Death of a Londoner
Appeasing Russia’s kleptocrats harms both Britain’s moral integrity and its hard-nosed interests
ON NOVEMBER 1st 2006 Marina Litvinenko cooked a special dinner for her husband, Alexander, to mark the sixth anniversary of their arrival in Britain from Russia (and their first since becoming citizens). In the early hours of November 2nd the spy-turned-dissident started vomiting. In hospital his condition deteriorated: his hair fell out, his skin turned yellow and he threw up parts of his stomach. After 20 days of agony he composed a statement blaming his poisoning on Vladimir Putin. He died of heart failure shortly afterwards.
Almost a decade later, on January 21st, a judge-led inquiry concluded that two Russian agents had most likely spiked Litvinenko’s tea with polonium-210, a radioactive isotope, at a meeting in London. They were “probably” acting on Mr Putin’s orders. Sir Robert Owen’s report also indicates that the murder was about more than bumping off an enemy. Its particulars—from the use of a slow-working poison to the trail of radiation through London and the decoration awarded to one of the suspects last year—amounted to an ostentatious sneer at the British state. They sent a message to other opponents: don’t think that Moscow’s jurisdiction is limited to Russia’s borders, or its citizenry.
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Death of a Londoner”
More from Britain
The return of the Farage ratchet
The Reform UK leader hopes to reshape the British political right again
The SNP feels the heat in Scotland’s election campaign
And Labour is not the only party to see the benefits
Labour’s growth ambitions demand more radicalism on planning
Small tweaks to the existing system are unlikely to deliver a big change in housebuilding