Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
'),o.close()}("https://assets.zendesk.com/embeddable_framework/main.js","jmir.zendesk.com");/*]]>*/

Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Feb 13, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 19, 2024 - Apr 15, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Investigating Feature Selection for Physical Activity Prediction Based on Ecological Momentary Assessments: Towards Tailoring the Timing of Behaviour Change Support Messages

  • Devender Kumar; 
  • David Haag; 
  • Jens Blechert; 
  • Josef Niebauer; 
  • Jan David Smeddinck

ABSTRACT

Background:

There has been a surge in the development of applications that aim to improve health, physical activity (PA), and well-being through behavior change. These apps often focus on creating a long-term and sustainable impact on the user. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) based on passive sensing of the current user context (e.g., from smartphones and wearables) have been devised to enhance the effectiveness of these apps and foster PA. JITAIs aim to provide personalized support and interventions, such as encouraging messages, in a context-aware manner. However, based on a limited range of passive sensing capabilities, getting the timing and context right for delivering well accepted and effective interventions is often challenging. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) can provide personal context by directly capturing user assessments e.g. moods and emotion. Thus, EMA might be a useful complement to passive sensing in determining when JITAIs are triggered. Yet, extensive EMA schedules need to be scrutinized as they can increase user burden.

Objective:

Use machine learning (ML) to balance feature set size of EMA questions with prediction accuracy regarding likelihood of enacting PA.

Methods:

A total of 43 healthy participants (ages 19-67) completed four EMA surveys daily for three weeks. These surveys prospectively assessed different states including both motivational and volitional variables of PA preparation (e.g. intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, perceived barriers) alongside stress and mood/emotions. PA enactment was assessed retrospectively via EMA and served as the outcome variable

Results:

The best performing ML models predicted PA engagement with an AUC score of 0.87 ± 0.02 SD in 5-fold cross validation and 0.87 on test set. Particularly strong predictors included self-efficacy, stress, planning, and perceived barriers, indicating that a small set of EMA predictors can yield accurate PA prediction.

Conclusions:

A small set of EMA based features like self-efficacy, stress, planning and perceived barriers can be enough to predict PA reasonably well and can thus be used to meaningfully tailor JITAIs such as sending well-timed and context aware support messages.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kumar D, Haag D, Blechert J, Niebauer J, Smeddinck JD

Investigating Feature Selection for Physical Activity Prediction Based on Ecological Momentary Assessments: Towards Tailoring the Timing of Behaviour Change Support Messages

JMIR Preprints. 13/02/2024:57255

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.57255

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/57255

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement