Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (79)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = GEP-NET

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 595 KiB  
Article
Serum Concentrations of IGF-1R, ERK2, and EGFR and Their Clinical Significance in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
by Roksana Duszkiewicz, Janusz Strzelczyk, Elżbieta Chełmecka and Joanna Katarzyna Strzelczyk
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(16), 6998; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14166998 - 9 Aug 2024
Viewed by 510
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of tumors located mainly in the gastrointestinal tract or the respiratory system. We aimed to determine the concentrations of IGF-1R, ERK2, and EGFR using the ELISA method in serum samples from patients with NETs and from a [...] Read more.
Neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of tumors located mainly in the gastrointestinal tract or the respiratory system. We aimed to determine the concentrations of IGF-1R, ERK2, and EGFR using the ELISA method in serum samples from patients with NETs and from a control group. Results were evaluated with the selected demographic, clinicopathological, and biochemical characteristics. The analyses performed on a group of patients (80 in the study group and 62 in the control group) showed that the concentration of EGFR in patients with neuroendocrine tumors was significantly higher (p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Additionally, a significantly higher (p < 0.001) EGFR concentration was found in GEP-NET. Our results indicate that impaired EGFR signaling pathways are important in the context of neuroendocrine tumors. The data presented are a good starting point for further analysis of these proteins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advancements in Biomarkers for Noncommunicable Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 5297 KiB  
Article
Cultivated Grassland Types Differently Affected Carbon Flux Downstream of the Yellow River
by Yibo Wang, Xudong Qu, Meixuan Li, Juan Sun and Zhenchao Zhang
Agronomy 2024, 14(5), 974; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14050974 - 6 May 2024
Viewed by 740
Abstract
Cultivated grasslands are an important part of grassland ecosystems and have been proven to be major carbon sinks, then playing an important role in the global carbon balance. The effect of cultivated grassland type (Medicago sativa, Triticum aestivum, Secale cereale [...] Read more.
Cultivated grasslands are an important part of grassland ecosystems and have been proven to be major carbon sinks, then playing an important role in the global carbon balance. The effect of cultivated grassland type (Medicago sativa, Triticum aestivum, Secale cereale, and Vicia villosa grasslands) on carbon flux (including net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE), ecosystem respiration (ER), and gross ecosystem productivity (GEP)) downstream of the Yellow River was studied via the static chamber technique and a portable photosynthetic system. Bare land was used as a control. The results showed that the four cultivated grassland types were mainly carbon sinks, and bare land was a carbon source. The cultivated grassland types significantly affected carbon flux. The average NEE and GEP of the grassland types were in the following order from high to low: Medicago sativa, Secale cereale, Triticum aestivum, and Vicia villosa grassland. Stepwise regression analysis showed that among all measured environmental factors, soil pH, soil bulk density (BD), soil organic carbon (SOC), and soil microbial carbon (MBC) were the main factors affecting CO2 flux. The combined influence of soil BD, SOC, and pH accounted for 77.6% of the variations in NEE, while soil BD, SOC, and MBC collectively explained 79.8% of changes in ER and 72.9% of the changes in GEP. This finding indicates that Medicago sativa grassland is a cultivated grassland with a high carbon sink level. The changes in carbon flux were dominated by the effects of soil physicochemical properties. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 5378 KiB  
Systematic Review
Clival Metastases: Single-Center Retrospective Case Series and Literature Review
by Alessandro Carretta, Giacomo Sollini, Federica Guaraldi, Arianna Rustici, Marcello Magnani, Sofia Asioli, Marco Faustini-Fustini, Ernesto Pasquini, Matteo Zoli and Diego Mazzatenta
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2580; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092580 - 27 Apr 2024
Viewed by 678
