Property talk:P3254
Documentation
URL of the page (or page section) on which the creation of the property was discussed
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3254#single best value, SPARQL
https://www\.wikidata\.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/\S+|
”: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3254#Item P2302, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3254#Scope, SPARQL
This property is being used by: Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
|
Properties created without formal discussion
[edit]What should be the value for the properties created without formal discussion? For example, currency (P38), head of government (P6) have values for property proposal discussion (P3254) as 'no value'. But much recently created properties like rating (P4271) have no related statements. What's the best option? 'no value' or not creating a statement? I personally feel that specifying 'no value' is a better way. John Samuel 19:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- I agree that using "no value" would be useful here. NMaia (talk) 14:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Exempting sandbox properties
[edit]Would it be okay to exempt any instance of (P31) Wikidata sandbox property (Q18720640) from most constraints, including this item-requires-statement constraint (Q21503247)? Am I even supposed to ask for approval to make such a change, or if not, on exactly what grounds? That it affects sandbox items alone? --SM5POR (talk) 04:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- All Properties
- Properties with url-datatype
- Properties used on 10000+ items
- Properties with single best value constraints
- Properties with format constraints
- Properties with entity type constraints
- Properties with constraints on type
- Properties with constraints on items using them
- Properties with scope constraints