products are unequally precipitating on the surface.

8.3.3 AC Voltage Measurements

AC voltage measurements are used to determine the level of AC inter-

ference. For this purpose, measurements must be made using a data
logging device programmed to measure the AC voltage in intervals suf-
ficiently short to capture the steady state long-term interference.

AC voltage measurements are usually made with reference to remote

earth. However, when continuous anode systems are buried in parallel
and close to the pipeline, the coating stress voltage may be a more ac-
curate measure of the driving force for the AC current density than the
measure of AC voltage to remote earth.

8.3.4 DC Potential Measurements

When influenced by AC, the accuracy of the DC instruments and data

loggers may be significantly affected. Furthermore, AC filters, when
provided, may introduce time delays in instant OFF potential readings
causing erroneous measurements. To minimize these effects, ON and
instant OFF potential measurements are often performed using coupons.

In relation to ON-potential measurements, the advantage of the coupons

is limited to the knowledge that an artificial coating defect has been
systematically introduced. However, in relation to instant-OFF potentials,
disconnecting the coupon from the pipe will remove the coupon from both
the AC and DC circuits.

Three different principles can be used individually or simultaneously to

measure the DC polarized potentials by minimizing or eliminating the
voltage drop on coupons:
1. By inserting a switch in the test station between the pipeline
connection and the coupon connection and measuring the potential
between the coupon and the reference electrode disconnecting the
coupon from the pipeline.
2. By embedding the reference electrode along with the coupon in a
test probe. In this case, the voltage drop compensation relies on the
geometrical arrangement of the assembly. It is still recommended to
test the instant OFF potential in this case for the efficiency of the
automated compensation provided by the close distance between
the coupon surface and the reference.

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
NACE International
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express SP21424-2018 — 11
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
 3. Quantifying the voltage-drop as the product of the DC current density
and the spread resistance of the coupon and subtracting this from
the ON-potential value allows the polarized potential to be assessed
without disconnecting the coupon from the pipeline. In such a case,
the polarized potential can be quantified under the same AC load as
experienced by the pipe in normal operation.

Regardless of the technique, due consideration shall be taken about the

sources causing uncertainty in the measurement described in Section 4.

8.4 Frequency of Measurements

The frequency of the measurements of the individual parameters shall be se-

lected in accordance with the expected frequency by which said parameter is
changing considering the worst case under normal operating conditions of the
interfering systems. It must be recognized that AC load will change seasonally as
will the physical and chemical environment. AC corrosion is a developing process
which has a period of incubation before a critical environment is established. As
such, the established measurement protocol shall be maintained for an appropri-
ate extended period of time in order to provide a meaningful judgment of the risk
of AC corrosion.

8.5 Accuracy and Operation of Measuring Equipment

The instruments and adopted procedures shall comply with the conditions given
in NACE TM0497.14

It is a fundamental requirement of any measuring instrument that it shall not

cause any unacceptable changes to the circuit being measured. As such, the
chosen instrument must be suitable for the specific situation.

The accuracy of the measuring equipment is only one among several factors
contributing to the uncertainty of the measurement.

Section 9: Long Term Monitoring

9.1 Monitoring of the AC corrosion shall be regarded as a dynamic process through
which the operator becomes increasingly aware of the risks of AC corrosion af-
fecting the pipeline system.

9.2 The monitoring system should be designed to provide information on the AC cor-
rosion criteria outlined in Section 6. Initial locations should be chosen based on
the considerations in Paragraph 7.1, and the data evaluation should follow the
procedure in Paragraph 8.3.

9.3 In accordance with Figure 1, the monitoring process made at the individual test
points can lead to a safe indication per criteria given in Section 6 at the point of
measurement, or it can lead to the conclusion that key parameters are exceeded
(violated). If key parameters are violated, the information can lead to a renewed
risk assessment analysis, or it can lead to a renewed mitigation strategy. Imple-
mentations from these renewed analysis or strategies should be tested in practice
by further monitoring in an iterative process.

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
12 — SP21424-2018
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express NACE International
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
References
1. NACE SP0177 (latest revision), “Mitigation of Alternating Current and Lightning
Effects on Metallic Structures and Corrosion Control Systems” (Houston TX: NACE).

2. NACE Publication 35110, “AC Corrosion State-of-the-Art: Corrosion Rate, Mecha-

nism, and Mitigation Requirements” (Houston, TX: NACE 2010).

3. “Develop a New Unique AC Corrosion CP Mitigation Criterion,” PRCI Report,

PR-405-113604-R01, October 2016.

4. “The Impact of Fluctuations in AC Interference on the Corrosion Risk,” PRCI Report,

PR-466-143602-R01, October 2016.

5. NACE SP0169 (latest revision), “Control of External Corrosion on Underground or

Submerged Metallic Piping Systems” (Houston TX: NACE).

