Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
'),o.close()}("https://assets.zendesk.com/embeddable_framework/main.js","jmir.zendesk.com");/*]]>*/

Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Feb 7, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 12, 2024 - Apr 8, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Using mHealth and Food Literacy to Optimize Glycaemic Control in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in Kenya: An Exploratory Trial

  • Moses Mokaya; 
  • Florence Kyallo; 
  • Roman Vangoitsenhoven; 
  • Christophe Matthys

ABSTRACT

Background:

The prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) is increasing at alarming rates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), including Kenya.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to optimize glycaemic control in adults with T2D in Kenya using mHealth by improving food literacy

Methods:

We conducted an exploratory trial in adults with T2D in two rural hospitals in Kenya. Participants were randomly selected from two hospitals. Each hospital was assigned to the mHealth intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group received mobile text messages through a bulk SMS API (Short Message Service Application Programming Interface). Participants in the control group received monthly appointment reminders (= attention control). Participants in both groups continued receiving routine standard of care. Baseline and endline data were collected through face-to-face sessions. The primary endpoint was glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Secondary outcomes were food literacy and Fasting blood glucose. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed using linear mixed models.

Results:

A total of 84 participants were recruited; 42 were assigned to the intervention group and 42 to the control group. A total of 57 (67.8%) participants (intervention: 29, control: 28) completed the study. After 12 weeks, univariate analysis showed that HbA1c remained stable in both groups. The difference with baseline measurement in the intervention group was 0.43% [from 10.02% (SD ±3.01) to 10.45% (SD ±3.22), P=.250] compared to 0.80% [from [10.62 (±3.35) to 11.42 (±3.25), P=.414]] in the control group. After multiple linear modelling, with age and education as random factors, the overall intervention effect for HbA1c was 0.19% (95% CI -0.82; 2.21) P=.846. For food literacy, the intervention group had a higher non-significant mean score after 12 weeks [53.5% (SD ±9.2) to 60.7% (±8.3), P=.012] compared to the control group [58.7% (±9.3) to 59.9% (±11.2), P=.767]. Fasting blood glucose did not significantly change.

Conclusions:

Although this study did not provide evidence on the effect of glycaemic control through food literacy for adults with Type 2 Diabetes, a focus on food literacy to improve dietary quality is still needed given its significant potential on dietary behaviour. Future research should pay attention to active patient involvement in the design and development of mHealth interventions, tracking behaviour and patient-centred outcomes, involving healthcare workers, and having a bi-directional approach. Clinical Trial: www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05013294)


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mokaya M, Kyallo F, Vangoitsenhoven R, Matthys C

Using mHealth and Food Literacy to Optimize Glycaemic Control in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in Kenya: An Exploratory Trial

JMIR Preprints. 07/02/2024:57202

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.57202

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/57202

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement