Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Next Article in Journal
Analysis for the Implementation of Distributed Renewable Energy Generation Systems for Areas of High Vulnerability Due to Hillside Movements: Case Study of Marianza-Cuenca, Ecuador
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Rotational Angle of Discrete Inclined Ribs on Horizontal Flow and Heat Transfer of Supercritical R134a
Previous Article in Special Issue
Review of Energy Deposition for High-Speed Flow Control
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Use of Spatially Multi-Component Plasma Structures and Combined Energy Deposition for High-Speed Flow Control: A Selective Review

by
Olga A. Azarova
* and
Oleg V. Kravchenko
Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control” of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str. 44, 119333 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(7), 1632; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071632
Submission received: 31 October 2023 / Revised: 22 December 2023 / Accepted: 22 March 2024 / Published: 28 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Deposition for Aerospace Applications)

Abstract

:
This review examines studies aimed at the organization of energy (non-mechanical) control of high-speed flow/flight using spatially multi-component plasma structures and combined energy deposition. The review covers selected works on the experimental acquisition and numerical modeling of multi-component plasma structures and the use of sets of actuators based on plasma of such a spatial type for the purposes of control of shock wave/bow shock wave–energy source interaction, as well as control of shock wave–boundary layer interaction. A series of works on repetitive multiple laser pulse plasma structures is also analyzed from the point of view of examining shock wave/bow shock wave–boundary layer interaction. Self-sustained theoretical models for laser dual-pulse, multi-mode laser pulses, and self-sustained glow discharge are also considered. Separate sections are devoted to high-speed flow control using combined physical phenomena and numerical prediction of flow control possibilities using thermal longitudinally layered plasma structures. The wide possibilities for organization and applying spatially multi-component structured plasma for the purposes of high-speed flow control are demonstrated.

1. Introduction: Survey of Selected Review Papers

Controlling the supersonic/hypersonic flow over an aerodynamic (AD) body by applying energy to the flow or to various points on the surface of the streamlined body is now a well-established field in aerospace science. A number of reviews covering different aspects of this topic include an analysis of research from the end of the last century to the present. In the review papers [1,2,3], D. Knight et al. consider the works on using energy deposition for aerodynamic applications. In [1], D. Knight and N. Kianvashrad review the recent developments in three areas: SparkJets, drag reduction, and flow control. Particular attention is paid to studies related to the experimental formation of the unique SparkJet and multi-electrode SparkJet and their impact on the flow structure, including the boundary layer (BL) and shock waves (SWs).
In [2,3], D. Knight presented surveys of research consisting of experiments and simulation of using microwave (MW) and laser discharges for supersonic flow control and aerodynamic drag reduction at high speeds. A classification of MW discharges, physical features of laser discharges, methods for producing MW and laser discharges, and the parameters of these discharges are analyzed. Experimental and numerical results on the reduction of wave drag with the use of MW and laser discharges are reviewed. The different types of energy deposition are considered: energy deposition in a uniform supersonic flow and energy deposition upstream of an AD body. The conditions for the formation of SWs and recirculation regions are analyzed along with the capability of the drag reduction. It is important that the reviews [1,2,3] include the indication of the parameters of experiments and calculations, as well as the comparison of the results examined in terms of individual characteristic parameters.
An extensive overview of wave drag reduction methods is presented by S. Rashid et al. in [4]. Flow control devices for drag reduction in the areas of aerodynamics and flight mechanics including passive flow control, hybrid flow control, and active flow control are analyzed. The results of the authors’ analysis are presented in the convenient form of tables. The last two parts include the review of studies on energy deposition for wave drag reduction. Energy deposition methods considered include basic principles, the summary of previous studies on energy deposition, factors affecting energy deposition devices, and a survey of related literature on energy deposition. The authors concluded that energy deposition is more advantageous in terms of operational robustness than passive methods such as spikes or air jets. The energy input can be continuous or pulsed and may be organized by laser or afterglow laser-plasma. The authors underlined that pulsed lasers have to be controlled by many parameters but this technique gives better results, even at high angles of attack.
A review of approaches to energy deposition using different kinds of gas discharges, such as surface barrier discharges, pulsed spark discharges, and optical discharges, for plasma aerodynamic applications is presented by A. Starikovskiy and N. Aleksandrov in [5]. The discharges considered are characterized by producing ultrafast (on the nanosecond time scale for atmospheric pressure) local gas heating. Studies of such plasma effects, which facilitate or impede flow control using discharge plasma, are analyzed from the viewpoint of the physical mechanisms of interaction of various types of discharges with gas flows. The mechanisms of ultrafast heating of air flow, as well as the processes defining the decay of nonequilibrium discharge plasma, are analyzed. Research on the control of the configuration of SWs in front of an AD body and its trajectory, quasi-steady separated flows and layers, separation of the BL, dynamics of flow separation, and the use of plasma for other applications, such as the deicing of an AD body, are considered.
The works on studies of bow shock wave (BSW) control devices for the reduction of drag, aero-heating, and their practical implementation are considered by M. Ahmed and N. Qin in [6] together with the physical mechanisms of action of these instruments. Studies concerning passive flow control, such as mechanical spikes, and active flow control, i.e., fluidic devices, counterflow (opposing) jets, and opposing plasma jets (or SparkJets) along with energetic (thermal) devices, end energy deposition devices, and hybrid devices including the coupling of passive and active flow control devices, are considered. The authors analyzed the principle of operation of such kinds of devices, practical implementation, factors controlling the effectiveness of these devices, flow unsteadiness associated with them, non-conventional studies, and prospective gaps in the investigation of these devices. Furthermore, the authors present a survey on key studies on energy deposition devices and the prospective gaps in the field of energy deposition instruments, which is interesting in the framework of the recent review. The authors review the existing practical applications of the BSW control devices, give numerous examples of the use of discharge-based instruments to control high-speed flows, and list the available real hypersonic vehicles that already implement these devices. The Appendix of [6] contains tables that present, in a convenient compact form, summaries of the previous studies on mechanical spike devices, fluidic (opposing jet) devices, energy deposition devices, and hybrid spike–fluid devices.
A historical review of the concept of flow control by energy deposition on supersonic flow past an AD body, which emerged in the last century and developed in the current one, is presented by V. Fomin et al. in [7]. In [8], P. Bletzinger et al. present an overview of research in the former Soviet Union and in the USA on the interaction of plasma with high-speed flows and shock waves. The authors note that as early as the 1980s, there were reports of modifications of traveling SWs in weakly ionized gases. The energy deposition into a high-speed flow leads to modifications of the flow due to a decrease in the Mach number in the plasma region. A critical question in many studies has been what effect plasma factors have on this process. This literature is analyzed and illustrated with representative examples. It is shown that heating, in many cases, has a global character; however, individual localized ionization and thermal effects are also of interest for high-velocity flow control. The authors emphasize that the effectiveness of plasma methods for flow control and drag reduction is quite high, which justifies further research in order to optimize the control of aerodynamic processes due to the energy deposition to the flow. In a review [9], J. Shang et al. considered the studies on mechanisms of plasma actuators (PAs) for hypersonic flow control. The review includes different plasma models, including the analysis of governing equations for investigation of the magneto–aerodynamic interaction, electro–aerodynamic interaction, and separated flow control. The example shown is when the separated flow region is completely suppressed in the numerical simulation at a Mach number of 14 (see [10] by G. Updike).
H. Zong et al. present a review paper [11] that considers plasma synthetic jet actuators (or SparkJets, or plasma jets) for active flow control. The paper provides an observation of plasma jet actuator systems, including working principles of them, power supply systems, and the construction of actuators. The authors examined experimental and numerical studies, considering parameters of jet formation and intensity metrics along with time evolutions of jet exit velocity and cavity pressure. Theoretical models of energy deposition are considered from an energy efficiency perspective, and examples of flow control applications are given. The article highlights that current studies on the application of an array of actuators have shown a reduction in flow separation, as well as mitigation of low-frequency instability associated with the separated flow.
R. Miles in [12] and M. Shneider et al., in [13], conduct an analysis of studies on flow control by adding energy to high-speed airflows, specifically regarding generating virtual shapes in the flow structure. In [12], Miles discusses laser and microwave energy deposition for drag reduction, steering, and related applications, and the use of electron beams for magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) applications, as well as the addition of acoustic energy into a BL. In [13], the authors present a short selective review of theoretical and experimental studies conducted by this group related to high-speed aerodynamic applications of energy injection for drag reduction, geometry control, steering, and sonic boom mitigation. A common feature of all these substantially different processes is the creation of virtual shock-vortex shapes, forming a new structure of the flow. The authors examine flow virtual shapes which are created by MW plasma heating, magnetohydrodynamic impacts, the use of electron beams, and localized plasma-assisted surface combustion. The studies of aerodynamic forces generated by off-axis heat addition upstream of an AD body are also considered.
In [14], A. Russel et al. present a review covering the fundamental characteristics of the methods of flow control based on Joule heating as well as the experience of their applications in controlling high-speed flows. The review includes parts concerning analyzing the studies on nanosecond pulse dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasmas, plasma actuators based on a localized arc filament, pulsed plasma synthetic jets, laser- and MW-generated plasma including numerical modelling, and energy deposition methods for shock wave–boundary layer interaction (SWBLI) and BL separation control in high-speed intakes. The authors underlined that in supersonic/hypersonic flows, the methods of mechanical control can be problematic because they require energy for moving and do not have a fast enough response time. Meanwhile, devices for energy deposition for flow control have no moving parts and their response times can be in nanoseconds. The review involves the consideration of the fundamental physics of the operation of such methods, along with the experience of their applications in high-speed flows.
In review papers [15,16] of S. Leonov’s group, surveys of experimental methods of flow control, including surface PAs, laser energy deposition, and the impact of plasma generated by MW impulses, are presented. In [15], attention is paid to studies of the effect of near-surface discharge on the structure and parameters of supersonic airflows and the mechanism of lateral jets generation, including research on the optimization of the discharge localization in a mixing layer of two gases. In [16], the authors present a review of studies on the dynamics of formation of near-surface electric discharges and on the mechanisms of their interaction with the airflow. The questions of the dynamics of surface dielectric barrier discharges (SDBD) in quiescent air, flow perturbations generated by SDBD plasma including kinetic modeling of SDBD plasmas, and the dynamics of DC SDBD in airflow including the effect of plasma-induced flow separation on a plane wall are examined with numerous illustrations reprinted from the considered works.
The studies on the flow perturbations generated by SDBD plasma include the effects of low-speed near-wall jets and vortices and the compression waves production accompanied by the following thermal perturbations [16]. The studies of the time scales of the development of various discharges and thermal perturbations in nanosecond pulse discharges and afterglow are also considered, which provides the necessary information for modeling the discharge experiments. Figures are presented of the formation of the stratified plasma medium in the case of quasi-DC (Q-DC) discharge plasma in M = 2 airflow. Within the framework of this review, the most interesting are the parts that deal with the review of studies on the transition from uniform to filamentary plasma and the review of the filamentary (constricted) mode of SDBD plasmas which has the shape of the stratified plasma medium. The authors underlined that for the filamentary discharge mode, modeling predictions were basically non-existent.
J. Kriegseis et al. present a review on studies on DBD-based boundary-layer control in aerodynamic applications [17]. The electrical and physical characteristics of PAs are considered along with the operating modes of the PAs. The authors consider the structure of PAs, including their geometry and materials, schemes of their action, intensity, and power consumption. The numerical results of solving the vorticity equation in the area of the actuator action are analyzed. In the subsections, the authors examine the studies on BL stabilization, including the using of vortex generators, active wave cancelation, and the discharge-based control of turbulent BL.
In the review article [18], I. Znamenskaya presents an overview of modern methods for recording, processing, and analyzing dynamic processes. The author of the review considers both the physical foundations of flow visualization and the foundations of modern technologies for digital processing of flow images. The review contains an analysis of modern methods of flow visualization. Particular attention is paid to methods using cross-correlation image processing algorithms. The actual problem of using big data in the analysis of the results of panoramic experiments is considered. Examples of the use of machine learning in the analysis of large shadow data sets are given.
In general, it can be stated that the main topics of the review papers in the field of active flow control via energy injection (SparkJets, PAs based on different gas discharges, such as SDBD, pulsed spark discharges, and MW and laser impulses) are energy deposition for drag reduction, weakening the BSW, and reducing the flow separation/boundary layer zone. Many reviews are devoted to the experimental devices and their acquisition for the implementation of active flow control and the physics-based mechanisms of the action of these devices. Different plasma models are also being discussed, including the analysis of the governing equations. Fewer reviews are devoted to studies of vortex effects and visualization of flow structure. A few reviews are devoted to the historical component of the ideology of controlling high-speed flows using energy deposition. It should be noted that in all considered reviews of works on plasma-energy control of high-speed flows, spatial structuring of plasma is not a group-forming factor.
The present review paper provides an overview which focuses on the use of spatially multi-component (complex) plasma structures and combined energy deposition for high-speed flow control. In this review, spatially multi-component plasma structures are understood as strongly inhomogeneous plasma formations generated by an energy source (ES) of some type or resulting from the mutual action of several energy sources of different types. Such structures are the result of a “nonlinear superposition” of the action of the individual components, causing new physical properties via the impact of this complex plasma structures on a high-speed flow. Despite the existence of many reviews devoted to active flow control with the help of energy deposition, there has not yet been a separate review that includes consideration of the specific effects of spatially multi-component (complex) plasma structures on the flow. This review is intended to fill this gap in the review literature on controlling the supersonic and hypersonic flows with the help of energy deposition. The review considers the use of spatially multi-component plasma structures for influencing a single SW, as well as the BSW, the structure of high-speed flows including control of SW–BL interaction (SWBLI), and control of AD characteristics of streamlined bodies.

2. Brief Background

The direction of flow/flight control with the use of high-speed heating of local areas of the supersonic/hypersonic gas flow began to develop rapidly in the second half of the last century (see [19] by D. Knight). Historical aspects of the development of these areas and their use for flow/flight control are given by V. Fomin et al. in [7] and P. Bletzinger et al. in [8]. At present, research on the control of high-speed flows around AD bodies by means of the formation of plasma zones in the flow and on the surfaces of an AD body occupies one of the leading places in aerospace engineering (see the reviews collected in the Introduction). ESs used for these purposes can be MW (e.g., R. Miles et al. [20] and Yu. Kolesnichenko et al. [21,22]), laser (L. Myrabo, Y. Raizer [23], P. Tretyakov et al. [24]), discharge (V. Bityurin et al. [25], D. Roupassov et al. [26]), plasma jets (or SparkJets, H. Zong et al. [11]), or magnetohydrodynamic (MHD, V. Bityurin et al. [27], T. Lapushkina et al. [28,29]). The features of plasma structures obtained using these sources and their effect on supersonic/hypersonic flow will be described below.
Theoretically, the possibility of controlling the structure of high-speed flows in problems of supersonic aerodynamics is substantiated by P. Georgievsky and V. Levin [30], I. Nemchinov et al. [31,32], and D. Riggins et al. [33]. The separation zones of the flow were studied in the case of a supersonic flow past a blunt body with an external energy sources (ESs). The effectiveness of the use of oblong sources—“thermal spikes”—was shown in [30,31]. Essential drag reduction using focused energy release was also shown in [33]. The formation of a return-circulation flow, which causes a change in pressure on the surface of a streamlined body, was also obtained in V. Artem’ev et al. [32]. Self-sustained flow pulsations in the flow past pointed and blunt bodies, initiated by an extended ESs, were obtained and studied by P. Georgievsky and V. Levin in [34] and by O. Azarova et al. in [35,36]. The high-speed flow past an ES was considered by K. Krasnobaev and R. Syunyaev in [37] and by K. Krasnobaev in [38]. It was shown that, due to heating, the flow near the source becomes subsonic, and the gas density may decrease by more than an order of magnitude [37]. It was established that the BSW is formed in the flow at a sufficiently large energy release, and a quantitative analogy was obtained between the supersonic flow past thin bodies and ESs [38].
In [39,40], O. Azarova and D. Knight carried out the optimization of the shape and parameters of the regions of “heat spots” resulting from the deposition of MW and laser energy in the supersonic flows over combined cylindrical bodies on the basis of the comparison with experimental data. Approaches to reduce the drag force for the considered MW and laser experiments were proposed, and estimates of the amount of energy required to produce regions of heated gas with the obtained parameters are given. A 3D gas dynamics code was created and described by D. Knight et al. in [41] for modeling the interaction of MW-generated plasma with supersonic flow over a blunt body. In this case, the thermochemical model contained the description of the 23 types of species and included 238 reactions. The dynamics of the kinetics of the species in the MW-plasma is discussed, and significant non-equilibrium effects were observed throughout the interaction.
In the calculations in [21] by Yu. Kolesnichenko et al., the vortex pattern in the region of the shock layer was shown to form under the influence of a longitudinal ES (filament), and the vortex mechanism of influence on the AD body was proposed, resulting in the reduction of the frontal drag. In [42] by O. Azarova, the formation of the vortex was obtained as a result of a flow separation and the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI) manifestation. In [43,44], O. Azarova and L. Gvozdeva, for various gas media, showed the possibility of controlling triple-shock configurations resulting from the interaction of the BSW with a longitudinal heated filament during the precursor growth. A complex structure of the vortex generated by the RMI was established, which arises when an ES interacts with a shock layer, consisting of two twisted shear layers and a set of reflected compression–rarefaction waves between them [43].
A separate direction is connected with the control of the interaction of SW/BSW with a boundary layer (SWBLI). BL separation is a frequently present phenomenon in supersonic and hypersonic flows past AD bodies. It can have a negative effect on the AD characteristics of the body. The objectives of SWBLI control are to reduce the separation zone caused by a pressure growth and to suppress the instabilities associated with the flow separation (see [45] by H. Babinsky, J. Harvey). The use of plasma structures initiated by sets of actuators to implement SWBLI control will also be discussed below.

3. Filamentary Plasma: Control of BSWESI and SWBLI

The problem of the interaction of SW/BSW with inhomogeneous plasma structures (filamentary plasma) is an integral part of research on supersonic/hypersonic flow control, since this process directly affects the aerodynamic characteristics of a flying object ([1] by D. Knight). The studies usually include research of the interaction of such ESs with the SW/BSW (SWESI/BSWESI), as well as their effect on the process of SWBLI. Inhomogeneous plasma can be initiated by energy release using various tools, such as arc plasma energy deposition (array of surface arc PAs), air glow gas discharge of constant voltage, a set of high-frequency counter-flow plasma synthetic jet actuators (CPSJAs), a set of pulsed discharges of a high-power density and long pulse width, NS-DBD burst PAs, pulsed spark discharge PAs, localized multiple MW discharge in air, MW radiation produced through a filamentation of ultrashort high-intensity laser pulses in the atmosphere, and so on. Impact results are usually associated with a change in the shape/position of the SW/BSW and blurring/weakening/disappearance of SW/BSW (resulting in the reduction of the drag force); changing the topology of a flow in a separation area (FSA) (resulting in the changing the lift forces). One of the promising areas is the study of gasdynamic instabilities in the processes under consideration, such as Richtmyer–Meshkov instability and Kelvin–Helmholtz instability (KHI), and the production of vorticity in the flow acting on the defined flow/flight characteristics. All these directions determine the choice of articles included in this section.
In [46,47,48,49,50,51], S. Leonov’s group considered the problem of SWBLI and suppression of the different types of SWs by a streaming plasma array. The experimental results on the damping of the oblique shock wave reflection by a filamentary plasma and the pressure distribution on the wall in a supersonic airflow of Mach number M = 2 moving along a channel are presented by S. Leonov et al. in [46,47,48]. Attention was paid to the effect of the filamentary plasma array on the reflection dynamics of the incident shock wave during its interaction with the BL. Methods used included schlieren imaging, plasma characterization by electrical probes, optical emission spectroscopy techniques, and wall pressure measurements along the test section. A filamentary plasma was generated between flush surface electrodes in the spanning array using a Q-DC electrical discharge (Figure 1). In the experiment, the moving SW interacts with a perturbed BL generated by the plasma array. The structure of the plasma ES is a set of discontinuous alternant supersonic and subsonic longitudinal zones capable of effectively damping the force of the external impinging shock wave (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Therefore, the interaction parameters were shown to give the possibilities of an active SWBLI control.
The simulation results showed good agreement with the experimental results (Figure 4). Thus, one may have the effect of weakening the SW due to the interaction with the stratified plasma in the modified BL. Another gasdynamic phenomenon is the generation of streamwise vorticity, which can be realized by the interaction of the confined plasma with the airflow, as shown in Figure 1b. An array of plasma flow vorticity generators was shown to prevent the flow separation. Thus, the approach shows promising results for controlling both SWBLI and shock-dominated flows.
P. Andrews et al., in [49], continued the study in works by S. Leonov et al. [46,47,48] and considered the problem of SW/BSW control in shock-containing flows. The triggering effect of patterned near-surface electrical discharges on the reflection SW was studied experimentally. A solid wedge SW generator was installed on the upper wall of a wind tunnel with a flow Mach number M = 4 and initial pressure p0 = 4 bar, and filamentary electrical Q-DC discharges were placed on the opposite wall. At the same time, the SW moved from the wedge to plasma filaments located along the flow. The main results of the work include studying the details of the interaction of the SW with the plasma array (SWESI), as well as with a single filament, using schlieren imaging and pressure measurement. In addition, the three-dimensional shape of the SW structure was constructed both before and after electrical discharge activation using Mie scattering methods (Figure 5).
The physical principles of flow control and criteria for determining its effectiveness by plasma trigger mechanisms were formulated. Simplified criteria for the efficiency of the plasma control of the SW position are formulated as a function of the critical plasma temperature and the flow Mach number (Figure 6).
S. Elliott et al. investigated the effects of Q-DC electrical discharges on supersonic flow dynamics in [50]. Schlieren imaging, pressure sensors, and pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) were used to study shock-dominated flow behavior near a compression ramp. As a result, the attenuation of reflected SWs was observed, and the emergence of new oblique shocks was registered. Importantly, the experiments showed that the discharge action did not induce additional pressure losses in the channel. At the same time, F. Falempin et al. [51] focused on the influence of weakly ionized plasma on a 2D aerodynamic configuration with a three-shock compression ramp. The results showed significant changes in SWs positions, flow field structure, pressure distributions, and mass flow rates. These changes were influenced by power deposition and operating conditions, including converting a two-SW structure to a single SW and enhancing pressure recovery coefficients.
In [52], L. Feng et al. present research on the characteristics of instabilities originating during the interaction of an SW with a turbulent BL (SWBLI) which was controlled by high-frequency arc plasma energy deposition (APED) initiated by six pairs of electrodes. This study conducted experiments with Mach 2.5 airflow over a semicircular column with 15 kHz APED pulsing in the microsecond range and generating rapid, high-frequency thermal bubbles downstream. Time-resolved schlieren imaging at 30 kHz framerate captured dynamic flow fields, focusing on how these thermal bubbles affected supersonic turbulent SWBLI instabilities. Analyzing 5000 schlieren images, the authors compared instantaneous and mean flow fields with and without APED control. The results revealed that the APED effectively reduced separation and attached SWs continuously, narrowed the low-frequency component of the oscillatory separation SW (SSW), and intensified the attached SW oscillation. In addition, the thermal bubbles enlarged vortex scales in the turbulent BL and shear layer, increasing shear layer fluctuations with numerous high-frequency components. Continuous transformation of enlarged eddies along the shear layer weakened the SWs and modulated SWBLI frequency. Notably, the SSW experienced a frequency modulation with reduced low-frequency components, attributed to enhanced shear layer fluctuations and continuous upstream thermal bubble entry into the separation zone.
In [53], L. Feng et al. continued the research presented in the previous work. The authors applied time-resolved schlieren imaging to observe the evolution of the turbulent SWBLI affected by the APED. The research also considered the effect of APED on the flow patterns in the absence of SWBLI at different condenser energy levels and flow deflection angles. Experimental results showed that the perturbing effect of the APED on the incoming SWBLI decreased at higher flow deflection angles for the same energy deposition. Direct numerical simulations confirmed the prevention by the APED of the velocity evolution of the turbulent BL, attributing the non-steady SSWs mainly to thermal bubbles that alter the BL compressibility, expand the separation zone, and contribute to the dispersion and displacement of the SW, in agreement with the experimental results.
In [54,55,56,57], T. Gan et al. present a study on the control of the SWBLI using surface arc PAs (SAPAs). The study was conducted in a Mach 2.0 flow with a 26° wedge angle. An array of 16 SAPAs was used to precisely control the SWBLI phenomenon. This array operated at discrete frequencies, specifically 500 Hz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz, and 5 kHz, strategically positioned upstream of the SWBLI region. Complex flow dynamics were visualized using a high-speed schlieren imaging system capable of acquiring data at 25,000 fps. The SW underwent profound changes induced by introducing control gas drops or control gas bottles generated by the SAPA array. These changes were manifested as the disappearance of the root portion of the SSW, accompanied by the branching of the oblique shockwave as the gas drops passed through the interaction region. The SW attenuation was additionally validated by analyzing root-mean-square schlieren intensity values.
Low-frequency and high-frequency modes of excitation were compared. The experimental results demonstrated the generation of numerous periodic vortices in the flow and small-scale vortices in the tail due to plasma excitation in the high-frequency regime. Therefore, blurring and bifurcation effects appear at the SSW front and the BL changes, as shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8. Such results provide insights into the control mechanisms of SWBLI using a SAPA array.
In [58,59,60], H. Wang et al. presented the results of their investigations on the topic of flow control with the use of a set of PAs. In the study in [58], the authors presented a strategy to suppress supersonic flow separation using high-frequency counterflow plasma synthetic jet actuators (CPSJAs). The primary objective was to investigate whether the control effectiveness of CPSJAs could be improved by their interaction with the jet/bow shock. Pulsed capacitive discharge was applied to an array of CPSJAs, resulting in the formation of the vortex rings, as was shown in schlieren images. Simulation results showed that the interaction between the CPSJAs and the BSW generated vorticity within the vortex ring. The result was a rapid deceleration of the jet and increased turbulent mixing in the synthetic jet. This interaction significantly disturbed the downstream flow. Furthermore, the study identified conditions under which the separation bubble could effectively suppress upstream laminar BL separation. As a result, CPSJAs were shown to be a promising technique for mitigating extensive separation regions in supersonic flows.
In [59,60], H. Wang et al. continued their previous studies and explored an innovative, high-speed aerodynamic control technique using high-power, long-pulse-width pulsed discharges. Transient schlieren images describing the interaction between flow structures induced by the discharges and the SW-containing flow field were presented. The investigations, which include experiments in Mach 5 and Mach 6 wind tunnels and numerical simulations, evaluate the effects of these discharges on a conical configuration with two ramps. The discharges rapidly perturb the flow dynamics, weakening the attached boundary layer SW and altering the aerodynamic forces. Improved control is achieved with deeper plasma penetration, resulting in energy efficiencies ranging from 28% to 32% (M = 5) and a maximum axial force reduction of 32.9% (M = 6). This research demonstrates the potential of electrical discharges for efficient and rapid flow control in high-speed flows.
In [61], X. Ma et al. investigated the response characteristics of an SWBLI controlled by six high-frequency pulsed arc discharges in Mach 2.5 flow. The authors investigated the evolution of the SWBLI under different excitation power and frequency conditions due to arc plasma energy deposition. The results show that the pulsed arc discharges profoundly affect SWBLI structures, distorting the SSW and improving flow control. Intense separation occurs in the initial flow field ahead of the semi-cylinder, forming SSWs and reattachment SWs accompanied by an expansion fan region. Plasma application weakens the oblique SWs, significantly expands the SWBLI zone with the upstream SSW motion, and provides continuous thermal excitation of the BL, reaching maximum penetration near the half-cylinder. Various plasma conditions demonstrated removal of the upstream shear layer and reattachment of the SW foot. Higher power or frequency settings also provided better drag reduction effects, achieving up to 25.5% drag reduction rate under certain control conditions (2.5 × 1010 W/m3/60 kHz).
M. Tang et al. experimentally investigated SWBLI control on a 24-degree compression ramp using a streamwise PAs array of five pulsed spark discharge actuators [62,63]. The results show a decrease in SW intensity as the separation region expands, decreasing the SSW angle from 41.6° to 22.3°. The study examines the time-averaged velocity field and the temporal evolution of the phase-averaged velocity field, highlighting the return of the flow field to baseline between actuation cycles and emphasizing the role of high-frequency actuation in maintaining control. Additionally, the streamline deflection when the flow is passing through the actuation region is observed. It is supposed that the flow deflection will also occur on both sides of the actuation region and produce the counter-rotating vortex, resulting in the separation reduction under the actuation. The research demonstrates a 45% reduction in the drag under the action of the PAs array and elucidates the principles underlying obtaining continuous control.

