Currently submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Date Submitted: Feb 3, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 12, 2024 - Apr 8, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Mental Health Apps Implemented in the Workplace: A Scoping Review of Trends and Gaps in Evaluation Research
ABSTRACT
Background:
Technology-based solutions to support the mental health needs of workers are on the rise, as evidenced by the growing body of research related to e-mental health applications (apps) implemented with workers or within the context of workplaces. This expanding landscape of evidence related to mental health apps underscores the necessity to summarize and consolidate the different ways in which studies are evaluating real-world technology-based interventions in a complex setting such as a workplace.
Objective:
The aim of this scoping review is to summarize the body of evidence regarding evaluation of mental health apps with workers or at workplaces. Specifically, this review will outline the current trends and gaps across the outcomes commonly assessed in studies evaluating digital mobile mental health interventions with workers.
Methods:
The scoping review followed the five stages outlined in Arksey and O’Mally’s framework combined with Levac's recommendations. The search strategy was applied across seven databases to identify relevant studies from inception to August 2023.
Results:
From the 288 abstracts screened, 54 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. The studies assessed apps in three ways: 1. Examining user engagement and utilization of the app 2. Investigating the effects of the app on users, and 3. Evaluating the implementation process. Most studies primarily evaluated the impact on individual mental health related outcomes as well as on workplace-related outcomes. A limited number of studies evaluated the implementation process and its relation to the overall effectiveness of the application for workers.
Conclusions:
This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of the ways in which studies are currently evaluating workplace mental health apps. The review highlights notable trends and gaps in the existing studies where majority of the studies focused on assessing the effects of mental health apps on individual users with a gap in assessing the ways in which the implementation of a dynamic intervention such as a mobile app in a complex workplace setting could interact and influence the overall effectiveness of the app. Future research needs to delve deeper in understanding the implementation process and consider evaluation methods that are in congruence with the goals of the intervention.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.