We're ending with a Napoleonic motto – delivered by Slavoj himself
Thanks very much for all your questions and to Slavoj for his brilliant answers. Until next time!
Thanks very much for all your questions and to Slavoj for his brilliant answers. Until next time!
a0y0y0 asks:
You are defending Lenin and communism and you criticize capitalism, state and liberalism. But you reject the revolutionary potential of the world working class ... Why?
torujordan asks:
“The End of History”, or Fukuyamaism as you sometimes name it, is a concept that appears in a number of your political writings. What do you think is unique about this period in History? And what do you mean by “end”? Is the this an “end” in the sense of a failure of imagination? Is it due to the defeats of the Left from its peak in the mid C20th? Or do you think something is happening with regard to the systemic level of capitalism as a mode of production, to use a term one does not hear very often any more?
CatontheMat asks:
Why are you so down on anarcho-communism? Would you rather put your faith in the dictatorship of the proletariat?
JovialMerchant asks:
What does Zizek think about Thomas Piketty’s proposal for a global progressive tax in order to reduce inequality? Does Zizek think this is a valid and worthwhile goal for the new left, or is it a futile waste of time?
jemurphy asks:
Is an academic boycott of Israel justified? Do you support a boycott?
kulusedada asks:
Stravinsky or Schoenberg?
Brandon Jones asks:
You seem to be friendly with Peter Sloterdijk’s ideas about contemporary cynicism. Do you buy his argument about “kynicism”, more reminiscent of ancient Greek Philosophical Cynicism, as the remedy to contemporary cynicism? If so, what does this look like?
Also, how much has Oscar Wilde’s The Soul of Man Under Socialism influenced your own work? It is my favorite book and I saw that you made direct reference to it in the RSA Animate video First As Tragedy, Then As Farce. I even read your own book of the same name for this reason.
Do you think modernist philosophy has become completely unhinged from the love/pursuit of wisdom, as the Greeks understood it? All theory and never any application, not unlike people like Nietzsche, Marx and Wittgenstein argued? How do you understand the love of wisdom? What, if anything, can or should be done about the way in which modernist thought has created a situation wherein people think they need a reason to care about people?
Lastly, I am a young American philosopher that does not buy into capitalism, democracy, or many other dominant paradigms of American life. I am miserable. My pain is constant, and sharp because I am forced to live in this, as you call it, “permissive totalitarian” country. Do you have any advice on how people like myself can overcome this and find some way to live well?
I am one of your biggest fans, and while I realize this might actually cause you to despise me, I just wanted you to know that I am always cheering on your endeavors and I wish you all of the success in the world – though you have achieved so much already.
Omar Bitar asks:
What is the future of philosophy – both within academia and in the so-called “collective consciousness”?
ID4857742 asks:
Professor Žižek:
What is your opinion of this week’s controversy and discussion in the US about the nature of the Islamic “threat” to Western societies and whether the threat is not only from the radical jihadists, but also includes most--if not all--of moderate Islam, which tacitly supports Jihadists or at least does not oppose their beliefs and intentions, and which supports the subjugation of women in their societies, including genital mutilation. The Quran and most of Islam seems to support censorship and execution of Danish cartoonists and the death penalty for “apostasy.”
It has been stated that Islam “is the motherlode of bad ideas.”
Do you in any way agree with this statement?
Thank you,
D.L.
DamienEngine asks:
Why did you get it so wrong about the UK riots? Why can’t the rioters’ control of the streets and the shops for a night be seen as political? Maybe not to your schema, but nonetheless...?