Magnetic Hyperthermia in Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment
by
, , , , ,
Veronica Manescu (Paltanea)
1,2.png)
,
Iulian Antoniac
1,3
,
Gheorghe Paltanea
2,*
,
Iosif Vasile Nemoianu
2
,
Aurel George Mohan
4,5, 
Aurora Antoniac
1,
Julietta V. Rau
6,7
,
Stefan Alexandru Laptoiu
1,
Petruta Mihai
8,
Horia Gavrila
2,9,
Abdel Rahim Al-Moushaly
10 and
Alin Danut Bodog
4 1
Faculty of Material Science and Engineering, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania
2
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania
3
Academy of Romanian Scientists, 54 Splaiul Independentei, RO-050094 Bucharest, Romania
4
Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 P-ta 1 December Street, RO-410073 Oradea, Romania
5
Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital Oradea, 65 Gheorghe Doja Street, RO-410169 Oradea, Romania
6
Istituto di Struttura della Materia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (ISM-CNR), Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Rome, Italy
7
Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Analytical, Physical and Colloid Chemistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Trubetskaya St. 8, Build.2, 119048 Moscow, Russia
8
Faculty of Entrepreneurship, Business Engineering and Management, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania
9
Technical Sciences Academy of Romania, 26 Bulevardul Dacia, RO-030167 Bucharest, Romania
10
Sfanta Maria Medical Center Ghencea, 43B Bulevardul Ghencea, RO-061696 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(18), 10065; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251810065
Submission received: 15 August 2024
/
Revised: 13 September 2024
/
Accepted: 17 September 2024
/
Published: 19 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Implication of Nanoparticles in Cancer Therapy Research, 2nd Edition)
Abstract
:Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) represents one of the most critical oncological diseases in neurological practice, being considered highly aggressive with a dismal prognosis. At a worldwide level, new therapeutic methods are continuously being researched. Magnetic hyperthermia (MHT) has been investigated for more than 30 years as a solution used as a single therapy or combined with others for glioma tumor assessment in preclinical and clinical studies. It is based on magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) that are injected into the tumor, and, under the effect of an external alternating magnetic field, they produce heat with temperatures higher than 42 °C, which determines cancer cell death. It is well known that iron oxide nanoparticles have received FDA approval for anemia treatment and to be used as contrast substances in the medical imagining domain. Today, energetic, efficient MNPs are developed that are especially dedicated to MHT treatments. In this review, the subject’s importance will be emphasized by specifying the number of patients with cancer worldwide, presenting the main features of GBM, and detailing the physical theory accompanying the MHT treatment. Then, synthesis routes for thermally efficient MNP manufacturing, strategies adopted in practice for increasing MHT heat performance, and significant in vitro and in vivo studies are presented. This review paper also includes combined cancer therapies, the main reasons for using these approaches with MHT, and important clinical studies on human subjects found in the literature. This review ends by describing the most critical challenges associated with MHT and future perspectives. It is concluded that MHT can be successfully and regularly applied as a treatment for GBM if specific improvements are made.
1. Introduction
This review paper will briefly present worldwide cancer statistics to show the importance of the chosen subject, focusing on glioblastoma. Then, it will provide a physical description of magnetic hyperthermia with a clear explanation of magnetism and electromagnetic field phenomena. After that, the main synthesis routes for magnetic nanoparticles will be detailed with theory and examples extracted from the literature, and some strategies adopted to improve the specific absorption rate will be enumerated. In vitro and in vivo studies that consider the glioma cell lines of murine or human provenience and animal testing are provided, and some already applicable and possible combined therapies are presented with clear examples from the literature. This paper ends with clinical studies conducted over time that considered human trials involving magnetic hyperthermia in conjunction with other therapies and showed their positive and negative outcomes. Some challenges and future perspectives are underlined based on studies in the literature and the authors’ remarks. Figure 1 presents a flow sheet diagram containing a summary of the study with two main parts. The first one consists of definitions and preclinical studies and includes the paragraphs from Section 1, Section 2 and Section 3, while the second part, exhibiting a clinical part, includes Section 4 and Section 5.
1.1. General Aspects
Cancer is considered today to be associated with important health concerns, being the second disease in the world that leads to patient death [1]. For example, Bray et al. [2] found that about 9.6 million cancer deaths occurred worldwide in 2018. In addition, Siegel et al. [3] said in their study that about 1.8 million new oncological cases appeared and were diagnosed in 2020 in the United States of America (USA). Also, in a recent statistical analysis [4], it was established that 2 million new cancer cases and 611,720 cancer deaths will occur in 2024 in the USA. Increased incidences of cancer were noticed between 2015 and 2019, with an annual prevalence of 0.6–1% for cervical, breast, and pancreatic cancer and 2–3% for liver, kidney, prostate, and oral cancer. In Europe, it was estimated in the year 2020 that a number of 1.9 million new oncological diseases occurred in the case of women and about 2.1 million in men [5]. Regarding the African continent, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that cancer deaths will reach a value higher than 1 million per year by 2030. In 2022, 882,882 new cancer cases were accounted for, followed by 573,653 deaths [6]. It can be foreseen that the cancer death number will still be high in the future, and new treatments and efficient therapies will be continuously investigated and considered with the highest priority.
Cancer can be defined as an abnormal state in which healthy cells change their deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and multiply in an unregulated manner so that tumors with modified tissue properties occur. The cells inside these new tissue structures suffer cell mutation and exhibit different behavior compared to other healthy cells. In clinical practice, two types of tumors are distinguished: benign and malignant. Usually, benign cells are cataloged as non-dangerous because they only grow and develop in a localized manner without causing important damage to the healthy tissue placed in the tumor’s vicinity. On the other hand, malignant cells are the most invasive because, once they appear in a certain part of the human body, they enter the bloodstream and can populate different organs or structures, forming so-called metastases. These secondary growths are, in most cases, very aggressive and can have the potential to be life threatening [7]. Malignant tissue is characterized by a decreased pH value, high interstitial fluid pressure, decreased oxygen intake (hypoxia), chaotic blood vessels, which feed the tumor and maintain its viability, and deposits of dense stroma [8,9].
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is frequently seen as a primary invasive brain tumor in the adult population and is, in most cases, associated with very poor prognoses and life expectancy. The standard surgical approach consisting of tumor resection and then administration of chemotherapeutical drugs or radiotherapy sessions is usually applied, but the estimated 5-year survival rate is seldom surpassed [10,11,12,13]. First-line treatment involves Temozolomide (TMZ) drug administration, but other drugs such as the monoclonal antibody Bevacizumab or combinations of lomustine, procarbazine, and vincristine (PCV) are approved and, in some cases, lead to cancerous cell death [10]. Almost always, patient outcome is reduced due to the fact that the tumor has no sharp edges, which does not permit its complete resection, and the risk of supplementary brain damage must be assumed. In addition, GBM can have different transcriptional profiles, such as classical, proneuronal, neuronal, and mesenchymal [14,15,16], and each of them is associated with different treatment approaches and life expectancies. In the USA, the average annual age-related rate of GBM apparition is equal to 3.21 per 100,000 people based on statistical analysis performed between 2011 and 2015 [17]. The median age of disease onset was established to be 65 years and mainly occurred in the case of men. The highest incidence was noticed in the case of non-Hispanic white populations, with an average annual age-adjusted incidence rate per 100,000 people of 4.71, 1-year relative survival of 41.4%, and 5-year relative survival of 5.4%. In addition, GBM occurrence is high in Australia, North America, and Europe [18]. In the USA, an overall prevalence of 9.23 per 100,000 people was reported [17]. From the risk factors associated with this type of cerebral cancer, one can mention exposure to ionizing radiations [19], rare genetic syndromes (Li–Fraumeni syndrome and Lynch syndrome), and increased patient age [10].
Recently, nanomaterials were introduced as a treatment in medicine, generating a new area called nanomedicine [20,21,22,23,24,25]. Many studies in this field were developed during this time, starting with clinical approval of different nanoparticles used in diagnosis and targeted therapy for different types of oncological tumors [26]. One of the most used strategies is hyperthermia, which consists of increasing the temperature above 40–43 °C in the affected tissue with the help of microwave, ultrasound, or radiofrequency waves, as well as based on laser tools or magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) [27,28,29]. In [30], Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles were manufactured with a SiO2 shell and then loaded with TMZ. They were then coated with a platelet membrane to increase the biocompatibility of the nano assembly and improve drug distribution across the blood–brain barrier (BBB). The system was developed to act as synergistic therapy dedicated to GBM treatment, including the possibility of using MRI combined with photothermal and chemotherapy strategies. This approach proved to have high efficiency in inducing cellular death in an in vitro study performed on U251 and U87 malignant cell lines. Enhanced pH-responsive drug release combined with a photothermal effect were noticed. A temperature increase of about 65 °C led to the death of 80% of GBM cells.
In addition, it is well known that MNPs, when subjected to the action of an alternating magnetic field (AMF), generate heat due to a transformation from magnetic energy to thermal energy. The potential of magnetic hyperthermia (MHT) was investigated in a direct relationship with the GBM treatment because, as stated before, these types of tumors are highly invasive and, in most cases, are resistant to classical approaches such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy due to the selectivity of the BBB, which permits the passage of lipophilic and small proteins without the necessity of special ionic channels. So, as a direct consequence, cerebral cancers are hard to destroy [13]. The treatment of GBM based on MHT is characterized by the administration of MNPs in the cancerous tumor, and then an AMF is applied (Figure 2). It results in an increase in tissue temperature between 41 and 43 °C as a direct consequence of the magnetic induction (B) value and the frequency (f) of the applied magnetic field. Different studies in the literature have investigated these treatments’ in vitro and in vivo efficiency and have shown that they have a high potential to increase patient life expectancy without the collateral effects of classical approaches [31,32].
1.2. Physical Theory of Magnetic Hyperthermia
To correctly understand and apply MHT in treating GBM, it is of utmost importance to briefly analyze the physical theory behind this phenomenon. MHT is an electromagnetic energy conversion to heat due to an interaction between MNPs and an external AMF [33]. When a time-variable magnetic field is applied, the MNP magnetic moments align parallel to the field direction. In some cases, minor deviations can occur as a function of material attributes such as chemical composition; crystallinity grade, size, and shape; the maximum value of magnetic field strength (H); and temperature (T). It is well known that under the action of a uniform increasing H, an MNP response can be quantified in a variable physical quantity called magnetization (M) [34]. The dependence, M(H), represents the hysteresis cycle of the magnetic particle and provides us with parameters such as coercivity (Hc), saturation magnetization (Ms), and remanent magnetization (Mr). Generally speaking, the magnetic behavior of a bulk magnetic material is governed by the existence of magnetic domains separated by domain walls [34]. In the case of nanoparticles below a given diameter, the single-domain state is much more favorable from an energetic point of view than the multi-domain one [35]. This critical size is obtained from a balance equation between different types of energies. The magnetic moment of a single-domain particle exhibits two stable antiparallel orientations along the easy magnetization axis of the MNP. To switch from one state to another, one must pass an energy barrier, namely anisotropy energy, which depends on the particle volume (V) and the first anisotropy constant (K). The height of the barrier energy level is directly proportional to the particle size [36]. The thermal energy is computed as kBT, where kB is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature. When this type of energy has high values, the MNP spins will be located randomly along one of the two stable orientations, so, as a direct consequence, the total magnetization has an average value equal to zero. This particular behavior is called superparamagnetism, and coercivity is null in this case. When applying an external magnetic field, superparamagnetic particles have high magnetic saturation values concomitant with a null value of the remanence. It can be observed that superparamagnetic MNPs do not exhibit a hysteresis cycle, just a non-linear M(H) dependence. In MHT treatments, materials with superparamagnetic behavior at the body temperature of 37 °C are usually chosen because, in the absence of an AMF, they are inert and do not heat themselves. On the other hand, they are able to be rapidly controlled by applying a magnetic field. Some important aspects worth mentioning are as follows: the critical volume (Vc) of the MNPs is considered to be a logarithmic function of time (t) (KVc= ln(tf0), where f0 is about 109 s−1), and it can be easily noticed that in the low-frequency domain, the particles are in a superparamagnetic state, but in the higher frequency range the hysteresis cycle becomes prevalent [37]. When an AMF is applied, the MNPs have a hysteresis cycle, and the heat generated by a particle is given by the hysteresis cycle area (W [J/m3]), known under the name of specific hysteresis losses (Equation (1)).
where is vacuum magnetic permeability. In order to compute the specific heat dissipation power P [W/m3], one can use Equation (2).
where f represents the frequency of the applied AMF. The Rosenweig model [38] is usually applied and provides a relationship between the MNP attributes and hysteresis cycle area. In the framework of the MNP dynamic behavior, the model takes into account linear dependence between the magnetization vector and magnetic field strength vector, according to Equation (3).
where χ is magnetic susceptibility. Considering the model in the complex number domain, one can assume that in which i denotes the complex part of the number and χ″ is associated with the part of the magnetization vector that is not in phase with the applied magnetic field. It is usually called the loss component of magnetic susceptibility. This particular case of a linear response (LRT) was developed into a Neel–Brown relaxation model [36] that is perfectly applicable in the case of superparamagnetic MNPs, low magnetic field strength, and magnetic susceptibility independent of magnetic field intensity. In [38], it was shown that, in this case, specific heat dissipation power could be computed as a function of the loss component of the susceptibility (Equations (4) and (5)).
where Hmax is the maximum field strength, represents static susceptibility, τ [s] is the relaxation time, and is the magnetic field angular frequency. The relaxation time can be expressed as a sum of two components (τN—Neel relaxation time related to thermal variations in the MNP magnetic moments, τB—Brown relaxation time linked to the rotational fluctuations of the particle), according to [39], as follows:
where τ0 is between 10−13 and 10−9 s [40], VH is the MNP hydrodynamic volume, and η is the viscosity of the magnetic fluid in which MNPs are immersed.
In the case of MHT treatments, specific power loss, namely the specific absorption rate (SAR) also known as specific loss power (SLP) or specific power absorption (SPA), must be analyzed. It is defined as the heat rate value at which the AMF absorbs electromagnetic energy and converts it into heat. It can be easily computed when the density (d) of the MNPs is known, according to Equation (7) [41].
The linear response theory becomes inadequate for the MNPs situated near the transition between the superparamagnetic and ferromagnetic states, and the Stoner–Wohlfarth (SW) model must be applied [42]. In the case of clinical applications based on MHT, this phenomenon occurs only seldomly near the transition point between single-domain and multi-domain states (Figure 3). Some general approaches [37,43], also provide a combination of LRT and SW theories, but many researchers consider the LRT model to accurately describe the superparamagnetic behavior of most of the MNPs used in MHT treatments. In some cases, it is preferred to provide a normalized value of the SAR, called intrinsic loss power (ILP), with magnetic field characteristics (Equation (8)).
Equation (8) is applicable only to frequencies in the MHz range, magnetic field strengths lower than the saturation field, and superparamagnetic particles.
One can immediately notice from Equation (4) that the heat dissipation power depends on the AMF attributes, such as the quadratic value of the maximum magnetic field strength and field frequency. It is expected when using MHT to treat oncological disease to establish given values for the product H × f [A/(ms)]. From the Maxwell–Hertz theory, it can be established that the eddy current and specific heat are directly proportional to (H × f)2.
In a study developed by Mamiya et al. [44] based on a model of the human body, the above-mentioned product was established to be about 2 × 109 A/(ms). Hergt et al. [45] mentioned that the H × f values must be lower than 5 × 109 A/(ms). Related only to cancers, Thiesen and Jordan [46] reported a value of 4.2 × 109 A/(ms) for GBM treatment and 1.6 × 109 A/(ms) in the case of prostate carcinoma. At the present moment, there is no standard limit for the value of H × f, but it is overall accepted that it must be chosen in good accordance with medical application, and its value must be established by considering that the body tissue overheating effect due to induced eddy currents has to be avoided. Generally, there are accepted values below the superior limit of 5 × 109 A/(ms), and each research group should perform in vivo experiments to see the results. Today, most MHT devices approved for human use can generate an AMF with a frequency of 0.05 ÷ 1.2 MHz and an amplitude of a maximum of 5000 A/m. On the other hand, in clinical trials for GBM treatment, a magnetic field characterized by a frequency of 100 kHz and an amplitude of 18 kA/m was applied to brain tumors in multiple treatment sessions [47].
2. Magnetic Nanoparticles Used in MHT Treatment for GBM
To enumerate the main magnetic requirements for MNPs, one must underline the fact that they need a high value of Ms because this will involve an important amount of thermal energy dissipation in tumor cells, as well as increased control of MNP movements in the blood when an external magnetic field is applied. The MNPs have to be in a superparamagnetic state; this means that their coercivity and remanence should be very low because, in the absence of an AMF, they exhibit any magnetic properties at temperatures higher than the blocking temperature, and, in this way, aggregations of particles are prohibited, and colloidal stability is maintained. The size of the particles must be in the nanometer range to generate low dipolar interactions between them [48].
It can be foreseen that MNP attributes such as saturation magnetization, remanent magnetization, coercivity, first anisotropy constant, particle diameter, and shape are very important in establishing a proper value for SAR [48]. From the literature, it was noticed that Ms values were lower than 200 emu/g [49,50], an appropriate diameter of particle D was chosen between 10 and 40 nm correlated with a volume V of 0.5 ÷27 × 103 nm3, and the first anisotropy constant was between 8 × 102 J/m3 and 1.6 × 102 J/m3 [36]. Regarding coercivity, values between 170 and 400 Oe were reported in the case of Fe3O4 MNPs with a diameter of about 17 nm and a spherical shape [51,52]. In most cases, the ratio of Mr/Ms was between 0.1 and 0.7 [36]. Magnetic hyperthermia in humans is usually performed based on iron oxide nanoparticles (IONs) because they have an increased heat capacity [53]. The main iron oxides used in nanomedicine are magnetite Fe3O4 and maghemite Fe2O3 [35].
Table 1 provides the magnetic and structural properties of MNPs used in MHT experiments.
As can be observed from Table 1, preparation methods and particle features are of utmost importance in obtaining optimal heat performance. It can be concluded that particle crystallinity grade, size, and size distribution must always be analyzed. In addition, chemical composition, magnetic properties, and anisotropy can have an effect on magnetic cluster apparitions if the medical application requires them. Otherwise, they can dictate to particles to remain independent.
2.1. Synthesis Routes for MNP Manufacture Used in MHT
Usually, MNPs for MHT applications use wet chemistry technology, which is defined as a chemical process conducted in a liquid medium [66]. Frequently, sol–gel processes are involved, and they consist of an inorganic colloidal suspension (sol) apparition, followed by sol gelation and its transformation into a continuous liquid phase known as a gel [36]. Taking into account the liquid in which MNPs are introduced, one can mention the hydrolytic and non-hydrolytic sol–gel processes that will be described in this section (Figure 4).
When it comes to preparing magnetite or maghemite nanoparticles, hydrolytic methods stand out as the techniques of choice. The most prevalent one is the co-precipitation of two metal salts, M2+ and M3+, and the oxidative precipitation of M2+ salts [67]. This synthesis route typically starts with the dissolution of metal salts into a solution obtained through a combination of water and alcohol. The addition of a strong base in some cases can lead to the formation of insoluble species such as Fe(OH)2 and Fe(OH)3, which then transform into magnetite (Fe3O4). The following chemical reaction illustrates this process:
One of the most important steps in this process consists of water deprotonation generated by cation solvation, hydrolysis that determines the apparition of hydroxide complexes M-OH, condensation, which is linked to M-O-M polymeric framework apparition, and finally, generating the MxFe3-xO4 compound [68]. The MNPs’ sizes can be easily tuned by changing the time, temperature, and pH. In this direction, Nkurikiymfura et al. [69] synthesized, through the co-precipitation method, Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles with a size of 11.22 nm at room temperature under a stirring rate of 200 rpm and a pH value of 10. This outcome is special because the literature had reported that superparamagnetic MNPs with a reduced particle size were usually produced at about 80 °C concomitantly, with a high stirring rate between 300 and 1500 rpm and/or under ultrasound waveforms. Mascolo et al. [70] used the same co-precipitation method for MNP synthesis at room temperatures and a large range of pHs based on different strong bases such as NaOH, (C2H5)4NOH, and KOH. They noticed that the pH value, chemical composition of the basic solution, and the rate of basic solution addition to the bivalent or trivalent iron highly influenced the MNPs’ sizes. Karaagac et al. [71] investigated the effect of the stirring rate and NaOH concentration on the MNPs’ size and magnetic properties. They noticed that MNPs with an average size of 7.4 nm were obtained at a stirring rate of 1100 rpm. These particles exhibited an average magnetic saturation of about 70.4 emu/g. In addition, the authors noticed that the saturation magnetization value can be controlled based on NaOH concentration, which must be higher than 5.5, and the stirring velocity.
Regarding the other hydrolytic route, namely oxidative precipitation, a partial oxidation reaction of Fe2+/M2+ salts, with M being a transition metal, occurs in an alkaline media such as NaOH under the action of an oxidative substance (NaNO3) [36]. An intermediate phase is formed due to base presence, which suffers a dihydroxylation process followed by magnetite apparition. The chemical reactions from Equation 10 characterize this synthesis route.
Marciello et al. [72] proposed an aqueous synthesis of up to 20 g of MNPs with a size between 20 and 30 nm close to the superparamagnetic–ferrimagnetic limit. For particles with a size bigger than 35 nm, the saturation magnetic moment was about 90 Am2/kg, and the coercive force (μ0HC) was estimated at 10 mT, while in the case of smaller MNPs with a size of 22 nm, a reduction in saturation magnetic moment (82 Am2/kg) and coercive force (3 mT) were observed. These values were very close to those of the superparamagnetic limit. SAR measurements were made by considering the following test conditions—70 kHz/44 mT and 102 kHz/20 mT—as it was already established that, in biomedical applications, these values must be in the 50–1200 kHz frequency range and in the 0–20 mT magnetic induction range, as presented in Section 1. The SAR values were between 95 and 170 W/g. Verges et al. [73] proposed a direct method for the preparation of Fe3O4 MNPs with a size of 30 nm and stability in aqueous media at a pH of 7. They used Fe2+ salt (FeSO4) under the effect of NaOH and KNO3. They found values for Ms between 83 and 92 emu/g and for Hc between 50 and 100 Oe. These values were very close to those at which the coherent mechanisms of magnetization rotations occurred in good accordance with the Stoner–Wohlfarth model [34]. The authors also performed MHT measurements based on calorimetric experiments and found that the maximum SAR value of 95 W/g was obtained for colloidal suspension with a concentration of 5 mg/mL. This value was appropriate for GBM treatment based on MHT, being one of the highest reported in the literature. Based on the classical oxidative precipitation method, Antoniac et al. [74] prepared a mixture of MNPs, γ–Fe2O3, α–Fe2O3, and Fe3O4, which were coated with biocompatible polymers. The particles had sizes between 40 nm and 118 nm and Zeta potentials between −29.7 mV and −62.7 mV. When introduced into a hyaluronic acid-based solution, no agglomerations of MNPs were observed. The authors concluded that by coating the size of the particle, it can be reduced concomitantly with an increase in biocompatibility.
Usually, after hydrolytic methods are performed, some special steps are required to enhance particle monodispersity and lower the standard deviation of the size, such as microfiltration, size-sorting, static magnetic fractionation, or ultracentrifugation [75,76,77]. These operations are important because a study developed by Bae et al. [78] proved that, by sorting the MNPs, higher SAR values and improved MHT effects can be achieved. The authors found that chitosan oligosaccharide-stabilized ferrimagnetic iron oxide nanocubes with a size of about 30 nm exhibited a SAR of 2614 W/g compared to the commercial superparamagnetic particles Feridex® (83 W/g).
