Sex show producers say they didn’t mislead Creative Scotland

Most of the funding for the show was promptly withdrawn by the arts agency after it emerged that performers intended to include real sex instead of simulating it
Creative Scotland said that after awarding the funding “one new and significant difference emerged which took the project into unacceptable territory”
Creative Scotland said that after awarding the funding “one new and significant difference emerged which took the project into unacceptable territory”
GETTY IMAGES

Producers of a hardcore sex show have disputed claims by the national arts quango that it was misled over the details of the project’s “non-simulated” performance before approving funding.

A decision by Creative Scotland to provide more than £100,000 for a production called Rein caused uproar after it emerged last month that it included a sequence “set in a cave where the characters could riotously hump”.

The project was described as a “raucous communal exploration of dyke sexuality” that included “a secret cave sex party”.

The bulk of the funding was promptly withdrawn by the national arts agency.

Critics questioned why Rein had been given such substantial public funding when other more mainstream theatre companies were struggling. Angus Robertson, the culture secretary, said that the