4. Filamentary Plasma: Control of SWESI

This part contains an analysis of the works on the control of SW interaction with energy sources (ESs) (SWESI), which are inhomogeneous plasma structures (filamentary plasma). ESs are considered in the different forms of gas discharges: elongated elliptically shaped inhomogeneities generated via discharge providing the exploding wires, air glow gas discharge of constant voltage with the formation of ionization strata, and other types of gas discharges. The results on an SW curvature, its blurring, weakening, or disappearance, were considered along with the manifestation of gasdynamic instabilities, namely the RMI and KHI. It should be underlined that the problem of SWESI is an important part of flow control because it models the impact of the ESs on high-speed flows/flights.
In [64], S. Sembian et al., and in [65], N. Apazidis et al. demonstrated the results of the interaction of a plane SW wave with an elongated rectilinear and thermally excited inhomogeneity. Experimental and numerical studies were made of the unstable evolution of an elongated elliptical inhomogeneity immersed in ambient air and oriented perpendicularly and obliquely to an incident planar blast wave with Mach number 2.15. In the experiments, the gas heating from an exploding wire generated elliptical inhomogeneities and SWs. Shadow patterns for rectilinear inhomogeneities (α = 0°) are presented together with the corresponding numerical fields of density gradients and vorticity, which demonstrated the manifestation of the RMI. Also presented is an experimental shadow photograph and a numerical density gradient field corresponding to the case of an oblique inhomogeneity (α = 24°), depicting the structure of the vortex street accompanying the formation of the KHI. Furthermore, a unique linear equation governing the normalized circulation has been derived through numerical simulations. In the case of α = 24°, a vortex tail resembling the KHI was observed. The initial velocity of each vortex in the series was shown to correlate with the intensity of the transmitted wave. In contrast, a linear decrease in velocity over time was observed as the vortex train expanded.
The studies of T. Lapushkina et al. and O. Azarova et al. [66,67,68,69,70] are devoted to ionization instability in air gas discharges of different scales. The experiments involved a constant voltage gas discharge in an open chamber without sidewalls, leading to the formation of ionization strata within the discharge region due to ionization instability. The scale of these ionization layers changed as a function of discharge conditions such as pressure or gas discharge current, resulting in a multilayer plasma medium with varying electron and gas temperatures. Different types of discharges were observed, ranging from large-scale structured (3–5 striations per discharge length) (Figure 9) to small-scale (20–25 striations per discharge length) (Figure 10), and their occurrence and development conditions were studied [66,67].
In addition, the interaction between an SW and a pre-established stratified gas discharge plasma was investigated experimentally and numerically, resulting in the formation of a new SW configuration during SW–energy source interaction (SWESI) and the curvature of the SW (Figure 11 and Figure 12). This interaction was found to cause significant waveform distortion, including destruction, which was obtained experimentally and numerically in [68,69,70] (Figure 13 and Figure 14).
In [25], V. Bityurin et al. considered the interaction of the SW with the longitudinal pulse discharge. In the numerical simulations, the authors assumed that the discharge plasma has a layered inhomogeneous structure due the streamers’ origin. The problem was considered in a cylindrical formulation without taking into account the effects introduced by viscosity and thermal conductivity. The plasma inhomogeneity was formed by specifying heated cylindrical layers of different widths. As a result of the simulation, the curvature of the initial SW front (due to the difference in the parameters of the heated layers) was obtained, as well as the zone of gasdynamic instabilities (vortex structures) located behind the modified SW front (Figure 15).

5. Multi-Component Plasma Structures: Experimental Obtaining and Modelling

In this part, we examine works on the experimental acquisition and modelling if spatially multi-component plasma structures, such as localized double and multiple MW discharge in air, MW radiation produced through a filamentation of ultrashort high-intensity laser pulses in the atmosphere, NS-SDBDs, NS-DBD burst multiple PAs, and a surface barrier corona discharge actuator. The part contains a review of the results of a physical-mathematical model including a set of thirteen plasma-chemical reactions and the study of localized multiple MW discharge in air, the model for MW plasma waveguides induced in the atmosphere through the filamentation of high-intensity ultrashort laser pulses, results on the increasing lift, reducing drag and trailing-edge excitation, and the prediction of the length and time scales of the filamentary plasma induced by NS-SDBDs, and the possibility of noise mitigation using barrier corona discharge.
In [71], A. Saifutdinov et al. performed numerical simulations using an extended hydrodynamic model to investigate the dynamics of parameter formation of a MW discharge in air. This MW discharge was localized at electric field maxima generated by a custom-designed focusing system in an experiment. The authors comprehensively determined all the critical parameters of the MW discharge plasma and captured images of elongated plasmoids aligned with the supersonic flow axis ([72] by R. Khoronzhuk) (Figure 16).
The model including thirteen plasma chemical reactions for the simulation of an SW in air (Figure 17) showed that the focusing system led to the emergence of two MW discharges (plasmoids) (the letters in the Figure 17 refer to specifying the shape of the computational domain and boundary conditions). The study also provided insight into the electron density and electric field strength distributions of these discharges. It was shown that optimal gas heating occurred when the MW discharge was excited at the focus of the system. These studies made a significant progress in understanding the physics of focused MW discharges.
M. Shneider et al. performed a self-consistent plasma-dynamic analysis and numerical simulations of long-lived laser-induced MW plasma waveguides in the atmosphere [73]. The authors developed a comprehensive model to assess the lifetime limits of these MW plasma waveguides generated by filamentation with high-intensity ultrashort laser pulses and sustained by longer laser pulses, integrating plasma kinetic, Navier–Stokes equations, electron heat conduction, and electron vibrational energy transfer equations. It was shown that near- or mid-infrared laser pulses can extend the lifetime of plasma waveguides by effectively increasing electron temperatures, thereby reducing electron attachment to neutral species and dissociative recombination. This enhancement enables MW transmission over long distances through the plasma waveguide. The findings obtained offer new possibilities for long-distance MW transmission.
C. Clifford et al. conducted NS-DBD experiments on a NACA 0015 airfoil in a wind tunnel at a 15° angle of attack [74]. Four symmetrically placed actuators on the airfoil’s top and bottom surfaces, at the aerodynamic leading edge and the aerodynamic trailing edge, were constructed using two copper strip electrodes. The action of these actuators extended into the wake region, slightly broadening and reducing the separation area, resulting in a 37% reduction in separation area, a 42% increase in lift, and a 20% reduction in drag. In addition, the plasma triggering at the aerodynamic trailing edge reduced the amplitudes of the pressure spectrum peaks over a wide range of Strouhal numbers.
In [75], L. Rajendran et al. investigated the length and time scales of filamentary surface plasma discharge in the context of using nanosecond surface dielectric barrier discharge (NS-SDBD) actuators for high-speed flow control in supersonic and hypersonic conditions. These actuators utilize short nanosecond high-voltage pulses to rapidly energize the electrode gap (see [76] by J. Little, [77] by L. Wang et al., and [14] by A. Russel et al.). NS-SDBDs are a type of PAs that employs high-voltage nanosecond pulses between surface-mounted electrodes, inducing electrical breakdown in the surrounding air and rapid heating. When operated at high pulse frequencies, these actuators generate multiple filaments, forming SW structures and complex flow patterns, such as vortex rings. A reduced-order model for the cooling induced by the vortex ring is presented. The results of this study demonstrate that a vortex ring-based cooling model effectively predicts the length and time scales of nanosecond surface discharge-induced flow. These predictions provide valuable insights for optimizing multi-filament, multi-pulse NS-SDBD actuators commonly used in flow control applications. This model also helps to bridge the gap between the early and late stages of the induced flow. Notably, the flow exhibited pronounced three-dimensionality during the experiments, necessitating the corresponding volumetric velocity and density field measurements.
T. Ukai and K. Kontis analyzed thermal fluctuations around NS-DBD plasma actuators using schlieren-based frequency analysis [78]. These thermal fluctuations are critical for effective flow control in high-speed flows. The focus of this study was on the burst plasma actuators (BPA), which can improve flow control by delaying separation and increasing turbulence. Schlieren images show more significant thermal perturbations during burst plasma discharges than in non-burst cases. These perturbations gradually increase as multiple plasma discharges supply thermal energy before diffusing due to thermal equilibrium (Figure 18). Even after the discharge stops, the thermal regions before diffusion grow slightly. A burst plasma discharge creates a hot plume, resulting in different thermal patterns, often fluctuating at 200 Hz at high burst ratios (Figure 19). Therefore, these wave-like thermal fluctuations can improve the process of flow control.
In [79], V. Kopiev et al. investigated the use of various plasma actuators (PAs) to control instability waves (IW) in turbulent jet shear layers, which are a significant source of aircraft noise. The results of testing three types of PAs are presented: high-frequency dielectric barrier discharge (DBD), slipping surface discharge, and surface barrier corona discharge. Particle image velocimetry measurements showed that these PAs effectively suppressed artificially induced IW in turbulent air jet shear layers at atmospheric pressure. These results suggest promising applications for PAs in jet noise suppression and provide directions for further research in this area.

6. Repetitive Multiple Laser Pulse Plasma Structures: Control of BSWESI and SWBLI

Research has revealed that a single laser pulse falls short in igniting combustible gas due to the rapid loss of over 90% of the absorbed energy within the initial microseconds through SW and radiation losses, leaving a mere 7% to 8% of energy available for ignition (see [80] by T. Phuoc). Consequently, numerous studies have focused on exploring the efficacy of employing a sequence of two consecutive pulses or multiple repetitive pulses, as opposed to a solitary pulse, as a means to enhance the energy delivered by laser sparks (LSs) for igniting combustible gases. In this section, we review selective studies on the effects on flow control using plasma structures initiated by multipulse laser action. The studies include the consideration of a problem of BSWESI control, models of pulsating heat supply, models including different species and chemical reactions, and the comparison of the effects for different shapes of bodies. The results on the effects of Mach number and ES location are considered in terms of improving the lift-to-drag ratio. Also, the results describing the double vortex mechanism for drag reduction are presented, which leads to enhanced frontal drag reduction and suppression of the shear layer instability and large-scaled flow pulsations.
In [81], S. Guvernuk and A. Samoylov investigated the problem of supersonic control of a flow over AD body using a repetitively pulsed source of external energy supply. In this work, the effects of the influence of a repetitively pulsed source of external energy supply on the AD characteristics of a downstream hemisphere are modeled. The dependence of the shape of an energy deposition and its effect on the flow on the pulsation frequency was studied, and it was shown that the regime of pulsating heat supply can be more efficient than a stationary one.
K. Anderson (Norton) and D. Knight studied the interaction between repetitively heated filaments and a blunt cylinder in a supersonic flow in [82,83,84]. The authors performed simulations in which the pulse energy deposition time was varied to assess its effect on heat transfer to the body. When the L/D ratio was 4/3, the filament spacing proved to be optimal, resulting in effective aerothermodynamic streamlining of the body (here, L is the pulse length, including the gap between pulses, and D is the pulse diameter). This streamlining resulted in a reduction in both average drag and average heat transfer. Within the streamlined region, a toroidal vortex of low-velocity flow was formed, facilitating the development of a thermal layer at the cylinder face while eliminating the stagnation point, thereby reducing heat transfer between the cylinder face and the flow. As a result, this study demonstrated that energy deposition can efficiently reduce drag without increasing the overall thermal load on a blunt body.
In [85], U. Padhi et al. performed numerical simulations of supersonic airflow under two consecutive laser pulses in stationary air. The second pulse was introduced into the previously created air breakdown zone created by the first pulse. Air dissociation and recombination in the high-temperature breakdown zone were modeled with five species and eleven reactions, assuming local thermal equilibrium conditions. The results revealed two distinct phases in laser spark decay: the first phase involved SW generation and propagation, while the second phase involved changes in the ignition core. Using repetitive pulses instead of a single pulse resulted in the propagation of an SW layer, and increasing the delay between pulses enhanced the evolution of the secondary SW around the breakdown zone. It was shown that the repetitive pulses with different delays induced significant changes in the density field and temperature range (Figure 20), with perturbations depending on the time intervals between laser pulses (the y axis displays the values of the presented functions as V- = V/Vmax, where Vmax is the maximum value of V within the entire simulation time).
A. Sangtabi et al. numerically investigated the effects of repetitive laser pulse energy deposition on supersonic flow around three shapes: sphere, cone, and oblate spheroid [86]. The authors compared the effects among these shapes regarding pulse number, frequency, Mach number, and energy deposition location. The energy-saving efficiency is calculated as follows:
η % = M D 0 ( 1 D / D 0 ) d t Q × 100 %
This was evaluated for these three shapes of the AD body for the total energy value Q. Here, the drag force increment after the interaction of the BSW with the blast wave (the negative term (1 − D/D0)), the duration of drag reduction dt, the steady drag force D0, and the free stream Mach number M were indicated as four defining parameters in the energy-saving efficiency. The results led to several observations. Dividing the total energy into multiple pulses with lower energy levels significantly increased the duration of drag reduction, with energy saving efficiencies of 199%, 93%, and 24% for a single pulse on the sphere, oblate spheroid, and cone, respectively. Changing the frequency from 50 kHz to 100 kHz increased the drag reduction duration and reduced the drag force fluctuations. In addition, the authors observed an inverse relationship between drag reduction duration and free-stream Mach number, with energy saving efficiencies improving by 212%, 215%, and 110% as Mach number increased from 2.5 to 5 for the sphere, oblate spheroid, and cone, respectively. Finally, it was found that the diameter of the blast wave/low-density region increased as the distance between the energy deposition point and the body increased, resulting in increased efficiency of the blast wave-BSW interaction for the sphere and oblate spheroid. At the same time, the cone showed a slight decrease in efficiency. Thus, the results presented showed effective drag reduction for all shapes, with the blunt shapes (sphere and oblate spheroid) outperforming the cone in drag reduction.
In [87], M. Takahashi and N. Ohnishi explored the potential for controlling airfoil separation using repetitive laser pulses. They conducted experiments with a flow Mach number of 1.7, an altitude of 20 km, and an angle of attack of 10 degrees. Repetitive pulses were directed at the underside of a diamond-shaped airfoil to mitigate flow separation on the upper surface. The rapid heating from the repetitive pulses generated a powerful SW from a focal point, leading to the induction of an expansion wave at the trailing edge as the supersonic SW propagated from the underside to the top surface, resulting in a reduction of the separation region on the top surface. A comparison of the local Mach number fields between cases without laser impact and those subjected to multiple laser pulses is shown in Figure 21. The research demonstrated that repetitive pulse energy deposition improved the lift-to-drag ratio of the wing, highlighting the effectiveness of a “contactless” flow control method through numerical simulations.
In [88], O. Azarova conducted a numerical investigation of supersonic flow control by combined energy deposition methods, considering various body shapes such as blunt cylinders, hemispherical cylinders, and pointed bodies over a range of freestream Mach numbers from 1.89 to 3.45. The study showed that the drag reduction was due to complex unsteady vortex structures resulting from the RMIs. Two mechanisms were described: unsteady double vortex mechanism for frontal drag reduction and constantly acting vortices in a steady flow. It was shown that the combined energy release suppressed the shear layer instability and the large-scaled flow pulsations. In particular, drag control showed significant improvements, with a 19% reduction for blunt cylinders and a 52% reduction for hemispherical cylinders, achieved by combining energy deposition with an interior rarefaction parameter αρ1 less than that of the initial filament: αρ1 < αρ (Figure 22a). This effect was associated with generating two vortices rotating in the same direction. When αρ1 > αρ, the forming vortices are rotating in opposite directions, leading to reduced drag variation (Figure 22b). The study investigated the structure of non-stationary and stationary flow fields for pointed bodies under different types of filaments (Figure 23). A steady flow mode has been established, characterized by a constantly acting vortex pair, which reduces frontal drag force by up to 71% (Figure 23b).

7. Self-Sustained Theoretical Models: Dual-Pulse Laser, Multi-Mode Laser Pulses and Self-Sustained Glow Discharge

This section is devoted to the analysis of three self-sustained theoretical models: the model of dual-pulse laser ignition, the model of nano-second multi-mode pulses, and the model of self-sustained glow discharge. These models include additional plasma reactions for the description of non-equilibrium plasma generation and a self-consistent theoretical approach for mathematical formulation for the inhomogeneous current contraction of a self-sustained glow discharge. Below, these models are discussed separately.
In [89,90], A. Tropina et al., and in [91], R. Mahamud et al. presented a comprehensive two-dimensional mathematical model for dual-pulse laser ignition. This model combines the Navier–Stokes equations with equations for translational and vibrational energy and neutral and charged species. The spatial contours of the temperature for one of the base cases were shown along with the velocity vectors and streamline profiles with respect to the temperature contours, as well as the spatial contours of different species after 60 µs. The results indicated that the behavior of the ignition core is influenced by the shape and initial energy distribution within the energy spot created by the initial ultraviolet laser pulse. In addition, the study underscores the significant influence of laser intensity, vibrational non-equilibrium, and initial electron number density on the ignition delay time and flame kernel evolution.
A. Alberti et al. investigated non-equilibrium plasma generation using nanosecond multi-mode laser pulses in [92]. The authors used a self-consistent computational model to study the formation and growth of plasma cores generated by these pulses, incorporating non-equilibrium effects through a two-temperature model and treating the plasma with an approach based on the Navier–Stokes equations. The propagation and attenuation of the laser beam was simulated using the radiative transfer equation coupled with the flow governing equations. The results successfully replicated critical experimental findings, including a two-lobed plasma core and the appearance of quasi-periodic structures. It was shown that the occurrence of these structures is closely related to the mode splitting frequency of the laser, which corresponds to local power peaks in the incident beam. Furthermore, the modulation frequency of the laser was found to affect the local electron density and temperature, resulting in a more-elongated plasma for multi-mode pulses compared to single-mode pulses.
In [93], M. Shneider et al. performed a numerical study of the dynamic contraction of the current channel within a quasi-neutral positive column of a self-sustained glow discharge occurring in a rectangular channel with convection cooling. The authors developed a self-consistent theoretical model to describe the inhomogeneous current contraction in this glow discharge, including a comprehensive set of two-dimensional equations that take into account the ionization thermal instability. This self-sustained glow discharge occurred in a molecular gas (nitrogen) stabilized by an external circuit and subjected to convective heat loss. The study illustrated the evolution of the contracted channel as it progressed from one electrode to another until it reached a longitudinally uniform contracted state. The propagation velocity of the contraction was also estimated and compared with the existing experimental results.

8. Flow Control Using Combined Physical Phenomena

In this part, we discuss the experimental works on the organization and study of the MW discharge initiated by single and double laser sparks (LSs) in a supersonic flow, pulse volumetric electric discharge, and a discharge organized as a pulsed plasma column with the use of plasma sheets. The results within the framework of organizing control of supersonic flows are also considered: plasmagasdynamic (PGD), electrogasdynamic (EGD), and magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) impact for the purposes of the BSW control, and using the spark discharge energy applied to one side of the wedge (“plasma wedge”) which is an example of coupling the mechanical and energy approaches to flow control.
In [94], S. Afanas’ev et al. conducted experiments to investigate the effect of gasdynamic processes on the characteristics and initiation threshold of a laser spark (LS)-initiated MW discharge in the open air (see Figure 24 and Figure 25).
Here, the MW beam propagates from left to right, and the laser beam propagates from top to bottom. In Figure 24, the MW beam characteristics are electric field voltage per centimeter E ≈ 5 kV/cm and time τMW = 4 μs, and the laser beam has the following parameters: energy w = 370 mJ, time of action τlas = 10 ns. In Figure 25, the MW beam characteristics are E ≈ 5 kV/cm for pressure p0 = 300 Torr and E ≈ 4 kV/cm for p0 = 150 Torr, with τMW = 4 μs; the laser beam has the following parameters: w = 370 mJ, τlas = 10 ns. It was shown that under the existing MW field strength, the duration for which a LS can initiate the discharge increases with higher laser pulse energy. In addition, the significant reductions in the MW discharge initiation threshold and the duration of LS initiation capability were observed at atmospheric and reduced air pressure, which was influenced by gasdynamic perturbations associated with the LS.
The works [72,95,96], presented by V. Lashkov’s group, are ideologically a continuation of the previous work. The authors present experimental results on MW discharge in a supersonic flow initiated by single and double LSs, along with numerical simulations of the SW structures induced by multiple LSs in an airflow (Figure 26). Here, in the experiments, the static pressure was p0 = 145 Torr and freestream Mach number M = 1.5.
The fusion of two plasma areas from the LSs into one extended region was also shown, and the mechanism of this fusion, associated with the formation of a secondary streamer between these regions, was elucidated (Figure 27). Overall, employing various spatial and temporal arrangements of LSs within a supersonic flow, the authors demonstrated the potential for lowering the MW breakdown threshold and manipulating the shape and placement of the MW plasma.
In [97,98,99], the group of I. Znamenskaya presented their results on obtaining the elements of a classical Riemann problem in an experiment. The authors performed experiments on the study of a flow dynamics after pulse ionization of a half-space in front of a flat SW within a channel. These results, described in detail in [97,98], showed that a pulsed volumetric electric discharge initiated near the SW concentrates in front of the SW and rapidly heats the adjacent gas. The evolution of the flow pattern after the discharge was studied using shadow imaging and a high-speed camera, revealing a configuration with two shocks separated by a contact surface, which is consistent with the solution of one of the classical Riemann problems for the decay of an arbitrary discontinuity. The authors also estimated the amount of discharge energy converted to heat over the duration of the discharge.
E. Koroteeva et al. experimentally and numerically studied the flow induced by a pulsed plasma column in low-pressure quiescent air [99]. The authors used plasma sheets to pre-ionize the gas, which facilitated the formation of a volume discharge between them. The results showed that in a confined mode, this discharge effectively deposited electrical energy uniformly in a long (24 mm) and narrow (less than 2 mm radius) plasma column. It was found that this pulsed localized energy deposition resulted in a highly symmetric cylindrical SW that expanded at an average velocity of 550 m/s within the first 40 µs after discharge. In the performed 3D CFD simulations, the observed flow structures were accurately reproduced, which provided more profound insights into the complex discharge-induced flow. Therefore, the generated SWs, whether in single or repetitive pulse modes, can be used to locally influence the high-speed flows in desired ways, provided their effects can be predicted.
In [28,29], the group of T. Lapushkina presented their results focused on the control of supersonic flows using magnetic impact in addition to plasma and electrical impacts. The study explores the potential for controlling SW configurations through plasmagasdynamic (PGD), electrogasdynamic (EGD), and magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) approaches [28]. Specifically, the effects of gas discharges with varying parameters of the standoff distance of a BSW in the supersonic flow of ionized xenon past a semi-cylinder AD body are investigated. In the PGD control method, a discharge generates a highly non-equilibrium plasma in front of the body, and the obtained experimental results showed that the BSW position changes depending on the degree of plasma non-equilibrium. In the EGD and MHD methods, a discharge was organized in the near-surface area of the nose section of the body. In these cases, changes in the BSW positions are achieved by adjusting the discharge intensity (EGD method) or by applying an external magnetic field (MHD method).
In [29], T. Lapushkina formulated the principles of MHD control for both internal and external supersonic flows. The experiments were performed using a shock tube- based gasdynamic setup capable of producing a wide range of flow Mach numbers (M = 4–7). Electric and pulsed magnetic fields with intensities up to 1.5 T were applied. The findings revealed that variation of the local region of deposition and the intensity and the direction of the gas discharge currents makes it possible to control the ponderomotive force acting on the gas flow during the MHD impact. This enables control of the SW shape and position and the flow velocity and direction, along with the variations in pressure in the vicinity of the surfaces of a streamlined body. The experimental flow patterns and data analysis illustrated the impact of the MHD effect in several aspects, including changing the angle of the attached SW, adjusting the BSW standoff distance, and modifying the drag and lift forces of streamlined bodies (Figure 28 and Figure 29). It should be underlined that a key advantage of MHD control over mechanical methods is its speed. In addition, when gas discharge flows are well organized, the MHD effects are independent of the flow velocity or angle of attack, making them suitable for a broader range of supersonic flow control applications.
In [100], P. Polivanov et al. presented an experimental and numerical study of a plasma vortex generator in a supersonic turbulent BL. This study addresses the challenge of flow control under turbulent BL conditions at transonic and supersonic speeds of the oncoming flow. The authors investigated a combined control device named by them as a “plasma wedge”, a wedge-shaped device installed in the flow. A spark discharge actuator applies power to one side of the wedge. The flow goes above a rectangular flat plate with a sharp leading edge. The results showed that the initiation of the discharge resulted in the formation of a longitudinal vortex in the wake behind the actuator. Experimental data included velocity distribution behind the plasma wedge, pressure distribution in the transverse coordinate, and temperature distribution on the surface. Besides the gasdynamic flow parameters, the electrical characteristics of the discharge were also measured. The experimental results confirmed that the activation of the discharge increases the flow vorticity, demonstrating the effectiveness of such PAs. The vortex formation process was also investigated numerically, considering the location of energy release on the wedge and the role of velocity gradients in the BL. The computational results showed that it is feasible to create a longitudinal vortex by heating the flow in the center and near the trailing edge of the wedge.
In [101,102], O. Azarova et al. studied the passage of an SW through the area of glow gas discharge plasma and conducted a comparison of thermal and plasma effects upon the characteristics of a supersonic flow past an AD body, such as a steady BSW position, as well as the properties of the streamlined body along with the characteristics of the near-surface gas discharge plasma. The authors proved the essential role of the plasma effects, in particular the degree of ionization and the degree of non-equilibrium of the discharge plasma. Numerical modeling of the thermal effect of plasma on the shock layer of a homogeneously heated region with the gas temperature equal to the electron temperature determined in the experiment for the flow parameters used in the experiment was performed in [101]. The analysis of the calculations and their comparison with experimental data leads to the conclusion that there is a plasma effect (as opposed to thermal exposure only) on the supersonic flow past an AD body, which increases nonlinearly with the increasing degree of non-equilibrium of gas discharge plasma in a wide temperature range (Figure 30).
Here, F is the relative frontal drag force, Xbw is the BSW coordinate, Dexp is the averaged (over all experiments with various numbers of electrode pairs) relative BSW standoff distance from the AD body (vs. degree of non-equilibrium in the oncoming flow for Ti = Te), and Dnum is the calculated BSW standoff.
The study in [102] is devoted to the control of the BSW in a Mach 4 supersonic airflow around a semi-cylindrical body using a surface gas discharge. In the experiments, increasing the discharge power in the plasma region increased the BSW standoff distance within certain power and current ranges. In the accompanying calculations, it was found that the plasma parameters such as the degree of ionization and the degree of non-equilibrium influence the position of the steady BSW (as well as the characteristics of the AD body). A mechanism based on non-steady processes during a steady flow formation was obtained which explained the change of the BSW position due to its interaction with the pre-existing plasma zone created by the discharge. Thus, the study demonstrates the potential of controlling the BSW position and AD body characteristics by creating a plasma region using a surface gas discharge on the front surface of the body.

9. High-Speed Flow Control Using Thermal Longitudinal Layered Plasma Structures

This section is devoted to the numerical prediction of the possibilities of high-speed flow control using thermal longitudinal layered plasma structures (LPSs). These structures are modelled as sets of heated layers—thermally stratified energy sources (TSSs). Calculations were performed using complex-conservative difference schemes ([103] by O. Azarova). The experimental and numerical results showed an SW curvature and blurring up to the complete disappearance of the SW fronts due to multiple manifestation of the RMI under the action of TSSs. Here, the results on the impact of TSS on BSW and AD characteristics of a body were examined, including the formulation of principles of high-speed flow control using TSS. These principles include both unsteady and steady flow control, inducing the possibilities of initiation and suppressing self-consistent flow pulsations, and drag/lift control. Finally, the results on the noise impact on the ground during flow control using TSS are analyzed.
In [104,105,106], O. Azarova et al. investigated the impact of a TSS on the BSW and AD characteristics of a streamlined pointed body. The principles of high-speed unsteady flow control are presented. These include control of BSW, drag and lift forces, and flow stability using TSSs. In [104], the authors reveal the emergence of multiple RMIs, leading to the almost-complete disappearance of the BSW front within the source region and introducing a novel multi-vortex mechanism affecting the streamlined body (Figure 31).
Earlier, TSSs were found to be superior, producing localized zones with significantly elevated specific internal energy and volume kinetic energy levels, up to 29% and 8.3 times higher, respectively, than homogeneous sources, with larger differences at lower rarefaction parameters and higher Mach numbers. The study [104] analyzes key parameters and compares the effects of stratified and homogeneous energy sources with equal total energy. In particular, the results highlight the potential for significant reductions in the temperature at the double-wedge vertex and the average front surface temperature due to energy redistribution into layers. In supersonic flow past a double-wedge pointed plate at M = 2, the study distinguishes the effect of a TSS, showing that it leads to a substantial reduction in the stagnation temperature and the average frontal surface temperature compared to a homogeneous source with similar total energy and spatial characteristics.
In [105], the author investigates the dependence of frontal drag and lift forces on temperature variations within the source layers. Each heated layer is assumed to have a reduced density and is characterized by a rarefaction parameter αj, which, taking into account that the pressure is assumed to be constant, means that the temperature in the layer is increased. The TSS is characterized by a set of rarefaction parameters in its layers {αj}. The study presents a novel method for high-speed flow control using a continuously active TSS, exploring the relationship between steady supersonic flow, aerodynamic body characteristics, and temperature variations within the layers of the TSS. By changing the temperature distribution within these layers, more intense vortices accompanying the RMI can be achieved, reducing the drag force and inducing transient changes in the lift forces. Detailed visualization of density, pressure, temperature, and local Mach number fields was carried out to analyze the controlled establishment of steady flow modes under the action of a TSS. Multiple RMI are observed, resulting in significant perturbation of the BSW front within the source layers and initiation of sharp peaks (Figure 31). Key findings include the wavy nature of the bow shock front, influenced by the source stratification, and the larger BSW separation distance at lower αj values (higher temperatures) in the layers. By changing the temperatures within the symmetric sets {αj}, control over flow parameters, pressure, density, and drag is achieved. Asymmetric sets {αj} can induce pulsating flow modes, with mechanisms for self-sustained pulsations described. Simultaneously, it is shown that it is possible to suppress such flow pulsations by changing the temperature settings. The study also considered the ability of initiating lift (pitch) forces and control (Figure 32). This novel approach can give valuable insights into dynamic flow control using thermally stratified energy sources (TSSs).
The issue of noise reduction (sonic boom problem) in supersonic aircraft design is critical and has a significant impact on the development of supersonic aviation. In [107], M. Park and M. Nemec provided an overview of noise generation research, explicitly addressing the sonic boom problem in supersonic flows/flights. The authors summarized the studies presented at the Second AIAA Sonic Boom Workshop.
The study by O. Kravchenko et al. in [106] deals with the issue of noise generation during civil supersonic aircraft flights and focuses on the effect of TSSs used to control the supersonic flow over an aerodynamic model of a pointed cylinder. The authors calculate the near-field and ground pressure signatures and the perceived noise level in decibels (PLdB) at the ground. Near-field modeling, analysis of ground pressure signatures, and PLdB estimates engage complex-conservative difference schemes [103], the C. Thomas waveform parameter method described in [108], and the Mark VII algorithm of S. Stevens presented in [109]. By varying the temperature in the TSS layers, and the number of layers in the TSS, there is a slight decrease in the pressure at the BSW front, and in the near-field and ground surface pressure signatures, which affects flow control. At the same time, these values do not exceed the pressure values for flow without TSS action (Figure 33). Therefore, the computational results demonstrate that controlling the flow with TSS at the ground does not introduce additional noise. In a broader sense, the simulation shows that changing the surface pressure and reducing drag does not necessarily change the PLdB near the ground.
These results have practical implications, suggesting that specific energy attributes within the SW structures, particularly in the hypersonic context, can be precisely controlled by strategically adjusting the rarefaction parameter or temperature profiles within the layers of the TSS, offering potential advances in supersonic and hypersonic flow control for various applications with no additional sonic influence emerging during the use of TSSs for the flow control.

10. Conclusions

A review is presented devoted to the analysis of studies on the experimental organization and application of spatially multi-component (complex) plasma structures and combined energy deposition for the purposes of high-speed flow control. The main emphasis is placed on the problems of external gasdynamics—control of flows during flights of aerodynamic bodies—but the results of this analysis can also find application in internal gasdynamics problems—organizing the control of mixing, ignition, and combustion processes in nozzles and combustion chambers.
The review contains an introduction, a brief background, which mentions the seminal works on flow control, as well as seven content sections, the conclusion, and Appendix A. In the first sections, research on the control of bow shock wave/shock wave–energy source interaction and shock wave–boundary layer interaction using filamentary plasma and repetitive multiple laser pulse plasma structures is considered. Shock wave curvature/bifurcation, as well as blurring/weakening/disappearance of the shock wave/bow shock wave, are also analyzed. Included are the results of studies on gasdynamic instabilities and flow control of separation zones. Other separate sections are devoted to experimentally obtaining and modeling spatially multi-component plasma structures and self-sustained theoretical models for dual-pulse lasers, multi-mode laser pulses, and self-sustained glow discharge. Flow control using combined physical phenomena was also analyzed. The final part presents the numerical prediction of the possibilities of a high-speed flow control using thermal longitudinal layered plasma structures. In Appendix A, the basic information about the papers considered in the relevant parts of the review is presented in the form of tables corresponding to the separate parts of the review. The types of energy sources with the help of which spatially multi-component plasma structures are formed are also indicated. Additional results and conclusions are listed in these tables where possible.
In general, the main conclusion made was that a new direction of research in the field of high-speed flow control, associated with the organization and use of spatially multi-component plasma structures, which exhibit new physical properties when affecting the flow and characteristics of aerodynamic bodies, is promising, multifunctional, and enables an increase in the efficiency of high-speed flow/flight control.

Author Contributions

Statement of the topic and selection of papers—O.A.A.; analysis and writing—O.A.A. and O.V.K.; verification and design—O.A.A. and O.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

ADaerodynamic
APEDarc plasma energy deposition
BLboundary layer
BPAburst plasma actuators
BSWbow shock wave
BSWESIbow shock wave–energy source interaction
CPSJAcounter-flow plasma synthetic jet actuator
CFDcomputational fluid dynamics
DBDdielectric barrier discharge
EGDelectrogasdynamic
ESenergy source
FSAflow in separation area
IWinstability wave
KHIKelvin–Helmholtz instability
LPSlayered plasma structures
LSlaser spark
MHDmagnetohydrodynamic
MWmicrowave
NS-SDBDnanosecond surface dielectric barrier discharge
PAplasma actuator
PGDplasmagasdynamic
PLdBperceived sound level in decibels
Q-DCquasi-constant (direct current electrical discharge)
RANSReynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations
RMIRichtmyer–Meshkov instability
SAPAsurface arc plasma actuator
SSWseparation shock wave
SDBDsurface dielectric barrier discharge
SWshock wave
SWBLIshock wave–boundary layer interaction
SWESIshock wave–energy source interaction
TSSthermally stratified energy source