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Clivus metastases from distant neoplasms are uncommon occurrences both in clinical practice and the neurosurgical literature. Surgical management is debated, particularly about the role of surgery and the preferable approach. The aim of this study was to report our surgical experience [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Clivus metastases from distant neoplasms are uncommon occurrences both in clinical practice and the neurosurgical literature. Surgical management is debated, particularly about the role of surgery and the preferable approach. The aim of this study was to report our surgical experience and review the concerning literature. Methods: Our institutional registry was retrospectively reviewed, and patients who underwent surgical treatment for clival metastasis from 1998 to 2023 were included. A PRISMA systematic review of the literature was performed. Results: Four patients were enrolled, and all of them underwent an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). Three presented with cranial nerve (CN) VI palsy. The aim of surgery was biopsy in all cases. No complications were reported. Mean overall survival (OS) was 6 ± 1 months. The systematic review retrieved 27 papers reporting 39 patients who underwent the surgical treatment of clivus metastases. Most of them (79.5%) presented with CN palsies, and EEA was the preferred approach in 92.3% of the cases, to perform a biopsy in most patients (59%). Two hemorrhagic complications (5.1%) were reported, and the mean OS was 9.4 ± 5.6 months. Conclusions: Clival metastases are uncommonly observed, in most cases, during advanced stages of oncological disease. The aim of surgery should be the confirmation of diagnosis and symptomatic relief, balancing the risk–benefit ratio in a multidisciplinary context. EEA is the approach of choice, and it should be carried out in experienced tertiary skull base centers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Treatment Options for Skull Base Tumors and Related Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 952 KiB  
Article
Sequencing Treatments in Patients with Advanced Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (pNET): Results from a Large Multicenter Italian Cohort
by Francesco Panzuto, Elisa Andrini, Giuseppe Lamberti, Sara Pusceddu, Maria Rinzivillo, Fabio Gelsomino, Alessandra Raimondi, Alberto Bongiovanni, Maria Vittoria Davì, Mauro Cives, Maria Pia Brizzi, Irene Persano, Maria Chiara Zatelli, Ivana Puliafito, Salvatore Tafuto and Davide Campana
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 2074; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13072074 - 3 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1327
Abstract
Background: The optimal treatment sequencing for advanced, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is unknown. We performed a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the best treatment sequence in terms of progression-free survival to first-line (PFS1) and to second-line (PFS2), and overall survival among patients [...] Read more.
Background: The optimal treatment sequencing for advanced, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is unknown. We performed a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the best treatment sequence in terms of progression-free survival to first-line (PFS1) and to second-line (PFS2), and overall survival among patients with advanced, well-differentiated pNETs. Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively analyzed the prospectively collected data of patients with sporadic well-differentiated pNETs who received at least two consecutive therapeutic lines, with evidence of radiological disease progression before change of treatment lines. Results: Among 201 patients, 40 (19.9%) had a grade 1 and 149 (74.1%) a grade 2 pNET. Primary tumor resection was performed in 98 patients (48.8%). First-line therapy was performed in 128 patients with somatostatin analogs (SSA), 35 received SSA + radioligand therapy (RLT), 21 temozolomide-based chemotherapy, and 17 SSA + targeted therapy. PFS was significantly longer in patients with grade 1 pNETs compared to those with grade 2, in patients who received primary tumor surgery, and in patients treated with RLT compared to other treatments. At multivariate analysis, the use of upfront RLT was independently associated with improved PFS compared to SSA. Second-line therapy was performed in 94 patients with SSA + targeted therapy, 35 received chemotherapy, 45 SSA + RLT, and 27 nonconventional-dose SSA or SSA switch. PFS was significantly longer in patients treated with RLT compared to other treatments. At multivariate analysis, the type of second-line therapy was independently associated with the risk for progression. OS was significantly longer in patients who received primary tumor surgery, with Ki67 < 10%, without extrahepatic disease, and in patients who received SSA–RLT sequence compared to other sequences. Conclusions: In this large, multicenter study, RLT was associated with better PFS compared to other treatments, and the SSA–RLT sequence was associated with the best survival outcomes in patients with pNETs with Ki67 < 10%. Primary tumor surgery was also associated with improved survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatobiliary Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 295 KiB  
Review
Lung NETs and GEPNETs: One Cancer with Different Origins or Two Distinct Cancers?
by Georgios Evangelou, Ioannis Vamvakaris, Anastasia Papafili, Maximilian Anagnostakis and Melpomeni Peppa
Cancers 2024, 16(6), 1177; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16061177 - 17 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1627
Abstract
Lung neuroendocrine tumors (LNETs) and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are two distinct types of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) that have traditionally been treated as a single entity despite originating from different sources. Although they share certain phenotypic characteristics and the expression of neuroendocrine markers, [...] Read more.
