Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Avatar
Anonymous asked:

Cos Daemon sees his daughters as his daughters but sisters/nieces/cousins are apparently Targaryen fair game. That's why the Alyssa mother scene didn't make sense because he sees his mother as his mother

my point in that post was to talk about how daemon was openly affectionate with rhaenyra, his niece, because he was actively grooming her and had ulterior motives with her. however when it comes to his daughters, he has no active use for them at this point in the show, so he therefore just outright ignores them or doesn't even spare them a second glance

"Sometimes I think I hate him" told us a lot about his current strained relationship with his daughters at this point. daemon can be very self interested, and those who don't currently serve a purpose for him usually get outright ignored or thrown to the backburner

Avatar

a lot of hotd revolves around fathers and daughters so it's interesting to me that daemon used to shower his teenage niece with gifts and attention whenever he was around (the one he was grooming) and yet could not even spare his daughter a second glance or even ask for the whereabouts of the other daughter this season

Avatar
reblogged

personally i rlly enjoy the writing decision by the hotd team to conceptualise fire & blood as a history text created as propaganda, where the events r often not only skewed but total falsehoods. it’s really interesting to do an adaptation from the pov of just how much could’ve been lost to time via institutional misinfo. like it is 100% an extreme adaptational decision and i get why people don’t like it. it absolutely is in the vein of a 500k word spec fic where the author has very much gone out of their way to argue that there’s very little that cannot be hidden thru institutional propaganda when info is a controlled resource. fire & blood is conceptually strange as a book, being purposely written as a potentially biased historical text, & hotd is an odd adaptation for taking that idea & fuckin sprinting with it. anyway thank u hotd for underlining the fact that underneath every greek tragedy of history, there very well could have been equally tragic lesbian lost loves

Avatar
reblogged

alicent being forced to choose between saving aegon or saving helaena in the exact same way that helaena was forced to choose between saving jaehaerys or saving jaehaera, and making the exact same choice helaena did to save her daughter, because the truth is that there is no saving her son no matter what she tries to do... the writers ate this one lil thing because the parallels are paralleling

Avatar

im genuinely curious since i keep seeing this opinion, but i rly dont think hotd writing was bad? nothing is perfect but idk, unless someone points to me the times they had shitty writing im having a hard time seeing it. unless i dont actually know what "writing" means here. english is not my first language, i COULD be misinterpreting things lmao. i rly liked how they did things this season, i think it made sense with the last one, this one was just Tenser because at any second the war will reallyyy break out n we dont know when cuz we have two driving forces from opposite sides not wanting that to happen, thats the entire point of s2 i think: establishing that in war there is no clear winner ("strange victory" n all that), that everyone is going to die, that there is no point to any of it theres no point to war at all, that every character is "heroic" and "villainous" in their own right in the right pov. i think it was a fun season to flesh out the characters, have us not feel entirely happy to be fighting for one side cuz theres innocents in both sides but ultimately we all know they will all die and its all for nothing. thats the tragedy of it all imo. i loved it to pieces. i guess id say im sad some characters didnt interact but also i dont see how they would considering how this season went. n also i wanted more rhaena (i do hope she'll have a cool ass role next season, idc idc)

Avatar

i personally think this season was truly a transition season to full out war. people are pissed because they wanted war to instantly happen after lucerys died last season, but in reality things arent that black and white and i think it would have cheapened the plot to fast forward through the political negotiations and underhanded scheming to try and win without fighting, to just full on nuclear dragon war.

I actually like the idea that this season was like standing on a cliffs edge where one wrong move led to oblivion with millions of people dying and the practical annihilation of half of house targaryen. I'm glad that the writers took the time to emphasize how dire this war could become before barreling us into it. the political battles and moral dilemmas are just as fun to watch as the actual battles

that being said, there are still valid criticisms of the show being brought up too: like the weird pacing and absolute dragging on of daemons harrenhal ghost adventures. on one hand I get it, because in the books daemon just disappears for weeks at a time, and the writers had to do SOMETHING with him this season instead of having him peace out for 7 episodes. but I agree that the harrenhal visions became repetitive, and I'm also not a huge fan of the back to the future magic being shoved in our faces instead of more subtle clues to it

overall, it was a transition season, not the absolute best season of television history, but it's definitely not the worst (and not even CLOSE to being as bad as got s8). I think in modern age media consumption, people now equate "i personally don't like this" to "this is all horrible and the whole show is trash now"

Avatar
reblogged

the hotd fandom complaining that the series is moving "too slow" for their instant gratification media shot brains is ironic to an almost hilarious degree. it's like the final monkeys paw curling inward as we slowly lead ourselves down the same path that gave us season 8 of game of thrones

once again I will be the first to say that the writing in hotd is not always great and some plotlines do deserve their fair share of criticism, but saying that this season was collectively worse than season 8 of game of thrones, aka the worst season in the history of television that almost destroyed the entire franchise itself, is an absolutely bonkers statement to make and just reeks of no media literacy

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

Anyone else interprets the entire Song of Ice and Fire saga as an anti-monarchist story? I mean, there is a theme of people being driven to madness and destruction while chasing the power of the Iron Throne, and limitless power only leading to indiscriminate death among the innocent and the guilty. The Dance of Dragons specifically was a destructive and pointless war, fought by two unfit rulers (at least that was what I thought when I read the book), that only led to their family’s own destruction. In retrospect, I shouldn’t be surprised by the way the fandom adopted both teams narratives of a β€œrightful heir” (HBO’s marketing leaned strongly on that direction, as well as the way people were with Game of Thrones). I hope that, if they adapt the Conquerors’ story, they at least address that part - there is no such thing as rightful heirs and usurpers; only power, politics and conquest by force.

one reason that I sincerely hope that they adapt an aegon the conqueror prequel is so that they can specifically go after the rumor that aenys I wasn't even aegons actual child and was instead a bastard of rhaenys and another lover she was rumored to have. this would basically mean that aegons' direct lineage ceased after maegor died.

this would make the centuries and centuries of targaryens fighting over a birthright to rule based on their "direct line to aegon the conqueror" not even be real in the first place. which would be both ironic and absolutely hilarious

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.