Appendix A. Summary Overview Tables of the Considered Literature

In Table A1, Table A2, Table A3, Table A4, Table A5, Table A6 and Table A7, the basic information about the main papers considered in the relevant parts of the review is included. The results regarding the main research areas examined in the review are indicated: control of SWESI, BSWESI, and SWBLI, SW curvature/bifurcation, and blurring/weakening/disappearance of the SW/BSW. The results on RMI and KHI manifestation and the control of separation zones are included. Additional results and conclusions are listed where possible. The types of energy sources are also indicated.
Table A1. Part 3. Filamentary plasma: control of BSWESI and SWBLI.
Table A1. Part 3. Filamentary plasma: control of BSWESI and SWBLI.
PaperBSWESISWESISWBLIExperimentNumerical ModelingType of ESSW Curvature/BifurcationBlurring/Weakening/Disappearance SW/BSWInstabilities Changing FSAAdditional Results and Conclusions
ExpNumExpNumExpNumExpNum
[46,47,48] Leonov et al. + +++Filamentary plasma generated by means of a Q-DC electric discharge +++ ++SW mitigation is demonstrated due to the interaction with the stratified plasma-modified BL; generation of streamwise vorticity
[49] Andrews et al.;
[50] Elliott et al.
+ +++Filamentary plasma generated by means of a Q-DC electric discharge +++ ++SW mitigation is demonstrated; three-dimensional shape of the SW structure is mapped; pressure distribution is evaluated; criteria of the efficiency of the plasma control of SW position
[51] Falempin et al.+ +++Filamentary plasma generated by means of a Q-DC electric discharge+ + ++Near-surface discharge significantly modifies the pressure distribution on the walls; discharge influences the air mass flow rate
[52,53] Feng et al.+ +++Arc plasma energy deposition, six pairs of electrodes + ++++Stronger oscillation of the attached shock; effects of thermal bubbles on SWBLI
[54,55,56,57] Gan et al.+ ++ Array of 16 SAPAs+ + + + Registration of local vortices, disappearance of the foot region of SSW, and bifurcation of SSW
[58] Wang et al.+ +++A set of high-frequency CPSJAs ++++Vorticity production by PSJ/bow shock interaction; the conditions for the separation bubble to suppress the separation area
[59,60] Wang et al.+ ++A set of pulsed discharges of a high power density and long pulse width ++ ++Energy efficiencies are 28–32% (M = 5); maximum reduction in the axial force 32.9% (M = 6); the rate of the reduction in the axial force increases linearly with the discharge-pulse energy, but it decreases parabolically with increasing angle of attack
[61] Ma et al. +++Six high-frequency pulsed arc discharges++++ ++A better drag-reduction effect is produced by the actuator with an increased operating power or frequency, and the drag reduction rate is 25.5%
[62,63] Tang et al. ++ Array of five pulsed spark discharge PAs+ + + + The drag of the separation wave is reduced by 45% under actuation and the principle of the continuous control was formulated
Table A2. Part 4. Filamentary plasma: control of SWESI.
Table A2. Part 4. Filamentary plasma: control of SWESI.
PaperBSWESISWESISWBLIExperimentNumerical ModelingType of ESSW Curvature/BifurcationBlurring/Weakening/Disappearance SW/BSWInstabilitiesChanging FSAAdditional Results and Conclusions
ExpNumExpNumExpNumExpNum
[64] Sembian et al., [65] Apazidis et al. + ++Elongated elliptically shaped inhomogeneity generated via discharge providing the exploding wire + (RMI, KGI)+ (RMI, KGI) Unique linear equation for the normalized circulation
[66,67,68,69,70] Lapushkina et al. and Azarova et al. + ++Air glow gas discharge of constant voltage with formation of ionization strata++++++ (RMI) Development of ionization instability with ionization strata of various scales; curvature, blurring, and disappearance of SW during the SWESI
[25] Bityurin et al. + ++Electrical discharge+ + + SW curvature and gas dynamic instabilities generation
Table A3. Part 5. Spatially multi-component plasma structures: experimental obtaining and modelling.
Table A3. Part 5. Spatially multi-component plasma structures: experimental obtaining and modelling.
PaperBSWESISWESISWBLIExperimentNumerical ModelingType of ESSW Curvature/BifurcationBlurring/Weakening/Disappearance SW/BSWInstabilities Changing FSAAdditional Results and Conclusions
ExpNumExpNumExpNumExpNum
[71] Saifutdinov et al. + Localized double MW discharge in air Physico-mathematical model including a set of thirteen plasma-chemical reactions; all main parameters of the microwave discharge plasma are determined
[72] Khoronzhuk + Localized multiple MW discharge in air;
laser initiated MW discharge
Generation and investigation of localized multiple MW discharge and laser-initiated MW discharges in air
[73] Shneider et al. +MW radiation produced through a filamentation of ultrashort high-intensity laser pulses in the atmosphere The model for MW plasma waveguides induced in the atmosphere through the filamentation of high-intensity ultrashort laser pulses
[74] Clifford et al. + NS-DBD, four actuators + + Increasing lift, reducing drag, and trailing-edge excitation
[75] Rajendran et al. ++NS-SDBDs Prediction of the length and time scales of the filamentary plasma induced by NS-SDBDs
[78] Ukai and Kontis + NS-DBD burst plasma actuators—multiple plasma discharges Increase in the thermal perturbation due to the shock wave generated from BPA; BPAs gradually increase the area of thermal perturbation
[79] Kopiev and Akishev et al. + Surface barrier corona discharge actuators; high-frequency DBD actuator; slipping surface discharge + Each of the discharges can be used to suppress the artificial IWs; possibility of noise mitigation
Table A4. Part 6. Repetitive multiple laser pulse plasma structures: control of BSWESI and SWBLI.
Table A4. Part 6. Repetitive multiple laser pulse plasma structures: control of BSWESI and SWBLI.
PaperBSWESISWBLIExperimentNumerical ModelingType of ESSW/BSW Curvature/BifurcationBlurring/Weakening/Disappearance SW/BSWInstabilities Changing FSAAdditional Results and Conclusions
ExpNumExpNumExpNumExpNum
[81] Guvernuk and Samoylov+ +Pulsating heat supply + Pulsating heat supply can be more efficient than a stationary one
[82,83,84] Anderson (Norton) and Knight+ +Repetitive heated filaments + + Energy deposition is shown to be an effective and efficient means of reducing drag without increasing the thermal load
[85] Padhi et al.+ +Two successive laser pulses in the quiescent air Five species (O2, O, N2, N, and NO) and eleven elementary reactions are introduced into a model; the repetitive pulse induces a significant change in density field
[86] Sangtabi et al.+ +Repetitive multiple laser pulses energy deposition + The comparison of effects for sphere, cone, and oblate spheroid is carried out based on number of pulses, frequency, Mach number, and ES location.
[87] Takahashi and Ohnishi++ +Repetitive multiple laser pulses energy deposition + +Lift-to-drag ratio of the wing was improved
[88] Azarova+ +Combined energy deposition + + (RMI,
KHI)
Double vortex mechanism of the drag reduction; intensification in the frontal drag force reduction; suppression of shear layer instability and large-scaled flow pulsations
Table A5. Part 7. Self-sustained theoretical models: dual-pulse laser, multi-mode laser pulses, and self-sustained glow discharge.
Table A5. Part 7. Self-sustained theoretical models: dual-pulse laser, multi-mode laser pulses, and self-sustained glow discharge.
PaperBSWESISWBLIExperimentNumerical ModelingType of ESSW/BSW Curvature/BifurcationBlurring/Weakening/Disappearance SW/BSWInstabilities Changing FSAAdditional Results and Conclusions
ExpNumExpNumExpNumExpNum
[89,90] Tropina et al. and in [91], Mahamud et al. +Dual-pulse laser ignition + Additional plasma reactions are included. The ignition kernel dynamics depends on the first ultraviolet laser pulse characteristics
[92] Alberti et al. +Nano-second multi-mode pulses Non-equilibrium plasma generation using self-consistent computational model
[93] Shneider et al. +Self-sustained glow discharge A self-consistent theoretical model for inhomogeneous current contraction of a self-sustained glow discharge
Table A6. Part 8. Flow control using combined physical phenomena.
Table A6. Part 8. Flow control using combined physical phenomena.
PaperBSWESISWBLIExperimentNumerical ModelingType of ESSW/BSW Curvature/BifurcationBlurring/Weakening/Disappearance SW/BSWInstabilities Changing FSAAdditional Results and Conclusions
ExpNumExpNumExpNumExpNum
[94] Afanas’ev et al. + LS-initiated MW discharge Decrease in the threshold for initiating a MW discharge and the period of maintaining the initiating ability of a LS
[95] Mashek et al. [96] Khoronzhuk et al. ++MW discharge in a supersonic flow initiated by single and double LSs Reducing the MW breakdown threshold; controlling the shape and location of the MW plasma
[97] Znamenskaya et al. [98] Doroshchenko et al. ++Pulse volumetric electric discharge+ A flow pattern consisting of two SWs separated by a contact surface was obtained
[99] Koroteeva et al. ++A pulsed plasma column; plasma sheets A flow pattern SW-contact surface-SW was obtained
[28,29] Lapushkina et al.+++ PGD, EGD, and MHD impact+ + Controlling the position of the BSW and AD characteristics of a body
[100] Polivanov et al. ++Energy supply to one side of the wedge due to a spark discharge (“plasma wedge”) Significant
intensification of the wake vortex
[101] Azarova et al. + ++A low current glow gas discharge: PGD and EGD impact + Existence in a broad temperature range of a plasma effect (in addition to the thermal one) on a supersonic flow over an AD body
[102] Azarova et al. ++++A surface gas discharge: PGD and EGD impact + +Ionization and non-equilibrium were shown to influence the position of a steady BSW (as well as the characteristics of an AD body)
Table A7. Part 9. High-speed flow control using thermal longitudinal layered plasma structures.
Table A7. Part 9. High-speed flow control using thermal longitudinal layered plasma structures.
PaperBSWESISWESIExperimentNumerical ModelingType of ESSW/BSW Curvature/BifurcationBlurring/Weakening/Disappearance SW/BSWInstabilities Changing FSAAdditional Results and Conclusions
ExpNumExpNumExpNumExpNum
[104,105] Azarova et al. + +Thermal longitudinal LPS modelled as TSS + + + (RMI) +Impact of TSS on BSW and AD characteristics of a body; principles of high-speed flow control using TSS are formulated
[106] Kravchenko et al.+ +Thermal longitudinal LPS modelled as TSS + + + (RMI) +Impact of TSS on the pressure signatures and PLdB effect on the ground; when controlling the flow using TSS, no additional noise is introduced to the ground.