Lung neuroendocrine tumors (LNETs) and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are two distinct types of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) that have traditionally been treated as a single entity despite originating from different sources. Although they share certain phenotypic characteristics and the expression of neuroendocrine markers, they exhibit differences in their microenvironment, molecular mutations, and responses to various therapeutic regimens. Recent research has explored the genetic alterations in these tumors, revealing dissimilarities in the frequently mutated genes, the role of EGFR in carcinogenesis, the presence of transcription factors, and the immunogenicity of the tumor and its microenvironment. Spread Through Air Spaces (STAS), a phenomenon unique to lung carcinomas, appears to play a crucial role in LNET prognosis. These distinctions are also evident in the cascade response of lung and GI tract neuroendocrine tumors to somatostatin analogs, Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT), chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Identifying similarities and differences between the two groups may improve our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and facilitate the development of more effective treatment strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Trachea, Bronchus and Lung Cancer Management)
51 pages, 3168 KiB  
Review
The State-of-the-Art Mechanisms and Antitumor Effects of Somatostatin in Colorectal Cancer: A Review
by Aldona Kasprzak and Agnieszka Geltz
Biomedicines 2024, 12(3), 578; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12030578 - 5 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1613
Abstract
Somatostatin, a somatotropin release inhibiting factor (SST, SRIF), is a widely distributed multifunctional cyclic peptide and acts through a transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor (SST1-SST5). Over the past decades, research has begun to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying the anticancer activity of this hormonal [...] Read more.
Somatostatin, a somatotropin release inhibiting factor (SST, SRIF), is a widely distributed multifunctional cyclic peptide and acts through a transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor (SST1-SST5). Over the past decades, research has begun to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying the anticancer activity of this hormonal peptide. Among gastrointestinal tract (GIT) tumors, direct and indirect antitumor effects of SST have been documented best in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and less well in non-endocrine cancers, including sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). In the latter, the signaling pathways involved in the antitumor function of SST are primarily MAPK/ERK/AKT and Wnt/β–catenin. Direct (involving the MAPK pathway) and indirect (VEGF production) antiangiogenic effects of SST in CRC have also been described. The anti-inflammatory role of SST in CRC is emphasized, but detailed molecular mechanisms are still being explored. The role of SST in tumor genome/tumor microenvironment (TME)/host’s gut microbiome interactions is only partially known. The results of SST analogues (SSAs)’ treatment of sporadic CRC in monotherapy in vivo are not spectacular. The current review aims to present the state-of-the-art mechanisms and antitumor activity of endogenous SST and its synthetic analogues in CRC, with particular emphasis on sporadic CRC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 452 KiB  
Article
Improving Generalizability of PET DL Algorithms: List-Mode Reconstructions Improve DOTATATE PET Hepatic Lesion Detection Performance
by Xinyi Yang, Michael Silosky, Jonathan Wehrend, Daniel V. Litwiller, Muthiah Nachiappan, Scott D. Metzler, Debashis Ghosh, Fuyong Xing and Bennett B. Chin
Bioengineering 2024, 11(3), 226; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11030226 - 27 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1193
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) algorithms used for DOTATATE PET lesion detection typically require large, well-annotated training datasets. These are difficult to obtain due to low incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and the high cost of manual annotation. Furthermore, networks trained and tested with [...] Read more.