6. M. Büchler, “Determining the a.c. corrosion risk of pipelines based on coupon

measurements,” CEOCOR(3) International Congress 2013, paper no. 2013-18
(Florence, Italy: CEOCOR, 2013).

7. L.V. Nielsen et al., “Effect of Coating Defect Size, Coating Defect Geometry, and
Cathodic Polarization on Spread Resistance—Consequences in relation to AC
Corrosion Monitoring,” CEOCOR International Congress 2010, paper no. 2010 C2
05 (Brussels, Belgium: CEOCOR, 2010).

8. R. Winston Revie, ed., Oil and Gas Pipelines: Integrity and Safety Handbook Ch. 26
(Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2015).

9. P. Linhardt, G. Ball. “AC Corrosion: Results from laboratory investigations and from a
failure analysis,” CORROSION 2006, paper no. 6160, Houston, TX: NACE Interna-
tional, 2006.

10. EN 15280 (latest revision), “Evaluation of a.c. corrosion likelihood of buried pipelines
applicable to cathodically protected pipelines” (Brussels, Belgium: CEN(4)).

11. ISO(5) 18086 (latest revision), “Corrosion of metals and alloys—Determination of AC

corrosion—Protection criteria” (Geneva, Switzerland: ISO).

12. NACE SP0104 (latest revision), “The Use of Coupons for Cathodic Protection
Monitoring Applications” (Houston TX: NACE).

13. ASTM G1-03 (latest revision), “Standard Practice for Preparing, Cleaning, and
Evaluating Corrosion Test Specimens” (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM).

14. NACE Standard TM0497 (latest revision), “Measurement Techniques Related to

Criteria for Cathodic Protection on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping
Systems” (Houston TX: NACE).

(3)
European Committee for the Study of Corrosion and Protection of Piping Systems (CEOCOR), c/o SYNERGRID, Avenue Palmerston
4, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.
( )
European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.
(5)
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Chemin de Blandonnet 8, CP 401, 1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland.

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
NACE International
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express SP21424-2018 — 13
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
 Appendix A
Measurement and Monitoring Equipment
(Nonmandatory)
This appendix is considered nonmandatory, although it may contain mandatory language. It is intended only to provide supplemen-
tary information or guidance. The user of this standard is not required to follow, but may choose to follow, any or all of the provisions
herein.

Equipment installed on the pipeline, such as coupon test stations or soil corrosion probes, is used to monitor AC current density and
corrosion rate on the pipeline at the location of installation. These devices will allow evaluation of existing pipeline and coupon data.

For analytical purposes, this data is required to be measured over time through periodic surveys or data logging. This measured data
should be correlated with AC line load currents on the power lines affecting the pipeline together with cathodic protection potentials.

Coupon test station or soil corrosion probes measurements

These measurement devices can assist in determining AC and DC current density values on the pipeline. The AC and DC current density
values (criteria) associated with AC corrosion mechanisms are outlined in Section 6.

A documented corrosion rate of less than 0.025 mm/y using weight loss coupons or soil corrosion probes connected to the pipeline at
selected points is considered an effective criterion.

In accordance with Section 7, AC corrosion measurement and monitoring techniques and equipment are specified to ensure accurate
data recording and monitoring of the corrosion risk.

Some of the testing and monitoring equipment required to determine AC corrosion effects to specific pipeline sections include the following:

• Coupon test stations

• Soil corrosion probes

• Data logging equipment – temporarily installed at a location

• Remote monitoring equipment – permanent /semi-permanent installations

• AC/DC multimeter – with appropriate voltage ranges and adequate input impedance. Commonly used digital instruments have a
nominal impedance of 10 megaohms.

• AC/DC ammeter

• Copper-copper sulfate reference electrode

• Permanent reference electrode – installed at coupon test stations

• Soil resistivity measurement equipment

Failure to select and use test instruments correctly can cause errors in these field measurements.

Some of the required parameters for these devices are outlined below:

• Data Logger or Remote Monitoring Equipment – time intervals sufficiently short to capture variations in the system and memory ca-
pacity to allow data logging for significant periods of time.

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
14 — SP21424-2018
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express NACE International
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
• Coupon current measurement – using the following methods:

Voltage drop across a series resistor (sufficiently low to avoid disturbance)

or
Zero resistance ammeter

All test equipment shall be calibrated regularly in accordance with applicable procedures to assure accuracy of test results.

Accuracy and operation of measuring equipment shall comply with NACE TM0497.14

Duration of testing or monitoring could have a major role in deciding the likelihood of AC corrosion attack.

©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
NACE International
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express SP21424-2018 — 15
written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.
 ©2018 NACE International, 15835 Park Ten Place, Suite 200, Houston TX 77084, USA. All rights re-
NACE SP21424-2018
served. Reproduction, republication or redistribution of this standard in any form without the express ISBN 1-57590-384-9
Item #21424 written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Contact NACE International by means of our website NACE International
www.nace.org, email [email protected], or (phone) 281-228-6223 for reprints of this standard.