Non-hydrolytic methods for MNP synthesis are based on alkyl oxygen derivates’ use as oxygen donors. These derivates react with Fe and generate its oxides, acting as a solvent and/or surfactant for a chemical reaction to stabilize the species that contain Fe inside the solution. Two main routes are found in the literature: solvothermal methods and organic precursor thermal decomposition. The solvothermal synthesis uses solvents such as polyols (ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol) or alcohols (1-octanol, ethanol, 1,2-hexanediol), two types of metal precursors (metal salts–ion chlorides or nitrates or metal-coordination complexes—iron–carbonyl, iron–oleates, and acetylacetonates/acetates), and surfactants such as water-soluble polymers, organic molecules, or surfactants with a hydrophobic tail as a function of the involved alcohol chemical formula [36]. Lin et al. [79] prepared based on solvothermal synthesis hollow Fe3O4 spheres. They used ferric chloride, ethylene glycol, urea, and ammonium acetate. A homogenous solution was made, dispersed, poured, and sealed into an autoclave for a maximum time interval of about 24 h up to 200 °C. Magnetite was present as ferric ions located on the hollow spheres. Another study performed by Tian et al. [80] synthesized 4–6 nm MNPs through this method based on Fe(acac)3, n-octylamine, n-octanol, solvents, and reducing agents. The authors concluded that, in this way, high-quality magnetic nanoparticles were produced without needing a high heat transfer value, as in the case of thermal decomposition. The research presented in [81] put into evidence the importance of the temperature at which the solvothermal method is performed. The authors reached a temperature below 140 °C, but the MNPs exhibited low saturation magnetization, which was inadequate for MHT treatments. It was concluded that the magnetic properties of the MNPs strongly depend on the particle crystallinity grade and the temperature at which the process is performed. There are a limited number of studies in the literature that discuss the MHT results for MNPs prepared through solvothermal methods. For example, Das et al. [82] prepared, based on a one-step solvothermal process, Ag/Fe3O4 nanoparticles at a standard temperature of 200 °C for 24 h. The MNPs exhibited a highly crystalline Ag monodomain of about 45 nm, and Fe3O4 randomly oriented crystallites around it. Magnetic measurements were carried out in DC based on a vibrating sample magnetometer, and the value of saturation magnetization was established to be between 62 emu/g and 90 emu/g. The MHT experiments were made in water and agar. The last medium was chosen to simulate the viscosity of cancer cells. A SAR value of about 160 W/kg was obtained for a magnetic field strength of 800 Oe. The authors concluded that the developed particles are a good candidate for MHT treatments. Hugounenq et al. [60] manufactured iron oxide monocrystalline nanoflowers using a modified “polyol” strategy. The particles were constituted of 11 nm grains, which formed a flower-like structure. The Ms was found to be about 69 emu/g, a value that is very close to that of bulk material, and an interesting compromise between a high SAR value of about 1992 W/kg and a size of 24 nm was noticed. However, besides the fact that the physical theory behind the thermal loss processes must be further investigated, the authors concluded that the developed nanoflowers exhibited proper characteristics to be applied in cancer treatment based on MHT. The solvothermal method exhibits an important advantage because the prepared MNPs could be easily transferred to water and directly applied to MHT. In addition, the method is characterized by some disadvantages such as a reduced quantity of MNPs in the order of milligrams, particle solubility depending on the high amount of surfactants that are used in the process, and the fact that in almost all the cases, supplementary processing steps are necessary.
The thermal decomposition (TD) route includes the use of an organic solvent that has an increased boiling point and is inert at a temperature of about 200 °C, which permits metallic precursor decomposition. Usually, solvents such as benzyl ether, 1-octadecene, octyl ether, or benzyl ether and metal precursors such as carbonyls, acetylacetonates, or oleates are involved in the process [36]. The shape, size, and aggregation of the MNPs depend on the surfactant nature and the number of nuclei that appear in the first nucleation step. The most used surfactants in the thermal decomposition method are oleic acid, trioctylphosphine oxide, decanoic acid, oleyamine, or quaternary ammonium salts. To obtain a proper result from a chemical reaction, this is conducted at an atmospheric or reduced pressure condition. Gonzales-Weimuller et al. [83] based their design on the thermal decomposition of iron oxide nanoparticles with sizes between 5 and 14 nm. They used octyl ether, iron pentacarbonyl, trimethylamine N-oxide, oleic acid, and chloroform. The initial magnetic susceptibility had value in a 0.93 (5 nm diameter MNPs) ÷ 12.31 (14 nm diameter MNPs) interval, while the SAR measured at a frequency of 400 Hz, and the applied magnetic field strength of 24.5 kA/m was between 130 W/kg (10 nm diameter MNPs) and 447 W/kg (14 nm diameter MNPs). The authors demonstrated that the SAR value has an important variation as a function of particle size and that through the TD synthesis route, particles with different sizes and shapes adequate for MHT applications can be obtained. Salas et al. [84] prepared uniform iron oxide MNPs with different sizes (14–22 nm) through TD of an iron oleate complex in 1-octadecene by controlling the nucleation and growth processes. They chose, for SAR estimation, the frequency of an external AMF of 77 kHz, with amplitude for magnetic field strength of 39.78 kA/m, and found values between 70 and 95 W/g. Regarding the ILP, a variation between 0.33 and 0.78 nHm2/kg was achieved. It was concluded that faceted MNPs can be successfully used for oncological treatments. Guardia et al. [56] used iron(m) acetylacetonate, decanoic acid, dibenzyl ether, squalane, gallic acid, poly(ethylene glycol), N,N′-dicyclohexylcarboiimide, and 4-dimethylaminopyridine to prepare, based on a TD synthesis protocol, well-defined cubic particles with sizes between 14 and 35 nm and octahedral- or truncated-octahedral-shaped (sizes 40–100 nm) MNPs by adjusting the dibenzyl ether–squalane ration. The SAR value for cubic MNPs was established to be between 360 W/g (14 nm MNPs) and 650 W/g (24 nm MNPs), and in the case of octahedral 18 nm sized MNPs, the value was about 124 W/kg, while for truncated octahedra 22 nm sized MNPs, it was estimated to be around 95 W/kg. Also, this study evidenced that the TD method is adequate for obtaining different shapes and magnetic behaviors of MNPs as a function of the chemical reactive ratio used in the synthesis steps. Because the TD synthesis route is characterized by an increased temperature value and because the surfactant uses specific kinetics of the chemical reactions, the crystallinity grades, sizes, and shapes of the MNPs can be quickly achieved compared to hydrolytic routes. As mentioned before, the process is tunable and can be modified as a function of precursor choice, solvent, molecule stabilizer substances, and the presence/absence of a temperature ramp, as well as by adjusting the constituent concentration in solutions to adapt, as much as possible, the MNPs’ magnetic and thermal properties and to design various solutions for patient-adapted oncological strategies.
Table 2 presents examples of MNPs prepared based on hydrolytic and non-hydrolytic routes, with information regarding the synthesis method, particle size and shape, SAR values, and H × f product.
From the studies presented in Table 2, it can be concluded that the highest SAR values were obtained for the solvothermal synthesis route and nanoflower γ-Fe2O3 magnetic particles for an H × f product in biological limits [60], followed by thermal decomposition applied for spherical Fe3O4 MNPs, but in some cases beyond the biological range [83,89]. The co-precipitation method leads to lower SAR values compared to oxidative precipitation in the case of different types and mixtures of iron oxide nanoparticles [72,85,88]. This synthesis route is the most used in the industry to produce the already Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MNPs such as Resovist® and Feraheme® [86,87]. Many synthesis routes and preparation methods are dedicated to MNPs, but they have not been extensively investigated in the literature for their direct relationship to the MHT phenomenon. In our opinion, for recurrent GBM tumor treatment, only one of the safest and known routes must be addressed, and much more research is needed to improve their magnetic properties and biocompatibility to be adequate not only for primary localized tumor treatment but also for small metastases, in which only a low quantity of MNPs can reach, and, to exhibit a destructive effect on cancer cells, their heat capacity should be higher. Considering BBB’s biological characteristics, only small MNPs coated with polymeric materials can pass without the necessity of ionic channels. Thus, we consider there to be a gap in worldwide research regarding the improvement of hydrolytic/non-hydrolytic methods to design optimized MNPs for GBM treatment and alleviation.
2.2. Strategies Adopted to Improve MHT Heat Performance
Some important strategies can improve and modify MHT heat characteristics, such as particle shape, chemical composition of the MNPs, and magnetic heterostructure design [36,91].
As presented in Table 2, one can notice that although spherical MNPs are the most used in preclinical studies, their SAR value is not the highest compared to other particle shape heat performances. The FDA-approved MNPs exhibit a spherical geometry because manufacture synthesis is much easier for this case, and a large quantity of this product can be delivered faster to consumers.
To achieve a shape-controlled process for nanocrystals (e.g., cubic, octahedral, flower, or rod), certain surfactants or ligands must be added, and the metal precursor’s and other chemical substances’ molar ratios must be carefully checked and adjusted as a function of different parameters such as time, pressure, heating rate, or temperature ramp. Guardia et al. [56,57] proved that dibenzyl ether used as a solvent generated, through a decomposition phenomenon, sub-products that were linked to increased control of the cubic shape for MNPs. The authors developed Fe3O4 MNPs with a 25 nm average cube edge and high SAR values of up to 650 W/g measured for an H × f product of about 4.8 × 109 A/(ms). Other studies [92,93] showed that, by introducing aromatic ethers that follow a radical decomposition during the thermolysis process, magnetic nanocubes can be obtained, while research developed by Lee et al. [94] considered the cubic shape of the MNPs to be in a direct relationship with the thermal decomposition of Fe3+ oleate due to the existence of certain ligands such as alkaline metal reagents and sodium oleate. Another particle shape analyzed in the literature is the octopod, which is considered to create supplementary symmetry that positively influences surface anisotropy energy and increases particle heat performance. In this direction, Nemati et al. [95] used oleic acid and polyamine as stabilizers and made Fe3O4 nano octopods. The authors reported, for the SAR, a value of 60 W/g at 4.9 × 109 A/(ms), very similar to that obtained for Resovist®. Another shape linked to cubic is octahedral. As presented before, Salas et al. [89] manufactured octahedral and truncated octahedral MNPs with an average size of about 20 nm by enhancing the growth rate along the <100> direction in detriment to the <111> direction. They proved the apparition of spherical polyhedral-shaped MNPs prepared with oleic acid [84]. It is well known that non-hydrolytic routes, such as solvothermal methods, lead to nanoflower synthesis. Hugounenq et al. [60] modified the protocol developed by Caruntu et al. [96] by introducing, in the synthesis protocol in diethylene glycol, a mixture of FeCl2/FeCl3 annealed in N-Methyldiethanolamine and NaOH and obtaining ION nanoflowers. A high value of SAR of about 500 W/g for an AMF field condition of 4.40 × 109 A/(ms) was achieved for the particles with a size of 21 nm. Modifying the synthesis route can produce particles of different shapes, and, for the same chemical composition, increased SAR values can be achieved. This strategy agrees with recurrent GBM treatment, characterized by the need for heat-efficiency MNP use.
Another important strategy to increase the MNP’s heat efficiency involves doping classical iron oxide with transition metals. Usually, metal ferrites have the following chemical formula, MFe2O4, in which M is a divalent transition metal, and are characterized by a spinel structure with face-centered cubic arrangements of the oxygen atoms, while iron (Fe2+) and the other metal (M2+) ions are positioned in octahedral or tetrahedral places. It can be foreseen that the SAR can be improved due to the fact that these transition metal atoms have a characteristic value of the magnetic moment due to the existence of vacancies in the MNP structure. All the synthesis methods that are presented in Section 2.1. are suitable for producing MNPs of advanced chemical composition. The most used elements are Zn, Mn, and Co. Other soft magnetic structures [50], which are not spinels, such as Fe nanoparticles (NPs) (α-Fe), Fe carbide NPs (ε’-Fe2.2C), or alloys such as Ni-Cu [97], Fe-Co, and Fe-Ni-Co [98] were proposed but exhibited reduced SAR values outside the biological limits of the MHT treatment. Some of the best heat performances were observed in cases of Co0.7Fe2.3O4 nanocubes [99], Mn0.7Fe2.3O4 nanoflowers [100], and Fe and Fe carbide nanospheres [50]. Bordet et al. [101] noticed that when the iron carbide NPs were exposed to air and then inserted into water, they could passivate, and a decrease in saturation magnetization was noticed concomitantly with the build of a 3 nm thick iron oxide shell. Firstly, the SAR value of 15 nm MNPs was measured at 700 W/g; then, it increased in the case of Fe2.2C at 3250 W/g, and, after iron carbide MNP oxidation to Fe3O4 on the shell, it reduced to 1000 W/kg at an H × f product of 3.7 × 109 A/(ms) after 4 months of heat transfer in water through dopamine-based ligands. These SAR values are much higher than those found in the case of commercial MNPs. Sathya et al. [99] prepared cobalt ferrite NPs through a non-hydrolytic method and found, in the case of cubic particles with a size between 17 ÷ 19 nm, a SAR value of 800 ÷ 900 W/g in a field condition of 4.8 × 109 A/(ms). Manganese ferrites are one of the most suitable MNPs used in MHT due to their excellent chemical stability, important magnetic properties, and reduced toxicity. Some medical studies [102,103,104,105,106,107], linked Mn toxicity with a potential neurotoxic effect related to Parkinson’s disease and other symptoms such as difficulty walking, facial and limb tremors, and impaired speech. Andrade et al. [108] synthesized, through the sol–gel method, Ca0.2Mn0.8Fe2O4 MNPs with a SAR value of about 36.3 W/g that determined a temperature increase with about 7 °C in only 120 s, proving to have high potential for MHT applications. Silveira-Alves et al. [109] also prepared MnFe2O4 nanoparticles with porphyrin coated with citrate, dimercaptosuccinicnate, and tripolyphosphate anions. Saturation magnetization of the MNPs mentioned above was between 44 emu/g and 50 emu/g. Another study [110] investigated MnFe2O4 modification with polyethylene glycol (PEG) loaded with glucose oxidase and reported a SAR value of about 296 W/g and a saturation magnetization of 75 emu/g. Casula et al. [111] synthesized Mn-doped nanoflowers with an average size of about 57 nm using the polyol method. The authors experimentally determined a maximum SAR value of about 350 W/g at 4.8 × 109 A/(ms). It can be observed that the efficiency of MHT treatments based on manganese MNPs is highly dependent on Mn2+ substitution, MNP size, number of substitution sites, characteristics of the AMF such as frequency and magnetic field strength, and the administrated dose of MNPs due to neurological side effects [112,113,114].
Jang et al. [115] prepared Zn-doped ferrites (Zn0.4Mn0.6Fe2O4) with a SAR value of about 432 W/g in the case of H × f = 2.6 × 109 A/(ms) and 15 nm diameter spherical MNPs. While iron oxide NPs are already used in clinical trials, Zn-ferrites were investigated in pre-clinical studies to analyze their toxicity and safety field limits [116]. The chosen concentration of 200 μgmetal/mL was considered safe, but the temperature of 43 °C was surpassed. However, a delay in tumor development in murine animal models was observed. Regarding Co-dopped ferrites, an in vivo study developed by Balakrishnan et al. [117] took into account the fact that Co induced signs of toxicity at concentrations of about 200 μgmetal/mL. Based on the plasma micro-arc oxidation (PMAO) procedure, the authors modified the surface of Co-ferrite nanocubes with an edge of 17 nm and injected the magnetic solution in a murine xenograft tumor model. It was noticed that the tumor was eliminated after one dose of 0.7 mg fluid injection and three MHT cycles applied at 110 kHz and 20 kA/m. Although gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents have been widely used and considered safe, some studies reported side effects associated with the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis [118], anaphylactic shock, or other acute reactions [119,120,121]. This lanthanide can accumulate in kidneys, bones, or even the patient’s brain without noticeable renal malfunction. The main toxicity was associated with Gd3+ dissociation from the chelated complexes due to the interaction with different compounds in the extracellular matrix. Jiang et al. [122] developed Gd0.02Fe2.98O4 MNPs for MHT with beneficial effects such as necrosis and damage of the blood vessels at the tumor site and diminishing of the hypoxic cells resistant to a radiation process. They combined radiotherapy and MHT strategies. A high SAR value correlated with an increased temperature of 45 °C was reported, and the authors concluded that the developed MNPs exhibited good thermal behavior and offered the possibility to be also used as radiotherapy agents. Avugadda et al. [123] synthesized multifunctional composite nanostructures based on Fe MNPs combined with Gd MNPs in a multilayer structure. These complexes were dedicated to a simultaneous imaging process and MHT. A SAR value of about 85 W/gFe was achieved. The authors investigated the magnetic structure biocompatibility on U87 glioblastoma cells and noticed that a maximum Gd dose of 125 μg/L was not toxic. The developed composite exhibited outstanding properties for tracking tumor microenvironment release with remote T1 guidance and magnetic hyperthermia therapy actuation. Considering the high potential of the Gd-based MNPs in MHT, one can foresee that this solution can be successfully applied in GBM treatment if only specific Gd doses are respected [124].
Other chemical formulations, such as iron-based NPs or ion carbide, must be further investigated because in vivo results are missing in the literature. As an overall conclusion, it can be observed that doped composition exhibits increased heat efficiency, but safety measures regarding metallic toxicity must be considered, and biocompatible coatings or surface modifications should be applied.
The synthesis of heterostructures represents another strategy adopted in material science to increase MHT heat performance. This domain includes bi-magnetic core–shells such as MNPs combined with ferrite core–shell, Fe core and iron carbide or ferrite core–shell, Co ferrite core and Zn ferrite shell, etc. Usually, the core–shell bi-magnetic structures are made based on a so-called seed growth method that consists of pre-formed seed NPs, which are used as a core, while the shell has to be characterized by a similar lattice structure [51]. In [51,125], CoFe2O4@MnFe2O4 and Fe3O4@CoFe2O4 were synthesized with excellent SAR values of 2000 W/g and 2778 W/g at an H × f value of 1.84 × 1010 A/(ms) but outside the biological limit. Another study [126] changed the shape of the core–shell particles from spherical to cubic and measured a SAR of 10,600 W/g in the case of ZnFe2O4@CoFe2O4 MNPs. By analyzing the literature, one can conclude that soft magnetic cores made of iron oxide, zinc ferrite, and manganese ferrite and hard magnetic shells such as cobalt ferrite can be linked to increased values of SAR, even though the studies were not performed in the biological range for the H × f product. The MNP concentration in ferrofluids can be adjusted to meet the clinical requirements. Other highly biocompatible core–shell structures were FeO@Fe3O4 developed by Lak et al. [63] and characterized by increased SAR values of 13-fold compared to the FDA-approved commercial Resovist®. Meffre et al. [50] developed a core–shell structure in which the core was made of metallic Fe MNPs, and the shell was designed from iron carbide. In this case, a very high SAR value of 3250 W/g was achieved in the clinical range of the applied AMF (3.24 × 109 A/(ms)). A possible explanation of increased SAR values characteristic of bi-magnetic core–shell MNPs is attributed to the exchange coupling energy that determines an increased coercivity of the particles.
Another solution for increasing the SAR values is the manufacture of magneto-plasmonic NPs. In this case, the magnetic part is used for MHT, and the plasmonic part plays the role of a photothermal material that is excited by laser light. We can meet these special structures with high values of SAR due to the simultaneous application of two stimuli (AMF and laser) under the name of hetero-dimers, nano-stars, and nanoflowers [36]. Guardia et al. [127] synthesized iron oxide on top of gold particles and obtained faceted magneto-plasmonic NPs with an average size of 30 nm and a maximum SAR value of 600 W/g at an H × f product of 4.4 × 109 A/(ms). The authors concluded that dimers do not lose their heating properties when applying the AMF. Das et al. [82] made Ag@Fe3O4 nanoflowers with a SAR value of 47 W/g at 9.8 × 109 A/(ms) and 170 W/g when a 442 nm laser (0.52 W/cm2) was combined with MHT. Espinosa et al. [128] prepared Fe3O4 seeds and Au growth with nano-star shapes. MHT efficiency was investigated in an AMF condition of 1.8 × 1010 A/(ms), which is not considered suitable for clinical research, and SAR values of 634 W/g were achieved. This effect was combined with that of a 680 nm NIR laser (0.3 W/cm2) under safety limits suitable for skin tissue. It can be concluded that these types of composite MNPs can exhibit increased values of SAR, MHT therapy can be combined with photothermal therapy, and enhanced and accelerated effects of cancer cell death are possible. Figure 5 presents the main strategies adopted in improving MHT heat efficiency.
All the strategies discussed in this section can be adapted for GBM treatment, but it is essential to consider safety and material toxicity for each combination. The establishment of safe combinations that can be applied in clinical trials requires numerous in vivo studies. The development of biodegradable MNPs, which can be eliminated through various routes from the human body, is desirable to mitigate the potential intoxication and side effects associated with different metals. The use of magneto-plasmonic NPs appears to be a promising advancement in cancer therapy, as it allows for the combination of two treatment strategies, potentially leading to more effective outcomes.
3. In Vitro and In Vivo Studies for MHT Application in the GBM Treatment
3.1. In Vitro Studies
The anticancerogenic effect of the MHT on GBM has been intensively investigated in the past years. One of the most important advantages of this treatment over its counterparts is tumor cell thermosensitivity compared to healthy cells when an AMF is applied. Irreversible oncological cell respiration damages are produced when the temperature is higher than 42 °C, resulting in cell apoptosis since, in the case of healthy cells, temperatures of about 55 °C produce a similar effect. Hanini et al. [129] investigated the thermosensitivity effect on malignant glioblastoma cells (U87-MG) and human endothelial cells (HUVEC) under MHT conditions (AC magnetic field strength of 23.10 kA/m and frequency of 700 kHz). They applied the alternative magnetic field for 1 h in the presence and absence of γ-Fe2O3 MNPs with a diameter of 10 nm, coated with polyol, and in a superparamagnetic state. Both types of cells, HUVEC and U87-MG, were incubated in combination with 50 μg/mL for 4 h. In order to estimate the MNP quantity internalized by the two cell lines, magnetophoresis and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy were performed. It was noticed that the malignant cells absorbed double MNP quantities compared to healthy HUVEC (magnetophoresis: HUVEC (4.70 pg per cell ± 0.77), U87-MG (8.02 pg per cell ± 0.84); XRF: HUVEC (4.98 pg per cell ± 1.97), U87-MG (8.45 pg per cell ± 3.34)). Hyperthermia measurements evidenced a temperature of 42 °C obtained for both cell lines and SAR values of about 114 W/g ± 21 for HUVEC and 178 W/g ± 37 for U87-MG. Fluorescence microscopy showed that, in the absence of MNPs under AMF action, cell death was less than 10%, while when MNPs were used, this value increased to 20% and 56% in the case of HUVEC and U87-MG cells. The main conclusion of this study was that cancerous cells internalized MNPs much better than healthy endothelial cells and generated a higher SAR value that contributed to cancer cell apoptosis. It can be noticed that this study led to the observation that MHT is a suitable tool for glioma cell annihilation by damaging relatively low amounts of healthy cells. In this way, the tumor can be locally destroyed without important loss of endothelial surrounding tissue due to cell thermosensitivity.
It is well known that to achieve high SAR values, the magnetic properties of the MNPs, such as anisotropy energy, saturation magnetization, and coercivity, must be modified and enhanced through doping operations. In this direction, a study developed by Hanini et al. [130] prepared Zn-substituted ferrite MNPs (Zn0.9Fe2.1O4) to be used for MHT in vitro analysis on U87-MG malignant glioma cells, as described in [129]. The immortalized human glioblastoma U87-MG and healthy umbilical vascular endothelial HUVEC cells were cultured single or in combination with 50 μg/mL MNPs in a DMEM medium. The average size of the MNPs was about 11 nm based on X-ray diffraction and high-resolution electron microscopy. In addition, a classical cubic spinel-type phase was noticed. A saturation magnetization of about 12 emu/g was determined for a temperature of 310 K and a magnetic field strength of 50 kOe. This value was in good accordance with those provided by the literature regarding zinc ferrites. The specific power losses were measured based on magnetocalorimetry, and a value of 36 W/g was obtained. The 20 g/L MNPs were dispersed in distilled water and induced a temperature of about 38.6 °C under the influence of a standard AMF field (289.7 Oe and 700 kHz). When the MNPs were incubated together with glioma cells for 4 h, a much higher temperature increase was determined, and it was concluded that 41.5 °C was sufficient to induce the malignant cell apoptosis.
Sanz et al. [131] performed an in vitro investigation on human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells by comparing the effect of MHT with that of exogenous heating (EHT) sources. The cells were loaded with different concentrations of PEI-MNPs (10 μg/mL ÷ 100 μg/mL) and then packed into pellets, which simulated an oncological tumor environment. The exogenous heating consisted of a water bath that allowed for reaching a maximum temperature of 56 °C for 30 min. The authors noticed that the MHT produced the same effect of cellular death as hyperthermia generated by exogenous sources and required a much-reduced temperature of 6 °C lower. This fact is of utmost importance if one considers the health of the tissue surrounding a tumor because the increased temperature could determine the unwanted effect of cell death. Supplementarily, it was concluded that the cell death pathways induced by MHT and EHT are quite similar, consisting of destruction and permeabilization of the cell membrane due to an intense heating phenomenon. This study evidenced that MHT is a suitable tool that can have a high potential in the destruction of solid tumors of neuroblastoma cells, and it is very helpful for metastatic patients. Ito et al. [132] demonstrated that heat shock protein (HSP) 70 is induced by MHT and generates antitumor immunity in T-9 murine glioma cells [133]. The authors considered that classical MHT treatments can be safely performed at about 42 °C, but this approach cannot solve the problem of antitumor immunity by itself. If the MNP effect is combined with HSP70 release, fast necrosis of the oncological tissue is evidenced. The two studies mentioned above [132,133] presented the use of magnetic liposomes, which act based on cationic interactions and exhibit increased cellular affinity due to the electrostatic forces that occur between them and the negatively charged phospholipids that exist in the cell membrane.
Another important strategy described in the literature is the application of magnetic gel composite. In most cases, MNPs are introduced into polymer hydrogel matrices. Meenach et al. [134] manufactured poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based magnetic hydrogel and tested its heating efficiency on M059K glioblastoma cells. This study’s main finding was that different heating grades can be achieved by modifying the magnetic field strength of an external AMF. The magnetic gels reached a hyperthermic (42 °C ÷ 45 °C) or a thermoablative (60 °C ÷ 63 °C) temperature. The authors demonstrated the efficiency of the developed magnetic biomaterial in killing the glioblastoma cells only in the thermoablative temperature range but explained that their future studies would include the hyperthermia range combined with drug delivery methods.
Green synthesis methods were involved in the context of innovative manufacturing methods. Ramirez-Nunez et al. [135] developed Fe3O4@γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles coated based on polyphenol using Cinnamomum verum and Vanilla planifolia. These natural extracts played a double role; firstly, they acted as reducing agents due to their phenolic groups, and, secondly, they bonded with the help of OH groups on the MNPs’ surfaces. Different saturation magnetizations were achieved at about 70.84 emu/g (Cinnamomum verum) and 59.45 emu/g (Vanilla planifolia). The authors investigated the potential effect of the developed MNPs to be used as magnetic heaters in cancer treatments. In this direction, they performed in vitro studies on immortalized brain microglia murine cell line BV-2 cultured in standard conditions in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium. The cells were cultured together with 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL. Good cell viability was established in each case. For MHT experiments, only the 100 μg/mL concentration samples were chosen, and, by applying an AMF with a field amplitude of 300 Gs and a frequency of 570 kHz, a temperature of 46 °C was achieved, being followed by the cell death. The authors concluded that the manufactured MNPs were eco-friendly, highly efficient for MHT use, and biologically safe. This research highlights the importance of eco-consciousness in the development of new medical technologies.
A study developed by Hamdous et al. [136] showed the importance of uncoated (M uncoated and MC) and biocompatible coated magnetosome minerals extracted from magnetotactic bacteria. For coating, the authors used polyethyleneimine (M-PEI), chitosan (M-Chi), and neridronate (M-Neri). The MNP heating efficiency for MHT was investigated using mouse glioblastoma cells (GL-261) and rat glioblastoma cells (RG-2). An AMF with a frequency of 198 kHz and strength varying between 34 mT and 47 mT was applied. In the case of PEI- and chitosan-coated samples, the SAR was estimated to have a maximum value of 125 W/gFe. A reduced rate of cellular internalization was established for chitosan-coated samples, while the PEI-coated ones were strongly associated with cells and modulated by the AMF. It was concluded that the highly biocompatible magnetosomes are adequate for MHT treatment, as they are linked to a temperature of about 43 °C and enhance cellular toxicity even when rapid sedimentation of the particles occurs. Gupta and Sharma [137] functionalized Fe3O4 MNPs with stevioside (STE-Fe3O4). They considered the natural glycoside to be an excellent surfactant used to control the particle size and, in this way, to modulate their magnetic properties. Cellular uptake efficiency and material biocompatibility were investigated in rat C6 glioma cells. The study was based on a comparative analysis made on MNPs coated with polysorbate-80(P-80-Fe3O4) and oleic acid (OA-Fe3O4). After an AMF with a frequency of 405 kHz and an amplitude of 168 Oe was applied, the authors noticed that the stevioside-coated samples exhibited the highest temperature rise, inducing glioma cell death after 30 min by reaching a temperature of 43 °C. The main conclusion of this study was that using a biocompatible coating improved the cell uptake of the MNPs and increased the retention time. It was concluded that, by coating with different polymers, the hydrodynamic diameter of the MNPs was reduced from 447 ± 15.97 nm (bare Fe3O4) to 191.5 ± 5.72 nm (P-80-Fe3O4), 270.4 ± 7.25 nm (OA-Fe3O4), 56.83 ± 10.76 nm (STE-Fe3O4/0.5 g), and 49.77 ± 6.98 nm (STE-Fe3O4/1.0 g). The stevioside coating hindered MNP agglomeration due to its negatively charged surface. Mandawala et al. [138] developed stable and biocompatible magnetosomes coated with poly-L-lysine, oleic acid, citric acid, and carboxy-methyl-dextran. Firstly, the authors isolated and purified the magnetosomes from MSR-1 magnetotactic bacteria. Secondly, as mentioned above, they stabilized the magnetosomes obtained with different chemical substances. Cubo-octahedral MNP cores were obtained and surrounded by a highly biocompatible coating. To investigate the heating efficiency and the potential application in MHT for GBM treatment, the magnetosomes were cultured together with GL-261 glioblastoma cells under the effect of an externally applied AMF (34 mT ÷ 47 mT, 198 kHz). SAR values between 89 W/gFe and 196 W/gFe were obtained. Different cell death percentages between 10% and 43% were noticed as a function of the chosen biocompatible coating and the AMF parameters. The authors concluded that the coated magnetosomes could be successfully applied for GBM tumor treatment, and the SAR values and in vivo distribution can be easily optimized to obtain the best-expected results. Rego et al. [139] prepared amino silane-coated iron oxide MNPs for MHT application in the GBM model. They performed an analysis regarding the SAR values and chose various types of AMF with a constant magnetic flux density of 100 Gs, 200 Gs, and 300 Gs and different frequencies between 309 kHz and 557 kHz. The SAR values varied between 3.789 ± 0.137 W/g (309 kHz, 100 Gs) ÷ 11.078 ± 0.403 W/g (557 kHz, 100 Gs), 54.757 ± 1.460 W/g (309 kHz, 200 Gs) ÷ 82.772 ± 3.548 W/g (557 kHz, 200 Gs), and 169.297 ± 5.097 W/g (309 kHz, 300 Gs) ÷ 320.070 ± 22.818 W/g (557 kHz, 300 Gs). For the in vitro investigations performed on the C6 cell line, the authors selected the 300 Gs and 309 kHz or 557 kHz conditions. Based on bioluminescence (BLI) measurements in the cases in which cells were cultured with MNPs and the AMF was applied, a reduction in BLI intensities was noticed (e.g., from (4.365 ± 0.276) × 109 to (1.748 ± 0.112) × 109 photons/s–300 Gs, 309 kHz and from (4.367 ± 0.276) × 109 to (8.730 ± 0.873) × 108 photons/s–300 Gs, 557 kHz). It was concluded that cell death occurred at a high rate under the MNPs and AMF effect and that the developed MNPs have high potential for MHT in GBM treatment.
In vitro studies are necessary for the first assessment of MNP biocompatibility and potential for MHT application in GBM treatment. All the investigations presented in this subsection were performed on human or animal glioblastoma cell lines and proved the efficiency of MHT in inducing cell death. Figure 6 presents some in vitro results after the application of different MHT protocols.
Table 3 emphasizes the main studies regarding MHT efficiency in glioblastoma treatment.
3.2. In Vivo Studies
In vivo studies are necessary to investigate the treatment effect directly on an animal model and to estimate the outcome of magnetic hyperthermia. Many literature studies have considered GBM treatment based on different MNPs and, most of all, have used murine animals. One of the first in vivo investigations seen in the literature was developed by Yanase et al. [141], who investigated intracellular hyperthermia based on Fe3O4 liposomes applied to reduce a solid glioma tumor artificially induced in the left femoral region in the case of rats. An AMF with therapeutic characteristics was applied, and the rats were divided into three groups with different numbers of AMF cycles as follows: control group I—no AMF cycle, group II—one irradiation cycle applied for 30 min, group III—two irradiation cycles, and group IV—three irradiation cycles. Complete tumor regression was obtained in the case of group IV in a higher percentage compared with the other groups (e.g., 87.5%—group IV, 60%—group III, 20%—group II). In addition, for groups III and IV, widespread distribution of magnetic liposomes was noticed in combination with necrotic cells in the tumor area. It was concluded that the most efficient way in which the treatment could be applied consisted of three cycles of AMF irradiation. The same research group developed, in [142], an interesting analysis regarding antitumor immunity induction after MHT application. They used the heating property of Fe3O4 positively charged liposomes in T-9 rat glioma tumors created through subcutaneous injection on both rat femurs. The left femur was chosen as the treatment site to administer the magnetic liposome solution. In this study, the animals were assessed into two groups: the first one with no AMF application and the second one characterized by 30 min irradiation in three consecutively applied cycles at 24 h intervals. It was noticed that the glioma tumor localized on the left side in the cases in which the AMF was applied completely disappeared. In addition, annihilation of the glioma cells of the right-side tumors was also evidenced. After that, the healed animals were injected again with T-9 cells 3 months after MHT sessions. It was observed that after transient tumor development, all the cancerous cells disappeared. The authors underlined the importance of their findings by concluding that, in some cases, antitumor immunity can be induced by magnetite liposome injection. This observation is of utmost importance because it proved the capacity of living organisms to heal themselves based on acquired immunity after a full cycle of MHT was applied. Jordan et al. [143] manufactured two magnetic fluids based on aminosilane- and dextran-coated iron oxide MNPs. They implanted RG-2 cells into 120 rats’ brains to induce glioblastoma multiforme tumor apparition. The animals were allocated to 10 groups containing 12 rats. Control was included. The protocol treatment consisted of one intratumoral injection. On days 4 and 6 after tumor induction, an AMF with a variable magnetic field strength up to 18 kA/m and a frequency of 100 kHz was applied. It was noticed that the animal group treated with aminosilane-coated iron oxide magnetic fluid exhibited a higher survival rate of 4.5-fold compared to control and dextran-coated MNP groups. Immunohistochemical analyses demonstrated the existence of large necrotic zones placed in the vicinity of amino silane-coated MNPs. The authors concluded that the coating of the MNPs had a decisive role in tumor reduction and prolonged rate survival. It can be foreseen that the development of biocompatible coatings can be an important research direction.
Besides finding proper coatings for MNPs to increase their heating efficiency and prohibit their agglomeration, another strategy described in the literature consists of combining heat-induced therapeutic gene expression or specific antibodies with magnetic hyperthermia, which seems to provide excellent results in inducing cancer cell death. Ito et al. [132] showed that the expression of heat shock protein 70 (HSP 70) generated antitumor immunity in the T-9 cell glioma tumors. As presented in Section 3.1., the authors purified the HSP70-peptide from the tumor after a hyperthermia treatment was applied. They noticed that, in the case of F344 rat animal models, which were previously immunized with T-9-derived HSP70, tumor growth was almost totally reduced. T-9 cells combined with magnetite cationic liposomes were implanted in the animal body, and tumor rejection assays were used to demonstrate that antitumor immunity was developed. It was concluded that this combined therapy dedicated to the treatment of a stereotactically implanted tumor in the subcutaneous zone led to important tumor immunity, being very helpful in GBM treatment. Le et al. [144] prepared tumor-specific magnetoliposomes that were conjugated with an antibody fragment. They performed an in vivo experiment based on glioma-harboring mice, which were injected with modified magnetoliposomes and then irradiated under an alternating magnetic field. A magnetic hyperthermia effect occurred, and a temperature of 43 °C was achieved in the tumor zone. The authors noticed after 2 weeks a regression of the tumor. The importance of this study consists of the fact that the problem of low amounts of magnetic heater accumulation in the tumor zone was solved through unique antibody-conjugated magnetoliposomes, which proved to have high heating potential under an AMF influence. Ito et al. [145] applied heat-induced therapeutic gene expression once again, but this time, they combined TNF–α gene therapy with MHT based on the stress-inducible promoter gadd 153 and magnetite cationic liposomes. An AMF with a frequency of 118 kHz and a magnetic field strength of about 384 Oe was applied during one magnetic irradiation session of 30 min. In vivo studies were conducted on mice with artificially induced U251-SP human glioma tumors. The authors noticed a powerful cell-killing effect on the cancerous cells. Although TNF–α was not able to cause complete cell death, a strong tumor-growth-diminishing effect was evidenced in combination with the heat generated by the MNPs. The magnetoliposomes used alone induced cell death, but tumor growth was not entirely arrested. It was concluded that this combined strategy should be considered due to the TNF–α property to inhibit neovascular apparition and to damage GBM blood vessels. In this way, the nutrients and oxygen that fed the tumor were not available anymore, and based on the heating effect of MNPs, cell death occurred with no new cancer cell apparition. Unfortunately, it is worth mentioning that TNF–α gene therapy has important side effects due to systemic toxicity related mainly to hepatocellular degeneration. The authors concluded that their treatment route can be considered a powerful tool against GBM, but the protocol must be carefully applied due to the important drawbacks of TNF–α therapy.
An innovative laboratory study developed by Ohno et al. [146] evidenced hyperthermia’s positive effect as a single treatment option in malignant glioma based on stick-type carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)-magnetite. The authors implanted CMC-magnetite into a T-9 rat glioma model. The animals were irradiated in an AMF (380 Oe and 88.9 kHz) for 30 min daily. Three groups of rats were analyzed. Group I was treated with three irradiation sessions, group II had only one session, and the control group had no AMF and only the CMC-magnetite stick was applied. The developed stick implant was characterized by its facile use, the possibility of treating a specific zone of the brain, and exhibiting an optimal concentration of Fe3O4. The highest survival rate and the most efficient way to attack the glioma cells was the AMF application by three times due to its strong hyperthermic effect, as well as strong diffusion of the MNPs through the glioma tumor. It can be concluded, as seen in many studies in the literature, that the application of multiple irradiation sessions is a promising way to conduct MHT treatments dedicated to GBM.
Magnetosomes isolated from magnetotactic bacteria represent an important research direction identified in the literature. This approach was used for MHT application in the case of GBM treatment. We will present some of the most important studies based on this concept. Fevre et al. [31] used magnetosomes to reduce and alleviate GL-261 mouse glioma cell-induced tumors in C57/BL6 mice. They divided the animals into four groups as follows: group 1 (received magnetosome injection, 11 to 15 magnetic irradiation sessions (MSs) in an AMF with a frequency of 198 kHz and strength between 11 and 27 mT), group 2 (received a magnetosome injection without AMF irradiation), group 3 (received classical Fe-based MNPs and 7 to 15 MSs in an AMF with a frequency of 198 kHz and strength between 22 and 31 mT during the first MS and between 22 and 27 mT during the second MS), group 4 (received Fe-based MNPs without AMF irradiation), group 5 (received glucose injection and 4 to 10 MSs in the AMF with the same frequency and average strength of 27 mT), and group 6 (received only 50 μL of 5% glucose suspension). Groups 2, 4, 5, and 6 were considered as control groups. The best survival rate and higher tumor reduction was achieved for group 1. In the case of magnetosome administration, the survival rate of the animals was estimated at 50%. They were cancer-free in 5 weeks in the case of group 1 for the magnetic field product H × f = 2 ÷ 4 × 109 A/(ms). Above this limit, the MHT treatment was considered dangerous due to eddy current apparition [33]. By comparing the efficiency of magnetosomes with that of Fe-based MNPs, it was concluded that the magnetosomes exhibited higher SAR values (e.g., SARmagnetosome= 40 W/gFe, SARFe-based MNPs = 26 W/gFe), an increased retention time inside the tumor environment (e.g., 5 days—magnetosomes, 1 day—Fe-based MNPs), and increased temperature (e.g., 46 °C—magnetosomes, 43 °C—Fe-based MNPs). The authors observed that reducing the tumor dimensions without magnetosomes was also possible when AMF sessions were applied. A possible explanation consists of the fact that tumor ischemia or antitumor immune response occurred. The main conclusion of this study was that the developed magnetosomes are an ideal candidate for MHT application to cure glioblastoma tumors.
Alphandery et al. [147] synthesized MNPs from magnetotactic bacteria and proved their efficiency regarding complete reduction in intracranial U87-Luc glioma in mice. The animals were injected with about 13 μg of magnetosome chain per tumor mm3 and introduced in an AMF with 198 kHz and 30 mT in therapeutic conditions [146,148]. The number of magnetic irradiation sessions was between 12 and 15 for 30 min each. Full tumor destruction was achieved for 40% of mice with no tumor metastasis apparition. The authors noticed that the developed magnetosomes were able to release a high level of endotoxins (1400 ÷ 8400 EU/mL/mg) compared with classical iron oxide MNPs (<50 EU/mL/mg) under the effect of the applied AMF, a fact that was considered beneficial for cancerous cell death through the apoptosis phenomenon. An interesting result was found in the case of magnetosomes, which infiltrated only a percentage of 10% inside the tumor, proving that an immune response occurred. It was concluded that biocompatible magnetosomes are very efficient in obtaining glioma remission under AMF conditions, and the main physical mechanism responsible for oncological cell death was the large quantity of heat that was generated based on the MHT phenomenon, as well as due to endotoxin release. One can observe that this type of treatment is suitable for infiltrating tumors such as GBM because, in these cases, full tumor coverage with MNPs is almost impossible to achieve during in vivo treatments. The study mentioned above was continued in [149]. Alphandery et al. coated the mineral magnetosomes with poly-l-lysine to increase the biocompatibility of the MNPs. Superior results compared to the authors’ previous investigations were achieved due to the improved ferrimagnetic behavior of the magnetosomes and higher heating capabilities. In this study, the animals underwent 27 magnetic sessions (30 min for each MS) under the effect of an AMF (frequency of 202 kHz; magnetic field of 27 mT). It was observed that, using the coated magnetosomes, a temperature of 42 °C was obtained in the cancerous U87-Luc tumors with a volume of 1.5 mm3. The outcome of the above-described treatment protocol consisted of healing in a percentage of 100% of the inoculated mice after 68 days. Bioluminescence intensity measurements of living GBM cells showed important tumor volume reduction starting on day 7 after surgery and ending with day 35. It was also extraordinary that the animals were still healthy and alive on day 350 after tumor apparition. The authors concluded that the mice were fully cancer-free, and no metastases were reported. It can be foreseen that the developed coated magnetosomes are an important and promising candidate for GBM treatment and could be successfully introduced as an alternative in clinical trials.
All the in vivo studies presented in this subsection were performed on murine animals and involved human or animal glioma-cell-line-induced tumors. It can be noticed that different treatment protocols were proposed (Table 4), and some of them were successful in reducing tumor volume or in establishing so-called immunity against glioma cells. Their combination with different targeting agents or the manufacturing of magnetosomes proved their efficiency in killing glioma cells, but much more research is necessary to introduce these solutions in clinical trials. Considering all the in vitro and in vivo research, in our opinion, MHT treatment can represent a viable solution to help the patient with GBM. However, some advances in the physical system can be necessary to establish a correct treatment route and to hinder the apparition of eddy currents generating a local overheating phenomenon. All the proposed solutions must be extremely carefully applied with respect to human subject anatomy because of notable differences from murine animals and have to be adapted in order to not exhibit important drawbacks. Figure 7 shows some in vivo results after the application of different MHT treatments.
Table 4 presents a comparative analysis of different magnetic hyperthermia treatments used in glioma murine animal models.
Figure 7.
In vivo results of MHT treatments. (I) In vivo result of biocompatible magnetosomes used in MHT protocol for GBM: (a–d) photographs of the tumor site on day 0 (D0), 11 (D11), 25 (D25), and 250 (D250) after MHT session; (e) H&E section of skin in day 250 from the initial place of the tumor with no cancer cells; sample of a lymph node collected from a cured mouse after 15 MHT sessions in day 250; (f) H&E lymph node; (g) H&E zoom, which evidences the macrophage presence (black arrow); and (h,i) Perls’ Prussian blue zoom sections presenting a blue color in the macrophage cytoplasm (black arrow), proving full elimination of the magnetosomes [31]. Figure 7 (I) is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. (II) In vivo result of aminosilane-coated MNPs used in multiple MHT irradiations: (A) BLI images of the tumor at day 13, 22, and 32 and different numbers of MHT applications; (B) BLI signal variation in relation to control versus evaluation time [139]. Figure 7 (II) is licensed under CC BY 4.0. (III) In vivo investigation of MHT and chemotherapy based on Fe(Salen) MNPs: (A) images of mouse leg tumor at day 0 and day 28 in the case of different treatment protocols; (B) regression rate of tumor volume measured at different days of treatment (n = 6; ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001) [150]. Figure 7 (III) is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Figure 7.
In vivo results of MHT treatments. (I) In vivo result of biocompatible magnetosomes used in MHT protocol for GBM: (a–d) photographs of the tumor site on day 0 (D0), 11 (D11), 25 (D25), and 250 (D250) after MHT session; (e) H&E section of skin in day 250 from the initial place of the tumor with no cancer cells; sample of a lymph node collected from a cured mouse after 15 MHT sessions in day 250; (f) H&E lymph node; (g) H&E zoom, which evidences the macrophage presence (black arrow); and (h,i) Perls’ Prussian blue zoom sections presenting a blue color in the macrophage cytoplasm (black arrow), proving full elimination of the magnetosomes [31]. Figure 7 (I) is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. (II) In vivo result of aminosilane-coated MNPs used in multiple MHT irradiations: (A) BLI images of the tumor at day 13, 22, and 32 and different numbers of MHT applications; (B) BLI signal variation in relation to control versus evaluation time [139]. Figure 7 (II) is licensed under CC BY 4.0. (III) In vivo investigation of MHT and chemotherapy based on Fe(Salen) MNPs: (A) images of mouse leg tumor at day 0 and day 28 in the case of different treatment protocols; (B) regression rate of tumor volume measured at different days of treatment (n = 6; ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001) [150]. Figure 7 (III) is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Table 4.
In vivo studies for MHT dedicated to GBM analysis.
| Mnps/Injection Zone | Cell Lines/Number of Inoculated Cells | AMF Conditions–H (Oe), f (kHz), Treatment Time | Number of AMF Cycles and Time between AMF Cycles | Animal Model | Animal Particularities | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe3O4 cationic liposomes combined with HSP70 gene therapy/Subcutaneous zone/Combined therapy MHT + Immunotherapy | T-9/1 × 106 cells | 384 Oe/118 kHz/30 min | 1,2,3 cycles/24 h | F344 (Fisher) rats | Female/6-week-old | [132] |
| Fe3O4 cationic liposomes/Subcutaneous site placed at left femoral region/Single MHT therapy | T-9/1 × 107 cells | 384 Oe/118 kHz/30 min | 1,2,3 cycles/24 h | F344 rats | Female/7-week-old | [141] |
| Fe3O4 cationic liposomes/Subcutaneous site placed at left and right femoral region/Single MHT therapy | T-9/1 × 107 cells | 384 Oe/118 kHz/30 min | 3 cycles/24 h | F344 rats | Female/7-week-old | [142] |
| Specific tumor antibody fragment conjugated with Fe3O4 magnetic liposomes/Subcutaneous femoral zone/Combined therapy MHT + Immunotherapy | U251-SP/2 × 105 cells | 384 Oe/118 kHz/30 min | 3 cycles/24 h | KSN nude mice | Albino athymic nude mice/Female/4-week-old | [144] |
| Aminosilane-coated MNPs, dextran-coated MNPs/Subcutaneous anterior part of the brain/Single MHT therapy | RG-2/1 × 105 cells | 0 ÷ 226.2 Oe/100 kHz/40 min | 1 cycle | F344 rats | Male | [143] |
| MNPs functionalized with aCD133/Subcutaneous in mouse striatum/Combined therapy MHT + Immunotherapy | CT-2A/2 × 105 cells | 2513.27 Oe/very low frequency field/2 h/day | 7 cycles in 7 days | C57 mice | C57 black 8 mice/Female/22-week-old | [151] |
| Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)–Fe3O4 MNPs/Single MHT Therapy | T-9/5 × 106 cells | 380 Oe/88.9 kHz/30 min | 3 cycles/24 h | F344 rats | Female/4-week-old | [146] |
| Magnetoliposomes/Subcutaneous in the animal back/Single MHT Therapy | GL-261/1 × 107 cells | Group 1: 11 ÷ 27 mT/198 kHz/-; Group 3: 22 ÷ 31 mT, 22 ÷ 27 mT/198 kHz/-; Group 5: 27 mT/198 kHz/- | Group 1: 11 and 15 sessions; Group 3: 7 and 15 sessions. Group 5: 4 to 10 sessions | C57/BL6 mice | Female/6-week-old | [31] |
| Chains of magnetosomes/Intracranial inoculation of glioma cells based on craniotomy/Single MHT Therapy | U87-Luc/2 × 105 cells | 30 mT/198 kHz/30 min | 12 ÷ 15 cycles | CD-1 nude mice | Female/7-week-old | [147] |
| Non-pyrogenic magnetosomes coated with poly-l-lysine/Intracranial inoculation of glioma cells based on craniotomy/Single MHT Therapy | U87-Luc/2 × 105 cells | 27 mT/202 kHz/30 min | 27 cycles | Charles River pathogen-free athymic nude mice | Female, 18 g/5-week-old | [149] |
| Fe3O4 magnetic liposomes combined with TNF–α gene therapy/Right flank/Combined therapy MHT + Immunotherapy | U251-SP/3 × 107 cells | 384 Oe/118 kHz/30 min | 1 cycle | Athymic nude mice | Female/4-week-old | [145] |
| Fe3O4/Subcutaneous space/Single MHT therapy | U251/1 × 107 cells | -/200 kHz/60 min | 2 cycles | Nude mice | Male | [152] |
| γ–Fe2O3 coated with dextran/Bregma region/Single MHT therapy | C6/8 × 106 cells | 138.2 Oe/150 kHz/20 min | 1 cycle | Wistar rats | Male | [153] |
| Amino-silane coated superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles/Motor cortex/Single MHT therapy | C6/1 × 106 cells | 300 Gauss/309 kHz/30 min | 3 cycles | Wistar rats | Male | [139] |
| Fe(Salen)/Leg/Combined therapy MHT + Chemotherapy | U251/1 × 107 cells | 31 mT/280 kHz/- | 1 cycle | Balb.c nu/nu mice | Female/6-week-old | [150] |
4. MHT Therapy in Combination with Other Therapies
MHT was used in clinical trials performed on patients with GBM in combination with other therapies. Some of the most important associations are MHT and radiotherapy (RT), MHT and chemotherapy, MHT and light-based therapy, and MHT and immunotherapy. In the previous section, we have already named a few studies and proved that a combined treatment route can be much more efficient than MHT used as a single therapy. In this section, we will provide the action mechanisms that occur and kill cancer cells and some examples of in vitro or in vivo studies extracted from the literature.
MHT was combined with radiotherapy due to the presence of abnormal blood vessels at the tumor site compared to healthy tissue. In these cases, a hypoxic tumor environment characterized by a lack of oxygen has an important contribution to transforming the oncological cells into radioresistant ones [154,155]. Combining the RT with MHT can overcome this radioresistance phenomenon [156,157] because heat apparition usually strongly influences radioresistant cells [158,159]. The abnormal vasculature inside the tumor does not have the normal blood vessel ability to expand and increase the speed of blood to regulate heat, so the generated heat through MHT remains inside the tumor [160,161]. In addition, it is well known that lactic acid accumulation occurs under hypoxic conditions, and the pH decreases, making the cancer cell more prone to the presence of heat [162]. In this way, the MNP’s heat efficiency is enhanced by coupling with RT, and the treatment becomes stronger and much more efficient [36]. This approach was one of the most investigated in the literature and has been used in pre-clinical and clinical studies [163,164]. Studies have revealed that the time interval between the application of irradiation and MHT remains one of the key parameters in obtaining a successful result. Decreasing the time between each application can maximize cancer cell death [165] since a difference higher than 4 h between RT and MHT increases the radiosensitization of the cell under the heat effect [166]. Supplementarily, a so-called thermo-tolerance phenomenon due to mild MHT conditions was evidenced in [167], which induced temporary resistance to heat treatment. Usually, during this combined therapy, the tumor region is firstly irradiated; after that, MNPs are injected, and, as a third step, an AMF with therapeutic characteristics is applied. In clinical trials performed on GBM patients, 15 nm aminosilane-coated spherical iron oxide MNPs were successfully applied [168,169]. In Table 5 some of the most relevant studies found in the literature related to RT + MHT combined therapy are provided [169,170,171].
Another highly investigated treatment strategy consists of a combination of chemotherapy and MHT. It is generally accepted that chemotherapy can be characterized by a lack of specificity concerning tumor particularities and can determine important side effects [7,168]. In most cases, reduced drug doses are used and can lead to insufficient cancer cell death. Many literature studies [7,172,173] evidenced the efficiency increase in chemotherapeutic medicines due to MHT, and this is usually called thermo-chemo-sensitization. Under the influence of heat, the perfusion and permeability of the tumor blood vessels are enhanced, and drugs at the tumor site spread much more quickly and efficiently [36]. In addition, high cancer cell membrane permeability is accompanied by a reduction in DNA classical repairing mechanisms in the MHT temperature range between 42 °C and 47 °C, so, in this way, cell uptake and drug action mechanisms are improved [168,174,175]. Also, by using chemotherapeutic drugs, which act locally, the number of MNPs can be adjusted in order for the therapeutic temperature to have a maximum value of 43 °C with no significant harmful effects on the healthy surrounding tissue and reduced toxicity of the MNPs. It can be observed that intense research is being conducted to manufacture MNP-based platforms that have magnetic material heating properties and can release and control chemotherapeutic drugs efficiently. Solutions such as thermo- and/or pH-responsive materials have been proposed. In this direction, the heat produced by the MHT phenomenon can be used as an external stimulus that can start the drug-release process. Supplementarily, the tumor has a particular microenvironment, which favors controlled release through intratumoral stimuli such as hypoxic and pro-oxidant states or acidic pH [176,177,178]. Unfortunately, only a few studies have associated MHT with intratumoral-stimuli release, while heat-mediated drug delivery is much more investigated.
Regarding the latter, MNPs are functionalized with coatings that permit a thermal-dependent interaction between drugs and coating and can be controlled through heat induced by MHT. In these cases, the drug is released based on diffusion. Another class of materials involves inserting thermal-sensitive material into the coating/shell of MNPs to block or encapsulate drug molecules.
Considering the systems based on direct thermal-sensitive interaction between MNPs and chemotherapeutic agents, combinations between MNPs and thermo-responsive (TR) polymers were developed. In polymers with a lower critical solution temperature (LCST), hydrogen bonds with water or hydrophilic drug molecules are formed. With the temperature increase above LCST, the hydrogen bond geometry is modified, generating a mechanical contraction of the polymer, which can release the drug [36]. Mai et al. [179] performed surface functionalization between Fe3O4 cubic MNPs and oligo ethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate (POEGMA) at a magnetic field strength intensity of 11 kA/m and a frequency of 105 kHz. The authors loaded the TR polymers with doxorubicin, and the drug was released in in vivo conditions in the case of a mouse animal model. Another candidate was considered—polynucleotide, which exhibits hydrogen donors and acceptors. In [180], Li et al. functionalized Fe3O4 with a polynucleotide (5′-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-3′, A15) and bis amino polyethylene glycol (PEG). The amine group hindered functionalization between the developed magnetic system and antibody anti-HER2, permitting the delivery of the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) drug to a cancerous tumor in mice. Another approach in the literature consists of host–guest chemistry, defining the host as MNP surface functionalization with cyclic macromolecules and drugs as the guest linked through interaction forces, not chemical bonding. Unfortunately, none of these solutions were applied to GBM treatment, but they should be exploited as viable possibilities in the future. An important strategy described in the literature is the production of a system based on a gating/trapping process, which represents a combination of mesoporous silica, a self-assembled polymer/phospholipid platform, or injectable hydrogels and MNPs, which play the role of a hosting template used to release a desired drug. The system based on mesoporous silica is characterized by dose control in temporal and spatial coordinates, being a proper candidate for use in conjunction with MHT, but much more research must be performed due to a lack of in vivo investigations [36]. Nanoformulation based on liposomes is the only platform approved for clinical use [181,182,183]. Liposomes exhibit a vesicular structure and can be loaded with hydrophilic or hydrophobic molecules. In addition, their membrane has a thermo-sensitive lipidic composition that can be disrupted around 42 °C [184]. Thermosensitive magneto-liposomes are obtained by introducing MNPs in lipidic structures [185]. Babincova et al. [186] made magneto-liposomes composed of DPPC/CH/DSPE-PEG200, in which encapsulated MNPs were loaded with doxorubicin. An in vivo study was performed on a mouse glioma model irradiated in an AMF (field intensity of 30 kA/m, frequency of 3.5 MHz) twice weekly for 28 days. Complete tumor regression was achieved. Polymersomes are characterized by a low micelle concentration, being much more thermodynamically stable than liposomes [187]. They can be easily combined with MNPs. Numerous studies related to these systems in combination with MHT have proven the treatment’s efficiency on different cancer cell lines [188,189]. As in the other cases, the necessity of investigation performed on GBM cell lines or animal models needs to be more analyzed, giving more space in science for development in this direction. Injectable hydrogels represent a viable way to deliver MNPs and chemotherapy. Usually, the gel is first made and then subcutaneously implanted at the tumor site. This gel blocks the MNPs and drugs inside it, preventing their leaching near the tumor. In practice, different types of hydrogels are used, such as polymeric-, α-cyclodextrin-, peptide-, and lipogel-based. One of the most investigated materials combined with MHT are polymers and α-cyclodextrin that are used for in vivo models [190,191].
It can be noticed that the heat effect on different chemotherapeutic drugs was reported to be synergistic (taxanes, fluorouracil), supra-additive (platinum-based agents and alkylating drugs), and threshold behavior (doxorubicin) [192]. Table 5 presents some examples found in the literature related to the combination of MHT and chemotherapy [150,193,194].
MHT combined with light-based therapy includes the association with photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT). Sometimes, MHT based on MNPs can exhibit an important disadvantage, which is low power absorption efficiency in the case of tumors localized deep inside the tissue [36]. To increase the quantity of heat, applying a strong magnetic field that is not included in the therapeutic range or increasing the MNP quantity with related toxicity issues is required [195,196]. The PTT exploits the light possibility to induce heat. This phenomenon is based on the properties of some materials that absorb light; then, electrons are excited to a superior energy state, and non-radiative processes such as heat release appear. In practice, the light-absorbing materials are phthalocyanine, cyanine, rhodamine groups (PDT) [197], semiconducting materials (graphene or carbon nanotubes), and nanoparticles that can absorb the light through a Surface Plasmon Resonance phenomenon, which is associated with coherent oscillations of metallic electrons localized in the conduction band that are in resonance at light frequencies (PTT) [198,199]. One can enumerate metals such as gold (Au), silver (Ag), and palladium (Pd) or chalcogenides (Cu2-xE, with E sulfur (S), selenium (Se), or tellurium (Te)). The last-mentioned materials can absorb near-infrared light (NIR) in the wavelength domain of 650 nm ÷ 950 nm and convert it into heat [200,201,202]. Unfortunately, PTT as a single therapy cannot be applied to tumors localized deep within healthy tissue due to the limited penetration possibility of NIR light (10 mm) [203]. Combining plasmonic materials with magnetic ones seems to be an appropriate strategy, making it possible for the toxicity associated with MNPs or plasmonic compounds to be reduced to a minimum. In addition, a higher heat value can be achieved and locally applied to accelerate tumor volume reduction. Usually, MNPs are inoculated through intratumoral deposition, and then laser light and AMF irradiation are applied. The combined therapy of MHT and PTT was included in a few studies regarding GBM treatment. Additionally, this dual heating strategy was successfully applied to human squamous carcinoma (A431), prostate cancer (PC3), and ovarian carcinoma (SKOV3) cell lines [204]. The positive results obtained in other types of cancer proved the potential of this combined therapy as an appropriate candidate for GBM’s possible cure. Table 5 provides examples of in vitro investigations related to GBM cell lines and the MHT+PTT combined strategy [140,205,206].
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has, as its primary mechanism, the apparition at the tumor site of toxic free radicals such as OH−, HO2−, O2− and singlet oxygen 1O2 as a result of photobiological and photochemical processes, which are due to the interaction of a photosensitizer (PS) (porphyrin) and the oxygen existing in living tissue under the effect of a given light wavelength [36,207,208,209]. In clinical trials with FDA approval, a porphyrin-based photosensitizer called Photofrin® is used [210,211]. If PDT is combined with MHT, many reactive oxidative species (ROS) are produced due to PS action and MNPs’ intrinsic toxicity. A main drawback of this combined strategy is that porphyrin remains in the human body for a long time and generates increased light sensibility, so it is recommended that the quantity of this drug be reduced. This is possible when the PDT effect is increased by the heat generated during MHT treatment. This process is obtained by combining the MNPs with a photosensitizer and injecting the resulting material at the tumor site. Then, the tumor will be simultaneously irradiated by light and AMF to activate ROS generation. Table 5 details some studies that use a combination of PDT and MHT to prove its efficiency with glioma cell lines [212,213]. There is a lack of literature regarding PDT and MHT combined therapy in conjunction with in vitro or in vivo studies related to GBM. However, this approach proved to be very efficient in reducing tumor sizes made of SKOV3 xenografts [214] by using a laser (wavelength of 650 nm, laser power of 100 mW/cm2) and an AMF (f = 111 Hz, H = 23.8 kA/m) for 30 min. In addition, Curcio et al. [215] prepared γ-Fe2O3 nanoflowers with a spiky copper sulfide shell (Fe2O3@CuS) characterized by an increased near-infrared (NIR) absorption coefficient adequate for PDT and PTT application. The heating efficiency of MHT and PTT was combined with PDT’s unique characteristics to increase the released ROS species. The treatment efficiency was tested based on in vitro and in vivo investigations performed on human prostate adenocarcinoma PC3 cells and on 30 pathogen-free 9-week-old immunodeficient athymic nude mice with surgically induced tumors. During MHT analysis, an AMF with a frequency of 471 kHz and a field of 18 mT was applied. Higher SAR values of about 350 W/g were achieved. For the PTT step, a laser (1064 nm, 0.3 W/cm2) was used. The heat produced via PTT was combined with that induced through MHT. For PDT therapy, the laser power was decreased to 1 W/cm2 to avoid the phenomenon of ROS signal saturation. The authors observed that, for the in vivo study, the PTT was much more efficient than MHT in the cases in which the tumor was placed in the skin vicinity, while for the tumors localized very deep inside the healthy tissue, MHT was preferred. In addition, applying the PDT strategy led to the highest tumor reduction. Considering the studies performed on cancer cell lines other than glioma, one may assume these combined strategies are a viable solution to address the GBM problem in a much more detailed analysis. Multi-therapeutic strategies are of utmost importance because they benefit from multiple physiological ways to kill cancer cells faster and in a higher amount.
Last but not least, MHT was combined with immunotherapy in some in vitro or in vivo studies that analyzed the treatment efficiency in a direct relationship with GBM cell lines or solid tumors (Table 5). Cancer immunotherapy enhances the human or animal body to fight against the tumor and even to destroy it [36,216,217,218,219]. In some cases, the immune system cell infiltration into the tumor activates the recruitment of innate and/or adaptive immune system cells, which suppress the tumor action [220]. From the innate immune system cells, one can mention macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils, natural killer cells, basophils, mast cells, and eosinophils, and it can be noticed that the action of these cells does not require specific stimulation through antigens [221]. On the other hand, the cells included in the adaptive immune system, such as T and B lymphocytes, need an antigen-presenting cell at the tumor place to be activated and to transform into antigen-specific B or T-cells, which can effectively kill the cancer cells, and to maintain long-time host immunity [222]. In [223,224,225], it is stated that the presence of heat can control and activate the intratumoral immune system cell action, increase interleukin generation, and favor the circulation of immune cells via tumors based on lymph nodes. This fact is due to the dilation of blood vessels under the heat effect in the tumor vicinity. In the cases in which hyperthermia was applied in the neighborhood of cancer tumors, some damage-associated molecular patterns antigens that can be recognized by tumor-associated dendritic cells and macrophages are released [226,227]. One of the most important damage-associated molecular patterns antigens are heat shock proteins, which result from necrotic cells and transform tumor-associated dendritic cells into antigen-presenting cells that activate other types of immune cells such as T-cells and natural killer cells [228] [229]. Another similar strategy consists of the modality of calreticulin protein release, which is a powerful immunostimulatory protein generated as a response to induced apoptotic stress conditions [230]. Chauhan et al. [231] made chitosan-coated Fe3O4 MNPs and analyzed the MHT effect and anti-tumor response of an ectopic tumor model of C6 glioma cells in rats. They injected the MNPs on days 1 and 7, and, after that, they noticed complete tumor reduction on day 32. The applied AMF has a frequency of 335 kHz and a magnetic field strength of 14 kA/m. Real-time gene expression tests of pro-inflammatory cytokines proved that the IL-6 activation process has an important effect on immunomodulation. Carter et al. [232] proved that only the application of MHT based on superparamagnetic MNPs can trigger the activation of immune system cells. After an in vivo experiment consisting of a GL261 murine glioma model and injection of Perimag-COOH MNPs directly into the tumor, cytotoxic T cells and increased production were activated in the animal lymph nodes. The authors concluded that MHT is a treatment that not only produces cancer cell death but also activates the animal’s immune system to fight against cancer, thus inducing long-term immunity. Regarding the heat shock protein effect, we have already presented a vital study [132] that underlines the positive cumulative effect of MHT and immunotherapy with potential clinical translation into GBM treatment.
Other immunotherapy and MHT combined strategies based on cytokines were developed. These signaling molecules regulate the immune system and control inflammation by increasing the cytotoxic T lymphocyte effect. Anti-cancer therapies include the use of interferon (IFN), colony-stimulating factors, and tumor necrosis factors. Unfortunately, this single strategy based on cytokines proved to have limited positive effects in clinical trials due to the short half-life of cytokines and narrow therapeutic window [126]. Instead, combining cytokines with MHT [145] proved to be an efficient way to tackle GBM.
From the studies presented in this section, it is clear that MHT, in combination with other therapies, holds significant promise for curing GBM. We believe that in the near future, these combined strategies, especially those involving light-based therapy and immunotherapy, will be developed and adopted in clinical trials. These combinations not only allow for a decrease in MNP dose and a reduction in related toxicity associated with transition metal ions but also address multiple mechanisms based on different physical phenomena, which can work together to effectively eliminate cancer cells. Figure 8 shows some combined strategies used in GBM treatment.
Table 5.
Relevant literature studies related to GBM treatment based on combinations between MHT and other therapies.
Table 5.
Relevant literature studies related to GBM treatment based on combinations between MHT and other therapies.
| Combined Therapy Type | Implant/MNPs | AMF Conditions | Therapy Parameters | Study Type | Cell Line/Animal Characteristics/Humans | Remarks | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT + MHT | Fe-Pt implant, 1.8 mm diameter, 15 ÷ 20 mm length | 240 kHz/induction coil with a 30 cm diameter | Interstitial hyperthermia temperature between 44 ÷ 46 °C and 30 ÷ 60 min/2 or 3 per week combined with RT | In vivo | Human/7 cases of metastatic brain tumor | Interstitial magnetic hyperthermia combined with RT is an efficient way to treat intracranial metastases. Complete healing in 2 patients | [170] |
| Silver nanoparticle (AgNP)-mediated RT with MHT based on γ–Fe2O3 MNPs | 40 kHz/100 kA/m | Hyperthermia temperature of 42 °C for 15 min/Combined with 0 ÷ 6 Gy | In vitro | U251 | Radio- and thermos-sensitivity on U251. The lowest cell survival rate was obtained under AMF application and ionizing radiation of 6 Gy | [171] | |
| Fe3O4 core of 12 nm diameter with aminosilane coating/Magnetic fluid MFL AS1 (NanoTherm® AS1; MagForce Nanotechnologies) with 112 mg/mL MNPs concentration | 100 kHz/2 ÷ 15 kA/m | Hyperthermia temperature of 43 °C/six semi-weekly sessions/1 h each thermotherapy session/Combined with 30 Gy biologically equivalent median dose administrated fractionated as 5 × 2 Gy per week | In vivo–Clinical trial | Human/66 patients (59 with recurrent GBM) | An important increase in the overall survival rate was noticed in the case of this combined therapy that uses a low radiotherapy dosage | [169] | |
| Chemotherapy + MHT | Fe3O4 MNPs and 5-FU were encapsulated within chitosan nanoparticles | 180 kHz/35 kA/m/10 kW induction heating system coupled with a 9-turn coil 5 cm in diameter | First MHT was applied for 20 min followed by 2 MHT sessions with a 1-day pause | In vitro | A-172 | The combined nanoparticles were successfully internalized by A-172 cells, and, through a combination of the two treatments, cell apoptosis was obtained. Apoptosis was confirmed by densification of the cytoplasm, cell shrinkage, and tighter packing of cell organelles | [193] |
| Magnetic core–shell MNP-mediated delivery of a mitochondria-targeting pro-apoptotic amphipathic tail-anchoring peptide (ATAP) | 300 kHz/5 kA/m | A temperature of 43 °C was obtained after the MNPs-ATAP-treated cells were subjected to MHT for 45 min | In vitro | U87 MG | The MNPs-ATAP system in combination with MHT conducted to an important apoptotic effect related to induced mitochondrial dysfunction of cancer cells | [194] | |
| Magnetoliposomes with encapsulated doxorubicin | 3.5 MHz/30 kA/m/applied 20 min | At a temperature of 43 °C, the encapsulated chemotherapeutic drug was released in a guided way | In vitro/In vivo | C6/Adult Sprague Dawley rat | The in vitro experiments demonstrated that the cell viability decreased to 79.2% for only MHT treatment, to 47.4% for only doxorubicin effect, and for a combination of the two strategies, it reached a value of 17.3%. Regarding the in vivo study, an enhanced effect of tumor volume growth inhibition followed by a full regression of the tumor was achieved | [150] | |
| PTT + MHT+ Immunotherapy | Core–shell Fe3O4@Au MNPs combined with chemotherapeutic antibody Cetuximab (C225) | 230 kHz/30 A/3 cycles of AMF | AMF cycles were combined with three irradiation sessions with NIR laser light (635 nm, 0.3 W/cm2)/30 min each/24 h pause | In vitro | U251 | In comparison with the control group, tumor growth was inhibited in the case of the combined strategy. The high affinity of C225 towards cancer cell receptors generated increased cell uptake for MNPs | [205] |
| PTT + MHT | Citric-acid-coated iron oxide MNPs that were encapsulated in cationic liposomes containing 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC), dimethyldioctadecyl ammonium bromide (DDAB), cholesterol (CH), cationic lipid dimethyldioctadecyl ammonium bromide (DDAB) | 5 kHz/- | AMF session was combined with NIR laser action (808 nm, 1.8 W/cm2). A temperature of 56 °C was achieved | In vitro | U87 | Cationic magnetoliposomes exhibited a promising effect in killing the cancer cells when PTT was combined with MHT | [206] |
| Mn-doped magnetic nanoclusters | 405 kHz/168 Oe/20 min | AMF session was combined with the effect of a near-infrared continuous laser (750 nm) | In vitro | C6 | The combination between MHT and PTT generated an increased toxicity to cancer cells by ROS-mediated apoptosis. The SAR value of the Mn-doped nanocluster was about 600 W/g | [140] | |
| PDT + MHT | Chloroaluminum-phthalocyanine (0.05 mg/mL) encapsulated-magnetic nanoemulsion | 1 MHz/40 Oe | The MHT therapy was combined with PDT (670 nm wavelength, 700 mJ/cm2 energy density) | In vitro | U87 MG, T98G | Cell viability was found to decrease by 70% for this combined strategy, and only by 15% for MHT applied as single therapy | [212,213] |
| Immunotherapy + MHT | Fe3O4 liposomes in conjunction with HSP70 | 118 kHz/384 Oe | The MHT treatment was combined with immunotherapy based on HSP70 | In vitro/In vivo | T-9/Fisher rat | Important tumor regression combined with enhanced tumor immunity was achieved | [132] |
| Fe3O4 liposomes in conjunction with TNF–α gene therapy | 118 kHz/384 Oe | The MHT treatment was combined with immunotherapy based on TNF-α | In vitro/In vivo | U251-SP/mice | The TNF–α property to inhibit neovascular apparition and to damage the GBM blood vessels combined with MHT led to efficient tumor volume reduction | [145] | |
| Fe3O4 MNPs combined with targeted heat shock protein 90 inhibition (HSP 90) (17-DMAG) | 335 kHz/175 Oe | HSP90 was overexpressed for both cell lines compared to control samples under the MHT effect | In vitro | C6, U87-MG | Through the use of 17-DMAG, an HSP90 inhibition was noticed, and glioma cell sensitivity to MHT was increased | [219] |
5. Clinical Studies of MHT in the Case of Patients with GBM
As we have underlined in previous sections for MHT treatment application, it is undoubtedly necessary to have an AMF generator [233]. The solenoidal coil represents the main component of different developed systems. The target region is introduced inside the coil and placed under a uniform magnetic field. Today, commercially available coils are produced by MagForce Nanotechnologies AG, Berlin, Germany, and Nanoscale Biomagnetics, Zaragoza, Spain [46,141,143,234]. It can be estimated that the coils that were used for in vitro or in vivo studies can be modified to be applied in the case of humans, but, unfortunately, in almost all the cases, important problems consisting of the fact that field uniformity is limited to the central zone of the coils and asymmetric field distribution could occur through transverse planes are identified [235]. A coil that has planar turns, field concentrator pieces placed on coil ends, and wider leads was designed by Bordelon et al. [235] to produce a highly uniform magnetic field. The hyperthermia and thermoablation system called MFH 300F Nanoactivator®, MagForce Nanotechnologies AG, Berlin, Germany, has been approved in the European Union for the clinical application of MHT to different types of oncological diseases [169,236,237,238,239,240]. This device generates a uniform AMF with a frequency of 100 kHz and a magnetic field strength of 18 kA/m. In addition, the field applicator has a diameter of 20 cm and can accommodate different types and shapes of tumors. Dedicated software for treatment planning, NanoPlan®, MagForce Nanotechnologies, is involved for accurate temperature control and coupled with the AMF generator. At the European level, the quality assurance guidelines for superficial hyperthermia were established by the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology (ESHO) [241,242] and provide clinical conditions to link hyperthermia parameters to a tumor’s geometrical shape and size. All clinical trials must respect these regulations.