Deep learning (DL) algorithms used for DOTATATE PET lesion detection typically require large, well-annotated training datasets. These are difficult to obtain due to low incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and the high cost of manual annotation. Furthermore, networks trained and tested with data acquired from site specific PET/CT instrumentation, acquisition and processing protocols have reduced performance when tested with offsite data. This lack of generalizability requires even larger, more diverse training datasets. The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility of improving DL algorithm performance by better matching the background noise in training datasets to higher noise, out-of-domain testing datasets. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT datasets were obtained from two scanners: Scanner1, a state-of-the-art digital PET/CT (GE DMI PET/CT; n = 83 subjects), and Scanner2, an older-generation analog PET/CT (GE STE; n = 123 subjects). Set1, the data set from Scanner1, was reconstructed with standard clinical parameters (5 min; Q.Clear) and list-mode reconstructions (VPFXS 2, 3, 4, and 5-min). Set2, data from Scanner2 representing out-of-domain clinical scans, used standard iterative reconstruction (5 min; OSEM). A deep neural network was trained with each dataset: Network1 for Scanner1 and Network2 for Scanner2. DL performance (Network1) was tested with out-of-domain test data (Set2). To evaluate the effect of training sample size, we tested DL model performance using a fraction (25%, 50% and 75%) of Set1 for training. Scanner1, list-mode 2-min reconstructed data demonstrated the most similar noise level compared that of Set2, resulting in the best performance (F1 = 0.713). This was not significantly different compared to the highest performance, upper-bound limit using in-domain training for Network2 (F1 = 0.755; p-value = 0.103). Regarding sample size, the F1 score significantly increased from 25% training data (F1 = 0.478) to 100% training data (F1 = 0.713; p < 0.001). List-mode data from modern PET scanners can be reconstructed to better match the noise properties of older scanners. Using existing data and their associated annotations dramatically reduces the cost and effort in generating these datasets and significantly improves the performance of existing DL algorithms. List-mode reconstructions can provide an efficient, low-cost method to improve DL algorithm generalizability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biosignal Processing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 5607 KiB  
Article
Head-to-Head Comparison of SSTR Antagonist [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 with SSTR Agonist [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in Patients with Well Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Imaging Study
by Rahul Viswanathan, Sanjana Ballal, Madhav P. Yadav, Frank Roesch, Parvind Sheokand, Swayamjeet Satapathy, Madhavi Tripathi, Shipra Agarwal, Euy Sung Moon and Chandrasekhar Bal
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(3), 275; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17030275 - 22 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1904
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are slow-growing tumors that express high levels of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). Recent studies have shown the superiority of radiolabeled SSTR antagonists in theranostics compared to agonists. In this prospective study, we compared the diagnostic efficacy between [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC and [...] Read more.
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are slow-growing tumors that express high levels of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). Recent studies have shown the superiority of radiolabeled SSTR antagonists in theranostics compared to agonists. In this prospective study, we compared the diagnostic efficacy between [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC and [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 in the detection of primary and metastatic lesions in patients with well differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs. Histologically proven GEP-NET patients underwent [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC & [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 PET/CT scans, which were analyzed. The qualitative analysis involved the visual judgment of radiotracer uptake validated by the morphological findings using CT, which was considered as the reference standard. Quantitative comparisons were presented as the standardized uptake value (SUV) corrected for lean body mass: SULpeak, SULavg, and tumor-to-background ratios (TBR). In total, 490 lesions were confirmed via diagnostic CT. The lesion-based sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 PET/CT was 94.28% (462/490) and 83.46% (409/490) for [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT (p < 0.0001). [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 had statistical significance over [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC in liver metastases [100% vs. 89.4%; p < 0.0001 (292 vs. 253 {283 lesions on CT})] and bone metastases [100% vs. 82.9%; p = 0.005 (45 vs. 34 {41 lesions on CT})]. Statistical significance was also noted for the TBR SULpeak of the primary and liver lesions. [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 showed better sensitivity and a higher target-to-background ratio than [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 PET/CT can be used to quantify the extent of skeletal and liver metastases for better planning of SSTR agonist- or antagonist-based therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development of Novel Radiotracers for PET Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 831 KiB  
Article
Virtual Care for Patients with Advanced Well Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (GEP-NET)
by William J. Phillips, Michelle Pradier, Rachel Goodwin, Michael Vickers and Tim Asmis
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(2), 952-961; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31020071 - 8 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1299
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an unprecedent shift towards virtual cancer care, including the care of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of virtual care for GEP-NETs during the COVID-19 pandemic at a high-volume [...] Read more.
