Currently submitted to: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Feb 18, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 18, 2024 - Apr 14, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Effectiveness of psychoeducational intervention in people after stroke. Systematic review protocol
ABSTRACT
Background:
Stroke is a public health problem, and the care of post-stroke people is a concern for families and their care. In this sense, psychoeducational intervention plays an important role in promoting health by empowering and guiding people with strokes and their carers.
Objective:
to evaluate the effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions in people after stroke and to synthesise the best evidence on the subject.
Methods:
systematic review with meta-analysis. The studies will be evaluated considering the descriptors and keywords (People after stroke, effectiveness studies, psychoeducational intervention, and improvement of quality of life) based on the following starting question: What is the effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions for the promotion of self-care of the person after stroke? The search strategy will use controlled terms MesH (Medical Subject Headings) and uncontrolled (Natural Language) and the selection of studies will be made talking into account the inclusion and exclusion criteria using the Cochrane methodology and the time limit the years 2017 to 2023 in the following databases: Medline, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL Complete.
Results:
Some psychoeducational interventions in post-stroke people in the intervention group have been shown to be effective and significant compared to the control group. Many studies support the inclusion of training programmes. The expected results are the identification and evaluation of psychoeducational interventions with effectiveness in training the person after stroke.
Conclusions:
It is expected that studies of effectiveness with psychoeducational interventions, show results that can contribute to improve functional, motor, and cognitive performance as well as quality of life in people after stroke. Clinical Trial: CDR42023483087
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.