We have identified several clinical studies focusing on MHT therapy in human glioma patients. The first studies in this direction were conducted by Stea et al. [243,244,245] and Iacono et al. [246], which investigated, in a phase I clinical trial, the effect of MHT used in conjunction with RT in the case of human subjects with primary or recurrent GBM. Although these investigations do not report MNP use, they must be mentioned, considering their practical importance. In these studies, 28 patients received wire implants manufactured from Ni-4% wt. Si, intratumorally inserted. A number of 11 patients received only one MHT session for 60 min, and, in the case of the remaining 17 patients, two AMF irradiations were applied. An overall survival time of about 15 months for patients with GBM was reported. Three significant complications were identified by the authors: secondary hydrocephalus due to catheter insertion, intracranial hemorrhage at wire implantation, and pneumocephalus generated by incorrect suture operation. Unfortunately, one patient died due to the increased volume of the Ni-Si implant. Focal seizures and cerebral edema were reported as minor complications that occurred in the case of 11 patients. After MHT sessions were applied, a temperature of 42 °C was obtained in the tumor region with temperature sensors placed mainly in the tumor core (60%), followed by tumor margins (35%), and healthy tissue localized in the tumor vicinity (3.5%). The main conclusion of the studies was that the combination of MHT and RT seems to be adequate for treating GBM patients, but important morbidities associated with this treatment route must be considered. A follow-up investigation [245] demonstrated that, in the case of patients with primary high-grade glioma tumors, the combination of MHT and RT generated an increase in the survival rate compared to RT used as a single therapy. On the other hand, no noticeable benefits were reported by comparing these two strategies for patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. It was concluded that for humans with metastases, it is advisable to apply only RT as a single therapy. Kobayashi et al. [247] developed a ferromagnetic implant (Fe-Pt) with a low Curie temperature adequate for MHT application. A number of 25 patients with brain tumors (glioblastoma and astrocytoma grade II) were treated for a maximum time of 23 weeks with a variable number of MHT sessions between 10 and 46. The repetition of MHT treatment in safe conditions was possible in the case of 23 patients, with an average response rate of about 35%. Implant migration and non-uniform thermal field distribution were reported as shortcomings. Side effects such as modification of cancerous cell morphology, thrombosis, or vascular problems were noticed in the places found near the area with coagulative necrosis in the implant vicinity. The authors concluded that no important other major drawbacks occurred.
Considering the analyses mentioned above performed based on ferromagnetic implants, different studies involving the use of MNPs for MHT applications were performed to observe the treatment’s most important shortcomings and side effects. Maier-Hauff et al. [236] performed a clinical study for twelve patients with recurrent GBM and two patients with primary GBM. They used a commercially magnetic fluid of aminosilane-coated iron oxide MNPs produced by MagForce Nanotechnologies, Germany. A high ferromagnetic concentration of 112 mg of Fe/mL was dispersed in water and injected into the tumor. They combined the MHT route with external beam radiotherapy. A standard AMF system MFH 300F (frequency of 100 kHz and variable magnetic field strength of 2.5 ÷ 18 kA/m) was used. An average temperature of 44.6 °C was achieved in the tumor zone. Patients received an average number of six MHT sessions and a single fraction of 2 Gy of a radiotherapy series with a median number of 30 Gy. MHT was well tolerated by all the patients with minor or absent side effects. It was concluded that the combination of MHT and RT is a good strategy for GBM treatment. The same research group [169] conducted an important large clinical trial that led, in 2012, to the European approval of MHT as adjuvant therapy in conjunction with RT for recurrent GBM. In this clinical trial, 59 patients with recurrent GBM were included. A median overall survival rate determined from the first diagnostic moment until the first recurrence apparition was established to be 13.5 months (95%CI: 17.2 ÷ 29.2). Magnetite MNPs were involved in the MHT strategy, which was combined with fractioned stereotactic radiotherapy with a median dose of about 30 Gy. Minor side effects such as headache, fever, tachycardia, moderate hypertension, and convulsion were reported. Only 14 patients reported a temporary worsening of their preexisting hemiparesis. The main drawback of this study was the necessity of removing all the metallic implants from the patient’s head. The main conclusion of this study was that a higher median survival rate can be achieved by applying MHT and RT combined therapy [169]. A recent and innovative investigation was reported by Grauer et al. [248] who combined MHT with RT once again. This study was performed on six patients with recurrent GBM. After tumor resection, the cavity wall was coated with 2 ÷3 layers of MNPs based on a hydroxycellulose mesh and fibrin glue, which was found to be adequate for increasing the stability of MNPs and providing adequate fixation. Patients received six semi-weekly AMF irradiation sessions for 1 h followed by RT in the case of four persons at a dose of 39.6 Gy. Of the four patients who were administered combined therapy, two patients exhibited no signs of tumor recurrence after 23 months. The median survival rate was estimated at 6.25 months, and the median overall survival rate was about 8.15 months. It was observed that after 2 ÷5 months, some clinical symptoms were present. CT scans revealed prominent edema placed around MNPs. Dexamethasone was administrated, and, in some cases, it was necessary to remove the MNPs surgically. Based on histopathology analyses, it was concluded that necrosis occurred in the zones near the MNPs, and it was also evidenced by an immune response with macrophage infiltration. The treatment was considered to exhibit positive effects on patients with recurrent GBM, although an important inflammatory reaction was observed in the vicinity of the resection cavity. Figure 9 synthesizes the main clinical trials found in the literature regarding the MHT treatment involved in GBM.
It can be noticed that MHT analysis is characterized by a lack of large phase III clinical trials that can explore the MHT effects in conjunction with chemotherapy and RT. Much more research is still necessary to establish a correct treatment route to increase the median survival rate.
6. Challenges and Future Perspectives
Our research has identified significant challenges in the field of MHT. The first is related to choosing the correct MNP ratio to be administered to achieve a moderate heating effect in the tumor zone. Another issue is linked to a proper understanding of the combining mechanisms, which occur in the case of MHT and other oncological approaches, to find adequate protocols to address different types of tumors and personalize the treatment for each patient’s anatomy. Many in vivo studies must be performed to establish a direct link between the magnitude of heat and the MNP ratio deposited in the GBM tumor and the value of MNP concentration needed in other body zones with metastases.
These challenges must be addressed and solved as future perspectives in GBM treatment by applying the MHT protocol. First of all, regarding the correct dose in the metastases, a new administration procedure must be developed. An answer can come from combining immunotherapy and MHT through the adaptation of immune system cells to transport MNPs and introduce them easily and quickly into the tumor microenvironment. Another research direction could be the development of functionalized MNPs capable of enhancing the therapeutic effect, as well as increasing the MNPs’ action time inside the tumors. By involving chemotherapy and immunotherapy, a remote heating control correlated with drug release can be locally applied, avoiding the systemic adverse effects that can occur in the case of classical approaches. In the case of combination with RT, radioisotopes can be associated with MNPs, permitting, in this way, the elimination of external radiation sources. Although some studies have been conducted, much more research on in vivo animal models must be carried out to establish a treatment protocol.
An important future direction can be considered in MNP manufacturing, which has a different chemical composition from classical iron oxides, which can enhance ROS and metallic ion delivery directly into the tumor to obtain faster cancerous cell death. In addition, researchers in the field must consider the development of MNPs characterized by an optimal interaction process with cells and reduced toxicity that is safe and without significant side effects, permitting tumor evolution monitoring with MRI devices.
Another future perspective must focus on the diminishing MNP ratio and its interaction with fluids with different viscosities because the tumor environment is complex and presents modified corporal fluids that can greatly influence MNP movements and magnetic behavior.
Another important direction must address easy, feasible, and large-scale production methods of MNPs. Although the experiments proved a high SAR value for MNPs manufactured through non-hydrolytic methods, it is hard to implement such technologies at the industrial level. Hydrolytic and non-hydrolytic methods must consider the use of biocompatible substances and a green route of production with no harmful environmental effects.
Considering all the challenges and future perspectives presented in this section, MHT treatment for GBM must be further developed to search for improved solutions, and many more experimental studies are necessary.
7. Conclusions
Glioblastoma treatment can be performed based on magnetic hyperthermia induced by magnetic nanoparticles under the influence of an external alternative magnetic field. It can be foreseen that MHT and other therapy routes can be combined successfully to treat primary or recurrent tumors.
A few possibilities are associated with GBM treatment based on MHT that are approved for human trials. Many non-commercial MNPs developed in different laboratories have proven to be highly efficient in inducing the death of brain cancer cells. These MNPs, characterized by their good magnetic properties and increased SAR value in the biological limit conditions for the applied AMF, must be further included in clinical trials.
The development of new therapeutic strategies, which have to include other treatment directions such as immunotherapy and chemotherapy, with devoted attention to an adequate MNP ratio related to the tumor’s nature and shape, remote particle transport control, and local drug release when necessary, should be addressed.
It can be anticipated that many patients worldwide will shortly benefit from MHT therapy.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, V.M., G.P., I.A., I.V.N., A.A., A.G.M., J.V.R., A.D.B., A.R.A.-M., P.M. and H.G.; methodology, V.M., G.P., I.A., I.V.N., A.A., A.G.M., S.A.L., J.V.R., A.D.B., A.R.A.-M. and H.G.; software, G.P., I.V.N., A.A., A.G.M., S.A.L., A.R.A.-M. and P.M.; validation, V.M., G.P., I.A., A.A., A.G.M., S.A.L., J.V.R., A.D.B., A.R.A.-M., P.M. and H.G.; formal analysis, V.M., G.P., I.A., I.V.N., J.V.R., A.D.B., P.M. and H.G.; investigation, V.M., I.A., I.V.N., A.A., A.G.M., J.V.R., A.D.B., A.R.A.-M., P.M. and H.G.; resources, I.V.N.; data curation, V.M., I.A., A.A., A.G.M., J.V.R., A.D.B. and H.G.; writing—original draft preparation, V.M., A.R.A.-M., H.G. and G.P.; writing—review and editing, V.M., G.P., I.A., A.A., A.G.M., S.A.L., J.V.R., A.D.B., P.M. and H.G.; visualization, G.P., I.A., A.A., A.G.M., J.V.R., A.D.B., A.R.A.-M. and P.M.; supervision, I.A., A.A., A.G.M. and A.R.A.-M.; funding acquisition, I.V.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from the National Program for Research of the National Association of Technical Universities–GNAC ARUT 2023—Project number 28 /9.10.2023, ID 220235135.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Nagai, H.; Kim, Y.H. Cancer Prevention from the Perspective of Global Cancer Burden Patterns. J. Thorac. Dis. 2017, 9, 448–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Siegel, R.L.; Giaquinto, A.N.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024, 74, 12–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- European Cancer Statistics: A Comprehensive Overview. Available online: https://beatcancer.eu/resources/science/article/european-cancer-statistics-a-comprehensive-overview/ (accessed on 8 May 2024).
- Why Inaction Could Raise Cancer Deaths in Africa to 1m per Year. Available online: https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/science-health/why-inaction-could-raise-cancer-deaths-in-africa-to-1m-per-year-4520486 (accessed on 8 May 2024).
- Rajan, A.; Sahu, N.K. Review on Magnetic Nanoparticle-Mediated Hyperthermia for Cancer Therapy. J. Nanopart. Res. 2020, 22, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coombes, R.C. Drug Testing in the Patient: Toward Personalized Cancer Treatment. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 284ps10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaupel, P.; Mayer, A. Hypoxia in Cancer: Significance and Impact on Clinical Outcome. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007, 26, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, A.C.; Ashley, D.M.; López, G.Y.; Malinzak, M.; Friedman, H.S.; Khasraw, M. Management of Glioblastoma: State of the Art and Future Directions. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stupp, R.; Mason Warren, P.; van den Bent Martin, J.; Weller, M.; Fisher, B.; Taphoorn Martin, J.B.; Belanger, K.; Brandes Alba, A.; Marosi, C.; Bogdahn, U.; et al. Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alcantara Llaguno, S.R.; Wang, Z.; Sun, D.; Chen, J.; Xu, J.; Kim, E.; Hatanpaa, K.J.; Raisanen, J.M.; Burns, D.K.; Johnson, J.E.; et al. Adult Lineage-Restricted CNS Progenitors Specify Distinct Glioblastoma Subtypes. Cancer Cell 2015, 28, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poot, E.; Maguregui, A.; Brunton, V.G.; Sieger, D.; Hulme, A.N. Targeting Glioblastoma through Nano- and Micro-Particle-Mediated Immune Modulation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2022, 72, 116913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verhaak, R.G.W.; Hoadley, K.A.; Purdom, E.; Wang, V.; Qi, Y.; Wilkerson, M.D.; Miller, C.R.; Ding, L.; Golub, T.; Mesirov, J.P.; et al. Integrated Genomic Analysis Identifies Clinically Relevant Subtypes of Glioblastoma Characterized by Abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 2010, 17, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Broekman, M.L.; Maas, S.L.N.; Abels, E.R.; Mempel, T.R.; Krichevsky, A.M.; Breakefield, X.O. Multidimensional Communication in the Microenvirons of Glioblastoma. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2018, 14, 482–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yao, M.; Li, S.; Wu, X.; Diao, S.; Zhang, G.; He, H.; Bian, L.; Lu, Y. Cellular Origin of Glioblastoma and Its Implication in Precision Therapy. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 15, 737–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ostrom, Q.T.; Gittleman, H.; Truitt, G.; Boscia, A.; Kruchko, C.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2011–2015. Neuro Oncol. 2018, 20, iv1–iv86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leece, R.; Xu, J.; Ostrom, Q.T.; Chen, Y.; Kruchko, C.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S. Global Incidence of Malignant Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors by Histology, 2003–2007. Neuro Oncol. 2017, 19, 1553–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, J.L.; Schwartzbaum, J.A.; Wrensch, M.; Wiemels, J.L. Epidemiology of Brain Tumors. Neurol. Clin. 2007, 25, 867–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boraschi, D.; Castellano, L.R.C.; Italiani, P. Editorial: Interaction of Nanomaterials with the Immune System: Role in Nanosafety and Nanomedicine. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchesan, S.; Prato, M. Nanomaterials for (Nano)Medicine. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 147–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paltanea, G.; Manescu, V.; Antoniac, I.; Antoniac, A.; Nemoianu, I.V.; Robu, A.; Dura, H. A Review of Biomimetic and Biodegradable Magnetic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering and Oncology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antoniac, I. Biologically Responsive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering; Springer Series in Biomaterials Science and Engineering; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Volume 1, ISBN 978-1-4614-4327-8. [Google Scholar]
- Mohan, A.G.; Ciurea, A.V.; Antoniac, I.; Manescu, V.; Bodog, A.; Maghiar, O.; Marcut, L.; Ghiurau, A.; Bodog, F. Cranioplasty after Two Giant Intraosseous Angiolipomas of the Cranium: Case Report and Literature Review. Healthcare 2022, 10, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cojocaru, F.D.; Balan, V.; Popa, M.I.; Lobiuc, A.; Antoniac, A.; Antoniac, I.V.; Verestiuc, L. Biopolymers—Calcium Phosphates Composites with Inclusions of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 125, 612–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chaturvedi, V.K.; Singh, A.; Singh, V.K.; Singh, M.P. Cancer Nanotechnology: A New Revolution for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Curr. Drug Metab. 2019, 20, 416–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsherbini, A.A.; Saber, M.; Aggag, M.; El-Shahawy, A.; Shokier, H.A. Laser and Radiofrequency-Induced Hyperthermia Treatment via Gold-Coated Magnetic Nanocomposites. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 2155–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perlman, O.; Weitz, I.S.; Azhari, H. Target Visualisation and Microwave Hyperthermia Monitoring Using Nanoparticle-Enhanced Transmission Ultrasound (NETUS). Int. J. Hyperth. 2018, 34, 773–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaczmarek, K.; Hornowski, T.; Dobosz, B.; Józefczak, A. Influence of Magnetic Nanoparticles on the Focused Ultrasound Hyperthermia. Materials 2018, 11, 1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nozhat, Z.; Wang, S.; Mushtaq, A.; Deng, T.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Kong, X. Temozolomide Loaded Fe3O4@SiO2 Nanoparticles for MR-Imaging Directed Synergistic Therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme in Vitro. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 38, 108289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Fèvre, R.; Durand-Dubief, M.; Chebbi, I.; Mandawala, C.; Lagroix, F.; Valet, J.-P.; Idbaih, A.; Adam, C.; Delattre, J.-Y.; Schmitt, C.; et al. Enhanced Antitumor Efficacy of Biocompatible Magnetosomes for the Magnetic Hyperthermia Treatment of Glioblastoma. Theranostics 2017, 7, 4618–4631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.; Muroski, M.E.; Petit, D.C.M.C.; Mansell, R.; Vemulkar, T.; Morshed, R.A.; Han, Y.; Balyasnikova, I.V.; Horbinski, C.M.; Huang, X.; et al. Rotating Magnetic Field Induced Oscillation of Magnetic Particles for in Vivo Mechanical Destruction of Malignant Glioma. J. Control. Release 2016, 223, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutz, S.; Hergt, R. Magnetic Nanoparticle Heating and Heat Transfer on a Microscale: Basic Principles, Realities and Physical Limitations of Hyperthermia for Tumour Therapy. Int. J. Hyperth. 2013, 29, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gavrila, H.; Chiriac, H.; Ciureanu, P.; Ionita, V.; Yelon, A. Magnetism Tenhic Si Aplicat; Editura Academiei Romane: Bucharest, Romania, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Manescu Paltanea, V.; Paltanea, G.; Antoniac, I.; Vasilescu, M. Magnetic Nanoparticles Used in Oncology. Materials 2021, 14, 5948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gavilán, H.; Avugadda, S.K.; Fernández-Cabada, T.; Soni, N.; Cassani, M.; Mai, B.T.; Chantrell, R.; Pellegrino, T. Magnetic Nanoparticles and Clusters for Magnetic Hyperthermia: Optimizing Their Heat Performance and Developing Combinatorial Therapies to Tackle Cancer. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 11614–11667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruta, S.; Chantrell, R.; Hovorka, O. Unified Model of Hyperthermia via Hysteresis Heating in Systems of Interacting Magnetic Nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosensweig, R.E. Heating Magnetic Fluid with Alternating Magnetic Field. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2002, 252, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shliomis, M.I.; Stepanov, V.I. Theory of the Dynamic Susceptibility of Magnetic Fluids. In Advances in Chemical Physics; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1994; pp. 1–30. ISBN 978-0-470-14146-5. [Google Scholar]
- Fannin, P.C. An Experimental Observation of the Dynamic Behaviour of Ferrofluids. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1994, 136, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres, T.E.; Lima, E.; Calatayud, M.P.; Sanz, B.; Ibarra, A.; Fernández-Pacheco, R.; Mayoral, A.; Marquina, C.; Ibarra, M.R.; Goya, G.F. The Relevance of Brownian Relaxation as Power Absorption Mechanism in Magnetic Hyperthermia. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mehdaoui, B.; Meffre, A.; Carrey, J.; Lachaize, S.; Lacroix, L.; Gougeon, M.; Chaudret, B.; Respaud, M. Optimal Size of Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 4573–4581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chantrell, R.W.; Walmsley, N.; Gore, J.; Maylin, M. Calculations of the Susceptibility of Interacting Superparamagnetic Particles. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 63, 024410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mamiya, H. Recent Advances in Understanding Magnetic Nanoparticles in AC Magnetic Fields and Optimal Design for Targeted Hyperthermia. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013, 752973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hergt, R.; Dutz, S.; Müller, R.; Zeisberger, M. Magnetic Particle Hyperthermia: Nanoparticle Magnetism and Materials Development for Cancer Therapy. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2006, 18, S2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thiesen, B.; Jordan, A. Clinical Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Hyperthermia. Int. J. Hyperth. 2008, 24, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahmoudi, K.; Bouras, A.; Bozec, D.; Ivkov, R.; Hadjipanayis, C. Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy for the Treatment of Glioblastoma: A Review of the Therapy’s History, Efficacy and Application in Humans. Int. J. Hyperth. 2018, 34, 1316–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obaidat, I.M.; Issa, B.; Haik, Y. Magnetic Properties of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Efficient Hyperthermia. Nanomaterials 2015, 5, 63–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bordet, A.; Lacroix, L.-M.; Fazzini, P.-F.; Carrey, J.; Soulantica, K.; Chaudret, B. Magnetically Induced Continuous CO2 Hydrogenation Using Composite Iron Carbide Nanoparticles of Exceptionally High Heating Power. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2016, 55, 15894–15898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meffre, A.; Mehdaoui, B.; Kelsen, V.; Fazzini, P.F.; Carrey, J.; Lachaize, S.; Respaud, M.; Chaudret, B. A Simple Chemical Route toward Monodisperse Iron Carbide Nanoparticles Displaying Tunable Magnetic and Unprecedented Hyperthermia Properties. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4722–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.-H.; Jang, J.-T.; Choi, J.-S.; Moon, S.H.; Noh, S.-H.; Kim, J.-W.; Kim, J.-G.; Kim, I.-S.; Park, K.I.; Cheon, J. Exchange-Coupled Magnetic Nanoparticles for Efficient Heat Induction. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caruntu, D.; Caruntu, G.; O’Connor, C.J. Magnetic Properties of Variable-Sized Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Synthesized from Non-Aqueous Homogeneous Solutions of Polyols. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, 5801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradhan, P.; Giri, J.; Banerjee, R.; Bellare, J.; Bahadur, D. Cellular Interactions of Lauric Acid and Dextran-Coated Magnetite Nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 311, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roca, A.G.; Morales, M.P.; O’Grady, K.; Serna, C.J. Structural and Magnetic Properties of Uniform Magnetite Nanoparticles Prepared by High Temperature Decomposition of Organic Precursors. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 2783–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guardia, P.; Labarta, A.; Batlle, X. Tuning the Size, the Shape, and the Magnetic Properties of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guardia, P.; Riedinger, A.; Nitti, S.; Pugliese, G.; Marras, S.; Genovese, A.; Materia, M.E.; Lefevre, C.; Manna, L.; Pellegrino, T. One Pot Synthesis of Monodisperse Water Soluble Iron Oxide Nanocrystals with High Values of the Specific Absorption Rate. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 4426–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guardia, P.; Di Corato, R.; Lartigue, L.; Wilhelm, C.; Espinosa, A.; Garcia-Hernandez, M.; Gazeau, F.; Manna, L.; Pellegrino, T. Water-Soluble Iron Oxide Nanocubes with High Values of Specific Absorption Rate for Cancer Cell Hyperthermia Treatment. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 3080–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Das, R.; Alonso, J.; Nemati Porshokouh, Z.; Kalappattil, V.; Torres, D.; Phan, M.-H.; Garaio, E.; García, J.Á.; Sanchez Llamazares, J.L.; Srikanth, H. Tunable High Aspect Ratio Iron Oxide Nanorods for Enhanced Hyperthermia. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 10086–10093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, H.; Chen, B.; Jiao, X.; Jiang, Z.; Qin, Z.; Chen, D. Solvothermal Synthesis of Tunable Electroactive Magnetite Nanorods by Controlling the Side Reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 5476–5481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hugounenq, P.; Levy, M.; Alloyeau, D.; Lartigue, L.; Dubois, E.; Cabuil, V.; Ricolleau, C.; Roux, S.; Wilhelm, C.; Gazeau, F.; et al. Iron Oxide Monocrystalline Nanoflowers for Highly Efficient Magnetic Hyperthermia. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 15702–15712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Corato, R.; Espinosa, A.; Lartigue, L.; Tharaud, M.; Chat, S.; Pellegrino, T.; Ménager, C.; Gazeau, F.; Wilhelm, C. Magnetic Hyperthermia Efficiency in the Cellular Environment for Different Nanoparticle Designs. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 6400–6411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fantechi, E.; Roca, A.G.; Sepúlveda, B.; Torruella, P.; Estradé, S.; Peiró, F.; Coy, E.; Jurga, S.; Bastús, N.G.; Nogués, J.; et al. Seeded Growth Synthesis of Au–Fe3O4 Heterostructured Nanocrystals: Rational Design and Mechanistic Insights. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 4022–4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lak, A.; Niculaes, D.; Anyfantis, G.C.; Bertoni, G.; Barthel, M.J.; Marras, S.; Cassani, M.; Nitti, S.; Athanassiou, A.; Giannini, C.; et al. Facile Transformation of FeO/Fe3O4 Core-Shell Nanocubes to Fe3O4 via Magnetic Stimulation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walter, A.; Garofalo, A.; Parat, A.; Jouhannaud, J.; Pourroy, G.; Voirin, E.; Laurent, S.; Bonazza, P.; Taleb, J.; Billotey, C.; et al. Validation of a Dendron Concept to Tune Colloidal Stability, MRI Relaxivity and Bioelimination of Functional Nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 1484–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niculaes, D.; Lak, A.; Anyfantis, G.C.; Marras, S.; Laslett, O.; Avugadda, S.K.; Cassani, M.; Serantes, D.; Hovorka, O.; Chantrell, R.; et al. Asymmetric Assembling of Iron Oxide Nanocubes for Improving Magnetic Hyperthermia Performance. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 12121–12133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Persano, S.; Das, P.; Pellegrino, T. Magnetic Nanostructures as Emerging Therapeutic Tools to Boost Anti-Tumour Immunity. Cancers 2021, 13, 2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chaneac, C.; Duchateau, A.; Abou-Hassan, A. Synthetic Formation of Iron Oxides. In Iron Oxides; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 225–242. ISBN 978-3-527-69139-5. [Google Scholar]
- Park, S.; Kim, C.-H.; Lee, W.-J.; Sung, S.; Yoon, M.-H. Sol-Gel Metal Oxide Dielectrics for All-Solution-Processed Electronics. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2017, 114, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nkurikiyimfura, I.; Wang, Y.; Safari, B.; Nshingabigwi, E. Temperature-Dependent Magnetic Properties of Magnetite Nanoparticles Synthesized via Coprecipitation Method. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 846, 156344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, H.; Yan, B.; Li, C. Preparation and Magnetic Properties of Magnetite Nanoparticles by Sol-Gel Method. In Proceedings of the 2010 3rd International Nanoelectronics Conference (INEC), Hong Kong, China, 3–8 January 2010; pp. 888–889. [Google Scholar]
- Karaagac, O.; Kockar, H. Effect of Synthesis Parameters on the Properties of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2012, 25, 2777–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marciello, M.; Connord, V.; Veintemillas-Verdaguer, S.; Vergés, M.A.; Carrey, J.; Respaud, M.; Serna, C.J.; Morales, M.P. Large Scale Production of Biocompatible Magnetite Nanocrystals with High Saturation Magnetization Values through Green Aqueous Synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 5995–6004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vergés, M.A.; Costo, R.; Roca, A.G.; Marco, J.F.; Goya, G.F.; Serna, C.J.; Morales, M.P. Uniform and Water Stable Magnetite Nanoparticles with Diameters around the Monodomain–Multidomain Limit. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2008, 41, 134003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antoniac, I.; Cernea, A.; Petcu, C.; Laptoiu, D.; Tabaras, D.; Tecu, C.; Antoniac, A.; Gradinaru, S. Synthesis and Characterization of Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Produced for Drug Delivery in Viscoelastic Solution. Rev. Chim. 2020, 71, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laptoiu, D.; Marinescu, R.; Balan, C.; Antoniac, I. Rheologic Properties of Some Current Hyaluronic Acid Products for Viscosupplimentation—New Trends for Amelioration. Mater. Plast. 2015, 52, 500–503. [Google Scholar]
- Cavalu, S.; Kamel, E.; Laslo, V.; Fritea, L.; Costea, T.; Antoniac, I.V.; Vasile, E.; Antoniac, A.; Semenescu, A.; Mohan, A.; et al. Eco-Friendly, Facile and Rapid Way for Synthesis of Selenium Nanoparticles Production, Structural and Morphological Characterisation. Rev. Chim. 2018, 68, 2963–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antoniac, I.; Matei, E.; Munteanu, C. Advanced Eco-Technologies and Materials for Environmental and Health Application. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2016, 15, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, K.H.; Park, M.; Do, M.J.; Lee, N.; Ryu, J.H.; Kim, G.W.; Kim, C.; Park, T.G.; Hyeon, T. Chitosan Oligosaccharide-Stabilized Ferrimagnetic Iron Oxide Nanocubes for Magnetically Modulated Cancer Hyperthermia. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5266–5273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, X.; Ji, G.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Q.; Yang, Z.; Du, Y. Formation Mechanism and Magnetic Properties of Hollow Fe3O4 Nanospheres Synthesized without Any Surfactant. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 8658–8663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Yu, B.; Li, X.; Li, K. Facile Solvothermal Synthesis of Monodisperse Fe3O4 Nanocrystals with Precise Size Control of One Nanometre as Potential MRI Contrast Agents. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 2476–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadi, S.; Chia, C.-H.; Zakaria, S.; Saeedfar, K.; Asim, N. Synthesis of Fe3O4 Nanocrystals Using Hydrothermal Approach. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2012, 324, 4147–4150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, R.; Rinaldi-Montes, N.; Alonso, J.; Amghouz, Z.; Garaio, E.; García, J.A.; Gorria, P.; Blanco, J.A.; Phan, M.H.; Srikanth, H. Boosted Hyperthermia Therapy by Combined AC Magnetic and Photothermal Exposures in Ag/Fe3O4 Nanoflowers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 25162–25169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gonzales-Weimuller, M.; Zeisberger, M.; Krishnan, K.M. Size-Dependant Heating Rates of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321, 1947–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salas, G.; Casado, C.; Teran, F.J.; Miranda, R.; Serna, C.J.; Morales, M.P. Controlled Synthesis of Uniform Magnetite Nanocrystals with High-Quality Properties for Biomedical Applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 21065–21075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De La Presa, P.; Luengo, Y.; Multigner, M.; Costo, R.; Morales, M.P.; Rivero, G.; Hernando, A. Study of Heating Efficiency as a Function of Concentration, Size, and Applied Field in γ-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 25602–25610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kallumadil, M.; Tada, M.; Nakagawa, T.; Abe, M.; Southern, P.; Pankhurst, Q.A. Suitability of Commercial Colloids for Magnetic Hyperthermia. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321, 1509–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bullivant, J.P.; Zhao, S.; Willenberg, B.J.; Kozissnik, B.; Batich, C.D.; Dobson, J. Materials Characterization of Feraheme/Ferumoxytol and Preliminary Evaluation of Its Potential for Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 17501–17510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolen’ko, Y.V.; Bañobre-López, M.; Rodríguez-Abreu, C.; Carbó-Argibay, E.; Sailsman, A.; Piñeiro-Redondo, Y.; Cerqueira, M.F.; Petrovykh, D.Y.; Kovnir, K.; Lebedev, O.I.; et al. Large-Scale Synthesis of Colloidal Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Exhibiting High Heating Efficiency in Magnetic Hyperthermia. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 8691–8701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salas, G.; Camarero, J.; Cabrera, D.; Takacs, H.; Varela, M.; Ludwig, R.; Dähring, H.; Hilger, I.; Miranda, R.; Morales, M.D.P.; et al. Modulation of Magnetic Heating via Dipolar Magnetic Interactions in Monodisperse and Crystalline Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 19985–19994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avolio, M.; Gavilán, H.; Mazario, E.; Brero, F.; Arosio, P.; Lascialfari, A.; Puerto Morales, M. Elongated Magnetic Nanoparticles with High-Aspect Ratio: A Nuclear Relaxation and Specific Absorption Rate Investigation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 18741–18752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gavilán, H.; Simeonidis, K.; Myrovali, E.; Mazarío, E.; Chubykalo-Fesenko, O.; Chantrell, R.; Balcells, L.; Angelakeris, M.; Morales, M.P.; Serantes, D. How Size, Shape and Assembly of Magnetic Nanoparticles Give Rise to Different Hyperthermia Scenarios. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 15631–15646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, D.; Lee, N.; Park, M.; Kim, B.H.; An, K.; Hyeon, T. Synthesis of Uniform Ferrimagnetic Magnetite Nanocubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 454–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.; Christiansen, M.G.; Anikeeva, P. Maximizing Hysteretic Losses in Magnetic Ferrite Nanoparticles via Model-Driven Synthesis and Materials Optimization. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 8990–9000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.; Lee, S.; Oh, M.C.; Ahn, B. Alkaline Metal Reagent-Assisted Synthesis of Monodisperse Iron Oxide Nanostructures. Metals 2018, 8, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nemati, Z.; Alonso, J.; Martinez, L.M.; Khurshid, H.; Garaio, E.; Garcia, J.A.; Phan, M.H.; Srikanth, H. Enhanced Magnetic Hyperthermia in Iron Oxide Nano-Octopods: Size and Anisotropy Effects. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 8370–8379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caruntu, D.; Caruntu, G.; Chen, Y.; O’Connor, C.J.; Goloverda, G.; Kolesnichenko, V.L. Synthesis of Variable-Sized Nanocrystals of Fe3O4 with High Surface Reactivity. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 5527–5534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araújo-Barbosa, S.; Morales, M.A. Nanoparticles of Ni1−xCux Alloys for Enhanced Heating in Magnetic Hyperthermia. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 787, 935–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salati, A.; Ramazani, A.; Almasi Kashi, M. Tuning Hyperthermia Properties of FeNiCo Ternary Alloy Nanoparticles by Morphological and Magnetic Characteristics. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020, 498, 166172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathya, A.; Guardia, P.; Brescia, R.; Silvestri, N.; Pugliese, G.; Nitti, S.; Manna, L.; Pellegrino, T. CoxFe3–xO4 Nanocubes for Theranostic Applications: Effect of Cobalt Content and Particle Size. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 1769–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Sol-Fernández, S.; Portilla-Tundidor, Y.; Gutiérrez, L.; Odio, O.F.; Reguera, E.; Barber, D.F.; Morales, M.P. Flower-like Mn-Doped Magnetic Nanoparticles Functionalized with Avβ3-Integrin-Ligand to Efficiently Induce Intracellular Heat after Alternating Magnetic Field Exposition, Triggering Glioma Cell Death. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 26648–26663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bordet, A.; Landis, R.F.; Lee, Y.; Tonga, G.Y.; Soulantica, K.; Rotello, V.M.; Chaudret, B. Water-Dispersible and Biocompatible Iron Carbide Nanoparticles with High Specific Absorption Rate. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 2870–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, G.R.; Masullo, L.N. Manganese Toxicity. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Crossgrove, J.; Zheng, W. Manganese Toxicity upon Overexposure. NMR Biomed. 2004, 17, 544–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peres, T.V.; Schettinger, M.R.C.; Chen, P.; Carvalho, F.; Avila, D.S.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Manganese-Induced Neurotoxicity: A Review of Its Behavioral Consequences and Neuroprotective Strategies. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2016, 17, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulshreshtha, D.; Ganguly, J.; Jog, M. Manganese and Movement Disorders: A Review. JMD 2021, 14, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarnacka, B.; Jopowicz, A.; Maślińska, M. Copper, Iron, and Manganese Toxicity in Neuropsychiatric Conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tillman, L. Manganese Toxicity and Effects on Polarized Hepatocytes. Biosci. Horiz. Int. J. Stud. Res. 2018, 11, hzy012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrade, R.G.D.; Ferreira, D.; Veloso, S.R.S.; Santos-Pereira, C.; Castanheira, E.M.S.; Côrte-Real, M.; Rodrigues, L.R. Synthesis and Cytotoxicity Assessment of Citrate-Coated Calcium and Manganese Ferrite Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silveira-Alves Jr, E.; Bezerra, F.C.; Guerra, R.A.; Zufelato, N.; Martins, C.S.; Desordi, J.C.; Caires, A.R.L.; Bakuzis, A.F.; Gonçalves, P.J. Coupling of Cationic Porphyrins on Manganese Ferrite Nanoparticles: A Potential Multifunctional Nanostructure for Theranostics Applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2023, 438, 114551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anithkumar, M.; Rajan S, A.; Khan, A.; Kaczmarek, B.; Michalska-Sionkowska, M.; Łukowicz, K.; Osyczka, A.M.; Gupta, J.; Sahu, N.K. Glucose Oxidase-Loaded MnFe2O4 Nanoparticles for Hyperthermia and Cancer Starvation Therapy. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 2605–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casula, M.F.; Conca, E.; Bakaimi, I.; Sathya, A.; Materia, M.E.; Casu, A.; Falqui, A.; Sogne, E.; Pellegrino, T.; Kanaras, A.G. Manganese Doped-Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Clusters and Their Potential as Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hyperthermia. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 16848–16855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Del Sol Fernández, S.; Odio, O.F.; Crespo, P.M.; Pérez, E.O.; Salas, G.; Gutiérrez, L.; Morales, M.D.P.; Reguera, E. Tunable Control of the Structural Features and Related Physical Properties of MnxFe3–xO4 Nanoparticles: Implication on Their Heating Performance by Magnetic Hyperthermia. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 10110–10128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poon, K.; Gupta, A.; Price, W.S.; Zreiqat, H.; Singh, G. Manganese Oxide Nanoplatforms for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment: Progress, Challenges and Opportunities. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 500, 215548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patil, S.A.; Gavandi, T.C.; Londhe, M.V.; Salunkhe, A.B.; Jadhav, A.K.; Khot, V.M. Manganese Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia, Antibacterial and ROS Generation Performance. J. Clust. Sci. 2024, 35, 1405–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, J.; Nah, H.; Lee, J.-H.; Moon, S.H.; Kim, M.G.; Cheon, J. Critical Enhancements of MRI Contrast and Hyperthermic Effects by Dopant-Controlled Magnetic Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2009, 48, 1234–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoo, D.; Jeong, H.; Noh, S.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Cheon, J. Magnetically Triggered Dual Functional Nanoparticles for Resistance-Free Apoptotic Hyperthermia. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2013, 52, 13047–13051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balakrishnan, P.B.; Silvestri, N.; Fernandez-Cabada, T.; Marinaro, F.; Fernandes, S.; Fiorito, S.; Miscuglio, M.; Serantes, D.; Ruta, S.; Livesey, K.; et al. Exploiting Unique Alignment of Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles, Mild Hyperthermia, and Controlled Intrinsic Cobalt Toxicity for Cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2003712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogosnitzky, M.; Branch, S. Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Toxicity: A Review of Known and Proposed Mechanisms. Biometals 2016, 29, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blasco-Perrin, H.; Glaser, B.; Pienkowski, M.; Peron, J.M.; Payen, J.L. Gadolinium Induced Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2013, 13, 88–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Terzi, C.; Sökmen, S. Acute Pancreatitis Induced by Magnetic-Resonance-Imaging Contrast Agent. Lancet 1999, 354, 1789–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Unal, O.; Arslan, H. Cardiac Arrest Caused by IV Gadopentetate Dimeglumine. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1999, 172, 1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, P.-S.; Tsai, H.-Y.; Drake, P.; Wang, F.-N.; Chiang, C.-S. Gadolinium-Doped Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Induced Magnetic Field Hyperthermia Combined with Radiotherapy Increases Tumour Response by Vascular Disruption and Improved Oxygenation. Int. J. Hyperth. 2017, 33, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avugadda, S.K.; Soni, N.; Rodrigues, E.M.; Persano, S.; Pellegrino, T. Protease-Mediated T1 Contrast Enhancement of Multilayered Magneto-Gadolinium Nanostructures for Imaging and Magnetic Hyperthermia. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 6743–6755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nauman, M.; Alnasir, M.H.; Hamayun, M.A.; Wang, Y.; Shatruk, M.; Manzoor, S. Size-Dependent Magnetic and Magnetothermal Properties of Gadolinium Silicide Nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 28383–28389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mameli, V.; Musinu, A.; Ardu, A.; Ennas, G.; Peddis, D.; Niznansky, D.; Sangregorio, C.; Innocenti, C.; Thanh, N.T.K.; Cannas, C. Studying the Effect of Zn-Substitution on the Magnetic and Hyperthermic Properties of Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 10124–10137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noh, S.-H.; Na, W.; Jang, J.-T.; Lee, J.-H.; Lee, E.J.; Moon, S.H.; Lim, Y.; Shin, J.-S.; Cheon, J. Nanoscale Magnetism Control via Surface and Exchange Anisotropy for Optimized Ferrimagnetic Hysteresis. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3716–3721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guardia, P.; Nitti, S.; Materia, M.E.; Pugliese, G.; Yaacoub, N.; Greneche, J.-M.; Lefevre, C.; Manna, L.; Pellegrino, T. Gold–Iron Oxide Dimers for Magnetic Hyperthermia: The Key Role of Chloride Ions in the Synthesis to Boost the Heating Efficiency. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 4587–4594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espinosa, A.; Bugnet, M.; Radtke, G.; Neveu, S.; Botton, G.A.; Wilhelm, C.; Abou-Hassan, A. Can Magneto-Plasmonic Nanohybrids Efficiently Combine Photothermia with Magnetic Hyperthermia? Nanoscale 2015, 7, 18872–18877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanini, A.; Lartigue, L.; Gavard, J.; Schmitt, A.; Kacem, K.; Wilhelm, C.; Gazeau, F.; Chau, F.; Ammar, S. Thermosensitivity Profile of Malignant Glioma U87-MG Cells and Human Endothelial Cells Following γ-Fe2O3 NPs Internalization and Magnetic Field Application. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 15415–15423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanini, A.; Lartigue, L.; Gavard, J.; Kacem, K.; Wilhelm, C.; Gazeau, F.; Chau, F.; Ammar, S. Zinc Substituted Ferrite Nanoparticles with Zn0.9Fe2.1O4 Formula Used as Heating Agents for in Vitro Hyperthermia Assay on Glioma Cells. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 416, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanz, B.; Calatayud, M.P.; Torres, T.E.; Fanarraga, M.L.; Ibarra, M.R.; Goya, G.F. Magnetic Hyperthermia Enhances Cell Toxicity with Respect to Exogenous Heating. Biomaterials 2017, 114, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ito, A.; Shinkai, M.; Honda, H.; Yoshikawa, K.; Saga, S.; Wakabayashi, T.; Yoshida, J.; Kobayashi, T. Heat Shock Protein 70 Expression Induces Antitumor Immunity during Intracellular Hyperthermia Using Magnetite Nanoparticles. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2003, 52, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shinkai, M.; Yanase, M.; Honda, H.; Wakabayashi, T.; Yoshida, J.; Kobayashi, T. Intracellular Hyperthermia for Cancer Using Magnetite Cationic Liposomes: In Vitro Study. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1996, 87, 1179–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meenach, S.A.; Hilt, J.Z.; Anderson, K.W. Poly(Ethylene Glycol)-Based Magnetic Hydrogel Nanocomposites for Hyperthermia Cancer Therapy. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6, 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramirez-Nuñez, A.L.; Jimenez-Garcia, L.F.; Goya, G.F.; Sanz, B.; Santoyo-Salazar, J. In Vitro Magnetic Hyperthermia Using Polyphenol-Coated Fe3O4@γFe2O3 Nanoparticles from Cinnamomun verum and Vanilla planifolia: The Concert of Green Synthesis and Therapeutic Possibilities. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 074001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamdous, Y.; Chebbi, I.; Mandawala, C.; Le Fèvre, R.; Guyot, F.; Seksek, O.; Alphandéry, E. Biocompatible Coated Magnetosome Minerals with Various Organization and Cellular Interaction Properties Induce Cytotoxicity towards RG-2 and GL-261 Glioma Cells in the Presence of an Alternating Magnetic Field. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2017, 15, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, R.; Sharma, D. Biofunctionalization of Magnetite Nanoparticles with Stevioside: Effect on the Size and Thermal Behaviour for Use in Hyperthermia Applications. Int. J. Hyperth. 2019, 36, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandawala, C.; Chebbi, I.; Durand-Dubief, M.; Le Fèvre, R.; Hamdous, Y.; Guyot, F.; Alphandéry, E. Biocompatible and Stable Magnetosome Minerals Coated with Poly-l-Lysine, Citric Acid, Oleic Acid, and Carboxy-Methyl-Dextran for Application in the Magnetic Hyperthermia Treatment of Tumors. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 7644–7660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rego, G.; Nucci, M.; Mamani, J.; Oliveira, F.; Marti, L.; Filgueiras, I.; Ferreira, J.; Real, C.; Faria, D.; Espinha, P.; et al. Therapeutic Efficiency of Multiple Applications of Magnetic Hyperthermia Technique in Glioblastoma Using Aminosilane Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: In Vitro and In Vivo Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, R.; Sharma, D. Manganese-Doped Magnetic Nanoclusters for Hyperthermia and Photothermal Glioblastoma Therapy. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 2026–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yanase, M.; Shinkai, M.; Honda, H.; Wakabayashi, T.; Yoshida, J.; Kobayashi, T. Intracellular Hyperthermia for Cancer Using Magnetite Cationic Liposomes: An in Vivo Study. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1998, 89, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yanase, M.; Shinkai, M.; Honda, H.; Wakabayashi, T.; Yoshida, J.; Kobayashi, T. Antitumor Immunity Induction by Intracellular Hyperthermia Using Magnetite Cationic Liposomes. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1998, 89, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jordan, A.; Scholz, R.; Maier-Hauff, K.; Van Landeghem, F.K.H.; Waldoefner, N.; Teichgraeber, U.; Pinkernelle, J.; Bruhn, H.; Neumann, F.; Thiesen, B.; et al. The Effect of Thermotherapy Using Magnetic Nanoparticles on Rat Malignant Glioma. J. Neurooncol. 2006, 78, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, B.; Shinkai, M.; Kitade, T.; Honda, H.; Yoshida, J.; Wakabayashi, T.; Kobayashi, T. Preparation of Tumor-Specific Magnetoliposomes and Their Application for Hyperthermia. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. JCEJ 2001, 34, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ito, A.; Shinkai, M.; Honda, H.; Kobayashi, T. Heat-Inducible TNF-α Gene Therapy Combined with Hyperthermia Using Magnetic Nanoparticles as a Novel Tumor-Targeted Therapy. Gene Ther. 2001, 8, 649–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohno, T.; Wakabayashi, T.; Takemura, A.; Yoshida, J.; Ito, A.; Shinkai, M.; Honda, H.; Kobayashi, T. Effective Solitary Hyperthermia Treatment of Malignant Glioma Using Stick Type CMC-Magnetite. In Vivo Study. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2002, 56, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alphandéry, E.; Idbaih, A.; Adam, C.; Delattre, J.-Y.; Schmitt, C.; Guyot, F.; Chebbi, I. Chains of Magnetosomes with Controlled Endotoxin Release and Partial Tumor Occupation Induce Full Destruction of Intracranial U87-Luc Glioma in Mice under the Application of an Alternating Magnetic Field. J. Control. Release 2017, 262, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alphandéry, E.; Lijeour, L.; Lalatonne, Y.; Motte, L. Different Signatures between Chemically and Biologically Synthesized Nanoparticles in a Magnetic Sensor: A New Technology for Multiparametric Detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 147, 786–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alphandéry, E.; Idbaih, A.; Adam, C.; Delattre, J.-Y.; Schmitt, C.; Guyot, F.; Chebbi, I. Development of Non-Pyrogenic Magnetosome Minerals Coated with Poly-l-Lysine Leading to Full Disappearance of Intracranial U87-Luc Glioblastoma in 100% of Treated Mice Using Magnetic Hyperthermia. Biomaterials 2017, 141, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ohtake, M.; Umemura, M.; Sato, I.; Akimoto, T.; Oda, K.; Nagasako, A.; Kim, J.-H.; Fujita, T.; Yokoyama, U.; Nakayama, T.; et al. Hyperthermia and Chemotherapy Using Fe(Salen) Nanoparticles Might Impact Glioblastoma Treatment. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garcia-Montes, J.-R.; Porceddu, P.-F.; Drucker-Colín, R.; Moratalla, R.; Martinez-Murillo, R. P022 Evidence That Functionalized Ferromagnetic Microparticles with CD133 Antigen Decreases Glioblastoma Multiforme Growth in Vivo and in Vitro by Magnetic Field Induced Hyperthermia. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2017, 128, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, H.; Zong, H.; Ma, C.; Ming, X.; Shang, M.; Li, K.; He, X.; Cao, L. Evaluation of Nano-Magnetic Fluid on Malignant Glioma Cells. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 13, 677–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rabias, I.; Tsitrouli, D.; Karakosta, E.; Kehagias, T.; Diamantopoulos, G.; Fardis, M.; Stamopoulos, D.; Maris, T.G.; Falaras, P.; Zouridakis, N.; et al. Rapid Magnetic Heating Treatment by Highly Charged Maghemite Nanoparticles on Wistar Rats Exocranial Glioma Tumors at Microliter Volume. Biomicrofluidics 2010, 4, 024111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. The Hallmarks of Cancer. Cell 2000, 100, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horsman, M.R.; Overgaard, J. Hyperthermia: A Potent Enhancer of Radiotherapy. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.) 2007, 19, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Overgaard, J. The Heat Is (Still) on--the Past and Future of Hyperthermic Radiation Oncology. Radiother. Oncol. 2013, 109, 185–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, O.S. Effect of Fractionated Hyperthermia on Hypoxic Cells in Vitro. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med. 1981, 39, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Garcia, H.; Ramirez-Loera, C.; Malouff, T.D.; Seneviratne, D.S.; Palmer, J.D.; Trifiletti, D.M. Novel Strategies for Nanoparticle-Based Radiosensitization in Glioblastoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vaupel, P.W.; Kelleher, D.K. Pathophysiological and Vascular Characteristics of Tumours and Their Importance for Hyperthermia: Heterogeneity Is the Key Issue. Int. J. Hyperth. 2010, 26, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, C.W. Effect of Local Hyperthermia on Blood Flow and Microenvironment: A Review. Cancer Res. 1984, 44, 4721s–4730s. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Tannock, I.F.; Rotin, D. Acid pH in Tumors and Its Potential for Therapeutic Exploitation. Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 4373–4384. [Google Scholar]
- Datta, N.R.; Puric, E.; Klingbiel, D.; Gomez, S.; Bodis, S. Hyperthermia and Radiation Therapy in Locoregional Recurrent Breast Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2016, 94, 1073–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franckena, M. Review of Radiotherapy and Hyperthermia in Primary Cervical Cancer. Int. J. Hyperth. 2012, 28, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillette, E.L.; Ensley, B.A. Effect of Heating Order on Radiation Response of Mouse Tumor and Skin. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1979, 5, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Overgaard, J. Simultaneous and Sequential Hyperthermia and Radiation Treatment of an Experimental Tumor and Its Surrounding Normal Tissue in Vivo. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1980, 6, 1507–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nielsen, O.S.; Overgaard, J. Importance of Preheating Temperature and Time for the Induction of Thermotolerance in a Solid Tumour in Vivo. Br. J. Cancer 1982, 46, 894–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, D.; Lim, M.; Goos, J.A.C.M.; Qiao, R.; Ng, Y.Y.; Mansfeld, F.M.; Jackson, M.; Davis, T.P.; Kavallaris, M. Biologically Targeted Magnetic Hyperthermia: Potential and Limitations. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maier-Hauff, K.; Ulrich, F.; Nestler, D.; Niehoff, H.; Wust, P.; Thiesen, B.; Orawa, H.; Budach, V.; Jordan, A. Efficacy and Safety of Intratumoral Thermotherapy Using Magnetic Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles Combined with External Beam Radiotherapy on Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme. J. Neurooncol. 2011, 103, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kida, Y.; Ishiguri, H.; Ichimi, K.; Kobayashi, T. Hyperthermia of metastatic brain tumor with implant heating system: A preliminary clinical results. No Shinkei Geka 1990, 18, 521–526. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, H.; Wang, C.; Guo, Z.; Wang, Z.; Liu, L. Silver Nanocrystals Mediated Combination Therapy of Radiation with Magnetic Hyperthermia on Glioma Cells. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 12, 8276–8281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vilas-Boas, V.; Carvalho, F.; Espiña, B. Magnetic Hyperthermia for Cancer Treatment: Main Parameters Affecting the Outcome of In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Molecules 2020, 25, 2874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eynali, S.; Khoei, S.; Khoee, S.; Esmaelbeygi, E. Evaluation of the Cytotoxic Effects of Hyperthermia and 5-Fluorouracil-Loaded Magnetic Nanoparticles on Human Colon Cancer Cell Line HT-29. Int. J. Hyperth. 2017, 33, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moros, M.; Idiago-López, J.; Asín, L.; Moreno-Antolín, E.; Beola, L.; Grazú, V.; Fratila, R.M.; Gutiérrez, L.; de la Fuente, J.M. Triggering Antitumoural Drug Release and Gene Expression by Magnetic Hyperthermia. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 138, 326–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Datta, N.R.; Krishnan, S.; Speiser, D.E.; Neufeld, E.; Kuster, N.; Bodis, S.; Hofmann, H. Magnetic Nanoparticle-Induced Hyperthermia with Appropriate Payloads: Paul Ehrlich’s “Magic (Nano)Bullet” for Cancer Theranostics? Cancer Treat. Rev. 2016, 50, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumari, R.; Sunil, D.; Ningthoujam, R.S. Hypoxia-Responsive Nanoparticle Based Drug Delivery Systems in Cancer Therapy: An up-to-Date Review. J. Control. Release 2020, 319, 135–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Arambula, J.F.; Koo, S.; Kumar, R.; Singh, H.; Sessler, J.L.; Kim, J.S. Hypoxia-Targeted Drug Delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 771–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.; Cheng, Y.; Zhao, X.; Luo, Y.; Chen, J.; Yuan, W.-E. Advances in Redox-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems of Tumor Microenvironment. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mai, B.T.; Balakrishnan, P.B.; Barthel, M.J.; Piccardi, F.; Niculaes, D.; Marinaro, F.; Fernandes, S.; Curcio, A.; Kakwere, H.; Autret, G.; et al. Thermoresponsive Iron Oxide Nanocubes for an Effective Clinical Translation of Magnetic Hyperthermia and Heat-Mediated Chemotherapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 5727–5739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, T.J.; Huang, C.C.; Ruan, P.W.; Chuang, K.Y.; Huang, K.J.; Shieh, D.B.; Yeh, C.S. In Vivo Anti-Cancer Efficacy of Magnetite Nanocrystal—Based System Using Locoregional Hyperthermia Combined with 5-Fluorouracil Chemotherapy. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 7873–7883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bulbake, U.; Doppalapudi, S.; Kommineni, N.; Khan, W. Liposomal Formulations in Clinical Use: An Updated Review. Pharmaceutics 2017, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dou, Y.; Hynynen, K.; Allen, C. To Heat or Not to Heat: Challenges with Clinical Translation of Thermosensitive Liposomes. J. Control. Release 2017, 249, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nardecchia, S.; Sánchez-Moreno, P.; de Vicente, J.; Marchal, J.A.; Boulaiz, H. Clinical Trials of Thermosensitive Nanomaterials: An Overview. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Discher, D.E.; Ahmed, F. Polymersomes. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2006, 8, 323–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, H.; Chen, W.; Sun, X.; Liu, Y.-N.; Li, J.; Wang, J. Theranostic Magnetoliposomes Coated by Carboxymethyl Dextran with Controlled Release by Low-Frequency Alternating Magnetic Field. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 118, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Babincová, N.; Sourivong, P.; Babinec, P.; Bergemann, C.; Babincová, M.; Durdík, Š. Applications of Magnetoliposomes with Encapsulated Doxorubicin for Integrated Chemotherapy and Hyperthermia of Rat C6 Glioma. Z. Naturforsch. C J. Biosci. 2018, 73, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mai, B.T.; Conteh, J.S.; Gavilán, H.; Di Girolamo, A.; Pellegrino, T. Clickable Polymer Ligand-Functionalized Iron Oxide Nanocubes: A Promising Nanoplatform for ‘Local Hot Spots’ Magnetically Triggered Drug Release. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 48476–48488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayashi, K.; Nakamura, M.; Miki, H.; Ozaki, S.; Abe, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Sakamoto, W.; Yogo, T.; Ishimura, K. Magnetically Responsive Smart Nanoparticles for Cancer Treatment with a Combination of Magnetic Hyperthermia and Remote-Control Drug Release. Theranostics 2014, 4, 834–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farzin, A.; Etesami, S.A.; Quint, J.; Memic, A.; Tamayol, A. Magnetic Nanoparticles in Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, e1901058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veloso, S.R.S.; Andrade, R.G.D.; Castanheira, E.M.S. Review on the Advancements of Magnetic Gels: Towards Multifunctional Magnetic Liposome-Hydrogel Composites for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 288, 102351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Din, F.U.; Jin, S.G.; Choi, H.-G. Particle and Gel Characterization of Irinotecan-Loaded Double-Reverse Thermosensitive Hydrogel. Polymers 2021, 13, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, J.; Lal, S.; Van Noorden, C.J. Nanoparticles for Hyperthermic Therapy: Synthesis Strategies and Applications in Glioblastoma. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 2863–2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamora-Mora, V.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, M.; González-Gómez, Á.; Sanz, B.; Román, J.S.; Goya, G.F.; Hernández, R.; Mijangos, C. Chitosan Nanoparticles for Combined Drug Delivery and Magnetic Hyperthermia: From Preparation to in Vitro Studies. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, B.P.; Pasquale, N.; De, G.; Tan, T.; Ma, J.; Lee, K.-B. Core-Shell Nanoparticle-Based Peptide Therapeutics and Combined Hyperthermia for Enhanced Cancer Cell Apoptosis. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 9379–9387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noh, S.; Moon, S.H.; Shin, T.-H.; Lim, Y.; Cheon, J. Recent Advances of Magneto-Thermal Capabilities of Nanoparticles: From Design Principles to Biomedical Applications. Nano Today 2017, 13, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espinosa, A.; Kolosnjaj-Tabi, J.; Abou-Hassan, A.; Plan Sangnier, A.; Curcio, A.; Silva, A.K.A.; Di Corato, R.; Neveu, S.; Pellegrino, T.; Liz-Marzán, L.M.; et al. Magnetic (Hyper)Thermia or Photothermia? Progressive Comparison of Iron Oxide and Gold Nanoparticles Heating in Water, in Cells, and In Vivo. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1803660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Li, L.; Chen, W.; Chen, H.; Yin, J. Near-Infrared Small Molecular Fluorescent Dyes for Photothermal Therapy. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019, 30, 1353–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bohren, C.F.; Huffman, D.R. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; ISBN 978-3-527-61816-3. [Google Scholar]
- Kreibig, U.; Vollmer, M. Optical Properties of Metal Clusters; Springer Series in Materials Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1995; Volume 25, ISBN 978-3-642-08191-0. [Google Scholar]
- Pissuwan, D.; Valenzuela, S.M.; Cortie, M.B. Therapeutic Possibilities of Plasmonically Heated Gold Nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, Z.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhao, K. Near-Infrared Light-Responsive Inorganic Nanomaterials for Photothermal Therapy. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 11, 349–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Estelrich, J.; Busquets, M.A. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Photothermal Therapy. Molecules 2018, 23, 1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teraphongphom, N.; Kong, C.S.; Warram, J.M.; Rosenthal, E.L. Specimen Mapping in Head and Neck Cancer Using Fluorescence Imaging. Laryngoscope Investig. Otolaryngol. 2017, 2, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, R.; Sharma, D. Evolution of Magnetic Hyperthermia for Glioblastoma Multiforme Therapy. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 1157–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, Q.; Dai, X.; Zhang, P.; Tan, X.; Zhong, Y.; Yao, C.; Song, M.; Song, G.; Zhang, Z.; Peng, G.; et al. Fe3O4@Au Composite Magnetic Nanoparticles Modified with Cetuximab for Targeted Magneto-Photothermal Therapy of Glioma Cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 2491–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thaghalli Shivanna, A.; Lu, Y.-J.; Chen, J.-P. Optimization of the Preparation of Magnetic Liposomes for the Combined Use of Magnetic Hyperthermia and Photothermia in Dual Magneto-Photothermal Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allison, R.R.; Downie, G.H.; Cuenca, R.; Hu, X.-H.; Childs, C.J.; Sibata, C.H. Photosensitizers in Clinical PDT. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2004, 1, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castano, A.P.; Demidova, T.N.; Hamblin, M.R. Mechanisms in Photodynamic Therapy: Part One-Photosensitizers, Photochemistry and Cellular Localization. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2004, 1, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Detty, M.R.; Gibson, S.L.; Wagner, S.J. Current Clinical and Preclinical Photosensitizers for Use in Photodynamic Therapy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3897–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Luo, R.; Liao, W.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, J.; Liu, X.; Miao, J. Clinical study of Photofrin photodynamic therapy for advanced cancers. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao 2003, 23, 1341–1343. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, T.E.; Chang, J.-E. Recent Studies in Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer Treatment: From Basic Research to Clinical Trials. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Paula, L.B.; Primo, F.L.; Pinto, M.R.; Morais, P.C.; Tedesco, A.C. Evaluation of a Chloroaluminium Phthalocyanine-Loaded Magnetic Nanoemulsion as a Drug Delivery Device to Treat Glioblastoma Using Hyperthermia and Photodynamic Therapy. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 9115–9122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Paula, L.B.; Primo, F.L.; Jardim, D.R.; Morais, P.C.; Tedesco, A.C. Development, Characterization, and in Vitro Trials of Chloroaluminum Phthalocyanine-Magnetic Nanoemulsion to Hyperthermia and Photodynamic Therapies on Glioblastoma as a Biological Model. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 07B307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Corato, R.; Béalle, G.; Kolosnjaj-Tabi, J.; Espinosa, A.; Clément, O.; Silva, A.K.A.; Ménager, C.; Wilhelm, C. Combining Magnetic Hyperthermia and Photodynamic Therapy for Tumor Ablation with Photoresponsive Magnetic Liposomes. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 2904–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Curcio, A.; Silva, A.K.A.; Cabana, S.; Espinosa, A.; Baptiste, B.; Menguy, N.; Wilhelm, C.; Abou-Hassan, A. Iron Oxide Nanoflowers @ CuS Hybrids for Cancer Tri-Therapy: Interplay of Photothermal Therapy, Magnetic Hyperthermia and Photodynamic Therapy. Theranostics 2019, 9, 1288–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribas, A.; Wolchok, J.D. Cancer Immunotherapy Using Checkpoint Blockade. Science 2018, 359, 1350–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponzoni, M.; Pastorino, F.; Di Paolo, D.; Perri, P.; Brignole, C. Targeting Macrophages as a Potential Therapeutic Intervention: Impact on Inflammatory Diseases and Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, Y.; Pawar, V.K.; Meher, J.G.; Raval, K.; Kumar, A.; Shrivastava, R.; Bhadauria, S.; Chourasia, M.K. Targeting Tumor Associated Macrophages (TAMs) via Nanocarriers. J. Control. Release 2017, 254, 92–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, R.; Chauhan, A.; Kaur, T.; Kuanr, B.K.; Sharma, D. Enhancing Magnetic Hyperthermia Efficacy through Targeted Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibition: Unveiling Immune-Mediated Therapeutic Synergy in Glioma Treatment. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 17145–17161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galli, F.; Aguilera, J.V.; Palermo, B.; Markovic, S.N.; Nisticò, P.; Signore, A. Relevance of Immune Cell and Tumor Microenvironment Imaging in the New Era of Immunotherapy. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anaya, J.-M.; Shoenfeld, Y.; Rojas-Villarraga, A.; Levy, R.A.; Cervera, R. Autoimmunity: From Bench to Bedside; El Rosario University Press: Bogota, Colombia, 2013; ISBN 978-958-738-366-9. [Google Scholar]
- Persano, S.; Vicini, F.; Poggi, A.; Fernandez, J.L.C.; Rizzo, G.M.R.; Gavilán, H.; Silvestri, N.; Pellegrino, T. Elucidating the Innate Immunological Effects of Mild Magnetic Hyperthermia on U87 Human Glioblastoma Cells: An In Vitro Study. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, H.G.; Mehta, K.; Cohen, P.; Guha, C. Hyperthermia on Immune Regulation: A Temperature’s Story. Cancer Lett. 2008, 271, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Skitzki, J.J.; Repasky, E.A.; Evans, S.S. Hyperthermia as an Immunotherapy Strategy for Cancer. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2009, 10, 550–558. [Google Scholar]
- Baronzio, G.F.; Seta, R.D.; D’Amico, M.; Baronzio, A.; Freitas, I.; Forzenigo, G.; Gramaglia, A.; Hager, E.D. Effects of Local and Whole Body Hyperthermia on Immunity. In Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet]; Landes Bioscience: Austin, TX, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kobayashi, T.; Kakimi, K.; Nakayama, E.; Jimbow, K. Antitumor Immunity by Magnetic Nanoparticle-Mediated Hyperthermia. Nanomedicine 2014, 9, 1715–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, S.S.; Repasky, E.A.; Fisher, D.T. Fever and the Thermal Regulation of Immunity: The Immune System Feels the Heat. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 335–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.Y.; Fu, J.C.M.; Lee, Y.C.; Lu, P.J. Hyperthermia Stress Activates Heat Shock Protein Expression via Propyl Isomerase 1 Regulation with Heat Shock Factor 1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33, 4889–4899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ito, A.; Honda, H.; Kobayashi, T. Cancer Immunotherapy Based on Intracellular Hyperthermia Using Magnetite Nanoparticles: A Novel Concept of “Heat-Controlled Necrosis” with Heat Shock Protein Expression. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2006, 55, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Azuma, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Higai, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Tada, S. Biphasic Increases of Cell Surface Calreticulin Following Treatment with Mitoxantrone. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2020, 43, 1595–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, A.; Midha, S.; Kumar, R.; Meena, R.; Singh, P.; Jha, S.K.; Kuanr, B.K. Rapid Tumor Inhibition via Magnetic Hyperthermia Regulated by Caspase 3 with Time-Dependent Clearance of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 2972–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, T.J.; Agliardi, G.; Lin, F.; Ellis, M.; Jones, C.; Robson, M.; Richard-Londt, A.; Southern, P.; Lythgoe, M.; Zaw Thin, M.; et al. Potential of Magnetic Hyperthermia to Stimulate Localized Immune Activation. Small 2021, 17, 2005241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nemkov, V.; Ruffini, R.; Goldstein, R.; Jackowski, J.; Deweese, T.L.; Ivkov, R. Magnetic Field Generating Inductor for Cancer Hyperthermia Research. COMPEL—Int. J. Comput. Math. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2011, 30, 1626–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonvin, D.; Alexander, D.T.L.; Millán, A.; Piñol, R.; Sanz, B.; Goya, G.F.; Martínez, A.; Bastiaansen, J.A.M.; Stuber, M.; Schenk, K.J.; et al. Tuning Properties of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Aqueous Synthesis without Ligands to Improve MRI Relaxivity and SAR. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bordelon, D.E.; Goldstein, R.C.; Nemkov, V.S.; Kumar, A.; Jackowski, J.K.; DeWeese, T.L.; Ivkov, R. Modified Solenoid Coil That Efficiently Produces High Amplitude AC Magnetic Fields With Enhanced Uniformity for Biomedical Applications. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2012, 48, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maier-Hauff, K.; Rothe, R.; Scholz, R.; Gneveckow, U.; Wust, P.; Thiesen, B.; Feussner, A.; von Deimling, A.; Waldoefner, N.; Felix, R.; et al. Intracranial Thermotherapy Using Magnetic Nanoparticles Combined with External Beam Radiotherapy: Results of a Feasibility Study on Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme. J. Neurooncol. 2007, 81, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gneveckow, U.; Jordan, A.; Scholz, R.; Brüss, V.; Waldöfner, N.; Ricke, J.; Feussner, A.; Hildebrandt, B.; Rau, B.; Wust, P. Description and Characterization of the Novel Hyperthermia- and Thermoablation-System MFH 300F for Clinical Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia. Med. Phys. 2004, 31, 1444–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wust, P.; Gneveckow, U.; Wust, P.; Gneveckow, U.; Johannsen, M.; Böhmer, D.; Henkel, T.; Kahmann, F.; Sehouli, J.; Felix, R.; et al. Magnetic Nanoparticles for Interstitial Thermotherapy—Feasibility, Tolerance and Achieved Temperatures. Int. J. Hyperth. 2006, 22, 673–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johannsen, M.; Thiesen, B.; Wust, P.; Jordan, A. Magnetic Nanoparticle Hyperthermia for Prostate Cancer. Int. J. Hyperth. 2010, 26, 790–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johannsen, M.; Gneveckow, U.; Thiesen, B.; Taymoorian, K.; Cho, C.H.; Waldöfner, N.; Scholz, R.; Jordan, A.; Loening, S.A.; Wust, P. Thermotherapy of Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Nanoparticles: Feasibility, Imaging, and Three-Dimensional Temperature Distribution. Eur. Urol. 2007, 52, 1653–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trefná, H.D.; Crezee, H.; Schmidt, M.; Marder, D.; Lamprecht, U.; Ehmann, M.; Hartmann, J.; Nadobny, J.; Gellermann, J.; van Holthe, N.; et al. Quality Assurance Guidelines for Superficial Hyperthermia Clinical Trials: I. Clinical Requirements. Int. J. Hyperth. 2017, 33, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobšíček Trefná, H.; Crezee, J.; Schmidt, M.; Marder, D.; Lamprecht, U.; Ehmann, M.; Nadobny, J.; Hartmann, J.; Lomax, N.; Abdel-Rahman, S.; et al. Quality Assurance Guidelines for Superficial Hyperthermia Clinical Trials: II. Technical Requirements for Heating Devices. Strahlenther. Onkol. 2017, 193, 351–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stea, B.; Cetas, T.C.; Cassady, J.R.; Guthkelch, A.N.; Iacono, R.; Lulu, B.; Lutz, W.; Obbens, E.; Rossman, K.; Seeger, J. Interstitial Thermoradiotherapy of Brain Tumors: Preliminary Results of a Phase I Clinical Trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1990, 19, 1463–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stea, B.; Kittelson, J.; Cassady, J.R.; Hamilton, A.; Guthkelch, N.; Lulu, B.; Obbens, E.; Rossman, K.; Shapiro, W.; Shetter, A.; et al. Treatment of Malignant Gliomas with Interstitial Irradiation and Hyperthermia. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1992, 24, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stea, B.; Rossman, K.; Kittelson, J.; Shetter, A.; Hamilton, A.; Cassady, J.R. Interstitial Irradiation versus Interstitial Thermoradiotherapy for Supratentorial Malignant Gliomas: A Comparative Survival Analysis. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1994, 30, 591–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iacono, R.P.; Stea, B.; Lulu, B.A.; Cetas, T.; Cassady, J.R. Template-Guided Stereotactic Implantation of Malignant Brain Tumors for Interstitial Thermoradiotherapy. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 1992, 59, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kobayashi, T.; Kida, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Hattori, K.; Matsui, M.; Amemiya, Y. Interstitial Hyperthermia of Malignant Brain Tumors by Implant Heating System: Clinical Experience. J. Neurooncol. 1991, 10, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grauer, O.; Jaber, M.; Hess, K.; Weckesser, M.; Schwindt, W.; Maring, S.; Wölfer, J.; Stummer, W. Combined Intracavitary Thermotherapy with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and Radiotherapy as Local Treatment Modality in Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients. J. Neurooncol. 2019, 141, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Flow sheet diagram depicting a summary of this study.
Figure 2.
MHT used for GBM treatment and the GBM tumor heterogeneous microenvironment. This Figure presents how GBM cells recruit the microglia, macrophage, astrocyte, and T cells to enhance angiogenesis and tumor development while reducing the inflammation at the tumor site. Supplementarily, a hypoxic medium occurs inside the tumor, favoring the cancer cells localized at the tumor edge to invade the healthy tissue. This Figure was generated using images assembled from Servier Medical Art, which are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license (https://smart.servier.com, accessed on 27 June 2024).
Figure 2.
MHT used for GBM treatment and the GBM tumor heterogeneous microenvironment. This Figure presents how GBM cells recruit the microglia, macrophage, astrocyte, and T cells to enhance angiogenesis and tumor development while reducing the inflammation at the tumor site. Supplementarily, a hypoxic medium occurs inside the tumor, favoring the cancer cells localized at the tumor edge to invade the healthy tissue. This Figure was generated using images assembled from Servier Medical Art, which are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license (https://smart.servier.com, accessed on 27 June 2024).
Figure 3.
Schematical representation of heat release mechanisms under AMF effect in (a) single-domain MNPs and (b) multi-domain MNPs.
Figure 3.
Schematical representation of heat release mechanisms under AMF effect in (a) single-domain MNPs and (b) multi-domain MNPs.
Figure 4.
Synthesis routes for MNP manufacture based on sol–gel approaches. Hydrolytic methods: (a) chemical co-precipitation; (b) oxidative precipitation. Non-hydrolytic methods: (c) solvothermal/polyol synthesis; (d) temperature thermal decomposition. This Figure was generated using images assembled from Servier Medical Art, which are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license (https://smart.servier.com, accessed on 27 June 2024).
Figure 4.
Synthesis routes for MNP manufacture based on sol–gel approaches. Hydrolytic methods: (a) chemical co-precipitation; (b) oxidative precipitation. Non-hydrolytic methods: (c) solvothermal/polyol synthesis; (d) temperature thermal decomposition. This Figure was generated using images assembled from Servier Medical Art, which are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license (https://smart.servier.com, accessed on 27 June 2024).
Figure 5.
Strategies adopted to improve MHT heat performance. Shape and geometry influence on Fe3O4 MNPs: (I) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of (a) 25 nm spherical MNPs; (b) 20 nm nano-octopod MNPs; (c) high-resolution image obtained for 26 nm octopod particles; and (d) X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra for different octopod particle sizes. (II) (a–c) calorimetric MHT curves for different particle sizes; (d) SAR variation as a function of particle size in the 200 ÷ 800 Oe field range; and (e) SAR values versus H values for various particle sizes. Reprinted with permission from [95]. Copyright (2024) American Chemical Society. Doping with transition metal influence: (III) comparison between Co-doped nano ferrite and classical iron oxide MNPs: (a) Schematical representation of magnetic aqueous solution; TEM images of (b) Co-doped nano ferrites; (c) classical iron oxide MNPs (scalebar 50 nm); and (d) SAR value variation obtained for different types of MNPs as a function of magnetic field strength at different frequencies of AMF [117]. Figure 5 (III) is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Manufacture of magneto-plasmonic NPs. (IV) Gold–iron oxide dimers for MHT applications: (a) Au-iron oxides dimer images; (b) statistical analysis performed to establish the average particle diameter; (c) SAR values at three field frequencies in the case of full and empty dimers; and (d) images of full and empty dimers obtained through the etching out of gold nanoparticles [127]. Figure 5 (IV) is licensed under CC BY-NC 3.0.
Figure 5.
Strategies adopted to improve MHT heat performance. Shape and geometry influence on Fe3O4 MNPs: (I) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of (a) 25 nm spherical MNPs; (b) 20 nm nano-octopod MNPs; (c) high-resolution image obtained for 26 nm octopod particles; and (d) X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra for different octopod particle sizes. (II) (a–c) calorimetric MHT curves for different particle sizes; (d) SAR variation as a function of particle size in the 200 ÷ 800 Oe field range; and (e) SAR values versus H values for various particle sizes. Reprinted with permission from [95]. Copyright (2024) American Chemical Society. Doping with transition metal influence: (III) comparison between Co-doped nano ferrite and classical iron oxide MNPs: (a) Schematical representation of magnetic aqueous solution; TEM images of (b) Co-doped nano ferrites; (c) classical iron oxide MNPs (scalebar 50 nm); and (d) SAR value variation obtained for different types of MNPs as a function of magnetic field strength at different frequencies of AMF [117]. Figure 5 (III) is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Manufacture of magneto-plasmonic NPs. (IV) Gold–iron oxide dimers for MHT applications: (a) Au-iron oxides dimer images; (b) statistical analysis performed to establish the average particle diameter; (c) SAR values at three field frequencies in the case of full and empty dimers; and (d) images of full and empty dimers obtained through the etching out of gold nanoparticles [127]. Figure 5 (IV) is licensed under CC BY-NC 3.0.
Figure 6.
In vitro results of various MHT protocols. (I) Heating efficiency test on M059K cells of PEG-based magnetic hydrogel under AMF influence. Fluorescent microscopy images after Life/Dead assay: (a–c) zone exposed directly to AMF in the center of the Petri dish; (d–f) zone placed at the boundary between dead and live cells; (g–i) zone placed near the edge of the Petri dish (First column: sample exposed to PEG-based magnetic hydrogel and AMF; second column: sample exposed to AMF; third column: control sample); infrared (IR) image of cells and hydrogel: (j) heated for 5 min; (k) under AMF effect for 5 min; and (l) schematic representation of the in vitro test. Reprinted from [134]. Copyright (2024) with permission from Elsevier. (II) In vitro MHT test on C6 cells based on different types of MNPs. (A) Temperature response at an AMF of 168 Gs and 405 kHz for 20 min.; (B–G) Prussian blue staining of C6 cells for control and incubation with different types of MNPs after 48 h and 72 h (scale bar 50 μm) [137]. Figure 6 (II) is licensed under CC BY 4.0. (III) In vitro MHT test on C6 cells based on aminosilane-coated Fe3O4 commercial MNPs. (A–C) BLI signal analyses after 1, 2, and 3 MHT cycles; (D) Histogram of BLI intensities; and Prussian blue and nuclear fast red images: Control: (E) 4× magnification; (G) 20× magnification; After labeling with 200 μgFe/mL MNPs, (F) 4× magnification and (H) 20× magnification [139]. Figure 6 (III) is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Figure 6.
In vitro results of various MHT protocols. (I) Heating efficiency test on M059K cells of PEG-based magnetic hydrogel under AMF influence. Fluorescent microscopy images after Life/Dead assay: (a–c) zone exposed directly to AMF in the center of the Petri dish; (d–f) zone placed at the boundary between dead and live cells; (g–i) zone placed near the edge of the Petri dish (First column: sample exposed to PEG-based magnetic hydrogel and AMF; second column: sample exposed to AMF; third column: control sample); infrared (IR) image of cells and hydrogel: (j) heated for 5 min; (k) under AMF effect for 5 min; and (l) schematic representation of the in vitro test. Reprinted from [134]. Copyright (2024) with permission from Elsevier. (II) In vitro MHT test on C6 cells based on different types of MNPs. (A) Temperature response at an AMF of 168 Gs and 405 kHz for 20 min.; (B–G) Prussian blue staining of C6 cells for control and incubation with different types of MNPs after 48 h and 72 h (scale bar 50 μm) [137]. Figure 6 (II) is licensed under CC BY 4.0. (III) In vitro MHT test on C6 cells based on aminosilane-coated Fe3O4 commercial MNPs. (A–C) BLI signal analyses after 1, 2, and 3 MHT cycles; (D) Histogram of BLI intensities; and Prussian blue and nuclear fast red images: Control: (E) 4× magnification; (G) 20× magnification; After labeling with 200 μgFe/mL MNPs, (F) 4× magnification and (H) 20× magnification [139]. Figure 6 (III) is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Figure 8.
Combined strategies used in GBM treatment. This Figure was generated using images assembled from Servier Medical Art, which are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license (https://smart.servier.com, accessed on 20 July 2024).
Figure 8.
Combined strategies used in GBM treatment. This Figure was generated using images assembled from Servier Medical Art, which are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license (https://smart.servier.com, accessed on 20 July 2024).
Figure 9.
Main clinical trials performed on patients with GBM (Maier-Hauff et al., 2011 [169]; Grauer et al., 2019 [248]; Maier-Hauff et al., 2007 [236]; Kobayashi et al., 1991 [247]; Stea et al., 1990 [243]). This Figure was generated using an image from www.freepik.com, accessed on 21 July 2024.
Table 1.
Magnetic and structural properties of pure IONs or combinations dedicated to MHT treatments.
Table 1.
Magnetic and structural properties of pure IONs or combinations dedicated to MHT treatments.
| MNP | Ms (emu/g) | Mr/Ms | Hc (Oe) | K (J/m3) | D (nm) | MNP Geometrical Attributes | Remarks | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe3O4 | 85 ÷ 110 | - | - | 1.3 ± (0.2) × 104 | 9 ÷ 15 | Spherical | All the magnetic properties were measured at 300 K | [51] |
| 60 | 0.4 | 170 | - | 5.7 ÷ 11 | Large-diameter MNPs were a mixture of cubic, diamond, and triangular. Small-diameter MNPs were spherical | The hysteresis loops were measured at 5 K | [54] | |
| 65 ÷ 92 | - | 70 ÷ 340 | - | 7.4 ÷ 45 | Spherical | The hysteresis loops were measured at 5 K | [55] | |
| For 6.6 nm MNP, 80.8 at 5 K and 70.7 at 300 K; for 17.8 nm MNP, 91.3 at 5 K and 82.5 at 300 K | For 6.6 nm MNP, 0.28 at 5 K and 0.024 at 300 K; for 17.8 nm MNP, 0.29 at 5 K and 0.0076 at 300 K | For 6.6 nm MNP, 405.6 at 5 K and 14.7 at 300 K; for 17.8 nm MNP, 379.4 at 5 K and 3.4 at 300 K | 4.74 × 105 for 6.6 nm MNP, 1.11 × 105 for 17.8 nm MNP | 6.6 ÷ 17.8 | Spherical | Magnetic properties were measured at 5 K and 300 K | [52] | |
| 80 ÷ 90 | - | 141–500 | - | 12 ÷ 38 | Cubic | SAR was between 400 and 800 W/gFe | [56] | |
| 78 ÷ 95 | - | 400–500 for MNPs with size below 20 nm; 250 ÷ 300 for larger particles | - | 13 ÷ 40 | Cubic | SAR was about 509 W/gFe at 320 kHz and 15 kA/m (H × f = 4.8 × 109 kA/(ms)) | [57] | |
| 50 ÷ 81 | 0.03 ÷ 0.12 | 0 ÷ 103 | (6.4 ÷ 9.5) × 103 | 17 ÷ 47 | Octopods | Ms and Hc were measured at 300 K | [58] | |
| 20 ÷ 80 | - | 0–50 | - | 40 ÷ 70/5 ÷ 10 | Nanorods | Magnetic measurements were performed at 300 K | [59] | |
| 83 ÷ 88 | 0.38 ÷ 0.44 | 200 ÷ 290 | (1.8 ÷ 2.6) × 104 | 20 ÷ 28 | Nanoflowers | SAR value of 1992 ± 34 W/g | [60] | |
| 68 ÷ 92 | 0 ÷ 0.14 | 0 ÷ 118 | - | 13 ÷ 260 | Octahedral | Ms was measured at 300 K. For 22 nm MNPs, SAR = (200 ÷ 800) W/g; for 43 nm MNPs, SAR = (250 ÷ 2400) W/g | ||
| Fe2O3 | 2.8 × 105/ 3.9 × 105/ 3.9 × 105 | - | - | 2.6 × 104/ 8 × 102/ 1.1 × 103 | 10/ 18/ 22 | Spheres/Cubes/Nanoflowers | τN, τB (s): 2 × 10−6, 2.4 × 10−8/8 × 10−6, 3 × 10−9/2 × 10−5, 4.6 × 10−9. The LRT model was valid only for spheres | [61] |
| Au@Fe3O4 | 28 ÷ 92 | 0.29 ÷ 0.32 | 280 ÷ 550 | 6 × 103 | 21 ÷ 52 | Dimers | Gold shell provided improved biocompatibility | [62] |
| CoFe2O4@Fe3O4 | 108 | - | 2530 | 2 × 104 | 15 | Spherical/Core–shell | - | [51] |
| Fe3O4@CoFe2O4 | 105 | - | 11,600 | 1.8 × 104 | 15 | Spherical/Core–shell | For a frequency of 500 Hz and a field amplitude of 37.3 kA/m (H × f) = 18.7 × 109 a SAR of 2795 W/g was reported | [51] |
| Fe3O4@FeO | 40 ÷ 80 | - | 1200 ÷ 5754 | (1 ÷ 1.3) × 104 | 16 ÷ 23 | Cubic/Core–shell | The magnetic measurements were performed at 10 K | [63,64] |
| FeO/Fe3O4 | 110 | 0.7 | 583 | - | - | Clusters centrosymmetric | Magnetization measurements were performed at 300 K, and the coercivity was determined at 10 K | [65] |
| 82 | 0.7 | 520 | - | - | Clusters dimers/trimers |
Table 2.
Examples of MNPs synthetized trough colloidal methods and heating efficiency.
| MNP | Synthesis Method/Producer | Particle Size (nm)/Shape | SAR (W/g) | H × f (A/(ms)) | Remarks | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| γ-Fe2O3 | Co-precipitation Acid treatment | 8 11 13 Spherical | 10 40 58 | 3.92 × 109 | The synthesis method is adequate for a large amount of particles. Cheap, easy, and reproducible protocol. The optimal particle size correlated with SAR was established to be around 12 nm. | [85] |
| Commercial MNPs–Resovist® (FDA approved) | Co-precipitation/ Bayer-Schering | 20 | 26.8 | 1.86 × 109 | Compared to other commercial MNPs similar magnetic heating efficiency was observed between Micromod’s nanomag-D 100 nm, Resovist, and Chemicell’s aged fluidmag-D 50 nm. | [86] |
| Commercial MNPs–Feraheme® (Ferumoxytol) (FDA approved) (γ-Fe2O3) | Co-precipitation/Berlex Laboratories | 30 | 50.5 | 2.75 × 109 | FDA approval permitted the use of commercial Feraheme® as an MHT nano heater. The particles coated with a polymer matrix (dextran) showed excellent heat transfer properties, being a good candidate for GBM treatments. | [87] |
| Fe3O4 | Co-precipitation; the synthesis process was conducted in an automated batch reactor Atlas Potassium (Syrris) | 13 18 20 Faceted | 46.64 86.87 51.90 | 3.58 × 109 | Large quantities of MNPs were prepared. The highest SAR value was obtained for particles with a size of about 18 nm. All the particles were adequate for MHT. | [88] |
| Fe3O4 | Oxidative precipitation | 22 26 34 Cubic | 130 170 120 | 2.54 × 109 | High-quality Fe3O4 nanocrystals were prepared. The highest SAR was noticed for a cubic particle with an edge of 170 nm. | [72] |
| Fe3O4 and ε-Fe2O3 | Oxidative precipitation | 22 Spherical (Fe3O4), Acicular (ε-Fe2O3) | 95 | 2.49 × 109 | The particle mixture exhibited a higher SAR value. The MNPs are a good candidate for AMF cancer therapy. | [73] |
| Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 | Thermal decomposition | 18/Octahedral 22/Truncated octahedral | 124 320 | 3.06 × 109 | The particles exhibited superparamagnetic behavior at room temperature. The predominant magnetic relaxation phenomena consisted of Neel processes. Higher SAR values were obtained compared to other synthesis routes. | [89] |
| IONs | Thermal decomposition; binary solvent mixture approach | 14 19 24 35 Cubic | 360 620 650 300 | 4.80 × 109 | High SAR values were noticed, and it was concluded that the developed IONs could be successfully used as nano heaters. | [56] |
| Fe3O4 and/or γ-Fe2O3 | Thermal decomposition | 14 18 22 Faceted | 70 80 95 | 3.06 × 109 | Superparamagnetic nanocrystalline MNPs with sizes higher than 10 nm were obtained. All SAR values were in biological limits. | [84] |
| Fe3O4 | Thermal decomposition | 5 10 14 13 Spherical | 180 130 447 200 | 9.80 × 109 | A high SAR rate was noticed when the polydispersity of the magnetic fluid decreased. The 14 nm diameter particles exhibited the highest value of SAR. | [83] |
| γ-Fe2O3 | Solvothermal/Polyol route | 21 24 28 34 38 Nanoflowers | 500 1992 1944 1230 787 | 4.40 × 109 1.51 × 109–for all the other sizes | Nanoflowers beyond the superparamagnetic range were synthetized. The flowers comprised independent crystals with an average size of 11 nm. The polycrystalline character generated an increase in heating power, making these nanoparticles suitable for GBM treatment, even for recurrent tumors. | [60] |
| α-Fe2O3 | Aerial oxidation and reduction | 26 × 98 25 × 97 16 × 87 | 190 260 370 | 4.40 × 109 | To be used as MHT agents, the SAR values must be improved in the low-field domain. | [90] |
Table 3.
In vitro studies for MHT dedicated to GBM analysis.
| MNPs/Quantity | Cell Lines | Particle Diameter/Shape | AMF Conditions–H (Oe), f (kHz) | SAR (W/g) | Temperature (°C) | Main Physical Phenomenon | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| γ-Fe2O3 coated with polyol/50 μg/mL | HUVEC, U89-MG | 10 nm/spherical | 289.7 Oe/700 kHz | HUVEC: 114 W/g ± 21; U87-MG 178 W/g ± 37 | 42 °C | Cell thermospecificity | [129] |
| Zn0.9Fe2.1O4/50 μg/mL | HUVEC, U89-MG | 11 nm/spherical | 289.7 Oe/700 kHz | 36 W/g | 41.5 °C | MNPs magnetic property tunning based on Zn doping | [130] |
| MNPs coated with polyethyleneimine (PEI)/10 μg/mL ÷ 100 μg/mL | SH-SY5Y micro-tumor-phantoms | - | 299.71 Oe/570 kHz | 239 ± 19 W/g in water | 46 °C | Comparison between MHT and hyperthermia mediated through exogenous heating | [131] |
| Fe3O4 cationic liposomes (TMAG, DLPC, DOPE (1:2:2)/100 μg/mL | T-9 cell pellets | 35 nm | 383.72 Oe/118 kHz | - | 42 °C | MHT combined with an innovative vaccination therapy | [132] |
| Fe3O4 cationic liposomes (TMAG, DLPC, DOPE (1:2:2)/7.2 mg/mL | T-9 | 35 nm | 384 Oe/118 kHz | - | 43 °C | Cancer cells were targeted and intracellular heated magnetoliposomes | [133] |
| Fe3O4/PEGMMA-PEGDMA/7.9 mg/mL | M059K | 20–30 nm | 225.72 Oe/297 kHz | - | 63 °C | An innovative magnetic gel suitable for both thermal ablation and magnetic hyperthermia as a function of the applied magnetic field strength | [134] |
| Fe3O4@γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles coated based on polyphenol/100 μg/mL | BV-2 | 10–14 nm | 300 Oe/570 kHz | For cinnamon–MNPs, 335.7 W/gFe3O4; for synthetic vanilla MNPs, 78.9 W/gFe3O4; and for vanilla pods, MNPs 234 W/gFe3O4 | 46 °C | An eco-friendly synthesis route was developed for obtaining highly biocompatible MNPs | [135] |
| Magnetosomes coated with chitosan/1 mg/mL | GL-261 | - | 340 Oe/198 kHz | 125 ± 5 W/gFe for chitosan coated, 120 ± 4.7 W/gFe for PEI coated, and 72 ± 2.8 W/gFe for neridronate-coated samples | 43 °C | Magnetosomes with high biocompatibility and potential application in MHT treatment | [136] |
| STE-Fe3O4/100 μg/mL | C6 | 49.77 nm/spherical | 168 Oe/405 kHz | 73.18 W/g, 1867.01 W/gFe | 43 °C | The natural plant-based coating prevented MNP agglomeration, increased cell uptake, and prolonged the retention time | [137] |
| Coated magnetosomes/1 mg/mL | GL-261 | 40 nm/cubo-octahedral | 34 mT ÷ 47 mT/198 kHz | 89 W/gFe ÷ 196 W/gFe | 43 °C ÷ 46 °C | Magnetosomes isolated from magnetotactic bacteria with high biocompatibility | [138] |
| Mn-doped magnetic nanoclusters/250 μg/mL | C6 | 133.53 ± 10.46 nm | 168 Oe/405 kHz | 600 W/g, 2197.80 W/g(Fe+Mn) | - | The importance of a bimodal application of Mn-doped magnetic clusters in magneto-photo thermotherapy of GBM was evidenced | [140] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Manescu, V.; Antoniac, I.; Paltanea, G.; Nemoianu, I.V.; Mohan, A.G.; Antoniac, A.; Rau, J.V.; Laptoiu, S.A.; Mihai, P.; Gavrila, H.; et al. Magnetic Hyperthermia in Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10065. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251810065
AMA Style
Manescu V, Antoniac I, Paltanea G, Nemoianu IV, Mohan AG, Antoniac A, Rau JV, Laptoiu SA, Mihai P, Gavrila H, et al. Magnetic Hyperthermia in Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(18):10065. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251810065
Chicago/Turabian StyleManescu (Paltanea), Veronica, Iulian Antoniac, Gheorghe Paltanea, Iosif Vasile Nemoianu, Aurel George Mohan, Aurora Antoniac, Julietta V. Rau, Stefan Alexandru Laptoiu, Petruta Mihai, Horia Gavrila, and et al. 2024. "Magnetic Hyperthermia in Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 18: 10065. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251810065
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