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an unprecedent shift towards virtual cancer care, including the care of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of virtual care for GEP-NETs during the COVID-19 pandemic at a high-volume academic cancer center. Methods: This retrospective, observational study performed at the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center in Canada evaluated adult patients with GEP-NETs seen in consultation by medical oncology between 1 June 2019 and 31 December 2022. Demographic, clinicopathologic, cancer treatment and visit data were collected. Univariable and multivariable analyses assessed the relationship between patient characteristics and virtual care use. Results: A total of 103 patients with well-differentiated GEP-NETS were included. Overall, 18/103 (17.5%) consults and 594/781 (76.1%) follow-ups were performed virtually. All consultation visits returned to in-person assessment by 2022, while 67.0% and 41.4% follow-ups remained virtual in 2022 and 2023, respectively. The year of follow-up, sex, employment and Charlston comorbidity index were associated with virtual follow-up use in the multivariable analysis. Discussion: Virtual care remained a predominant method of GEP-NET patient assessment in the peri-pandemic period. These results highlight an opportunity to improve access to subspecialty neuroendocrine cancer care through the continued use of virtual care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastrointestinal Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 508 KiB  
Article
Radiation Exposure from GEP NET Surveillance
by Jordan Iannuzzi, Caitlin T. Yeo, Vicky Parkins, Dean Ruether, Errol Stewart, Denise Chan, Janice Pasieka and Kirstie Lithgow
Cancers 2024, 16(2), 427; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16020427 - 19 Jan 2024
Viewed by 937
Abstract
Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are neoplasms that secrete peptides and neuroamines. For gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NET, surgical resection represents the only curative option. Ten-year imaging surveillance programs are recommended due to long time-to-recurrence following resection. We performed retrospective chart review evaluating radiation exposure and [...] Read more.
Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are neoplasms that secrete peptides and neuroamines. For gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NET, surgical resection represents the only curative option. Ten-year imaging surveillance programs are recommended due to long time-to-recurrence following resection. We performed retrospective chart review evaluating radiation exposure and practice patterns from surveillance of completely resected GEP NET. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of cases with well-differentiated GEP NET from January 2005 to July 2020. Location of primary, modality of imaging, and duration of follow-up were collected. Dosimetry data was collected to calculate effective dose. Results: 62 cases were included with 422 surveillance scans performed. Cross-sectional imaging was used in 82% and functional imaging was used in 18% of scans. Mean number of scans per year was 1.25 (0.42–3). Mean total effective dose was 56.05 mSv (SD 45.56; 0 to 198 mSv) while mean total effective dose per year was 10.62 mSv (SD 9.35; 0 to 45 mSv). Over the recommended ten years of surveillance the estimated total effective dose was 106 mSv. Conclusions: Surveillance of completely resected GEP NET results in cumulative radiation doses in the range associated with secondary malignancy development. Strategies to minimize radiation exposure in surveillance should be considered in future guideline development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1814 KiB  
Systematic Review
Defining Tumor Microenvironment as a Possible Target for Effective GEP-NENs Immunotherapy—A Systematic Review
by Paulina Chmiel, Paulina Rychcik-Pazyrska and Rafał Stec
Cancers 2023, 15(21), 5232; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15215232 - 31 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2185
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogenous and recurrent group of malignancies originating from neuroendocrine secretory cells diffused on all parts of the human body. Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) account for most NENs. Considering the abundance of possible origins, locations, and tumor specifications, there [...] Read more.
