ACTION-357: Add service provider option text (with jmayer) as an issue in the draft with an option box
Add service provider option text (with jmayer) as an issue in the draft with an option box
- State:
- pending review
- Person:
- David Singer
- Due on:
- February 20, 2013
- Created on:
- January 23, 2013
- Associated Issue:
- ISSUE-137
- Related emails:
- Re: ACTION-357: Add service provider option text (with jmayer) as an issue in the draft with an option box (from [email protected] on 2013-03-22)
- Re: ACTION-357: Add service provider option text (with jmayer) as an issue in the draft with an option box (from [email protected] on 2013-03-22)
- Re: DNT: Agenda for March 20 call (revised) (from [email protected] on 2013-03-19)
- Re: DNT: Agenda for March 20 call (from [email protected] on 2013-03-19)
- DNT: Agenda for March 20 call (from [email protected] on 2013-03-19)
- RE: ACTION-357: Add service provider option text (with jmayer) as an issue in the draft with an option box (from [email protected] on 2013-03-16)
- ACTION-357: Add service provider option text (with jmayer) as an issue in the draft with an option box (from [email protected] on 2013-03-15)
- Re: TPWG agenda for Wednesday, January 16 (from [email protected] on 2013-01-30)
- Re: TPWG agenda for Wednesday, January 16 (from [email protected] on 2013-01-29)
Related notes:
[npdoty]: the goal is to have a concise alternative/additional text for the "s flag" or otherwise an alternative to roy's most recent proposal
23 Jan 2013, 18:08:54Update from MIT: we need to clarify the question, and perhaps the 2 to 3 proposals that will be necessary. Aleecia, JMayer, Fielding and perhaps EFelten may want to give input.
Nick Doty, 13 Feb 2013, 15:29:03we believe that the various WKR fields cover this use case.
David Singer, 1 May 2013, 00:25:29Display change log.