Abstract
In this paper Nowak–Szamrej–Latané model is reconsidered. This computerised model of opinion formation bases on Latané theory of social impact. We modify this model to allow for multi (more than two) opinions. With computer simulations we show that in the modified model the signatures of order/disorder phase transition are still observed. The transition may be observed in the average fraction of actors sharing the ith opinion, its variation and also average number of clusters of actors with the same opinion and the average size of the largest cluster of actors sharing the same opinion. Also an influence of model control parameters on simulation results is shortly reviewed. For a homogeneous society with identical actors’ supportiveness and persuasiveness the critical social temperature TC decreases with an increase of the number of available opinions K from TC = 6.1 (K = 2) via 4.7, 4.1 to TC = 3.6 for K = 3, 4, 5, respectively. The social temperature plays a role of a standard Boltzmann distribution parameter containing social impact as the equivalent of energy or one may think about it just as on a noise parameter.
Graphical abstract
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
D. Stauffer, inEncyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, edited by R.A. Meyers (Springer, New York, NY, 2009), p. 6380
S. Galam, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 19, 409 (2008)
S. Galam, Physica A 336, 49 (2004)
C. Gros, Eur. Phys. J. B 90, 223 (2017)
P. Nyczka, K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Stat. Phys. 151, 174 (2013)
K. Kułakowski, Physica A 388, 469 (2009)
S. Gekle, L. Peliti, S. Galam, Eur. Phys. J. B 45, 569 (2005)
K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd, Physica A 351, 593 (2005)
F. Amblard, G. Deffuant, Physica A 343, 725 (2004)
J.A. Hołyst, K. Kacperski, F. Schweitzer, Physica A 285, 199 (2000)
K. Kacperski, J.A. Hołyst, Physica A 287, 631 (2000)
J.-D. Mathias, S. Huet, G. Deffuant, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 19(1), 6 (2016)
K. Malarz, P. Gronek, K. Kułakowski, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 14(1), 2 (2011)
G. Deffuant, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 9(3), 8 (2006)
R. Hegselmann, U. Krause, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5(3), 2 (2002)
T. Feliciani, A. Flache, J. Tolsma, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 20(2), 6 (2017)
J. Li, R. Xiao, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 20(2), 4 (2017)
P. Duggins, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 20(1), 13 (2017)
W. Lenz, Phys. Z. 21, 613 (1920)
E. Ising, Phys. Z. 31, 253 (1925)
K. Malarz, K. Kułakowski, Acta Phys. Pol. A 114, 581 (2008)
F. Slanina, K. Sznajd-Weron, P. Przybyla, Europhys. Lett. 82, 18006 (2008)
K. Sznajd-Weron, Acta Phys. Pol. B 36, 2537 (2005)
K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1157 (2000)
K. Malarz, K. Kułakowski, Acta Phys. Pol. A 117, 695 (2010)
G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, Adv. Complex Syst. 3, 87 (2000)
F.W.S. Lima, Front. Phys. 5, 47 (2017)
K. Malarz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 17, 1521 (2006)
F. Baccelli, A. Chatterjee, S. Vishwanath, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 62, 5678 (2017)
W. Su, G. Chen, Y. Hong, Automatica 85, 448 (2017)
Y. Zhu, Q.A. Wang, W. Li, X. Cai, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp.2017, 093401 (2017)
C. Anteneodo, N. Crokidakis, Phys. Rev. E 95, 042308 (2017)
G. Chen, H. Cheng, C. Huang, W. Han, Q. Dai, H. Li, J. Yang, Phys. Rev. E 95, 042118 (2017)
Y. Zhang, Q. Liu, S. Zhang, PLoS ONE 12, e0172982 (2017)
K. Malarz, K. Kułakowski, Europhys. News 45, 21 (2014)
K. Malarz, K. Kułakowski, Acta Phys. Pol. A 121, B86 (2012)
F.W.S. Lima, N. Crokidakis, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 28, 1750123 (2017)
Y. Li, H. Cao, G. Wen, Simulation 93, 899 (2017)
H. Alatas, S. Nurhimawan, F. Asmat, H. Hardhienata, Chaos Solitons Fractals 101, 24 (2017)
M.G. Medina-Guevara, J.E. Macias-Diaz, A. Gallegos, H. Vargas-Rodriguez, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 28, 1750058 (2017)
S.E. Parsegov, A.V. Proskurnikov, R. Tempo, N.E. Friedkin, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 62, 2270 (2017)
G. Albi, L. Pareschi, M. Zanella, Kinet. Relat. Mod. 10, 1 (2017)
F. Xiong, Y. Liu, J. Cheng, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 44, 513 (2017)
L.C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, Graduate studies in mathematics, 2nd edn. (American Mathematical Society, 2010)
R. Hegselmann, A. Flache, V. Möller, inTools and Techniques for Social Science Simulation, edited by R. Suleiman, K.G. Troitzsch, N. Gilbert (Physica, 2000), p. 151
A. Ilachinski,Cellular Automata: A Discrete Universe (World Scientific, 2001)
S. Wolfram,A New Kind of Science (Wolfram Media, 2002)
B. Chopard, M. Droz,Cellular Automata Modeling of Physical Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005)
B. Chopard, inComputational Complexity: Theory, Techniques, and Applications, edited by R.A. Meyers (Springer, New York, NY, 2012), p. 407
A. Abramiuk, J. Pawłowski, K. Sznajd-Weron, Entropy 21, 521 (2019)
A. Jedrzejewski, K. Sznajd-Weron, C.R. Phys. (2019),
A.R. Vieira, C. Anteneodo, Phys. Rev. E 97, 052106 (2018)
B. Nowak, K. Sznajd-Weron, Complexity 2019, 5150825 (2019)
A. Jedrzejewski, G. Marcjasz, P.R. Nail, K. Sznajd-Weron, PLoS ONE 13, e0206166 (2018)
A. Jedrzejewski, K. Sznajd-Weron, Physica A 505, 306 (2018)
A. Nowak, J. Szamrej, B. Latané, Psychol. Rev. 97, 362 (1990)
B. Latané, S. Harkins, Percept. Psychophys. 20, 482 (1976)
B. Latané, S. Nida, Psychol. Bull. 89, 308 (1981)
B. Latané, Am. Psychol. 36, 343 (1981)
J.A. Hołyst, K. Kacperski, F. Schweitzer, inAnnual Reviews of Computational Physics IX, edited by D. Stauffer (World Scientific, Singapore, 2011), p. 253
H.B. Gerard, R.A. Wilhelmy, E.S. Conolley, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 8, 79 (1968)
S.E. Asch, Sci. Am. 193, 31 (1955)
S. Milgram, L. Bickman, L. Berkowitz, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 13, 79 (1969)
J.M. Darley, B. Latané, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 8, 377 (1968)
M. Gansberg, “37 who saw murder didn’t call the police; Apathy at stabbing of queens woman shocks inspector”, New York Times (March 27, 1964), p. 1
R. Manning, M. Levine, A. Collins, Am. Psychol. 62, 555 (2007)
K. Kułakowski, arXiv:0807.0711 (2008)
L.M. Floría, C. Gracia-Lázaro, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, Y. Moreno, Phys. Rev. E 79, 026106 (2009)
M.J. de Oliveira, J. Stat. Phys. 66, 273 (1992)
P. Bańcerowski, Master’s thesis, AGH University of Scienceand Technology, Kraków, 2017, in Polish
S.P. Anderson, A. De Palma, J.F. Thisse,Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992)
K. Byrka, A. Jedrzejewski, K. Sznajd-Weron, R. Weron, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 62, 723 (2016)
R. Likert, Arch. Psychol. 22, 1 (1932)
S.S. Stevens, Science 103, 677 (1946)
R.B. Potts, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 48, 106 (1952)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P. Bańcerowski and K. Malarz conceived the study and analysed the results. P. Bańcerowski performed the simulation. K. Malarz wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Bańcerowski, P., Malarz, K. Multi-choice opinion dynamics model based on Latané theory. Eur. Phys. J. B 92, 219 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2019-90533-0
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2019-90533-0