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogenous and recurrent group of malignancies originating from neuroendocrine secretory cells diffused on all parts of the human body. Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) account for most NENs. Considering the abundance of possible origins, locations, and tumor specifications, there is still no consensus about optimal treatment options for these neoplasms. In light of the escalating immunotherapeutic approaches, it is crucial to define indications for such therapy in GEP-NETs. Bearing in mind the significance of pathophysiological mechanisms and tumor microenvironment (TME) impact on carcinogenesis, defining TME structure and correlation with the immune system in GEP-NETs appears essential. This paper aimed to assess the characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment for a better understanding of the possible therapeutic options in GEP-NETS. The authors performed a systematic review, extracting papers from the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Among 3800 articles identified through database searching, 292 were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, 28 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. This paper sums up the research on the immune cell infiltrates, immune checkpoint expression, cytokine profile, neoangiogenesis, and microbiome in the TME of GEP-NETs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 7564 KiB  
Article
Application of Machine Learning in Predicting Hepatic Metastasis or Primary Site in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
by Mahesh Kumar Padwal, Sandip Basu and Bhakti Basu
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(10), 9244-9261; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30100668 - 19 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1644
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) account for 80% of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). GEP-NETs are well-differentiated tumors, highly heterogeneous in biology and origin, and are often diagnosed at the metastatic stage. Diagnosis is commonly through clinical symptoms, histopathology, and PET-CT imaging, while molecular markers [...] Read more.
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) account for 80% of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). GEP-NETs are well-differentiated tumors, highly heterogeneous in biology and origin, and are often diagnosed at the metastatic stage. Diagnosis is commonly through clinical symptoms, histopathology, and PET-CT imaging, while molecular markers for metastasis and the primary site are unknown. Here, we report the identification of multi-gene signatures for hepatic metastasis and primary sites through analyses on RNA-SEQ datasets of pancreatic and small intestinal NETs tissue samples. Relevant gene features, identified from the normalized RNA-SEQ data using the mRMRe algorithm, were used to develop seven Machine Learning models (LDA, RF, CART, k-NN, SVM, XGBOOST, GBM). Two multi-gene random forest (RF) models classified primary and metastatic samples with 100% accuracy in training and test cohorts and >90% accuracy in an independent validation cohort. Similarly, three multi-gene RF models identified the pancreas or small intestine as the primary site with 100% accuracy in training and test cohorts, and >95% accuracy in an independent cohort. Multi-label models for concurrent prediction of hepatic metastasis and primary site returned >98.42% and >87.42% accuracies on training and test cohorts, respectively. A robust molecular signature to predict liver metastasis or the primary site for GEP-NETs is reported for the first time and could complement the clinical management of GEP-NETs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 319 KiB  
Review
Monitoring and Surveillance of Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Undergoing Radioligand Therapy
by Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson, Nadine Mallak, Scott Paulson, Chandrikha Chandrasekharan, Mona Natwa, Ayse Tuba Kendi and Hagen F. Kennecke
Cancers 2023, 15(19), 4836; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194836 - 2 Oct 2023
Viewed by 2011
Abstract
Radioligand therapy (RLT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is a standard of care for adult patients with somatostatin-receptor (SSTR)-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Taking advantage of this precision nuclear medicine approach requires diligent monitoring and surveillance, from the use of diagnostic SSTR-targeted radioligand imaging [...] Read more.
Radioligand therapy (RLT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is a standard of care for adult patients with somatostatin-receptor (SSTR)-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Taking advantage of this precision nuclear medicine approach requires diligent monitoring and surveillance, from the use of diagnostic SSTR-targeted radioligand imaging for the selection of patients through treatment and assessments of response. Published evidence-based guidelines assist the multidisciplinary healthcare team by providing acceptable approaches to care; however, the sheer heterogeneity of GEP-NETs can make these frameworks difficult to apply in individual clinical circumstances. There are also contradictions in the literature regarding the utility of novel approaches in monitoring and surveilling patients with GEP-NETs receiving RLT. This article discusses the emerging evidence on imaging, clinical biochemistry, and tumor assessment criteria in the management of patients receiving RLT for GEP-NETs; additionally, it documents our own best practices. This allows us to offer practical guidance on how to effectively implement monitoring and surveillance measures to aid patient-tailored clinical decision-making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
11 pages, 1274 KiB  
Systematic Review
Assessing the Relationship between Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Grade and Overall Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Preeti Malik, Neel Patel, Azadeh Khayyat, Muhammad Asad, Sameer Dawoodi, Sangeetha Chandramohan, Nkechi Unachukwu, Bibimariyam Nasyrlaeva, Laseena Vaisyambath, Sriram B. Chowdary, Vikramaditya Samala Venkata and Urvish Patel
Gastrointest. Disord. 2023, 5(3), 408-418; https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord5030033 - 18 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1501
Abstract
Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are a rare group of epithelial neoplasms present in the gastrointestinal tract (GI) (67.5%) and bronchopulmonary tree (25.3–30%), and in 15% of cases, their primary sites cannot be identified. Although endoscopic screening, improvements in pathological techniques, and early detection [...] Read more.
Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are a rare group of epithelial neoplasms present in the gastrointestinal tract (GI) (67.5%) and bronchopulmonary tree (25.3–30%), and in 15% of cases, their primary sites cannot be identified. Although endoscopic screening, improvements in pathological techniques, and early detection have shown improvements in NET survival rates, the prognosis of advanced, metastatic, and poorly differentiated NET is very poor. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of gastrointestinal and pancreatic (GEPs) NETs’ grade on overall survival. Method: We searched observational studies describing the overall survival or prognostic factors of primary GEP NETs from May 2011–May 2021 following the PRISMA guidelines. Studies describing the effect of primary grade 3 GEP NETs on overall survival were included. A meta-analysis was performed, and a pooled hazard ratio and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were obtained. Forest plots were created using random effects models and a sensitivity analysis was performed to account for the heterogeneity. Results: Seven studies with 7692 confirmed patients were included. In our meta-analysis, grade 3 GEP NETs were associated with higher odds of poor survival (pooled HR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.36–5.47; p = 0.005), with a 92% heterogeneity between studies (p < 0.0001). To account for this heterogeneity, a sensitivity analysis was performed by removing two outlying studies (Fathi et al. and Foubert et al.) on funnel plots. The results after the sensitivity analysis did not change and still showed a significant association of grade 3 with a poor survival (pooled HR: 4.53; 95% CI: 3.54–5.78; p < 0.00001), with no heterogeneity between studies (p = 0.72; I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis found that grade 3 GEP NETs are associated with poor survival and additional future studies are needed to identify other risk factors associated with poor survival in GEP NETs to improve their mortality. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 10794 KiB  
Communication
Survival and Response Outcomes for Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor (GEP-NETs) Patients Treated with Lutetium—177-DOTATATE in a Brazilian Reference Center: A Six-Year Follow-Up Experience
by Zenaide Silva de Souza, Camila Bragança Xavier, Luciana Beatriz Mendes Gomes, Maria Fernanda Barbosa de Medeiros, Micelange Carvalho de Sousa, Allan Andresson Lima Pereira, José Flávio Gomes Marin, Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel and Frederico Perego Costa
Cancers 2023, 15(18), 4506; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184506 - 11 Sep 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1089
Abstract
Background: PRRT can be an option for all-grade GEP-NETs, but selecting patients is challenging. In this scenario, clinical-pathological and radiological characteristics, such as pre-treatment Ga-68 DOTA PET/CT, might have the potential to help. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on advanced GEP-NETs [...] Read more.
Background: PRRT can be an option for all-grade GEP-NETs, but selecting patients is challenging. In this scenario, clinical-pathological and radiological characteristics, such as pre-treatment Ga-68 DOTA PET/CT, might have the potential to help. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on advanced GEP-NETs treated with at least one PRRT dose. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Krenning Score (KS), and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were derived from the pre-treatment scans. A maximally selected rank statistics test was used for SUVmax simple cut point estimate. Results: Among 36 patients, 19 had primary pancreatic tumors. The numbers of G1, G2, and G3 tumors were 10, 18, and 7, respectively. During a median follow-up of 90.5 months, 4 patients died. Median OS was not reached for G1 and G2 tumors, and it was 30 months for G3 (p = 0.001). Median PFS was 23 months, with G3 showing lower PFS compared to G1 [7 versus 30 months; HR 8.41 (95%CI 2.2–31.0; p = 0.001)]. Conclusions: PRRT provides long-term PFS in patients with G1/G2 GEP-NETs independent of clinical characteristics and primary site. G3 has worse survival, but selected patients may experience long OS after PRRT treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop