Your censors block remarks that do not violate Yahoo's guidelines, but merely state a different viewpoint from their own.
This comment of mine was rejected in an article on gun control. Why?
"Because Repubicans block crime bills and anything else proposed by Democrats. You claim Democrats attack "the law-abiding?" This is why Repubicans can't win elections without gerrymandering. Because the majority of Americans are tired of obstruction, hyperbole and inability to tell the truth."
Clinton Pope
shared this idea
-
Taylor Brown
commented
They know it. They know they are doing it. They think they are safe and there won't be consequences for their actions. Start making lists of the people running these departments. They all need to go to ******* jail, let's look at all of their communication over the past 3-4 years. That's what needs to happen.
I'm going to keep ******* the drums of war until the weak braindead people shut up and stop trying to control and if they don't, I am going to personally ruin them.
It's promise, not a threat.
The thing about arbitrary authority and power and being weak is,
Someone resilient only needs to choose to knock you over and there is not a thing they can't do about it.
These weak people are begging to get knocked out.
-
Up Yours yahoo
commented
DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME WITH YAHOO. RUSSIAN CONTROLLED
-
Doug Epling
commented
I would say that in this case yours is quite possibly a legitimate complaint. In this case it gives you the opportunity to think about why this happened and to rewrite your viewpoint so it is an acceptable argument that won't "mistakenly" get blocked.
-
Old Vet/dad
commented
One other thing. I get hammered by Yahoo for things like butt, ***, fecal matter, damit, ******* or because of writing things like "they deserve what they got for murdering, raping, killing the wounded and elderly children and women. Beheading and torturing soldiers. I feel we all should have a voice against this.
-
Old Vet/dad
commented
I don't see any problems with the above statement. There was no cussing or death threats or vulgar slang. Just one opinion of their concept at getting to the truth.
-
Rel Bochat
commented
Here is an example of a comment that got rejected for violating community guidelines. I would really like to know what standard was violated.
Your comment on "Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) Stock Forum & Discussion - Yahoo Finance" violates the community guidelines and has been rejected
publisher's logo
Relbochat Sat 01 Jul 2023 03:17:57 PM
Revenue for the quarter will be around $1 million driven by the delivery of 10 vehicles to Kingsbury. -
Rel Bochat
commented
My posts are general on stocks and the long bias censorship is evident.
-
Greg M
commented
Same has happened to me. Doesn't matter what I post. I could say "hello" and it gets rejected. It's CENSORSHIP plain and simple. I've made comments that do not go against the community standards, but go against Yahoo's liberal censors so I'm banished. PATHETIC!
-
bilwis hobstocking
commented
the word "oaf" "dastardly" "Ham-fisted" and "verbal kung fu" seemingly violate Openweb & yahoo community guidelines. ...
these are very common words, normal, non offensive words, yet seemingly trigger the A.I. bots "Certain parts of your comment may include inappropriate language. Please revise to take part in the conversation." warning.
mind you the whole and full comments where...quote me:
"a no2 pencil... just as dastardly."
"that sign, seems ham-fisted."
"if you swore an oath, don't be an oaf."
"alright enough verbal kung fu".all those comments where blocked / rejected, or until figured out what may have wrongly triggered your bots to block my comment.
i cannot help but feel a great aversion
to using the yahoo news and comment features, if such common, non offensive words and sentences are forbidden to be used.thank you.
-
Steven Franks
commented
yahoo is a cancel culture propagator. I posted one word, "no" and was censored. I am going to send my posts to a major news outlet and have them do a story on the new yahoo, the bud light of internet news.