References

  1. Knight, D.; Kianvashrad, N. Review of energy deposition for high-speed flow control. Energies 2022, 15, 9645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Knight, D. A Short review of microwave and laser discharges for supersonic flow control. AerospaceLab 2015, 10, AL10-02. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Knight, D. Survey of aerodynamic drag reduction at high speed by energy deposition. J. Propuls. Power 2008, 24, 1153–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rashid, S.; Nawaz, F.; Maqsood, A.; Salamat, S.; Riaz, R. Review of wave drag reduction techniques: Advances in active, passive, and hybrid flow control. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerosp. Eng. 2022, 12, 2851–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Starikovskiy, A.Y.; Aleksandrov, N.L. Gasdynamic flow control by ultrafast local heating in a strongly nonequilibrium pulsed plasma. Plasma Phys. Rep. 2021, 47, 148–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ahmed, M.Y.M.; Qin, N. Forebody shock control devices for drag and aero-heating reduction: A comprehensive survey with a practical perspective. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2020, 112, 100585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fomin, V.M.; Tretyakov, P.K.; Taran, J.-P. Flow control using various plasma and aerodynamic approaches (short review). Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2004, 8, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bletzinger, P.; Ganguly, B.N.; Van Wie, D.; Garscadden, A. Plasmas in high speed aerodynamics. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, R33–R57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shang, J.S.; Surzhikov, S.T.; Kimmel, R.; Gaitonde, D.; Menart, J.; Hayes, J. Mechanisms of plasma actuators for hypersonic flow control. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2005, 41, 642–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Updike, G.A.; Shang, J.S.; Gaitonde, D.V. Hypersonic Separated Flow Control Using Magneto–Aerodynamic Interaction; AIAA 2005-0164: Reno, NV, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zong, H.; Chiatto, M.; Kotsonis, M.; de Luca, L. Plasma synthetic jet actuators for active flow control. Actuators 2018, 7, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miles, R.B. Flow control by energy addition into high-speed air. In Proceedings of the Fluids 2000 Conference and Exhibit, Denver, CO, USA, 19 June–22 June 2000; Paper AIAA-2000-2324. pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shneider, M.N.; Macheret, S.O.; Zaidi, S.H.; Girgis, I.G.; Miles, R.B. Virtual shapes in supersonic flow control with energy addition. J. Propuls. Power 2008, 24, 900–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Russel, A.; Zare-Bentash, H.; Kontis, K. Joule heating flow control methods for high-speed flows. J. Electrostat. 2016, 80, 34–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leonov, S.B. Review of plasma-based methods for high-speed flow control. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Fluid Mechanics AIP Conference Proceedings, Guangzhou, China, 30 June–3 July 2011; pp. 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leonov, S.B.; Adamovich, I.V.; Soloviev, V.R. Dynamics of near-surface electric discharges and mechanisms of their interaction with the airflow. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2016, 25, 063001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kriegseis, J.; Simon, B.; Grundmann, S. Towards in-flight applications? A review on dielectric barrier discharge-based boundary-layer control. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2016, 68, 020802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Znamenskaya, I.A. Methods for panoramic visualization and digital analysis of thermophysical flow fields. A review. Sci. Vis. 2021, 13, 125–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Knight, D.D. Energy Deposition for High-Speed Flow Control; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019; 450p. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kline, J.; Murray, R.; Miles, R. Microwave Plasma-Electron Beam Interactions for Hypersonic Flow Control. In Proceedings of the ICOPS 2000. IEEE Conference Record-Abstracts. 27th IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (Cat. No.00CH37087), New Orleans, LA, USA, 4–7 June 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kolesnichenko, Y.; Brovkin, V.; Azarova, O.; Grudnitsky, V.; Lashkov, V.; Mashek, I. Microwave energy release regimes for drag reduction in supersonic flows. In Proceedings of the 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 14–17 January 2002; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, Virigina, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kolesnichenko, Y.; Azarova, O.; Brovkin, V.; Khmara, D.; Lashkov, V.; Mashek, I.; Ryvkin, M. Basics in beamed MW energy deposition for flow/flight control. In Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 5–8 January 2004; p. 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Myrabo, L.; Raizer, Y. Laser-induced air spike for advanced transatmospheric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 25th Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 20–23 June 1994; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, Virigina, 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tretyakov, P.K.; Fomin, V.M.; Yakovlev, V.I. New principles of control of aerophysical processes—Research development. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Methods of Aerophysical Research, Novosibirsk, Russia, 29 June–3 July 1996; p. 210. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bityurin, V.A.; Klimov, A.I.; Leonov, S.B.; Potebnya, V.G. On interaction of longitudinal pulse discharge with bow shock. In Proceedings of the Workshop “Perspectives of MHD and Plasma Technologies in Aerospace Applications”, IVTAN, Moscow, Russia, 24–25 March 1999; p. 114. [Google Scholar]
  26. Roupassov, D.V.; Nikipelov, A.A.; Nudnova, M.M.; Starikovskii, A.Y. Flow separation control by plasma actuator with nanosecond pulsed-periodic discharge. AIAA J. 2009, 47, 168–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bityurin, V.; Klimov, A.; Leonov, S.; Bocharov, A.; Lineberry, J. Assessment of a concept of advanced flow/flight control for hypersonic flights in atmosphere. In Proceedings of the 9th International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Norfolk, VA, USA, 1–5 November 1999; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, Virigina, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lapushkina, T.A.; Erofeev, A.V. Supersonic flow control via plasma, electric and magnetic impacts. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2017, 69, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lapushkina, T. Principles of magnetohydrodynamical control of internal and external supersonic flows. Energies 2022, 15, 5641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Georgievsky, P.Y.; Levin, V.A. Supersonic flow over bodies in the presence of external energy input. Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. 1988, 14, 684–687. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  31. Nemchinov, I.V.; Artem’ev, V.I.; Bergelson, V.I.; Khazins, V.M.; Orlova, T.I.; Rybakov, V.A. Rearrangement of the bow shock shape using a “hot spike”. Shock Waves 1994, 4, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Artem’ev, V.I.; Bergel’son, V.I.; Nemchinov, I.V.; Orlova, T.I.; Smirnov, V.A.; Hazins, V.M. Changing the regime of supersonic streamlining obstacles via raising the thin channel of low density. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Meh. Židk. Gaza 1989, 5, 146–151. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  33. Riggins, D.; Nelson, H.F.; Johnson, E. Blunt-body wave drag reduction using focused energy deposition. AIAA J. 1999, 37, 460–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Georgievsky, P.; Levin, V. Transition to irregular regimes of supersonic flows over bodies initiated by energy deposition. In Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 10–13 January 2005; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, Virigina, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Azarova, O.; Knight, D.; Kolesnichenko, Y. Pulsating stochastic flows accompanying microwave filament/supersonic shock layer interaction. Shock Waves 2011, 21, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Azarova, O.A.; Knight, D.D.; Kravchenko, O.V. Self-sustained oscillations of lift and drag forces, heat fluxes, and flowfield parameters over supersonic bodies under asymmetric energy deposition. Shock Waves 2023, 33, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Krasnobaev, K.V.; Syunyaev, R.A. Calculation of flow of stellar wind past an x-ray source. Fluid Dyn. 1984, 18, 584–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Krasnobaev, K.V. Supersonic flow past weak sources of radiation. Fluid Dyn. 1985, 19, 629–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Azarova, O.A.; Knight, D.D. Interaction of microwave and laser discharge resulting “heat spots” with supersonic combined cylinder bodies. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2015, 43, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Azarova, O.A.; Knight, D.D. An approach of drag force decrease for combined cylinder ad bodies under the action of microwave and laser energy deposition. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2017, 64, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Knight, D.; Kolesnichenko, Y.F.; Brovkin, V.; Khmara, D.; Lashkov, V.; Mashek, I. Interaction of microwave-generated plasma with a hemisphere cylinder at Mach 2.1. AIAA J. 2009, 47, 2996–3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Azarova, O.A. Generation of Richtmyer–Meshkov and secondary instabilities during the interaction of an energy release with a cylinder shock layer. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2015, 42, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Azarova, O.A.; Gvozdeva, L.G. Control of triple-shock configurations in high-speed flows over a cylindrically blunted plate in gases for different Mach numbers. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G J. Aerosp. Eng. 2022, 236, 448–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Azarova, O.A.; Gvozdeva, L.G. Unsteady triple-shock configurations and vortex contact structures initiated by the interaction of an energy source with a shock layer in gases. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2016, 42, 799–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Babinsky, H.; Harvey, J.K. Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011; p. 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Leonov, S.; Carter, C.; Houpt, A.; Ombrello, T. Mitigation of reflected shock wave by streamwise plasma array. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences (EUCASS), Milan, Italy, 3–6 July 2017; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Leonov, S.B.; Firsov, A.A.; Houpt, A.W. Suppression of reflected oblique shock wave by multi-filamentary plasma. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1112, 012005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Leonov, S.; Andrews, P.; Lax, P. Shock wave reflection from plasma array. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences (EUCASS), Lille, France, 27 June–1 July 2022; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Andrews, P.; Lax, P.; Leonov, S. Triggering shock wave positions by patterned energy deposition. Energies 2022, 15, 7104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Elliott, S.; Hasegawa, M.; Sakaue, H.; Leonov, S. Shock-dominated flow control by plasma array: Pressure analysis including pressure-sensitive paint visualization. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2022, 131, 110522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Falempin, F.; Firsov, A.A.; Yarantsev, D.A.; Goldfeld, M.A.; Timofeev, K.; Leonov, S.B. Plasma control of shock wave configuration in off-design mode of M = 2 inlet. Exp. Fluids 2015, 56, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Feng, L.; Wang, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Y. Unsteadiness characterization of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction controlled by high-frequency arc plasma energy deposition. Phys. Fluids 2021, 33, 015114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Feng, L.; Ma, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Xue, R.; Chen, Z. Response characteristics of impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction disturbed by arc plasma energy deposition. Phys. Fluids 2022, 34, 015132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gan, T.; Wu, Y.; Sun, Z.; Jin, D.; Song, H.; Jia, M. Shock wave boundary layer interaction controlled by surface arc plasma actuators. Phys. Fluids 2018, 30, 055107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gan, T.; Wang, Q. Mechanisms of SWBLI control by using a surface arc plasma actuator array. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2021, 128, 110428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gan, T.; Wang, Q. Manipulation of ramp-induced shock using an array of surface arc PAs. Internat. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2022, 93, 108894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gan, T.; Wang, Q.; Gan, W.; Jieming, Z. Visualization study of perturbations induced by plasma actuator and its effect on shock wave/boundary-layer interaction. J. Vis. 2023, 26, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, H.; Li, J.; Jin, D.; Tang, M.; Wu, Y.; Xiao, L. High-frequency counter-flow plasma synthetic jet actuator and its application in suppression of supersonic flow separation. Acta Astronaut. 2018, 142, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, H.; Min, F.; Xie, Z.; Xie, F.; Li, J.; Yang, Y. High-speed aerodynamics control using energy injection of pulsed discharges. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2023, 133, 108115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, H.; Min, F.; Xie, Z.; Li, J.; Dai, J.; Yang, Y. Quantitative study of the control of hypersonic aerodynamics using millisecond pulsed discharges. Phys. Fluids 2022, 34, 021701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ma, X.; Fan, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, X.; Xue, R. Study on the mechanism of shock wave and boundary layer interaction control using high-frequency pulsed arc discharge plasma. Phys. Fluids 2022, 34, 086102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tang, M.; Wu, Y.; Zong, H.; Guo, S.; Liang, H.; Luo, Y. Experimental investigation on compression ramp shock wave/boundary layer interaction control using plasma actuator array. Phys. Fluids 2021, 33, 066101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tang, M.X.; Wu, Y.; Guo, S.G.; Sun, Z.Z.; Luo, Z.B. Effect of the streamwise pulsed arc discharge array on shock wave/boundary layer interaction control. Phys. Fluids 2020, 32, 076104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sembian, S.; Liverts, M.; Apazidis, N. Plane blast wave interaction with an elongated straight and inclined heat-generated inhomogeneity. J. Fluid Mech. 2018, 851, 245–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Apazidis, N.; Sembian, S.; Liverts, M. Blast wave interaction with thermal and density inhomogeneities in air. In Proceeding of the 32nd International Symposium on Shock Waves, Singapore, 14–19 July 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lapushkina, T.A. Peculiarities of the development of ionization instability of various scales in the air gas discharge. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1697, 012219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lapushkina, T.A.; Erofeev, A.V. Features of the interaction of shock waves with regions of a gas-discharge plasma of different structure. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1400, 077028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lapushkina, T.A.; Erofeev, A.V.; Azarova, O.A.; Kravchenko, O.V. Interaction of a plane shock wave with an area of ionization instability of discharge plasma in air. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2019, 85, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Azarova, O.A.; Kravchenko, O.V.; Lapushkina, T.A.; Erofeev, A.V. Density and temperature fluctuations behind a shock wave under the influence of a stratified energy source. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2020, 46, 649–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Azarova, O.A.; Lapushkina, T.A.; Erofeev, A.V.; Kravchenko, O.V. Passage of a shock wave through the region of ionization instability of gas discharge plasma. WSEAS Trans. Heat Mass Transf. 2018, 13, 87–94. Available online: http://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/heat/2018/a165912-144.pdf (accessed on 31 October 2023).
  71. Saifutdinov, A.I.; Kustova, E.V.; Karpenko, A.G.; Lashkov, V.A. Dynamics of focused pulsed MW discharge in air. Plasma Phys. Rep. 2019, 45, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Khoronzhuk, R. Laser-Initiated Microwave Discharge in Supersonic Airflow. Ph.D. Thesis, St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2015. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  73. Shneider, M.N.; Zheltikov, A.M.; Miles, R.B. Long-lived laser-induced microwave plasma guides in the atmosphere: Self-consistent plasma-dynamic analysis and numerical simulations. J. App. Phys. 2010, 108, 033113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Clifford, C.; Singhal, A.; Samimy, M. Flow control over an airfoil in fully reversed condition using plasma actuators. AIAA J. 2016, 54, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rajendran, L.K.; Singh, B.; Vlachos, P.P.; Bane, S. Filamentary surface plasma discharge flow length and time scales. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2021, 54, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Little, J. Localized thermal perturbations for control of turbulent shear flows. AIAA J. 2019, 57, 655–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, L.; Luo, Z.; Xia, Z.; Liu, B.; Deng, X. Review of actuators for high speed active flow control. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2012, 55, 2225–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ukai, T.; Kontis, K. Thermal fluctuation characteristics around a nanosecond pulsed dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator using a frequency analysis based on schlieren images. Energies 2020, 13, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kopiev, V.F.; Akishev, Y.S.; Belyaev, I.V.; Berezhetskaya, N.K.; Bityurin, V.A.; Faranosov, G.A.; Grushin, M.E.; Klimov, A.I.; Kopiev, V.A.; Kossyi, I.A.; et al. Instability wave control in turbulent jet by plasma actuators. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 505201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Phuoc, T.X.; White, F.P. An optical and spectroscopic study of laser-induced sparks to determine available ignition energy. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2002, 29, 1621–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Guvernuk, S.; Samoylov, A. Control of supersonic flow around bodies by means of a pulsed heat source. Tech. Phys. Lett. 1997, 23, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Norton (Anderson), K.; Knight, D. Thermal effects of microwave energy deposition in supersonic flow. In Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL, USA, 5–8 January 2009. Paper AIAA 2009-1224, 19p. [Google Scholar]
  83. Anderson, K.; Knight, D. Interaction of heated filaments with a blunt cylinder in supersonic flow. In Proceedings of the 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL, USA, 4–7 January 2010. Paper AIAA 2010-1381, 35p. [Google Scholar]
  84. Anderson, K.; Knight, D. Interaction of heated filaments with a blunt cylinder in supersonic flow. Shock Waves 2011, 21, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Padhi, U.P.; Singh, A.P.; Joarder, R. Numerical simulation of multiple laser energy deposition in quiescent air. In Proceedings of the 1st National Aerospace Propulsion Conference NAPC, Kanpur, India, 15–17 March 2017; Kanpur NAPC-2017-012, 8p. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317511303_Numerical_Simulation_of_Multiple_Laser_Energy_Deposition_in_Quiescent_Air (accessed on 31 October 2023).
  86. Sangtabi, A.R.; Ramiar, A.; Ranjbar, A.A.; Abdollahzadeh, M.; Kianifar, A. Influence of repetitive laser pulse energy depositions on supersonic flow over a sphere, cone and oblate spheroid. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2018, 76, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Takahashi, M.; Ohnishi, N. Separation control on an airfoil using repetitive laser pulses. In Proceedings of the AIAA SciTech Forum, Kissimmee, FL, USA, 8–12 January 2018. Paper AIAA 2018-1430, 7p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Azarova, O.A. Supersonic flow control using combined energy deposition. Aerospace 2015, 2, 118–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tropina, A.A.; Shneider, M.N.; Miles, R.B. Modeling of dual-pulse laser ignition. In Proceedings of the 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, TX, USA, 9–13 January 2017. Paper AIAA 2017-1972, 12p. [Google Scholar]
  90. Tropina, A.A.; Miles, R.B.; Shneider, M.N. Mathematical model of dual-pulse laser ignition. J. Propuls. Power 2017, 34, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mahamud, R.; Tropina, A.A.; Shneider, M.N.; Miles, R.B. Dual-pulse laser ignition model. Phys. Fluids 2018, 30, 106104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Alberti, A.; Munafò, A.; Nishihara, M.; Pantano, C.; Freund, J.B.; Panesi, M. Non-equilibrium plasma generation via nano-second multi-mode laser pulses. J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 131, 033102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shneider, M.N.; Mokrov, M.S.; Milikh, G.M. Dynamic contraction of the positive column of a self-sustained glow discharge in molecular gas. Phys. Plasmas 2012, 19, 033512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Afanas’ev, S.A.; Brovkin, V.G.; Kolesnichenko, Y.F.; Mashek, I.C. Effect of gasdynamic processes on structure and threshold of laser spark-initiated microwave discharge. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2011, 37, 710–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mashek, I.C.; Lashkov, V.A.; Khoronzhuk, R.S.; Potapeko, D.P.; Brovkin, V.G. Microwave energy deposition in supersonic flows on laser-initiated dipole structures. In Proceedings of the Proc. 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting (SciTech), National Harbor, MD, USA, 13–17 January 2014. Paper AIAA 2014-0487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Khoronzhuk, R.S.; Karpenko, A.G.; Lashkov, V.A.; Potapeko, D.P.; Mashek, I.C. Microwave discharge initiated by double laser spark in a supersonic airflow. J. Plasma Phys. 2015, 81, 905810307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Znamenskaya, I.A.; Koroteev, D.A.; Lutsky, A.E. Discontinuity breakdown on shock wave interaction with nanosecond discharge. Phys. Fluids 2008, 20, 056101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Doroshchenko, I.; Znamenskaya, I.; Koroteev, D.; Kuli-zade, T. When shock is shocked: Riemann problem dynamics at pulse ionization of a shock wave. Phys. Fluids 2017, 29, 101701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Koroteeva, E.; Znamenskaya, I.; Doroshchenko, I. Experimental and numerical investigation of a flow induced by a pulsed plasma column. Phys. Fluids 2018, 30, 086103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Polivanov, P.; Vishnyakov, O.; Sidorenko, A. Study of plasma-based vortex generator in supersonic turbulent boundary layer. Aerospace 2023, 10, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Azarova, O.A.; Erofeev, A.V.; Lapushkina, T.A. A comparison of plasma and thermal effects upon supersonic flow past aerodynamic bodies. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2017, 43, 405–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Azarova, O.A.; Lapushkina, T.A.; Shustrov, Y.A. Near-surface gas discharge effect on a steady bow shock wave position in a supersonic flow past a cylindrically blunted body in the air. Phys. Fluids 2022, 34, 066117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Azarova, O.A. Complex conservative difference schemes for computing supersonic flows past simple aerodynamic forms. J. Comp. Math. Math. Phys. 2015, 55, 2025–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Azarova, O.A.; Kravchenko, O.V. Impact of a thermally stratified energy source on the bow shock wave and aerodynamic characteristics of a body. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1891, 012025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Azarova, O.A. Basics of control of the bow shock wave, drag and lift forces, and stability in a steady supersonic flow past an ad body using permanently operating thermally stratified energy deposition. Energies 2022, 15, 8627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kravchenko, O.V.; Azarova, O.A.; Knight, D.D. Impact of a thermally stratified energy source located in front of a pointed cylinder aerodynamic model on the pressure signatures and PLdB effect on the ground. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Park, M.A.; Nemec, M. Nearfield Summary and Statistical Analysis of the Second AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop. J. Aircr. 2019, 56, 851–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Thomas, C.L. Extrapolation of Sonic Boom Pressure Signatures by the Waveform Parameter Method. NASA Technical Note D-6832. 1972, pp. 1–31. Available online: https://archive.org/details/NASA_NTRS_Archive_19720018354/mode/2up (accessed on 13 September 2023).
  109. Stevens, S.S. Perceived level of noise by Mark VII and decibels (E). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1972, 51, 575–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Image of the Q-DC plasma at initial pressure p0 = 270 mbar, seven-electrode configuration. Exposure 10 µs; (b) scheme of generation of the filamentary plasma and streamwise vorticity [46]. Copyright© 2017 by S. Leonov, reprint under permission, 21 July 2023.
Figure 1. (a) Image of the Q-DC plasma at initial pressure p0 = 270 mbar, seven-electrode configuration. Exposure 10 µs; (b) scheme of generation of the filamentary plasma and streamwise vorticity [46]. Copyright© 2017 by S. Leonov, reprint under permission, 21 July 2023.
Energies 17 01632 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of the impinging shock reflection pattern without plasma (a) and with filamentary plasma (b) (yellow arrow shows the flow direction) [46]. Copyright© 2017 by S. Leonov, reprint under permission, 21 July 2023.
Figure 2. Comparison of the impinging shock reflection pattern without plasma (a) and with filamentary plasma (b) (yellow arrow shows the flow direction) [46]. Copyright© 2017 by S. Leonov, reprint under permission, 21 July 2023.
Energies 17 01632 g002
Figure 3. Schlieren visualization of SWBLI: the impinging SW on at mid position, plasma off (a) and on (b). Each schlieren image is combined from up to five individual frames due to a limited aperture of the schlieren optical system [48]. Copyright© 2017 by S. Leonov, reprint under permission, 21 July 2023.
Figure 3. Schlieren visualization of SWBLI: the impinging SW on at mid position, plasma off (a) and on (b). Each schlieren image is combined from up to five individual frames due to a limited aperture of the schlieren optical system [48]. Copyright© 2017 by S. Leonov, reprint under permission, 21 July 2023.
Energies 17 01632 g003
Figure 4. Results of CFD simulations: density gradients. (a) Baseline, plasma off; (b) plasma on, heat source power W = 8 kW [47]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 license.
Figure 4. Results of CFD simulations: density gradients. (a) Baseline, plasma off; (b) plasma on, heat source power W = 8 kW [47]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g004
Figure 5. Resulting SW surfaces after merging plasma SW profiles taken from Mie scattering images: (a) single plasma filament; (b) three plasma filaments [49]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 5. Resulting SW surfaces after merging plasma SW profiles taken from Mie scattering images: (a) single plasma filament; (b) three plasma filaments [49]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g005
Figure 6. Simplified criteria of plasma control of the SW position [49]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 6. Simplified criteria of plasma control of the SW position [49]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g006
Figure 7. Disappearance of the root part of the SSW in a Mach 2.0 flow (schlieren images): (a) t = 0 µs, (b) t = 20 µs, (c) t = 40 µs, (d) t = 60 µs [57]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 7. Disappearance of the root part of the SSW in a Mach 2.0 flow (schlieren images): (a) t = 0 µs, (b) t = 20 µs, (c) t = 40 µs, (d) t = 60 µs [57]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g007
Figure 8. Bifurcation of the SSW in a Mach 2.0 flow (the mean schlieren intensity field): (a) baseline (without actuation), (b) actuation [57]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 8. Bifurcation of the SSW in a Mach 2.0 flow (the mean schlieren intensity field): (a) baseline (without actuation), (b) actuation [57]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g008
Figure 9. The structure of ionization strata of the gas discharge at currents of 10–200 mA [66]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 license.
Figure 9. The structure of ionization strata of the gas discharge at currents of 10–200 mA [66]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g009
Figure 10. The structure of ionization strata the gas discharge at currents of 300–500 mA [66]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 license.
Figure 10. The structure of ionization strata the gas discharge at currents of 300–500 mA [66]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g010
Figure 11. Deformation of the front of an SW with MSW = 3 by the influence of a stratified energy source with more heated central layers: (a) density field, (b) temperature field [69]. Reprint under Springer Nature License, 11 March 2024.
Figure 11. Deformation of the front of an SW with MSW = 3 by the influence of a stratified energy source with more heated central layers: (a) density field, (b) temperature field [69]. Reprint under Springer Nature License, 11 March 2024.
Energies 17 01632 g011
Figure 12. Distortion of the SW passing through the region of large-scaled ionization strata: (a) experiment, (b) calculations [70]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 12. Distortion of the SW passing through the region of large-scaled ionization strata: (a) experiment, (b) calculations [70]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g012
Figure 13. Blurring of the front of an SW with MSW = 2 under the influence of a stratified energy source with equally heated layers: (a) density field, (b) temperature field [69]. Reprint under Reprint under Springer Nature License, 11 March 2024.
Figure 13. Blurring of the front of an SW with MSW = 2 under the influence of a stratified energy source with equally heated layers: (a) density field, (b) temperature field [69]. Reprint under Reprint under Springer Nature License, 11 March 2024.
Energies 17 01632 g013
Figure 14. Process of passing the SW through the region of small-scaled ionization strata: (a,c) experiment, (b) calculations [70]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 14. Process of passing the SW through the region of small-scaled ionization strata: (a,c) experiment, (b) calculations [70]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g014
Figure 15. Modeling the interaction of an SW with a thermally stratified gas discharge zone [25]. Reprint under permission from AIAA Publishing, 21 July 2023.
Figure 15. Modeling the interaction of an SW with a thermally stratified gas discharge zone [25]. Reprint under permission from AIAA Publishing, 21 July 2023.
Energies 17 01632 g015
Figure 16. Development of multiple MW discharges [71,72]. Reprint under permissions of R. Khoronzhuk, 27 September 2023.
Figure 16. Development of multiple MW discharges [71,72]. Reprint under permissions of R. Khoronzhuk, 27 September 2023.
Energies 17 01632 g016
Figure 17. Initial distribution of the MW electric field. Simulation [71]. Reprint under Springer Nature License, 27 March 2024.
Figure 17. Initial distribution of the MW electric field. Simulation [71]. Reprint under Springer Nature License, 27 March 2024.
Energies 17 01632 g017
Figure 18. The location of the hot spots: (a) case 1 (baseline, without burst events), nine plasma discharges, (b) cases with burst events [78]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 18. The location of the hot spots: (a) case 1 (baseline, without burst events), nine plasma discharges, (b) cases with burst events [78]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g018
Figure 19. Area of the thermal perturbation [78]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 19. Area of the thermal perturbation [78]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g019
Figure 20. The variation of the relative maximum values of density ρ′, pressure p′ and temperature T′ with time throughout the entire domain: (a) single pulse, (b) double-pulse at 1.13 µs, (c) double-pulse at 7 µs [85]. Reprint under permission of U. Padhi, 19 December 2023.
Figure 20. The variation of the relative maximum values of density ρ′, pressure p′ and temperature T′ with time throughout the entire domain: (a) single pulse, (b) double-pulse at 1.13 µs, (c) double-pulse at 7 µs [85]. Reprint under permission of U. Padhi, 19 December 2023.
Energies 17 01632 g020
Figure 21. Flow Mach number: (a) without repetitive pulses; (b) with repetitive pulses [87]. Reprint under permission from AIAA Publishing, 11 March 2024.
Figure 21. Flow Mach number: (a) without repetitive pulses; (b) with repetitive pulses [87]. Reprint under permission from AIAA Publishing, 11 March 2024.
Energies 17 01632 g021
Figure 22. Density fields. Generation of two vortices as the result of the RMI, (a) rotating clockwise (αρ = 0.5, αρ1 = 0.35) and (b) rotating in opposite directions (αρ = 0.5, αρ1 = 0.75) [88]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 22. Density fields. Generation of two vortices as the result of the RMI, (a) rotating clockwise (αρ = 0.5, αρ1 = 0.35) and (b) rotating in opposite directions (αρ = 0.5, αρ1 = 0.75) [88]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g022
Figure 23. Unsteady vortex structures in front of the body: density, αρ = 0.6: (a) non-combined filament; (b) combined filament, αρ1 = 0.4; (c) combined filament, αρ1 = 0.8 [88]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 23. Unsteady vortex structures in front of the body: density, αρ = 0.6: (a) non-combined filament; (b) combined filament, αρ1 = 0.4; (c) combined filament, αρ1 = 0.8 [88]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g023
Figure 24. Schlieren photographs (obtained with a 3.5 μs exposure) of LS-initiated MW discharge in air for various delays between the laser and MW pulses (tdel, μs): (a) 10 μs; (b) 300 μs; (c) 500 μs [94]. Reprint under Springer Nature License, 19 March 2024.
Figure 24. Schlieren photographs (obtained with a 3.5 μs exposure) of LS-initiated MW discharge in air for various delays between the laser and MW pulses (tdel, μs): (a) 10 μs; (b) 300 μs; (c) 500 μs [94]. Reprint under Springer Nature License, 19 March 2024.
Energies 17 01632 g024
Figure 25. Schlieren photographs (obtained with a 3.5 μs exposure) of LS-initiated MW discharge in air for various delays between the laser and MW pulses (tdel, μs): (a) 10 μs; (b) 300 μs; (c) 500 μs [94]. Reprint under Springer Nature License, 19 March 2024.
Figure 25. Schlieren photographs (obtained with a 3.5 μs exposure) of LS-initiated MW discharge in air for various delays between the laser and MW pulses (tdel, μs): (a) 10 μs; (b) 300 μs; (c) 500 μs [94]. Reprint under Springer Nature License, 19 March 2024.
Energies 17 01632 g025
Figure 26. (a) Two areas of air heated by double LS (without MW discharge), t = 30 μs; (b) MW discharge-initiated, t = 20 μs; (c) MW discharge-initiated, t = 30 μs; (d) MW discharge-initiated, t = 42 μs. [72]. Reprint under permission of R. Khoronzhuk, 27 September 2023.
Figure 26. (a) Two areas of air heated by double LS (without MW discharge), t = 30 μs; (b) MW discharge-initiated, t = 20 μs; (c) MW discharge-initiated, t = 30 μs; (d) MW discharge-initiated, t = 42 μs. [72]. Reprint under permission of R. Khoronzhuk, 27 September 2023.
Energies 17 01632 g026
Figure 27. Secondary streamer (indicated by arrow) between two separate MW. Two LSs of 145 mJ, the delay is 30 µs, microwave pulse 1.5 µs, 200 kW, 95 µs after the first LS [72]. Reprint under permission of R. Khoronzhuk, 27 September 2023.
Figure 27. Secondary streamer (indicated by arrow) between two separate MW. Two LSs of 145 mJ, the delay is 30 µs, microwave pulse 1.5 µs, 200 kW, 95 µs after the first LS [72]. Reprint under permission of R. Khoronzhuk, 27 September 2023.
Energies 17 01632 g027
Figure 28. Supersonic flow past a blunt body at current I = 800 A connected on a two-electrode circuit: (a) glow of a gas discharge; (b) without magnetic field; (c) MHD action at current from the top electrode to the bottom one and magnetic field induction B = 1.3 T; (d) MHD action at current from the bottom electrode to the top one and B = 1.3 T [29]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 28. Supersonic flow past a blunt body at current I = 800 A connected on a two-electrode circuit: (a) glow of a gas discharge; (b) without magnetic field; (c) MHD action at current from the top electrode to the bottom one and magnetic field induction B = 1.3 T; (d) MHD action at current from the bottom electrode to the top one and B = 1.3 T [29]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g028
Figure 29. Supersonic flow past a blunt body at current I = 800 A connected on a three-electrode circuit: (a) glow of a gas discharge; (b) without magnetic field; (c) MHD action at current from the central electrode to the side one and magnetic field induction B = 1.3 T; (d) MHD action at current from the side electrodes to the central one and B = 1.3 T [29]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 29. Supersonic flow past a blunt body at current I = 800 A connected on a three-electrode circuit: (a) glow of a gas discharge; (b) without magnetic field; (c) MHD action at current from the central electrode to the side one and magnetic field induction B = 1.3 T; (d) MHD action at current from the side electrodes to the central one and B = 1.3 T [29]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g029
Figure 30. Dependences of the considered parameters on the relative temperature of the discharge plasma: Xbw min and Fmin (curves 1 and 2, respectively) (left ordinate axis); Dexp and Dnummax (curves 3 and 4, respectively) (right ordinate axis) [101]. Reprinted under Springer Nature License, 11 March 2024.
Figure 30. Dependences of the considered parameters on the relative temperature of the discharge plasma: Xbw min and Fmin (curves 1 and 2, respectively) (left ordinate axis); Dexp and Dnummax (curves 3 and 4, respectively) (right ordinate axis) [101]. Reprinted under Springer Nature License, 11 March 2024.
Energies 17 01632 g030
Figure 31. Generation of multiple Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities at the first stage of the interaction, density fields, enlarged: (a) plane view; (b) surface view [105]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 license.
Figure 31. Generation of multiple Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities at the first stage of the interaction, density fields, enlarged: (a) plane view; (b) surface view [105]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g031
Figure 32. Flow pulsation suppression: dynamics of (a) pressure and density at the top of the body; drag and lift forces (b) [105]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 license.
Figure 32. Flow pulsation suppression: dynamics of (a) pressure and density at the top of the body; drag and lift forces (b) [105]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g032
Figure 33. Near-field pressure signatures for different number of layers in TSS, M = 2 [106]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Figure 33. Near-field pressure signatures for different number of layers in TSS, M = 2 [106]. Reprint by Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
Energies 17 01632 g033
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Azarova, O.A.; Kravchenko, O.V. The Use of Spatially Multi-Component Plasma Structures and Combined Energy Deposition for High-Speed Flow Control: A Selective Review. Energies 2024, 17, 1632. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071632

AMA Style

Azarova OA, Kravchenko OV. The Use of Spatially Multi-Component Plasma Structures and Combined Energy Deposition for High-Speed Flow Control: A Selective Review. Energies. 2024; 17(7):1632. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071632

Chicago/Turabian Style

Azarova, Olga A., and Oleg V. Kravchenko. 2024. "The Use of Spatially Multi-Component Plasma Structures and Combined Energy Deposition for High-Speed Flow Control: A Selective Review" Energies 17, no. 7: 1632. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071632

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop